Category archive

Islamism

Rupa Huq MP SHUTS DOWN speech by Polish anti-Islamism commentator Rafał Ziemkiewicz

in Islamism/World News by

In the last couple of days, Rupa Huq, MP for Ealing Central and Acton, has successfully bullied a Polish writer and social activist, Rafał Ziemkiewicz, who was due to give a speech in Acton criticising Islamism, into cancelling his trip.

Rupa lied in her tweet stating ‘he refused to debate with me’ when what actually happened is Rupa wrote to the Home Office trying to bar his entry into the UK, and when that failed she got her mates in the Metropolitan police to threaten the premises that were due to host the debate with having their licence revoked if they went ahead.

Rupa described Rafał’s intended UK tour as ‘hate speech’. The Guardian published Rupa’s view on why Rafał should be barred from entering the UK but refused to publish Rafał’s letter response to her.

She also claimed that Rafał is a Holocaust denier which is not correct – Rafał actually called for an exhumation of the Jedwabne mass grave – this has been supported by the Mayor of Jedwabne – and the campaign was led by another guy, a historian called Krzysztof Krasowski, who wanted to determine whether the Germans were behind the Jedwabne massacre during the War, which a Princeton professor had claimed was perpetrated by Poles.

This is sheer hypocrisy from Rupa Huq, who has previously suggested that the UK should apologise for creating the state of Israel.

The same Rupa Huq has failed to speak out against the Al Quds March in London where Islamists openly call for the state of Israel to be destroyed. She has failed to call out Shaykh Bahm from South Africa who called Jews ‘fleas’ and who came to speak at an Islamic Conference a few weeks ago, also speaking at the Palestine expo in August last year. She has failed to speak out against Anjem Choudhary being released early from prison.

As outspoken ex-Muslim Shazia Hobbs pointed out in one of the comments: “We allow hate preachers from Pakistan to come to UK & tour mosques, spreading their poison. Hate preachers who are banned from addressing crowds in Pakistan.”

In fact many people spoke out very strongly against Rupa Huq’s censorship.

A few Polish accounts supported Rupa, one of which was clearly a fake profile with 8 followers that had been set up the day before simply to comment supportively on Rupa Huq’s account.

Shock as Lancashire Methodists Back Call for Sharia Britain

in Islamism by

The Light Foundation, launched at the University of Central Lancashire, is holding an event calling for Britain to adopt Sharia law.

The seminar entitled, “Is it now time for Sharia Law in the UK?” is hosted by the local Methodist church. This is a surprising choice, because surely the role of a church is to promote Christianity and not other faiths.

The event features guest panellists Shaykh Adam Kelwick from Liverpool, and Shaykh Bilal Brown from Oldham.

The Light Foundation group has support from the Mayor and Mayoress of Preston. Their website states that their aim is for a “greater awareness of traditional Islam by promoting teachings firmly rooted in reliable Sunni scholarship.”

The event advert on Facebook states that Sharia has been “used . . . to kill others in the name of religion”. The legal system has often been criticised by opponents of FGM, while even Channel 4 has criticised Mohammed’s rape of a nine year-old child.

Freedom of religion is a right, certainly, but the practise of faith, whatever faith, must be in a peaceful manner, subject to the English law (Scottish in Scotland, etc.).

Diane Abbott orders Labour MPs to oppose ban of Islamist ‘terror’ group

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

The Shadow Home Secretary, Diane Abbott, has ordered Labour MPs to OPPOSE a move to ban the Islamist terror group Hezbollah from Britain.

Abbott would rather “encourage” it to become democratic. Democratic jihad? Jeremy Corbyn famously called Hezbollah “friends” during a meeting in Parliament in 2009.

Currently only the military wing of the Islamist political party is classed as a terrorist group but a Labour MP led a Commons debate arguing for the whole group to be banned.

Before the debate Abbot sent a briefing note to Labour MPs urging them not to back the motion because it would hinder peace talks in the Middle East.

The document –  obtained by the Jewish Chronicle – read: “There is a balance between making absolutely clear our abhorrence of using violence to achieve political ends and at the same time encouraging organisations down an effective democratic path.

“Full proscription could be a move against dialogue and meaningful peace negotiations in the Middle East.”

This has caused more division in Labour; a party known for anti-Semitism issues. Jennifer Gerber, Head of Labour Friends of Israel, slammed the Labour frontbench for actively pressuring its MPs to block the banning of Islamist group Hezbollah.

Gerber said: “It is sadly unsurprising that the Labour frontbench would issue a statement on Hezbollah which fails to support banning the terror group in its entirety, and which makes no reference to its virulent antisemitism, its desire to annihilate Israel and its appalling role in propping up Assad’s murderous regime in Syria.

“It is, moreover, utterly delusional to think that, having wreaked death and destruction throughout the region, Hezbollah can play any role in promoting peace. We would urge Labour’s leadership to listen to this afternoon’s debate and reconsider its position.”

 

The tragedies British and European detainees face in foreign lands

in Islamism/World News by
Laura Plummer and her husband

If there is one thing we learnt with certainty by the conclusion of the year, it is that travelling to a country where Sharia law is the rule of the land can be exceptionally risky for anyone of European descent or at least anyone travelling from the European continent. Unfortunately, this includes our fellow Britons.

In the past few months, there have been at least three striking cases of British citizens withheld as detainees in nations where Sharia law is applied. The tragedy suffered by British journalist Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, 40, which everyone has read about in The Times or the Daily Telegraph, is only one of the many cases of British citizens being held as political prisoners in foreign lands. Zaghari-Ratcliffe, who has worked for several media organisations in Britain, has been incoherently and unjustly accused of “attempting to topple the Iranian regime”.

Another ambiguous case is that of Laura Plummer, 33 (pictured above), who risks ten years imprisonment in Egypt merely for having brought a high dose of Tramadol (painkillers) to her ill husband, who resided in a country that is clearly inclined to the use of anti-democratic and authoritarian measures. Let us not forget that Egypt is a location where to this day vicious terror attacks against Christians occur with frequency.

However, what is truly shocking is that similar cases to those mentioned above do not only happen in strictly traditionalist and reactionary Sharia states such as Iran, Egypt or even Libya but have also occurred in the ‘westernised’ and ‘capitalist’ United Arab Emirates.

A young British woman named Asa Hutchinson, 21, may indeed face prosecution in Dubai. The reasons for her arrest in November were unclear, and the investigation was most likely conducted in a superficial manner. The British youngster has been accused of disturbing a man sleeping in the lobby of a hotel room while taking pictures of him with her friends. As fictitious as the story may sound, according to UAE law the accusation is serious enough to have her locked up in a local prison after having manipulated her into signing concession papers written in Arabic.

Tragic incidents involving young British citizens are not new to Sharia states. Britain still hasn’t healed after the homicide of diplomat Rebecca Dykes, 30, in Beirut, Lebanon. Moreover, the British are not the only ones to have suffered tragic fates in certain countries. The murder of the Italian former Cambridge student Giulio Regeni, carried out by Egyptian police authorities in Cairo and the unfortunate events of several French travellers throughout the year have marked a new low in diplomatic relations between European countries and Sharia states.

Something needs to be done, justice needs to be done.

Firemen SHUT DOWN city streets in fear of terror attack

in Islamism by

There was once a time, when during December, mothers would take their kids to the shops without fear of a jihadist nutjob slaughtering them to death, in broad daylight with a sword like some medieval invader. Gone are those days! Britain has fallen.

A fire engine parked at the top of Fargate in Sheffield city centre is there for ‘reassurance’ purposes, according to South Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service. Reassurance of what? That the state has measures up to stop Islamists killing people buying Christmas pressies! The road has literally been closed, blocked off by a fire engine.

This isn’t normal! People are carrying on their lives as if this is, to quote Sadiq Khan, “part and parcel” of life in a modern city. An absurd proposition, considering that Japan has some of the largest cities in the world, but doesn’t have to put concrete blocks around markets, in case some Sharia extremist decides to go on a butchering spree, slaughtering the “kaffir”.

ISIS scum threatens to kill those who attend unholy Xmas markets

The increased presence of state forces is because ISIS has declared that it will attack this December. Armed police have been seen patrolling Christmas markets across the country, but they are clearly struggling so much to control the jihadist problem, that they are calling on the fire brigade for back-up. With things this rough, it is time Theresa May showed some strength, and had the army patrol our streets.

Britain has a long-established principle of ‘negative liberty”, with concepts such as “an Englishman’s home is his castle”, and our insistence on “freedom of religion” that brought to an end bloodshed due to conflict between Catholic and Protestant.

But the Islamist would seek to end such peace. They can not tolerate the fact that in this traditionally Judeo-Christian culture, people commit the great sin of celebrating Christmas. It is time to ditch the failed experiment of multiculturalism. We need the government to firmly adopt a principle of integration, of respect for our laws, including freedom of belief for Christians and atheists.

Israeli government SLAMS UK Labour party for racism

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

A senior Israeli cabinet minister has accused the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour party of being antisemitic.

Gilad Erdan said his government had become very concerned by the views expressed by figures in the top level of the Labour party.

“We recognise and we see that there are antisemitic views in many of the leadership of the current Labour party,” Israel’s public security minister said.

When asked specifically whether he was suggesting Corbyn himself was an antisemite, the Israeli minister hesitated, before adding: “I didn’t say it. I said there are views that are very close to antisemitism in the leadership of the Labour party today in the UK.”

Last summer Corbyn told MPs investigating accusations of antisemitism in the Labour party that he regretted once calling members of Hamas and Hezbollah “friends”.

The Labour Party have been criticised at being slow in responding to the problem and several high-profile figures who have been suspended for antisemitism, such as Tony Greenstein, Jackie Walker and Marc Wadsworth. They have been waiting over a year for their cases to be heard.

A recent internal inquiry reported that a shocking 83% of British Jews believe the Labour Party is too tolerant of antisemitism and many expressing concerns of the Labour Leader’s links to other terrorist groups in the past such as the IRA.

The latest accusations come a month after Corbyn attended an event in Parliament held by a Muslim group (MEND) accused of hosting preachers with extremist views.

Possible Terror Attack in Australia: 14 Injured

in Islamism/World News by

Fourteen people have been injured in Melbourne, with several in a critical condition after a car intentionally drove into a crowd of shoppers ‘sending bodies flying everywhere’ according to witnesses.

Police have said it was a deliberate act but said it was too early to say whether it was terrorist-related. The driver and another man have been detained.

Witness Jim Stoupas, told the press: “It just barrelled through a completely full intersection of pedestrians. There was no attempt to brake, no attempt to swerve.”

He added: “I saw probably five to eight people on the ground with people swarming around them [to help]. Within a minute, I think, there were police on site, so it was very, very speedy.”

Victoria Ambulance said in a statement that a child of pre-school age with serious head injuries was among those taken to hospital.

Another witness. Vince Harris was nearby in the immediate aftermath of the crash.

He was on the scene from about two minutes after the car collided and could see the cracked windscreen and Good Samaritans trying to save injured pedestrians.

‘I was here when the other one (the Bourke Street tragedy) happened …. you get desensitised.’ he shockingly claimed.

The carnage comes almost a year after six people were killed and 30 injured when a car ploughed through the Bourke Street Mall in January.

The driver, Dimitrious Gargasoulas, was charged with six counts of murder after he allegedly used a maroon Holden Commodore sedan to run down shoppers during the lunch break.

A child and two adults were among those who died following the attack as well as a three-month-old baby boy.

City authorities installed concrete blocks in various locations – including on Flinders Street – hoping to prevent vehicle-based attacks.

ISIS Linked Royal Attack Thwarted

in Islamism by

A suspected ISIS supporter will go on trial in the Spring after being accused of giving details of Prince George’s school on social media and encouraging followers to attack.

Husnain Rashid from Nelson in Lancashire had allegedly planned to travel to Syria to join ISIS to join the fighting before making posts of the 4 year old.

The 31 year old was arrested in November and charged with preparing acts of terrorism and assisting others to prepare acts of terrorism.

Appearing in front of Mr Justice Haddon-Cave at the Old Bailey through a video feed from Wandsworth prison he confirmed only his name and nationality.

Neighbours of Mr Rashid expressed shock following his arrest in the sleepy town. A woman, who did not want to be named, said: ‘It’s usually so quiet. I have not seen or heard anything suspicious myself.’

The 4 week trail is expected to start in April. Rashid has been remanded in custody.

Austria’s “Islam has no place in Europe” Freedom Party sworn in to power 

in Islamism/World News by

Austria’s populist Freedom Party has been sworn in to power amid a heavy police presence as alt-left anti-democratic thugs waved ‘No Nazi pigs’ signs in Vienna this morning.

The party’s coalition with the conservative People’s Party (OeVP) was agreed on Friday along with pledges to stop illegal immigration and resist EU centralisation.

It will be led by Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, who took over the OeVP in May and moved it to the right, securing his party first place in October elections. At 31, Kurz will be the world’s youngest leader.

At Kurz’s side for the investiture by Austria’s president in the Hapsburg dynasty’s imperial palace in Vienna was FPOe chief Heinz-Christian Strache, 48, now vice-chancellor, and FPOe general secretary Herbert Kickl, the new interior minister.

Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz (left) stands next to vice-chancellor of the far-right Freedom Party Christian Strache during the inauguration ceremony.

Strache has said Islam ‘has no place in Europe’ and last year called German Chancellor Angela Merkel ‘the most dangerous woman in Europe’ for her open-door refugee policy.

On Sunday, Strache trumpeted to his 750,000 followers on Facebook that the new government would slash social benefits for asylum-seekers.

‘It will no longer happen that migrants who have never worked here a single day or paid anything into the social system will get thousands of euros in welfare!’ he said in a post that has gained 9,000 ‘likes’.

More than 2,000 alt-left fascist anti-democratic thugs took part in demonstrations this morning, brandishing placards such as ‘refugees welcome’ and ‘Nazis out’ and ‘No Nazi pigs’.

Alt-Left thug

At one point police fired a smoke grenade when some anti-democratic protestors tried to break through a barricade.

‘Security incident’ at US Air Force base RAF Mildenhall as ‘car tries to ram gates’

in Islamism by
A US Air Force base in the UK was placed on lockdown on this afternoon when a car reportedly tried to ram the entry gates. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) confirmed an incident at “the entry point of RAF Mildenhall, Suffolk.”

The Royal Air Force (RAF) base is used by the US Air Force.

According to a British defence source, a car tried to force its way onto the base and a man has been arrested by police.

On its Facebook page, the base reported RAF Mildenhall is no longer on lockdown.

RAF Mildenhall locked down at 1 p.m. today following reports of a disturbance on base. The base was locked down and…

Posted by RAF Mildenhall on Monday, 18 December 2017

Trump STOPS terrorists planning attack on Russia

in Islamism/World News by

The Russian President Vladimir Putin has thanked his US counterpart Donald Trump for help in preventing a terrorist attack in St. Petersburg.

The CIA tip-off allowed Russia’s top domestic security agency, the FSB, to track down and arrest a group of suspects who were planning to bomb the city’s Kazan Cathedral and other crowded sites, the Kremlin said.

The White House later said in a statement: “President Trump appreciated the call and told President Putin that he and the entire United States intelligence community were pleased to have helped save so many lives.” The White House also confirmed that US intelligence agencies provided Russia with information “concerning a major terror plot in St. Petersburg.”

The White House did not disclose details about the plot itself, but said the attack “could have killed large numbers of people”.

Russia’s Federal Security Service, or FSB, announced on Friday that seven suspected followers of the Islamic State group had been arrested for allegedly planning to carry out terror attacks in St Petersburg on December 16.

The agency said the suspects were plotting a suicide bombing in a church and a series of other explosions in the city’s busiest areas on IS orders.

It said a search of a St Petersburg apartment found explosives, automatic weapons and extremist literature.

Russian news reports said the Kazan Cathedral was the prime target.

The White House seized on the foiled plot as a sign of what Moscow and Washington could do if they cooperate.

Armed police sent to Tommy Robinson’s town to keep people safe from jihadis

in Islamism by

Luton Council confirm that armed police have been deployed to Tommy Robinson’s hometown to keep people safe from jihadis this Christmas.

Luton is a truly multicultural town, where 14.4% of the population is Pakistani, and 7% Bangladeshi. In fact, the majority of its residents being from a foreign ethnic background. However, it is often alleged to lack unity, and to be home to great division.

It is also religious diverse, with a 40% Christian population, and 1 in 4 residents being Muslim according to the National Office of Statistics.

Britain is home to 23,000 suspected Islamist terrorists. There are also 400 ISIS in the community, who returned from fighting in Syria.

Britain First deputy Jayda Fransen may be sent to jail for 3 years

in Islamism by

Jayda Fransen, 31, the deputy leader of the controversial political party Britain First may be sent to jail for 3 years – so announced their leader to Facebook in a video.

The charges regard a speech Fransen gave at the “Northern Ireland Against Terrorism” rally in August in Belfast, where she was critical of Islam – an action deemed by the judge to have used “threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour” intended to or likely to stir up hatred.

Fransen’s barrister, Richard McConkey, branded the curbs on her freedom of speech, as a politician, as disproportionate.

He said: “This lady is as entitled to free expression within the law as anyone else. If there is an offence she will be arrested like everyone else.”

Yesterday, Fransen, from Anerley in south-east London, was re-arrested in Belfast, by Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI), as she was arriving at Laganside Courts in the city. She was arrested because on Wednesday she posted a tweet showing her criticise Islam as she stood beside a peace wall in Belfast.

The PSNI said: ‘Detectives investigating an incident at a peace wall in Belfast on Wednesday 14 December have arrested a 31-year-old woman in the Belfast area today.’

She was allegedly involved in a video recorded outside Belfast’s Islamic Centre with Councillor Jolene Bunting, in which the Britain First deputy referred to it as a “den of iniquity”.

A detective constable told the court she was seeking conditions on the accused’s bail because of a planned rally on December 10 which was postponed. “We were concerned that there would be further offences,” she added.

Leader of Britain First, Paul Golding (left) with his Deputy, Jayda Fransen (right), and supporter Andy Edge, arriving at Belfast Laganside courts.

Her lawyer told the court she intended to plead not guilty. However, according to a video released by their party leader, Paul Golding, it would seem that she rejected the bail terms. The restrictions required her not to speak at any protests in Ulster.

There is a question as to validity of claims the state will ban her from using Facebook. District Judge Fiona Bagnall expressed doubts about whether her jurisdiction extended to the accused’s social media use.

She went on Twitter within minutes of her release on bail and said it was a “nonsense charge”.

“I criticise Islam and now they want to send me to prison for two years.”

McConkey expressed that Fransen had stood for election and was a politician. “The idea that she be prevented from speaking in my respectful submission is completely disproportionate.”

Detectives from the PSNI also detained yesterday the leader of the group, Paul Golding, 35, who was there accompanying his colleague ahead of the hearing. He was let out on bail.

UKIP slams political correctness for rape of white girls by Pakistani men

in Islamism/Student Politics by

Attention was drawn this week to the “grooming gang” issue, when the controversial Quilliam think tank published a report which said that 84% of all child rape gang convictions in the period studied were Asian, mostly Pakistani.

Far from being a party silent on such issues, as some critics have claimed, various UKIP figures have heavily criticised the “ridiculous” culture of political correctness that stopped the police from acting in Rotherham to stop child rape gangs.

David Kurten AM stated, “84% of grooming and rape gangs are ‘Asian’ Muslim men, despite being only 2.5% of the UK population. These gangs target white teenage girls. No more political correctness. British girls have suffered far too long.”

UKIP MEP Jane Collins said: “But it’s a stigma. People don’t want to talk about it for fear of being accused of targeting different societies – and I think they’ve got to get over that because if we can’t look after our children we have failed as a society, as human beings.”

(On the left: Nate Rydings)

Nathan Rydings, the Chair of the UKIP youth wing, Young Independence, said, “This is disgusting; this report proves that the PC culture we are currently living in doesn’t work. We are living in a society where young British females are being raped by gangs of Pakistani men and the mainstream media don’t even bat an eye to it! They would rather report on a peaceful “far-right” march whose objective is to shed light on these disgusting attacks.

“It is appalling how nothing is being done to protect young people in this country from these vile individuals. YI and UKIP as a whole will stand up for our youth! This should not and will not be tolerated. We must end this ridiculous politically correct culture and start using our brains; start thinking common sense!

New law states animals must be treated as sentient beings post-Brexit

in Brexit/Islamism by

A new law was today published by the government to say that it must treat animals as “sentient beings” when it makes laws in future.

Michael Gove MP promised to “make Brexit work not just for citizens but for the animals we love and cherish too”.

The welcome draft law also increases the maximum sentence for serious animal cruelty to five years in jail and states that the government “must have regard to the welfare needs of animals as sentient beings in formulating and implementing government policy”.

Gove said: “Animals are sentient beings who feel pain and suffering, so we are writing that principle into law and ensuring that we protect their welfare. Our plans will also increase sentences for those who commit the most heinous acts of animal cruelty to five years in jail”.

One area not discussed however was the slaughtering of animals for Halal which many animal rights campaigners see as barbaric when the method of non-stunning is used and argue that it is extremely cruel.

To date there is nothing to stop this practice within the UK due to its membership with the EU that states “EU legislation grants exceptions from stunning for religious groups…”

The rise in Halal meat being common place in the British food-chain has caused alarm for many.

“We absolutely are not demanding people be forced to eat non-halal meat, but we do, and rightly so, insist that farm animals are treated with dignity. If someone will only eat meat procured by a form of slaughter that is abusive to animals, better they avoid eating meat at all. It is as simple as that,” Luke Nash-Jones, Director of the People’s Charter Foundation said in support of a Lancashire council voting to ban schools from serving non-stunned halal meat.

Many have criticised the RSPCA’s lack of support on this issue suggesting the charity is worried about its funding but today David Bowles, the RSPCA’s head of public affairs, said the plans were “potentially great news” for animals post-Brexit.

He said: “To include the recognition of animal sentience as well as increasing animal cruelty sentencing to five years into the new 2018 Animal Welfare Bill is a very bold and welcome move by the government.”

The law comes after a recent vote by Lancashire Council to ban halal food in its schools.

Labour Party says it’s wrong for army to kill the enemy

in Islamism by

Labour MP Dan Jarvis has criticised the Defence Secretary’s promise to kill returning jihadis, “Soldiers are taught that for force to have legitimacy it must: distinguish between those who pose a threat and those who do not.”

Jarvis’s dismissal of the threat jihadis pose shows how he is out of touch with reality. A paper, written by Richard Barrett, a former director of global counter-terrorism at MI6, said: “While returning foreign fighters have not as yet added significantly to the threat of terrorism around the world, the number of attacks inspired or directed by the Islamic State continues to rise.

Around 850 UK-linked individuals “of national security concern” made the journey to the jihadists’ crumbling “caliphate” in Syria and Iraq, with just under half of those believed to have come back. These people want you and I dead. Their return increases the likelihood of a terror attack; very likely a surge in violent deaths in Britain.

Sue Hemming, the Crown Prosecution Service’s head of counter-terrorism, said her team had doubled in size to cope with “cases emerging from Syria” and the rise of Islamic State, as well as the recent attacks here. But she said even more lawyers were required.

Barrett continues, “All returnees, whatever their reason for going home, will continue to pose some degree of risk.”

(Sally Jones, who is believed to have been killed, had been plotting terror attacks in Britain)

Richard Inman of Veterans Against Terrorism has criticised the suggestions that jihadis be granted council homes, and said that they should be sent back to Syria to face trial for their crimes.

Luke Nash-Jones, Director of The People’s Charter Foundation, stated, “The Labour Party are a bunch of nutters, in cloud cuckooo land, who want to abolish nuclear warheads. Corbyn thought the answer to ISIS was a cup of tea. The cowardice must stop! Anyone found through fair trial to be a returning jihadi, to have committed treason, should face a firing squad, should get a bullet to the head.”

Jarvis on the other hand seems ever keen to virtue signal to impress the liberal elite. He continued, “It is right that the International Criminal Court investigate claims that British soldiers committed war crimes against detainees in Iraq.”

Kill the returning Jihadis says UK Defence Secretary

in Islamism by

Not a single British citizen who has fought for Islamic State should be allowed back into the UK, the Defence Secretary declared last night.

The UK’s new Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson says a “dead terrorist can’t cause any harm to Britain”, adding that “no British citizen who has fought for so-called Islamic State should be allowed back into the UK.”

Gavin Williamson signalled he was prepared to hunt down and use air strikes against the remaining 270 UK passport holders who have travelled to Syria and Iraq.

Whilst this is good to hear, actions will speak louder than words, and he is reminded that we currently have 23,000 known Jihadists roaming our streets.

He added: ‘I do not believe that any terrorist, whether they come from this country or any other, should ever be allowed back into this country.

‘We should do everything we can do to destroy and eliminate that threat.’

Cute platitudes from the pretty boy. More than 800 UK citizens are thought to have gone to fight for Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. Around half of them have ALREADY returned, and around 130 have been killed, leaving an estimated 270 left. What is Williamson going to do about them?

Christianophobic gang beat up “non-Muslim” Liverpool residents

in Islamism by

A gang of Muslim men rampaged through Liverpool city centre violently attacking strangers because they were white “non-Muslims”.

One witness feared Amin Mohmed, 24, Mohammed Patel, 20, and Faruq Patel were ISIS terrorists.

We do not know the identity of the first three men that were attacked, but we know that the gang proceeded on to beat up Gary Bohanna when he admitted he was Christian.

Mr Bohanna was asked: “What are you?”

The victim was confused but when one of them said “I’m a Muslim, what are you?” he answered “I’m a Christian”.

The Christianophobic attacker shouted “Why aren’t you a Muslim?” before punching him twice, breaking his glasses and causing a 2cm cut above his left eye. Mr Bohanna is fortunate not to have lost his eyesight.

The gang then encountered Mr Lynch, Labour councillor for Moss Bank, and his girlfriend Jill Newton.

Laughing Faruq, 19, was not convicted of a racial or religious motive, despite the gang blatantly targeting people by religion. He then filmed Mohmed punching St Helens councillor Paul Lynch to the ground, as his terrified girlfriend tried to protect him.

A “sickening blow” could be “seen and heard”.

While people are arrested, charged, for mere words, that are deemed Islamophobic, and incitement of racial hatred, the state turns a blind eye to blatant religious discrimination against Christians.

Toni Bugle, former English Democrats candidate, says, “So beat up someone up and call them names because they are white and it isn’t racially motived I wonder if they would say the same if it was the other way round? Of course they bloody wouldn’t!”

Liverpool Crown Court heard counter-terrorism officers raided the three men’s homes in Bolton after the shocking incident on March 20 last year.

The judge, Recorder Louise Brandon, said: “This was a disgraceful and sustained campaign of violence carried out on the streets of this city.”

Tommy Robinson: Deep State Asked Me to Bring Down Britain First

in Islamism by

Rebel Media reporter Tommy Robinson says he was approached by Scotland Yard, who want him to help them with “bringing down” Britain First.

Robinson said, “Frankly, there is a massive campaign, I could tell you firsthand.”

The deputy leader of Britain First Jayda Fransen, was recently flown to Belfast, to be charged by the police for “threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour” – state action that some would deem a severe violation of freedom of speech – and is due to appear at Belfast Magistrates’ Court on 14 December.

Meanwhile, the party’s leader Paul Golding has been accused of and is under investigation following allegations of sexual assault.

The Rebel Media reporter continued, “When I was in custody, I was approached by a secretive organisation in Scotland Yard called Metropolitan Intelligence Bureau asking me to work for them in bringing down Britain First.”

“That is the deep state. We have a democracy, people have the right to express freedom and free speech, and that’s what Britain First do.”

He was commenting on Donald Trump’s retweeting of videos posted by Fransen when he made the claim.

“The whole country’s talking about Donald Trump and Jayda Fransen – we had a terror attack stopped two days ago which was in preparation with weapons by a man in Birmingham and a man in London. Why is that not the topic?”

10 men in court accused of Rotherham child rape

in Islamism by

Ten men are to stand trial accused of raping and sexually abusing eight teenage girls in Rotherham.

The men, aged between 33 and 38 and all from South Yorkshire, are charged with a total of 33 offences said to have taken place between 1998 and 2005.

They were charged as part of National Crime Agency’s investigation into historical child abuse in Rotherham.

The men, who deny the charges, will stand trial at Sheffield Crown Court in September and November 2018.

Those facing trail are:

Mohammed Imran Ali Akhtar, 36, of East Road, Rotherham, who is charged with four counts of indecent assault, one count of rape, one count of supplying a controlled drug, one count of sexual assault and one count of procuring a girl under 21 to have unlawful sexual intercourse

Nabeel Kurshid, 34, of Warwick Street, Rotherham, who is charged with two counts of rape and one count of indecent assault

Iqlak Yousaf, 33, of Tooker Road, Rotherham, who is charged with two counts of rape and one count of indecent assault

Amjal Rafiq, 38, of Warwick Street, Rotherham, who is charged with one count of indecent assault

Salah Ahmed El-Hakam, 38, of Tudor Close, Sheffield, who is charged with one count of rape

Aftab Hussain, 38, of York Road, Rotherham, who is charged with three counts of rape, one count of abducting a child and two counts of indecent assault

Abid Saddiq, 36, of Walter Street, Rotherham, who is charged with five counts of indecent assault and four counts of rape

Waseem Khaliq, 33, of Eldon Court, Sheffield, who is charged with one count of rape

Masaeud Malik, 33, of Doncaster, who is charged with one count of indecent assault

Sharaz Hussain, 33, of Fraser Road, Rotherham, who is charged with one count of indecent assault

Two other men, Tanweer Ali, 36, of Godstone Road, Rotherham; and Mohammaed Ashen, 33, of Chorley, Lancashire; who have been charged in connection with the case, were not arraigned.

Five men injured as “Somalian” MOWS DOWN people in London

in Islamism by

Police raced to Stockwell Road, between Stockwell and Brixton tube stations, at around 3am this morning after reports of a dramatic collision.

Images from the scene show debris scattered across the road as the flashing blue lights from police and ambulances lit up houses and buildings.

Five male pedestrians – aged between 23 and 42 years – were taken to hospital by ambulance.

In video footage from the scene, a bystander says “This is what happened in Stockwell. Was a crazy Somalian guy [inaudible] Somalian guy”. We have no information on the driver, or cause of the incident.

Several injured after car ploughs into pedestrians in south London

Posted by MBGA News » Make Britain Great Again on Saturday, 2 December 2017

Kevin Bate, deputy director of Operations at London Ambulance Service, said six ambulance crews, two advance paramedics, two incident response officers, a hazardous area response team and air ambulance medics attended.

He said: “We treated five patients on the scene for a range of head and leg injuries. We took one patient as a priority to a major trauma centre and took four patients as a priority to a trauma centre.”

“Black Widow of the jihad” stripped of Belgian citizenship

in Islamism by

The Court of Appeal in Brussels has ruled that a 58-year-old woman convicted of recruiting young Brussels Muslims to fight in the so-called “holy war” in Afghanistan be stripped of her Belgian citizenship.

Malika El Aroud now only has Moroccan citizenship. In 2010 she was sentenced to 8 years in prison and fined 5,000 euro for terrorist-related offences.

In 2014 proceedings were launched to strip Malika El Aroud of her Belgian citizenship. It has taken so long as Ms El Aroud’s solicitor took the case to the Constitutional Court. Now the Court of Appeal has decided that she should lose her Belgian citizenship.

At the Court of Appeal, the Advocate-General said that Ms El Aroud no longer deserved Belgian citizenship as “for many years she has continually spread jihadism in our country”.

The so-called “Black-widow of the jihad” Malika El Aroud, has twice been married to extremists, both of whom died in the so-called “holy war’.

She has twice been convicted for terrorist-related offences. She and her late husband set up a website to recruit young men to go and fight alongside the Taliban in Afghanistan.

UK home to highest number of Islamists in Europe

in Islamism by

The UK is home to up to 25,000 Islamist extremists who could pose a threat, the EU’s top terror official has warned.

Officials have warned that the threat from home-grown jihadis who are prevented from joining Isis in Syria and Iraq is increasing, with the group inciting global terror attacks to maintain momentum.

Among those known to security services but not considered an imminent danger were the perpetrators of the three Isis-linked terror attacks that have killed 35 victims in Britain this year.

Westminster attacker Khalid Masood was described a “peripheral figure” by Theresa May, while the Manchester bomber Salman Abedi was known to MI5 but not under active investigation and the ringleader of the London Bridge attack, Khuram Butt, was not thought to be a risk despite being a known member of Anjem Choudary’s banned network.


A man carrying a little girl flies an ISIS flag outside Parliament

Gilles de Kerchove, the EU’s counter-terror coordinator, said he expected more atrocities following the deadly car rammings in Barcelona and Cambrils.

“The group’s propaganda no longer calls so much for people to travel to the ‘caliphate’, but to launch attacks in their places of origin or of residence, even on a small scale with homemade weapons.”

Mr de Kerchove said the UK was home to the highest known number of Islamist radicals in Europe – between 20,000 and 25,000 people – with 3,000 considered a direct threat by MI5 and 500 under constant surveillance.

McDonalds tells customer: remove hijab or get out

in Islamism by

McDonald’s has apologized after a security guard at one of its London restaurants reportedly told a woman she must remove her hijab or leave the premises.

The incident happened in North London as the woman attempted to place an order at a fast-food chain on the Seven Sisters Road. Footage circulated online Friday shows the would-be customer remonstrating with a security guard after being repeatedly told to remove the traditional Muslim headscarf.

Luke Nash-Jones of the People’s Charter Foundation says, “There seems to be some confusion between the burqa – a full head covering, that could be a security issue – and the harmless hijab – little different to the headscarves that most women in Europe wore until recently, and even Queen Elizabeth the II still does. A Western-style scarf would suggest integration, but there are absolutely no grounds to ban the clothing item. Let’s focus on real issues like prosecuting people for FGM.”

McDonalds tells customer: remove hijab or get out

Posted by MBGA News » Make Britain Great Again on Friday, 1 December 2017

It’s just a matter of taking it [the hijab] off,” a man, wearing a security tag, states.

The unidentified woman then states that she wears the hijab for religious reasons – though there is dispute as to whether Sharia requires wearing of a headscarf, she is not breaking the law. For centuries, women have worn headscarves in Britain.

At one point a bystander steps in, telling the security employee that he cannot stop the woman from visiting the restaurant because of her headscarf.

“I will stand in line and get the food that I want because this isn’t okay,” the woman says.

“This is a hate crime,” the woman adds. “I’ve been living in the UK for 19 years  now and this is the first time I’m faced with this kind of discrimination and I am shocked. I’m actually shocked.”

Kent Uni shuts down UKIP event because of fancy dress featuring English flag

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism/Student Politics by

Free speech has been restricted at the University of Kent, where the Students Union banned a Kent UKIP Students Society social event. A Student Union representative felt that a proposed Crusader fancy dress outfit “caused discomfort and frustration among the Muslim community on campus”.

Following a cease-and-desist email from Kent Union we have cancelled our planned Crusader pub crawl this Friday. Kent…

Posted by University of Kent UKIP Students on Wednesday, 22 November 2017

Crusaders rode out to the Holy Land to protect Christian pilgrims from highway men. They were truly brave heroes, and their knights outfits, emblazoned with the St. George’s Cross, the flag of England, are often worn at cricket matches.

An email sent to Kent UKIP Students Chairman Joe Simons said that the event was banned and with threat disband the UKIP society.

Reece Coombes, a candidate for Young Independence deputy said, “The event, which was a satirical commemoration of the First Crusade, invited attendees to don ‘crusader attire’ and encouraged ‘infidels’ to attend, in what was a poke of fun at the raging political correctness of modern students and universities.”

BREAKING: Car explodes into flames at Christmas fair in London

in Islamism by

The car exploded on Pinner High Street in north-west London this evening as a Christmas fair was being held.

The outdoor Pinner Panto show was also taking place when the car erupted into flames. The incident causes concern with ISIS having only this week released posters threatening to target Christmas markets.

One Twitter user posted a shocking video of the car on flames on the busy high street. He said the cause was unknown but claimed it was been parked in a “suspect” location.

BREAKING: Car on fire during Christmas event in LondonThe car exploded on Pinner High Street in north-west London this evening as a Christmas fair was being held. The outdoor Pinner Panto show was also taking place when the car erupted into flames.

Posted by Make Britain Great Again on Thursday, 30 November 2017

Greenhill police said they were not treating the incident as suspicious at this stage. They tweeted: “Swift work by MPS Pinner responding to a car on fire in Bridge Street this evening has been resolved with the assistance of fire brigade.”

MP Nick Hurd wrote on Twitter: “Thanks to police; stewards and fire brigade for a speedy response to the dramatic car fire that disrupted #pinnerpanto this evening.”

Pinner Pantomime responded to the MP’s comments on Twitter.

They said: “Yes thank you everyone – and also the public who responded to directions.

Diane Abbott’s mob reported to police for assault of mixed-race reporter

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Richard Inman, spokesman for Veterans Against Terrorism, and other persons, including Luke Nash-Jones of Make Britain Great Again, have reported to the Scottish police a potential race hate crime committed by Diane Abbott’s activists in Edinburgh.

Mixed-race reporter Olivia Bailey attended the Veterans Against Terrorism march in Edinburgh this weekend. She states that the only racism she experienced was from the left-wing activists of Diane Abbott’s organisation Stand Up To Racism.

In video footage filmed by Pepe Ramirez, a thin white man (circa 60s) clean shaven clearly hits Bailey over the head with a placard – this is common assault, if not a racist attack: the police saw and did nothing. Absolute hypocrisy from a group claiming to oppose racism.

Mr Inman states, “This was a hostile and masked crowd of white men, who launched a verbal and physical assault! White ‘anti-racists’ harassed a reporter, in full view of the police.”

The truly fascist nature of the hard-left is becoming even clearer thanks to the brave work of alternative media. While the veterans march had a diverse panel of speakers, and a peaceful crowd, the tiny Stand Up to Racism march was all white, predominantly male, and violent. On Facebook, Brent Holloway exclaims, “Notice how the only masked individuals came from the protesters?” Why the hidden faces? Are they afraid our camera footage could be used to report them for crimes?

(Evidence of assault of Olivia Bailey: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbUjXQilGAs)

Another man (circa 60s) with a white beard assaulted Luke Nash-Jones, grabbing his arm and shoving him to the right, and pointing in his face – this is also common assault, if not an Anglophobic Christianophobic hate crime.

(Evidence of assault of Luke Nash-Jones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iAFahza2DU)

If you attend a protest, and wave a placard, surely you believe in something strongly enough that you can express it to a reporter? They know their position is weak. This was clear intimidation to silence journalists speaking the truth about the racist leadership of the counter-protestors.

What did Luke Nash-Jones mention that was so controversial?

The group Stand Up to Racism is led by notorious anti-white bigot Diane Abbot MP, who said white mothers are inferior, and supported the IRA. Their keynote speaker Moazzam Begg praised terrorist Jihadi John. Then they assembled to oppose a peaceful march of war heroes against violence. It is clear who the “hate group”, the “extremists” are. “Stand Up for Racism” acted in a truly fascist manner, silencing opposition, rather than engaging in peaceful dialogue.

If the roles had been reversed, Olivia and Luke would no doubt have been arrested. They were clearly assaulted, but the police ignored these crimes, and pushed Luke out of the area, demanding the other journalists leave too.

If anyone was offended by the bigoted chants of the “Stand Up to Racism” group at the Veterans Against Terrorism protest on Saturday, please report the “hate crime” using the form attached.
https://www.scotland.police.uk/secureforms/hate-crime/

Trump REBUKES Theresa May: “Focus on the destructive Radical Islamic terrorism”

in Islamism/World News by

Trump’s sharing of the Britain First content comes at a very awkward time for the May government, who have just had Fransen arrested for stirring “racial hatred”. Now, the most powerful Western leader is going against May’s agenda.

While US presidents traditionally pick up the telephone or make subtle diplomatic overtures to express their feelings to world leaders, Trump used his preferred social media outlet to reach the Prime Minister, perhaps reflecting how little he thought of Mr Maybe’s view.

Theresa May finds herself this week in a very tricky situation. On one hand, as Britain is part of the Union for the Mediterranean, she has to keep happy its southern oil-rich Arab League OPEC members that our economy relies on (1970s oil embargo), such as Libya, Algeria, etc., who will not appreciate criticism of Islam. Hence, Theresa May was probably under incredible pressure to criticise the Donald’s decision to retweet three videos that had been posted by Jayda Fransen of Britain First.

On the other, as Britain, leaves the EU, even if just in name, a trade deal with the US will be an absolute priority, and this means Mrs Maybe can not afford to alienate Trump. While the US government pursues a nationalistic “American exceptionalism” approach, putting its people first, bring jobs back from China, Theresa is a globalist Remoaner who would give up our national sovereignty and identity.

Many people in Britain were pleased when the US President tweeted: “Theresa @theresamay, don’t focus on me, focus on the destructive Radical Islamic Terrorism that is taking place within the United Kingdom. We are doing just fine!”

Her spokesperson said Trump had been “wrong” to share the videos, adding that “Britain First seeks to divide communities through their use of hateful narratives which peddle lies and stoke tensions”, and “British people overwhelmingly reject the prejudiced rhetoric of the far-right”.

Luke Nash-Jones, Director of the People’s Charter Foundation stated, “While some people may not appreciate the Britain First strategy, such as ‘mosque invasions’ (I, myself, prefer other approaches), they are not ‘far-right’ – they are not neo-Nazis, holding drunken parties where they sing Nazi songs – no, that’s what Theresa’s own party do!”

UKIP MEP Gerard Batten said, “BBC today branding Britain First party as ;far-right’. I have no interest in BF but what gives BBC the right to decide who is ‘far-right’?”

Trump’s state visit to the UK will occur, even if Chuka Umuna MP is furious. Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury, ever keen for an opportunity to virtue signal, said Trump’s decision to retweet the videos was “deeply disturbing”. Saudi-funded the Independent was quick to quote CAIR, a group many, even Al Jazeera, associate with Hamas, to defend Theresa.

The Conservative party’s UK Communities Secretary Sajid Javid, a Muslim himself, said Trump had “endorsed the views of a vile, hate-filled racist organisation that hates me and people like me”, and was “wrong” to have done so.

However, Trump appears to have shared the posts due to his concern about the surge in Isalmists attacks in the UK. The White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders defended the President by saying journalists were focusing on “the wrong thing”. She said: “Whether it’s a real video, the threat is real. His goal is to promote strong border security and strong national security.”

One carried the caption, “Muslim migrants beating up a Dutch boy on crutches”, while another claimed to show an “Islamist mob” pushing a teenager off a roof and beating him to death and a third allegedly showed a Muslim man destroying a Virgin Mary statue.

Fransen quickly moved to capitalise on the attention Mr Trump had brought her, saying she was “delighted”.

Outrage as EU blames Brexit voters for surge in ISIS terror attacks

in Brexit/Islamism by

The EU’s Chief Negotiator Michel Barnier has provoked fury with a speech in Berlin where he implied that Brexit Britain is somehow ducking the fight with Islamist terrorism.

Barnier said: “More than 500 days ago, the United Kingdom took the sovereign decision to leave the European Union and bring to an end 44 years of common history. To many of us this came as a great shock. It was a decision taken against the backdrop of a strategic repositioning by our American ally, which has gathered pace since the election of Donald Trump.

“It was a decision that came after a series of attacks on European soil, committed by young people who grew up in Europe, in our countries. It was a decision that came six months after the French Minister of Defence issued a call for solidarity to all his European counterparts to join forces to fight the terrorism of Daesh.”

It is disgraceful of Barnier to blame Brexit supporters for the surge in terror attacks, especially as the UK, which has suffered a string of terror attacks in 2017 so far, has been at the forefront of the fight against ISIS. Of course, we will still be able to co-operate with other European nations on issues of national security, even after we leave the EU.

Barnier’s comments drew an immediate response from Brexit campaigners.

Luke Nash-Jones, Director of the People’s Charter Foundation says, “Barnier is ProjectFear on steroids. First the EU denied they are building an army, and now they have the damn cheek to say our refusal to give up our military, our vote for Brexit, our support of Trump, caused the surge in ISIS attacks on the Continent.”

“How dare the surrender-monkey try such spin! The truth is that the EU is flooded with Islamists because it simply doesn’t bother to man its southern borders!”

“From the days of WWII, through de Gaulle, to now, the French national flag has effectively been a white bedsheet. They took us into the Union for the Mediterranean, they sold out the European nations for deals with Saudi for oil! The sooner we get out this evil, Wahhabist-influenced Kalergi cesspit, the better.”

Tory backbencher Peter Bone MP said it was ‘outrageous’ for Mr Barnier to suggest the UK was not playing its part – insisting that NATO, not the EU was responsible for ensuring peace.

Anonymous government officials are said to be furious about Barnier’s comments.

Downing Street said: “We’ve been clear that we want to play a full part in the security of the EU and Europe after we leave, and we think that’s in the interests of both Britain and the European Union.”

Facebook creates guide to protecting Muslims online

in Islamism by

Facebook has created a guide to improving the safety of Muslims online, in an effort to combat Islamaphobia, racism and hate speech levelled at the community. The guide contains advice on reporting abusive comments and content to Facebook and the police.

Mo Fyaz of Multiracial Alliance Tackling Extremism said, “How about Facebook protecting ex-Muslims from violent reprisals or death propagated by Muslims?”

Keeping Muslims Safe Online: Tackling Hate and Bigotry was written in partnership with non-theological consultancy Faith Associates, and is designed to “empower Muslim users of Facebook”, Simon Milner, Head of Policy UK at Facebook said.

Luke Nash-Jones of the People’s Charter Foundation responded, “Surely it is ‘racist’ that they only want to protect people of one faith, and not Sikhs, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, and atheists. Why are non-Muslims worthless? Many people including myself are victims of Christianophobia, but Facebook and police do nothing to help us.”

It will be launched at a parliamentary reception, where MPs will be invited to speak to Imams from their constituencies about the issues facing Muslim communities.

The guide says, “If you see someone sharing Daesh inspired content and encouraging others to join extremist groups, report them and then make or share posts that show true Islamic messages of peace, mercy and tolerance.”

‘We will destroy your country’: latest ISIS poster threatens terror attack on London

in Islamism by

ISIS appears to be stepping up their propaganda machine ahead of the holidays, producing a series of horrific graphic posters threatening attacks on Christmas shoppers in Europe and the United States.

Islamist terrorists are threatening an attack on London and the Queen in their latest ISIS propaganda posters shared online.  An ISIS flag flies from the top of a burning Big Ben, which also has a large crack running across the building.

Running down the side of the image is a message, reading: ‘We will destroy your country, as you destroyed our country’.

The other shows a bloody knife over an image of Queen Elizabeth II, with the message; ‘Under observation… soon’.

Another poster shared on encrypted channels show Santa kneeling in front of a terrorist with London’s Regent Street in the background.

One poster shows a jihadi with a bloody knife looking out over a Christmas market with the Eiffel Tower in the background and the message ‘soon in your holidays’ in English, French, and German.

The propaganda images are a chilling reminder of the terror attack on a Berlin Christmas Market last year.

Instructed by ISIS, Tunisian asylum seeker Anis Amri drove a truck into the crowds at the Christmas Market at Breitscheidplatz in Berlin on December 19.

ISIS fanatics have also urged jihadists to attack Rome in an online poster showing a wolf overlooking St Peter’s Square.

Electoral Commission REJECTS Anne-Marie Waters’s planned For Britain party

in Islamism by

The Electoral Commission (an independent body set up by the UK Parliament to decide who can stand in an election) have rejected Anne-Marie Water’s planned For Britain party.

They state that “The Commission must not register an identity mark that is the same as that of a currently-registered identity mark” – or in plain English: they think someone else is already using the name “For Britain”.

(Source: Electoral Commission)

This doesn’t stop Anne-Marie Waters forming a party – it can be registered under another name – or as Paul Weston is combining efforts with her, they could use his vehicle, which is fully-registered with the Electoral Commission.

The Commission doesn’t state which party the name “For Britain” could be confused with. Perhaps they are referring to the number of affiliates of Matthew Elliot’s Vote Leave, which used the “for Britain” phrase, and are registered with the EC.

Meanwhile, the Electoral Commission denies the assertion by Vote Leave’s former chief Dominic Cummings that it sent a letter permitting payments to other anti-EU campaigns. It is currently investigating the controversial six-figure sum that the group paid to student Darren Grimes.

John Rees-Evans’s Affinity has also been rejected on the grounds of incomplete paperwork.

Katie Hopkins DELETES Twitter and leaves Mail Online

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Katie Hopkins’ column for Mail Online has been scrapped after a slew of complaints over her comments on terror attacks and other controversies.

A spokesperson for the website said her contract “was not renewed by mutual consent” and gave no further detail.

Ms Hopkins did not immediately respond to a request for comment and appeared to have deleted all tweets on her official Twitter account, apart from a small number of retweets topped with a video of her “bitchiest moments”.

Read more at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/katie-hopkins-mail-online-leaves-column-dropped-mutual-consent-twitter-history-right-wing-a8078161.html?amp

The Qur’an And Violence

in Islamism by

I think we all know the script now. A terrorist attack occurs. Hours later, the world learns the identity of the attacker (or, the identities of the attackers). Then comes the inevitable question, “What was the motive?” We wait and a familiar narrative emerges, but we can usually guess the conclusion.

Sometimes a consensus is quick. Few disagree, for instance, that Anders Breivik was motivated by xenophobia and ultranationalism when he killed 77 fellow Norwegians in 2011, or that anti-Muslim bigotry propelled Darren Osbourne to plough his car into a crowd of Muslims near the Finsbury Park Mosque in London in June 2017.

Yet other times, particularly when the perpetrators are Muslims, such a consensus becomes elusive. At least that is what we are told. Suddenly the motive becomes complicated.  We’re told that the attackers could have been influenced by any number of factors, and for some — including many journalists, pundits, social scientists, terrorism experts, even heads of government— there is one factor that did not, or even could not, play a role: and that is the terrorists’ stated faith.

A week after the Westminster attack in March 2017, journalist Mehdi Hasan offered this argument in an article with the  title, “You Shouldn’t Blame Islam for Terrorism. Religion Isn’t a Crucial Factor in Attacks.”

According to Hasan, Islam is not the “main motivation” in Muslim terror attacks, and if the attackers do cite religion as an influence, it is because they are “cynically appealing to Radical Islamic motifs or doctrines” that provide “a ready-made justification” for their violence.

A week after the 2013 murder of British Army soldier Lee Rigby in Woolwich, Hasan wrote in the New Statesman that “Muslim extremists usually cite political, not theological, justifications for their horrendous crimes.” As evidence, Hasan cites the words of Michael Adebolajo, one of the two men who killed Rigby: “The only reason we killed this man…is because Muslims are dying daily.”

He omits (because his argument depends on ignoring half of what jihadists say) Adebolajo’s multiple references to Islam during his 80-second on-camera rant. “By Allah, we swear by the almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you until you leave us alone,” he said, his blood-soaked hands holding two blood-soaked knives. “So what if we want to live by the Sharia in Muslim lands?” And, clearly providing a religious justification for his act, Adebolajo said, “We are forced by the Qur’an in Surat at-Tawba [the ninth chapter of the Qur’an], through many many [verses] throughout the Qur’an, that we must fight them as they fight us.”

Adebolajo’s statements indicate that we shouldn’t understand Islamist terrorist motives as being either political or religious. Rather, we should recognise that, in the mind of the jihadist, the two domains are inseparable. Simply put, their theological convictions inform their political beliefs.

That Adebolajo was not just using Islamism, the Qur’an, and Sharia as an “excuse” is evident by looking at the ten years that preceded his assassination of Rigby. After enrolling at Greenwich University in London in 2003, he began mingling with Islamists, including members of alal-Muhajiroun (a group once co-led by Anjem Choudary, recently found guilty of inviting support for the Islamic State). In 2006, Adebolajo participated in a demonstration outside the trial of Mizanur Rahman who had called for “another 9/11” in countries “all over Europe” in response to the publication of the Danish cartoons caricaturing Muhammad.

2009, Adebolajo attended a protest of the EDL (English Defence League, insisting those in attendance convert; and a year later he was apprehended and returned to the United Kingdom after attempting to emigrate to Somalia, where he hoped to live under Islamic law). Abebolajo’s interpretation of Islam was not an inconsequential factor in his radicalisation or his justification for murder.

And this is not a one-off. Countless Islamist terrorists have demonstrated that their political grievances and terrorist acts are inspired by a sincere belief in a radical interpretation of Islam.

Mohamed Atta, one of the 9/11 hijackers, wrote a letter to his co-conspirators drenched with references to martyrdom and the glory awaiting them in paradise. (“Be happy, optimistic, calm because you are heading for a deed that God loves and will accept,” Atta instructed the attackers. “It will be the day, God willing, you spend with the women of paradise.”)

And two individuals who appeared in the 2016 Channel 4 documentary entitled The Jihadis Next Door later went on to commit acts of terror: one, Abu Rumaysah, became an executioner for ISIS, and another, Khuram Shazad Butt, led the group of terrorists that carried out the London Bridge attack in June 2017.

Of course, members of the “it’s-not-Islam” crowd will argue that these terrorists have followed a perverted version of Islam. But a reading of Islam’s most revered and influential texts — including the Qur’an, hadiths (collections of the sayings and deeds of Muhammad), the biographies of Muhammad, and tafaseer (commentaries by respected Islamic scholars) — indicates that all this violence follows Islamists’ accepted interpretation of the religion. The Qur’an is not written in a concurrent timeline. The beginning is not the earliest event and the end not the last. Tommy Robinson and Peter McLoughlin have written Mohammed’s Koran that does indeed put it in a chronological order.

Islamists express a desire to establish a religious state and resurrect a vast caliphate. They are following the Qur’an. Verse 18:26 of the Qur’an says that Allah “shares not His legislation with anyone,” and verse 4:59 declares, “Obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you believe in Allah and the Last Day.”

Some radical Islamist groups argue that violence can be used to restore religious rule in territory once controlled by Muslims that has ceased to be sufficiently governed by Islamic law. That would mean that Bradford, Birmingham and parts of East London can be subject to open jihad!

One verse that supports this argument is 5:50, which reads, “Is it the judgment of [the time of] ignorance they desire? But who is better than Allah in judgment for a people who are certain [in faith]?”

There are, of course, tolerant and peaceful verses in the Qur’an like ‘There is no compunction to religion’ or ‘Transgression should not be done’ But these are early in the timeline. The belligerent verses that came toward the end of Muhammad’s career — when the Muslims’ military and political power were ascendant and they override the more tolerant verses.

Other statements from Qur’anic texts also lend themselves to justifying the use of violence to spread submission to the one true faith. (The word Islam actually means submission, or ‘to submit’.)

The two most trusted hadith collections (Bukhari and Muslim) testify to Muhammad declaring, “I have been commanded to battle mankind until they declare that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.”

Also Ibn Khaldun wrote, “In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation) to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. Therefore, caliphate and royal authority are united in Islam, so that the person in charge can devote the available strength to both of them at the same time.”

The verses, hadiths, and commentaries cited above all provide a firm theological basis for Islamists’ desire to legislate and enforce Sharia and jihadists’ use of violence to topple secular regimes and establish a religious state. But this still leaves us with the issue of Islamist terrorism, including why it is carried out and how the terrorists justify killing civilians — and even themselves.

As the statements by Tsarnaev and Adebolajo prove, many Islamist terrorists see their attacks as a legitimate form of defensive jihad.

Terrorist attacks cannot be viewed as distinct from radical Islam’s stated goal of toppling regimes and creating a pan-Islamic state. Osama bin Laden explained the singular purpose behind al-Qaeda’s attacks on the Muslim world and the West this way in his ‘Letter To America’ in 2002: “The removal of these governments is an obligation upon us, and a necessary step to free the Ummah, to make the Shariah the supreme law and to regain Palestine. And our fight against these governments is not separate from our fight against you” [emphasis added]. And in a 2016 article entitled “Why We Hate You & Why We Fight You” published in its magazine Dabiq, ISIS explained that it hates and fights the West, first and foremost, not because of its foreign policy but because of its disbelief. “The gist of the matter is that there is indeed a rhyme to our terrorism, warfare, ruthlessness, and brutality,” the article explains. “We have been commanded to fight the disbelievers until they submit to the authority of Islam, either by becoming Muslims, or by paying jizyah — for those afforded this option — and living in humiliation under the rule of the Muslims.”

Some have seized on and applied this rationale to justify terrorist attacks on civilians. Yusuf al-Qaradawi, for example, one of the most influential Islamic scholars in the world, stated that Israeli women and children can be targeted because of Israel’s law mandating a stint of military service (even though many potential conscripts are granted exemptions).

Al-Qaeda has stated that attacking Western civilians is justified because of their collective political support for governments that engage in hostilities in Muslim lands.

Takfir is a component of Islam, dating back to the Sunni-Shi’a split and the Kharijites of the seventh century. It was used most notoriously by Ibn Taymiyyah, who argued in fatwas around the year 1300 that Muslim Mamluk troops could engage in battle against the invading Mongols despite their leader’s recent conversion to Islam. The Mongols, Ibn Taymiyyah claimed, were not true Muslims because of the influence of Shi’ite and Mongol beliefs and customs on their society.

In recent decades, jihadist groups have used takfir as a justification for killing both troops and civilians.

Finally, there is the controversy over suicide terrorism — whether Muslims can kill themselves while attacking the enemy. At first glance, it appears that Islam prohibits such actions. Indeed, verse 4:29 says, “And do not kill yourselves.”

Verse 4:74, however, encourages martyrdom by promising “a great reward” to those who “fight in the cause of Allah” and “sell the life of this world for the Hereafter.”

Numerous hadiths indicate that Muhammad approved of fighters entering battle against overwhelming odds, even if their death was all but certain. According to one, Muhammad said, “In order that the people have a livelihood, it is best that they have a man who holds on to the reins of his horse, battling in the way of Allah. He flies upon [his horse’s back] every time he hears the call or alarm, wishing for death or expecting to be slain.” There are so many references in the Islamic scriptures that can be interpreted so as to allow force, coercion and domination of others, meaning Islamists see it as a manifesto of global control, by fair means or foul. The latter being demonstrated too many times over the 1400 year history for it to be coincidence.

The point of the above is this:

First, they counter arguments about the motives of radical Islamic terrorists. Yes, these terrorists do harbour political grievances against Western powers. But these grievances derive from their beliefs. They are living out an extreme yet learned interpretation of the faith.

Second, some argue, for instance, that terrorism cannot be a cause of jihadist and terrorist violence because throughout its 1,400-year history, not all Muslims have exhibited such behaviour. A worrying number have though.

As Fareed Zakaria put it in a Washington Post editorial in 2014, “You can never explain a variable phenomenon with a fixed cause. So, if you are asserting that Islam is inherently violent and intolerant — ‘the mother lode of bad ideas’ — then, since Islam has been around for 14 centuries, we should have seen 14 centuries of this behaviour.” Well, I personally, would argue we have: the above examples being just a few available.

Finally, there is a alleged practical benefit to establishing the connection between militant Islam and Islamism, jihadism, and terrorism. Grasping this connection is essential to understanding the beliefs, we are told, and motivations of the radical groups at odds with the West.  They are at odds with civilisation itself.

We should pay attention when ISIS says “We will never stop hating you until you embrace Islam, and will never stop fighting you until you’re ready to leave the swamp of warfare and terrorism through the exits we provide, the very exits put forth by our Lord for the People of the Scripture: Islam, jizyah, or — as a last means of fleeting respite — a temporary truce.”

Mutual coexistence with Islamism is impossible. We need learn this lesson sooner rather than later.

Twitter gives Muslim Brotherhood a blue tick

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

With Twitter’s recent pledge to remove the blue tick verification from accounts it deems rightwing – a sanction already placed on Milo – the tick is becoming effectively an endorsement of political views.

Hence, whom Twitter grants such verification to will come under great scrutiny. Surely, Islamists do not qualify? What about Muslim Brotherhood leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi? He has been granted a verified Twitter account.

His fatwas in support of suicide bombings against Israeli civilians were instrumental in the development of the terror method. 😐😐

Terrorist-supporter speaking at Labour-backed London conference

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism/Student Politics by

Former Guantanamo Bay prisoner, Moazzam Begg, who called ISIS terrorist Jihadi John a good guy, will be speaking at Labour MP Diane Abbott’s “Fight Islamophobia” conference tonight. Think about this: The man supported a TERRORIST, and now he’s shouting “Islamophobe” at his critics.

In fact, he has previously been dropped as a speaker due to his links to the terrorist.

Stand Up to Racism’s national conference at Friends Meeting House in Euston, London, on Saturday the 21st of October advertised Diane Abbott, a Hackney MP and Shadow Home Secretary, as its star speaker, along with Moazzam Begg, who has called Mohammed Emwazi – also known as Jihadi John – a “beautiful young man”, and been condemned by Amnesty International.

Luke Nash-Jones infiltrated that October conference held by this “Stand Up to Racism” organisation – his report is here:

Moazzem Begg’s group CAGE is planning to protest against the Football Lads Alliance and veterans march in Scotland this weekend. Think about this: A group, whose leader was in Gitmo, and who praised a terrorist, is opposing a march AGAINST terror. Hardly surprising!

Why is the West soft on Sharia? The truth that the mainstream media will not share.

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit/Islamism by

To sum everything up briefly: Thanks to the anti-American stance of a French president, Europe made an alliance with Arabia that meant in exchange of a steady supply of oil, Europe would let terrorist-backing Saudi Arabia call the shots.

 
Why is Britain so soft on Sharia?

Why are people arrested for “naughty” tweets?

Why don’t we turn away fake refugees who do not meet the UN definition?

Why do we trade so heavily with Saudi Arabia?
(In July 2013, Saudi Arabia’s Wahhabism was identified by the European Parliament in Strasbourg as the main source of global terrorism.)

We only need to consider one thing: What is the REAL cause of 1970s recession that we never truly recovered from?

Across Arabia and the North of Africa are a number of oil rich countries who along with communist Venezuela form the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). The most powerful, and leader of this Islamo-Marxist alliance, is the Wahhabist state of Saudi Arabia.

During the Arab-Israeli Yom Kippur War of 1973, Arab members of the OPEC, who form the majority, imposed an embargo against the United States in retaliation for the US decision to re-supply the Israeli military. Arab OPEC members also extended the embargo to other countries that supported Israel including the Netherlands, Portugal, and South Africa. The embargo both banned petroleum exports to the targeted nations and introduced cuts in oil production.

The 1973 Oil Embargo acutely strained a US economy that had grown increasingly dependent on foreign oil. The price of oil quadrupled. There were long queues outside petrol stations. Britain reduced to a three-day working week. The oil rich OPEC countries, led by terrorist-sponsoring Wahabbist Saudi Arabia, had the West by the balls, and still do. It is no wonder that America, Britain, and the EU, do little while Saudi Arabia throw money into universities and into building of mosques in Europe. They fear another recession.

Another consequence of the sudden increase in oil prices was a sudden influx of US dollar to countries such as Saudi Arabia, which permitted the Saudis to fund a worldwide Islamic resurgence.

Up until this point, the West had been following the Bretton Woods system, where the US dollar was linked to gold, and the world reserve currency. This highly successful system was threatened by France, who saw America as a rival. Aggressive financial diplomacy coupled with de Gaulle’s needless, blatantly destructive demand for conversion of US dollar holdings into gold weakened confidence in the US dollar and helped to precipitate the collapse of fixed exchange rates. France intentionally destroyed the Bretton Woods system, in hope it could rise from the ashes to gain more influence on the world stage. The boom of the Western economy up until that stage, the incredible optimism, ceased, and has never been regained.

The result was a realignment of the world order, from one wherein America and Europe dominated, to that in which now the developing Arabia countries were seen as equals. A petrodollar recycling mechanism was created, through which OPEC surplus funds were channelled through the capital markets to the West to finance the current account deficits. One aspect of this agreement was that in return for US protection of the Saudi oil fields, Saudi would invest in US stocks, and only sell oil in US dollars.

As a result, the USA moved from a manufacturing economy to a consumer based one. The departure from the gold standard allowed it to print as many notes as it wished, and mass circulation occurred, facilitated by the international use of the dollar as a reserve currency – off the back of which a large US welfare state could be afforded. Then there are the claims that those countries such as Libya, Iraq, even Russia, that do not comply with this system at the core of the US economy and level of wealth, the selling of oil only in US dollars, face violent takeover by US forces, or a mass negative media campaign, such as the constant criticism of Putin.

In fact, France’s, still burning, hatred of the USA is a key factor in the fall of Western civilisation. In addition to his attack on the US dollar, de Gaulle was playing with fire, pursuing a Eurabia alliance. After Algeria gained its independence in 1962, France had a change of policy toward the Islamic world, seeking to unite the countries of the Mediterranean into an economic bloc to rival the USA and the Soviet Union. During a November 27, 1967 press conference, Charles de Gaulle stated openly that French cooperation with the Arab world had become “the fundamental basis of our foreign policy.”


The French creation of Eurabia, with backing by the EU Commission.

Perhaps by coincidence this matches the plan of Kalergi, who not only designed the EU flag, and proposed the anthem, but called for a merging of North Africa and Europe into a super-state. The use of the term “Eurabia” was first introduced in the mid-1970s, as the title of a journal edited by the President of the Association for Franco-Arab Solidarity, Lucien Bitterlein, and their articles called for common Euro-Arab positions at every level.

While this opened huge markets for European products in the Arab world, especially in oil-producing countries, and secured supplies of petroleum and natural gas to Europe, it came at a price. Euro-Arab Dialogue Symposia conducted in Venice (1977) and Hamburg (1983) included recommendations that have been successfully implemented. These recommendations were accompanied by a deliberate, privileged influx of Arab and other Muslim immigrants into Europe in enormous numbers.


French president Charles de Gaulle – the man who killed Europe

The recommendations included:

1. Coordination of the efforts made by the Arab countries to spread the Arabic language and culture in Europe,
2. Creation of joint Euro-Arab Cultural Centers in European capitals,
3. The necessity of supplying European institutions and universities with Arab teachers specialised in teaching Arabic to Europeans, and
4. The necessity of cooperation between European and Arab specialists in order to present a positive picture of Arab-Islamic civilisation and contemporary Arab issues to the educated public in Europe.

The nation-state would be no more. Hence, the rise of the word “Islamophobia”, and the government crackdown, the declaration that anyone who question Sharia law is a “racist”. This surge in political correctness, the Anglophobic surge of the British authorities, was a clear betrayal of the people, as in Rotherham the police remained silent while 1,400 little girls were raped. It was driven by a desire for oil profits, but also served well the cultural Marxists who found British individualism to be an obstacle to their communist dream that is so reliant on collectivism. Hence the alliance of Islamists and Marxists, as Labour party students declared their love for Hamas.

Eurabia’s driving force, the Parliamentary Association for Euro-Arab Cooperation, was created in Paris in 1974. It now has over six hundred members — from all major European political parties — active in their own national parliaments, as well as in the European parliament. France continues to be the key protagonist of this association. This process was ratified by the parliamentary assembly of the Council of Europe in September 1991, at its meeting devoted to “The Contribution of the Islamic Civilisation to European culture.”

As we notice the increased alliance of European Union current and prospective members, Switzerland and Norway (Schengen members); with Arab League member and observer states, the future becomes clear – not just a European Union, but no, a Mediterranean Union. Before you dismiss this as foolish ramblings, on the 13th of July 2008, French President Nicolas Sarkozy called for a “Union for the Mediterranean”.

Please read up on the Barcelona Process, otherwise known as the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (Euromed), started in 1995 with the Barcelona Euro-Mediterranean Conference. It was organised by the European Union to strengthen its relations with the countries in the Mashriq and Maghreb regions. The partnership laid the foundations for what came to be the Union for the Mediterranean – that is effectively the country Britons now live within.

To sum everything up briefly: Thanks to the anti-American stance of a French president, Europe made an alliance with Arabia that meant in exchange of a steady supply of oil, Europe would let terrorist-backing Saudi Arabia call the shots.

Royal Navy Whistleblower: UK Military Bases Are Not Secure

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Security concerns raised by Royal Navy whistleblower William McNeilly have been brought up yet again, this time by a top military official. Defence Police Federation chairman Eamon Keating has told Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson that budget cuts have left military bases open to attack.

In 2015, McNeilly leaked a report to WikiLeaks detailing safety and security failures aboard the UK’s Trident nuclear armed submarines and at their base at Faslane in Scotland. The same concerns were raised on Wednesday in an open letter to Williamson, only this time by the officers in charge of base security.

In his letter, Keating pleaded with the Tory minister to veto further cuts to the defence budget and issued him with stark warning: cuts to the Ministry of Defence (MoD) police force budget will lead to fewer officers on the ground and weakened security at Faslane and other MoD sites. The shocking betrayal of UK defence at the hands of our Government is another example of how unfit they are to keep us safe.

“I must highlight the deeply concerning, and in many cases deplorable decision making that is leaving many of the UK’s critical military assets and sites at unacceptable risk of attack on our own shores,” Keating’s letter reads.
“It is perhaps only a matter of time before an MoD establishment in the UK faces attack, and the reality is that continued and pernicious reductions in the capacity of the MoD Police leave it ill-equipped and understaffed to deal with such a situation.”

Keating’s plea for more finances echo the same concerns raised by McNeilly two years ago. At the time, McNeilly’s claims were dismissed by the military.

The header image of this article shows the WikiLeaks submission detailing Trident Security Concerns.

Security weakness will only increase the chances of a large and sustained attack on our land, and we must rally the Government into taking action. With the threat of UK terrorism at its highest level, we cannot be blasé about security, and these concerns from experts must be heeded, or we will become “nothing but targets in this war against terrorism.”

Tommy Robinson Verification Ban: Leftist Echo Chamber Strikes Again

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

It appears as though left-wing social media has removed the ‘verification marker’ of another controversial figure; their target on this occasion was Tommy Robinson, who caught their attention for speaking the truth on key issues facing this country, and the world.

Unfortunately, Twitter did not see it that way, and removed his ‘verification’ status in a rather humorous attempt to silence him, and his many followers.

Twitter need to get a sense of humour and resist the urge to censor the internet because they don’t agree with individual accounts, and they have a duty to protect freedom of expression and speech regardless of whether the corporation agree with those views or not.

In the words of a Facebook user: Tommy = legend: verified and permanent.
To all readers, I do hope you get to read this article before Facebook and Twitter remove it and me from their platforms. Do keep sharing the message, we cannot let them win.

1 2 3
Go to Top