Category archive

Islamism

UKIP slams political correctness for rape of white girls by Pakistani men

in Islamism/Student Politics by

Attention was drawn this week to the “grooming gang” issue, when the controversial Quilliam think tank published a report which said that 84% of all child rape gang convictions in the period studied were Asian, mostly Pakistani.

Far from being a party silent on such issues, as some critics have claimed, various UKIP figures have heavily criticised the “ridiculous” culture of political correctness that stopped the police from acting in Rotherham to stop child rape gangs.

David Kurten AM stated, “84% of grooming and rape gangs are ‘Asian’ Muslim men, despite being only 2.5% of the UK population. These gangs target white teenage girls. No more political correctness. British girls have suffered far too long.”

UKIP MEP Jane Collins said: “But it’s a stigma. People don’t want to talk about it for fear of being accused of targeting different societies – and I think they’ve got to get over that because if we can’t look after our children we have failed as a society, as human beings.”

(On the left: Nate Rydings)

Nathan Rydings, the Chair of the UKIP youth wing, Young Independence, said, “This is disgusting; this report proves that the PC culture we are currently living in doesn’t work. We are living in a society where young British females are being raped by gangs of Pakistani men and the mainstream media don’t even bat an eye to it! They would rather report on a peaceful “far-right” march whose objective is to shed light on these disgusting attacks.

“It is appalling how nothing is being done to protect young people in this country from these vile individuals. YI and UKIP as a whole will stand up for our youth! This should not and will not be tolerated. We must end this ridiculous politically correct culture and start using our brains; start thinking common sense!

New law states animals must be treated as sentient beings post-Brexit

in Brexit/Islamism by

A new law was today published by the government to say that it must treat animals as “sentient beings” when it makes laws in future.

Michael Gove MP promised to “make Brexit work not just for citizens but for the animals we love and cherish too”.

The welcome draft law also increases the maximum sentence for serious animal cruelty to five years in jail and states that the government “must have regard to the welfare needs of animals as sentient beings in formulating and implementing government policy”.

Gove said: “Animals are sentient beings who feel pain and suffering, so we are writing that principle into law and ensuring that we protect their welfare. Our plans will also increase sentences for those who commit the most heinous acts of animal cruelty to five years in jail”.

One area not discussed however was the slaughtering of animals for Halal which many animal rights campaigners see as barbaric when the method of non-stunning is used and argue that it is extremely cruel.

To date there is nothing to stop this practice within the UK due to its membership with the EU that states “EU legislation grants exceptions from stunning for religious groups…”

The rise in Halal meat being common place in the British food-chain has caused alarm for many.

“We absolutely are not demanding people be forced to eat non-halal meat, but we do, and rightly so, insist that farm animals are treated with dignity. If someone will only eat meat procured by a form of slaughter that is abusive to animals, better they avoid eating meat at all. It is as simple as that,” Luke Nash-Jones, Director of the People’s Charter Foundation said in support of a Lancashire council voting to ban schools from serving non-stunned halal meat.

Many have criticised the RSPCA’s lack of support on this issue suggesting the charity is worried about its funding but today David Bowles, the RSPCA’s head of public affairs, said the plans were “potentially great news” for animals post-Brexit.

He said: “To include the recognition of animal sentience as well as increasing animal cruelty sentencing to five years into the new 2018 Animal Welfare Bill is a very bold and welcome move by the government.”

The law comes after a recent vote by Lancashire Council to ban halal food in its schools.

Labour Party says it’s wrong for army to kill the enemy

in Islamism by

Labour MP Dan Jarvis has criticised the Defence Secretary’s promise to kill returning jihadis, “Soldiers are taught that for force to have legitimacy it must: distinguish between those who pose a threat and those who do not.”

Jarvis’s dismissal of the threat jihadis pose shows how he is out of touch with reality. A paper, written by Richard Barrett, a former director of global counter-terrorism at MI6, said: “While returning foreign fighters have not as yet added significantly to the threat of terrorism around the world, the number of attacks inspired or directed by the Islamic State continues to rise.

Around 850 UK-linked individuals “of national security concern” made the journey to the jihadists’ crumbling “caliphate” in Syria and Iraq, with just under half of those believed to have come back. These people want you and I dead. Their return increases the likelihood of a terror attack; very likely a surge in violent deaths in Britain.

Sue Hemming, the Crown Prosecution Service’s head of counter-terrorism, said her team had doubled in size to cope with “cases emerging from Syria” and the rise of Islamic State, as well as the recent attacks here. But she said even more lawyers were required.

Barrett continues, “All returnees, whatever their reason for going home, will continue to pose some degree of risk.”

(Sally Jones, who is believed to have been killed, had been plotting terror attacks in Britain)

Richard Inman of Veterans Against Terrorism has criticised the suggestions that jihadis be granted council homes, and said that they should be sent back to Syria to face trial for their crimes.

Luke Nash-Jones, Director of The People’s Charter Foundation, stated, “The Labour Party are a bunch of nutters, in cloud cuckooo land, who want to abolish nuclear warheads. Corbyn thought the answer to ISIS was a cup of tea. The cowardice must stop! Anyone found through fair trial to be a returning jihadi, to have committed treason, should face a firing squad, should get a bullet to the head.”

Jarvis on the other hand seems ever keen to virtue signal to impress the liberal elite. He continued, “It is right that the International Criminal Court investigate claims that British soldiers committed war crimes against detainees in Iraq.”

Kill the returning Jihadis says UK Defence Secretary

in Islamism by

Not a single British citizen who has fought for Islamic State should be allowed back into the UK, the Defence Secretary declared last night.

The UK’s new Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson says a “dead terrorist can’t cause any harm to Britain”, adding that “no British citizen who has fought for so-called Islamic State should be allowed back into the UK.”

Gavin Williamson signalled he was prepared to hunt down and use air strikes against the remaining 270 UK passport holders who have travelled to Syria and Iraq.

Whilst this is good to hear, actions will speak louder than words, and he is reminded that we currently have 23,000 known Jihadists roaming our streets.

He added: ‘I do not believe that any terrorist, whether they come from this country or any other, should ever be allowed back into this country.

‘We should do everything we can do to destroy and eliminate that threat.’

Cute platitudes from the pretty boy. More than 800 UK citizens are thought to have gone to fight for Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. Around half of them have ALREADY returned, and around 130 have been killed, leaving an estimated 270 left. What is Williamson going to do about them?

Christianophobic gang beat up “non-Muslim” Liverpool residents

in Islamism by

A gang of Muslim men rampaged through Liverpool city centre violently attacking strangers because they were white “non-Muslims”.

One witness feared Amin Mohmed, 24, Mohammed Patel, 20, and Faruq Patel were ISIS terrorists.

We do not know the identity of the first three men that were attacked, but we know that the gang proceeded on to beat up Gary Bohanna when he admitted he was Christian.

Mr Bohanna was asked: “What are you?”

The victim was confused but when one of them said “I’m a Muslim, what are you?” he answered “I’m a Christian”.

The Christianophobic attacker shouted “Why aren’t you a Muslim?” before punching him twice, breaking his glasses and causing a 2cm cut above his left eye. Mr Bohanna is fortunate not to have lost his eyesight.

The gang then encountered Mr Lynch, Labour councillor for Moss Bank, and his girlfriend Jill Newton.

Laughing Faruq, 19, was not convicted of a racial or religious motive, despite the gang blatantly targeting people by religion. He then filmed Mohmed punching St Helens councillor Paul Lynch to the ground, as his terrified girlfriend tried to protect him.

A “sickening blow” could be “seen and heard”.

While people are arrested, charged, for mere words, that are deemed Islamophobic, and incitement of racial hatred, the state turns a blind eye to blatant religious discrimination against Christians.

Toni Bugle, former English Democrats candidate, says, “So beat up someone up and call them names because they are white and it isn’t racially motived I wonder if they would say the same if it was the other way round? Of course they bloody wouldn’t!”

Liverpool Crown Court heard counter-terrorism officers raided the three men’s homes in Bolton after the shocking incident on March 20 last year.

The judge, Recorder Louise Brandon, said: “This was a disgraceful and sustained campaign of violence carried out on the streets of this city.”

Tommy Robinson: Deep State Asked Me to Bring Down Britain First

in Islamism by

Rebel Media reporter Tommy Robinson says he was approached by Scotland Yard, who want him to help them with “bringing down” Britain First.

Robinson said, “Frankly, there is a massive campaign, I could tell you firsthand.”

The deputy leader of Britain First Jayda Fransen, was recently flown to Belfast, to be charged by the police for “threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour” – state action that some would deem a severe violation of freedom of speech – and is due to appear at Belfast Magistrates’ Court on 14 December.

Meanwhile, the party’s leader Paul Golding has been accused of and is under investigation following allegations of sexual assault.

The Rebel Media reporter continued, “When I was in custody, I was approached by a secretive organisation in Scotland Yard called Metropolitan Intelligence Bureau asking me to work for them in bringing down Britain First.”

“That is the deep state. We have a democracy, people have the right to express freedom and free speech, and that’s what Britain First do.”

He was commenting on Donald Trump’s retweeting of videos posted by Fransen when he made the claim.

“The whole country’s talking about Donald Trump and Jayda Fransen – we had a terror attack stopped two days ago which was in preparation with weapons by a man in Birmingham and a man in London. Why is that not the topic?”

10 men in court accused of Rotherham child rape

in Islamism by

Ten men are to stand trial accused of raping and sexually abusing eight teenage girls in Rotherham.

The men, aged between 33 and 38 and all from South Yorkshire, are charged with a total of 33 offences said to have taken place between 1998 and 2005.

They were charged as part of National Crime Agency’s investigation into historical child abuse in Rotherham.

The men, who deny the charges, will stand trial at Sheffield Crown Court in September and November 2018.

Those facing trail are:

Mohammed Imran Ali Akhtar, 36, of East Road, Rotherham, who is charged with four counts of indecent assault, one count of rape, one count of supplying a controlled drug, one count of sexual assault and one count of procuring a girl under 21 to have unlawful sexual intercourse

Nabeel Kurshid, 34, of Warwick Street, Rotherham, who is charged with two counts of rape and one count of indecent assault

Iqlak Yousaf, 33, of Tooker Road, Rotherham, who is charged with two counts of rape and one count of indecent assault

Amjal Rafiq, 38, of Warwick Street, Rotherham, who is charged with one count of indecent assault

Salah Ahmed El-Hakam, 38, of Tudor Close, Sheffield, who is charged with one count of rape

Aftab Hussain, 38, of York Road, Rotherham, who is charged with three counts of rape, one count of abducting a child and two counts of indecent assault

Abid Saddiq, 36, of Walter Street, Rotherham, who is charged with five counts of indecent assault and four counts of rape

Waseem Khaliq, 33, of Eldon Court, Sheffield, who is charged with one count of rape

Masaeud Malik, 33, of Doncaster, who is charged with one count of indecent assault

Sharaz Hussain, 33, of Fraser Road, Rotherham, who is charged with one count of indecent assault

Two other men, Tanweer Ali, 36, of Godstone Road, Rotherham; and Mohammaed Ashen, 33, of Chorley, Lancashire; who have been charged in connection with the case, were not arraigned.

Five men injured as “Somalian” MOWS DOWN people in London

in Islamism by

Police raced to Stockwell Road, between Stockwell and Brixton tube stations, at around 3am this morning after reports of a dramatic collision.

Images from the scene show debris scattered across the road as the flashing blue lights from police and ambulances lit up houses and buildings.

Five male pedestrians – aged between 23 and 42 years – were taken to hospital by ambulance.

In video footage from the scene, a bystander says “This is what happened in Stockwell. Was a crazy Somalian guy [inaudible] Somalian guy”. We have no information on the driver, or cause of the incident.

Several injured after car ploughs into pedestrians in south London

Posted by MBGA News » Make Britain Great Again on Saturday, 2 December 2017

Kevin Bate, deputy director of Operations at London Ambulance Service, said six ambulance crews, two advance paramedics, two incident response officers, a hazardous area response team and air ambulance medics attended.

He said: “We treated five patients on the scene for a range of head and leg injuries. We took one patient as a priority to a major trauma centre and took four patients as a priority to a trauma centre.”

“Black Widow of the jihad” stripped of Belgian citizenship

in Islamism by

The Court of Appeal in Brussels has ruled that a 58-year-old woman convicted of recruiting young Brussels Muslims to fight in the so-called “holy war” in Afghanistan be stripped of her Belgian citizenship.

Malika El Aroud now only has Moroccan citizenship. In 2010 she was sentenced to 8 years in prison and fined 5,000 euro for terrorist-related offences.

In 2014 proceedings were launched to strip Malika El Aroud of her Belgian citizenship. It has taken so long as Ms El Aroud’s solicitor took the case to the Constitutional Court. Now the Court of Appeal has decided that she should lose her Belgian citizenship.

At the Court of Appeal, the Advocate-General said that Ms El Aroud no longer deserved Belgian citizenship as “for many years she has continually spread jihadism in our country”.

The so-called “Black-widow of the jihad” Malika El Aroud, has twice been married to extremists, both of whom died in the so-called “holy war’.

She has twice been convicted for terrorist-related offences. She and her late husband set up a website to recruit young men to go and fight alongside the Taliban in Afghanistan.

UK home to highest number of Islamists in Europe

in Islamism by

The UK is home to up to 25,000 Islamist extremists who could pose a threat, the EU’s top terror official has warned.

Officials have warned that the threat from home-grown jihadis who are prevented from joining Isis in Syria and Iraq is increasing, with the group inciting global terror attacks to maintain momentum.

Among those known to security services but not considered an imminent danger were the perpetrators of the three Isis-linked terror attacks that have killed 35 victims in Britain this year.

Westminster attacker Khalid Masood was described a “peripheral figure” by Theresa May, while the Manchester bomber Salman Abedi was known to MI5 but not under active investigation and the ringleader of the London Bridge attack, Khuram Butt, was not thought to be a risk despite being a known member of Anjem Choudary’s banned network.


A man carrying a little girl flies an ISIS flag outside Parliament

Gilles de Kerchove, the EU’s counter-terror coordinator, said he expected more atrocities following the deadly car rammings in Barcelona and Cambrils.

“The group’s propaganda no longer calls so much for people to travel to the ‘caliphate’, but to launch attacks in their places of origin or of residence, even on a small scale with homemade weapons.”

Mr de Kerchove said the UK was home to the highest known number of Islamist radicals in Europe – between 20,000 and 25,000 people – with 3,000 considered a direct threat by MI5 and 500 under constant surveillance.

McDonalds tells customer: remove hijab or get out

in Islamism by

McDonald’s has apologized after a security guard at one of its London restaurants reportedly told a woman she must remove her hijab or leave the premises.

The incident happened in North London as the woman attempted to place an order at a fast-food chain on the Seven Sisters Road. Footage circulated online Friday shows the would-be customer remonstrating with a security guard after being repeatedly told to remove the traditional Muslim headscarf.

Luke Nash-Jones of the People’s Charter Foundation says, “There seems to be some confusion between the burqa – a full head covering, that could be a security issue – and the harmless hijab – little different to the headscarves that most women in Europe wore until recently, and even Queen Elizabeth the II still does. A Western-style scarf would suggest integration, but there are absolutely no grounds to ban the clothing item. Let’s focus on real issues like prosecuting people for FGM.”

McDonalds tells customer: remove hijab or get out

Posted by MBGA News » Make Britain Great Again on Friday, 1 December 2017

It’s just a matter of taking it [the hijab] off,” a man, wearing a security tag, states.

The unidentified woman then states that she wears the hijab for religious reasons – though there is dispute as to whether Sharia requires wearing of a headscarf, she is not breaking the law. For centuries, women have worn headscarves in Britain.

At one point a bystander steps in, telling the security employee that he cannot stop the woman from visiting the restaurant because of her headscarf.

“I will stand in line and get the food that I want because this isn’t okay,” the woman says.

“This is a hate crime,” the woman adds. “I’ve been living in the UK for 19 years  now and this is the first time I’m faced with this kind of discrimination and I am shocked. I’m actually shocked.”

Kent Uni shuts down UKIP event because of fancy dress featuring English flag

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism/Student Politics by

Free speech has been restricted at the University of Kent, where the Students Union banned a Kent UKIP Students Society social event. A Student Union representative felt that a proposed Crusader fancy dress outfit “caused discomfort and frustration among the Muslim community on campus”.

Following a cease-and-desist email from Kent Union we have cancelled our planned Crusader pub crawl this Friday. Kent…

Posted by University of Kent UKIP Students on Wednesday, 22 November 2017

Crusaders rode out to the Holy Land to protect Christian pilgrims from highway men. They were truly brave heroes, and their knights outfits, emblazoned with the St. George’s Cross, the flag of England, are often worn at cricket matches.

An email sent to Kent UKIP Students Chairman Joe Simons said that the event was banned and with threat disband the UKIP society.

Reece Coombes, a candidate for Young Independence deputy said, “The event, which was a satirical commemoration of the First Crusade, invited attendees to don ‘crusader attire’ and encouraged ‘infidels’ to attend, in what was a poke of fun at the raging political correctness of modern students and universities.”

BREAKING: Car explodes into flames at Christmas fair in London

in Islamism by

The car exploded on Pinner High Street in north-west London this evening as a Christmas fair was being held.

The outdoor Pinner Panto show was also taking place when the car erupted into flames. The incident causes concern with ISIS having only this week released posters threatening to target Christmas markets.

One Twitter user posted a shocking video of the car on flames on the busy high street. He said the cause was unknown but claimed it was been parked in a “suspect” location.

BREAKING: Car on fire during Christmas event in LondonThe car exploded on Pinner High Street in north-west London this evening as a Christmas fair was being held. The outdoor Pinner Panto show was also taking place when the car erupted into flames.

Posted by Make Britain Great Again on Thursday, 30 November 2017

Greenhill police said they were not treating the incident as suspicious at this stage. They tweeted: “Swift work by MPS Pinner responding to a car on fire in Bridge Street this evening has been resolved with the assistance of fire brigade.”

MP Nick Hurd wrote on Twitter: “Thanks to police; stewards and fire brigade for a speedy response to the dramatic car fire that disrupted #pinnerpanto this evening.”

Pinner Pantomime responded to the MP’s comments on Twitter.

They said: “Yes thank you everyone – and also the public who responded to directions.

Diane Abbott’s mob reported to police for assault of mixed-race reporter

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Richard Inman, spokesman for Veterans Against Terrorism, and other persons, including Luke Nash-Jones of Make Britain Great Again, have reported to the Scottish police a potential race hate crime committed by Diane Abbott’s activists in Edinburgh.

Mixed-race reporter Olivia Bailey attended the Veterans Against Terrorism march in Edinburgh this weekend. She states that the only racism she experienced was from the left-wing activists of Diane Abbott’s organisation Stand Up To Racism.

In video footage filmed by Pepe Ramirez, a thin white man (circa 60s) clean shaven clearly hits Bailey over the head with a placard – this is common assault, if not a racist attack: the police saw and did nothing. Absolute hypocrisy from a group claiming to oppose racism.

Mr Inman states, “This was a hostile and masked crowd of white men, who launched a verbal and physical assault! White ‘anti-racists’ harassed a reporter, in full view of the police.”

The truly fascist nature of the hard-left is becoming even clearer thanks to the brave work of alternative media. While the veterans march had a diverse panel of speakers, and a peaceful crowd, the tiny Stand Up to Racism march was all white, predominantly male, and violent. On Facebook, Brent Holloway exclaims, “Notice how the only masked individuals came from the protesters?” Why the hidden faces? Are they afraid our camera footage could be used to report them for crimes?

(Evidence of assault of Olivia Bailey: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbUjXQilGAs)

Another man (circa 60s) with a white beard assaulted Luke Nash-Jones, grabbing his arm and shoving him to the right, and pointing in his face – this is also common assault, if not an Anglophobic Christianophobic hate crime.

(Evidence of assault of Luke Nash-Jones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iAFahza2DU)

If you attend a protest, and wave a placard, surely you believe in something strongly enough that you can express it to a reporter? They know their position is weak. This was clear intimidation to silence journalists speaking the truth about the racist leadership of the counter-protestors.

What did Luke Nash-Jones mention that was so controversial?

The group Stand Up to Racism is led by notorious anti-white bigot Diane Abbot MP, who said white mothers are inferior, and supported the IRA. Their keynote speaker Moazzam Begg praised terrorist Jihadi John. Then they assembled to oppose a peaceful march of war heroes against violence. It is clear who the “hate group”, the “extremists” are. “Stand Up for Racism” acted in a truly fascist manner, silencing opposition, rather than engaging in peaceful dialogue.

If the roles had been reversed, Olivia and Luke would no doubt have been arrested. They were clearly assaulted, but the police ignored these crimes, and pushed Luke out of the area, demanding the other journalists leave too.

If anyone was offended by the bigoted chants of the “Stand Up to Racism” group at the Veterans Against Terrorism protest on Saturday, please report the “hate crime” using the form attached.
https://www.scotland.police.uk/secureforms/hate-crime/

Trump REBUKES Theresa May: “Focus on the destructive Radical Islamic terrorism”

in Islamism/World News by

Trump’s sharing of the Britain First content comes at a very awkward time for the May government, who have just had Fransen arrested for stirring “racial hatred”. Now, the most powerful Western leader is going against May’s agenda.

While US presidents traditionally pick up the telephone or make subtle diplomatic overtures to express their feelings to world leaders, Trump used his preferred social media outlet to reach the Prime Minister, perhaps reflecting how little he thought of Mr Maybe’s view.

Theresa May finds herself this week in a very tricky situation. On one hand, as Britain is part of the Union for the Mediterranean, she has to keep happy its southern oil-rich Arab League OPEC members that our economy relies on (1970s oil embargo), such as Libya, Algeria, etc., who will not appreciate criticism of Islam. Hence, Theresa May was probably under incredible pressure to criticise the Donald’s decision to retweet three videos that had been posted by Jayda Fransen of Britain First.

On the other, as Britain, leaves the EU, even if just in name, a trade deal with the US will be an absolute priority, and this means Mrs Maybe can not afford to alienate Trump. While the US government pursues a nationalistic “American exceptionalism” approach, putting its people first, bring jobs back from China, Theresa is a globalist Remoaner who would give up our national sovereignty and identity.

Many people in Britain were pleased when the US President tweeted: “Theresa @theresamay, don’t focus on me, focus on the destructive Radical Islamic Terrorism that is taking place within the United Kingdom. We are doing just fine!”

Her spokesperson said Trump had been “wrong” to share the videos, adding that “Britain First seeks to divide communities through their use of hateful narratives which peddle lies and stoke tensions”, and “British people overwhelmingly reject the prejudiced rhetoric of the far-right”.

Luke Nash-Jones, Director of the People’s Charter Foundation stated, “While some people may not appreciate the Britain First strategy, such as ‘mosque invasions’ (I, myself, prefer other approaches), they are not ‘far-right’ – they are not neo-Nazis, holding drunken parties where they sing Nazi songs – no, that’s what Theresa’s own party do!”

UKIP MEP Gerard Batten said, “BBC today branding Britain First party as ;far-right’. I have no interest in BF but what gives BBC the right to decide who is ‘far-right’?”

Trump’s state visit to the UK will occur, even if Chuka Umuna MP is furious. Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury, ever keen for an opportunity to virtue signal, said Trump’s decision to retweet the videos was “deeply disturbing”. Saudi-funded the Independent was quick to quote CAIR, a group many, even Al Jazeera, associate with Hamas, to defend Theresa.

The Conservative party’s UK Communities Secretary Sajid Javid, a Muslim himself, said Trump had “endorsed the views of a vile, hate-filled racist organisation that hates me and people like me”, and was “wrong” to have done so.

However, Trump appears to have shared the posts due to his concern about the surge in Isalmists attacks in the UK. The White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders defended the President by saying journalists were focusing on “the wrong thing”. She said: “Whether it’s a real video, the threat is real. His goal is to promote strong border security and strong national security.”

One carried the caption, “Muslim migrants beating up a Dutch boy on crutches”, while another claimed to show an “Islamist mob” pushing a teenager off a roof and beating him to death and a third allegedly showed a Muslim man destroying a Virgin Mary statue.

Fransen quickly moved to capitalise on the attention Mr Trump had brought her, saying she was “delighted”.

Outrage as EU blames Brexit voters for surge in ISIS terror attacks

in Brexit/Islamism by

The EU’s Chief Negotiator Michel Barnier has provoked fury with a speech in Berlin where he implied that Brexit Britain is somehow ducking the fight with Islamist terrorism.

Barnier said: “More than 500 days ago, the United Kingdom took the sovereign decision to leave the European Union and bring to an end 44 years of common history. To many of us this came as a great shock. It was a decision taken against the backdrop of a strategic repositioning by our American ally, which has gathered pace since the election of Donald Trump.

“It was a decision that came after a series of attacks on European soil, committed by young people who grew up in Europe, in our countries. It was a decision that came six months after the French Minister of Defence issued a call for solidarity to all his European counterparts to join forces to fight the terrorism of Daesh.”

It is disgraceful of Barnier to blame Brexit supporters for the surge in terror attacks, especially as the UK, which has suffered a string of terror attacks in 2017 so far, has been at the forefront of the fight against ISIS. Of course, we will still be able to co-operate with other European nations on issues of national security, even after we leave the EU.

Barnier’s comments drew an immediate response from Brexit campaigners.

Luke Nash-Jones, Director of the People’s Charter Foundation says, “Barnier is ProjectFear on steroids. First the EU denied they are building an army, and now they have the damn cheek to say our refusal to give up our military, our vote for Brexit, our support of Trump, caused the surge in ISIS attacks on the Continent.”

“How dare the surrender-monkey try such spin! The truth is that the EU is flooded with Islamists because it simply doesn’t bother to man its southern borders!”

“From the days of WWII, through de Gaulle, to now, the French national flag has effectively been a white bedsheet. They took us into the Union for the Mediterranean, they sold out the European nations for deals with Saudi for oil! The sooner we get out this evil, Wahhabist-influenced Kalergi cesspit, the better.”

Tory backbencher Peter Bone MP said it was ‘outrageous’ for Mr Barnier to suggest the UK was not playing its part – insisting that NATO, not the EU was responsible for ensuring peace.

Anonymous government officials are said to be furious about Barnier’s comments.

Downing Street said: “We’ve been clear that we want to play a full part in the security of the EU and Europe after we leave, and we think that’s in the interests of both Britain and the European Union.”

Facebook creates guide to protecting Muslims online

in Islamism by

Facebook has created a guide to improving the safety of Muslims online, in an effort to combat Islamaphobia, racism and hate speech levelled at the community. The guide contains advice on reporting abusive comments and content to Facebook and the police.

Mo Fyaz of Multiracial Alliance Tackling Extremism said, “How about Facebook protecting ex-Muslims from violent reprisals or death propagated by Muslims?”

Keeping Muslims Safe Online: Tackling Hate and Bigotry was written in partnership with non-theological consultancy Faith Associates, and is designed to “empower Muslim users of Facebook”, Simon Milner, Head of Policy UK at Facebook said.

Luke Nash-Jones of the People’s Charter Foundation responded, “Surely it is ‘racist’ that they only want to protect people of one faith, and not Sikhs, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, and atheists. Why are non-Muslims worthless? Many people including myself are victims of Christianophobia, but Facebook and police do nothing to help us.”

It will be launched at a parliamentary reception, where MPs will be invited to speak to Imams from their constituencies about the issues facing Muslim communities.

The guide says, “If you see someone sharing Daesh inspired content and encouraging others to join extremist groups, report them and then make or share posts that show true Islamic messages of peace, mercy and tolerance.”

‘We will destroy your country’: latest ISIS poster threatens terror attack on London

in Islamism by

ISIS appears to be stepping up their propaganda machine ahead of the holidays, producing a series of horrific graphic posters threatening attacks on Christmas shoppers in Europe and the United States.

Islamist terrorists are threatening an attack on London and the Queen in their latest ISIS propaganda posters shared online.  An ISIS flag flies from the top of a burning Big Ben, which also has a large crack running across the building.

Running down the side of the image is a message, reading: ‘We will destroy your country, as you destroyed our country’.

The other shows a bloody knife over an image of Queen Elizabeth II, with the message; ‘Under observation… soon’.

Another poster shared on encrypted channels show Santa kneeling in front of a terrorist with London’s Regent Street in the background.

One poster shows a jihadi with a bloody knife looking out over a Christmas market with the Eiffel Tower in the background and the message ‘soon in your holidays’ in English, French, and German.

The propaganda images are a chilling reminder of the terror attack on a Berlin Christmas Market last year.

Instructed by ISIS, Tunisian asylum seeker Anis Amri drove a truck into the crowds at the Christmas Market at Breitscheidplatz in Berlin on December 19.

ISIS fanatics have also urged jihadists to attack Rome in an online poster showing a wolf overlooking St Peter’s Square.

Electoral Commission REJECTS Anne-Marie Waters’s planned For Britain party

in Islamism by

The Electoral Commission (an independent body set up by the UK Parliament to decide who can stand in an election) have rejected Anne-Marie Water’s planned For Britain party.

They state that “The Commission must not register an identity mark that is the same as that of a currently-registered identity mark” – or in plain English: they think someone else is already using the name “For Britain”.

(Source: Electoral Commission)

This doesn’t stop Anne-Marie Waters forming a party – it can be registered under another name – or as Paul Weston is combining efforts with her, they could use his vehicle, which is fully-registered with the Electoral Commission.

The Commission doesn’t state which party the name “For Britain” could be confused with. Perhaps they are referring to the number of affiliates of Matthew Elliot’s Vote Leave, which used the “for Britain” phrase, and are registered with the EC.

Meanwhile, the Electoral Commission denies the assertion by Vote Leave’s former chief Dominic Cummings that it sent a letter permitting payments to other anti-EU campaigns. It is currently investigating the controversial six-figure sum that the group paid to student Darren Grimes.

John Rees-Evans’s Affinity has also been rejected on the grounds of incomplete paperwork.

Katie Hopkins DELETES Twitter and leaves Mail Online

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Katie Hopkins’ column for Mail Online has been scrapped after a slew of complaints over her comments on terror attacks and other controversies.

A spokesperson for the website said her contract “was not renewed by mutual consent” and gave no further detail.

Ms Hopkins did not immediately respond to a request for comment and appeared to have deleted all tweets on her official Twitter account, apart from a small number of retweets topped with a video of her “bitchiest moments”.

Read more at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/katie-hopkins-mail-online-leaves-column-dropped-mutual-consent-twitter-history-right-wing-a8078161.html?amp

The Qur’an And Violence

in Islamism by

I think we all know the script now. A terrorist attack occurs. Hours later, the world learns the identity of the attacker (or, the identities of the attackers). Then comes the inevitable question, “What was the motive?” We wait and a familiar narrative emerges, but we can usually guess the conclusion.

Sometimes a consensus is quick. Few disagree, for instance, that Anders Breivik was motivated by xenophobia and ultranationalism when he killed 77 fellow Norwegians in 2011, or that anti-Muslim bigotry propelled Darren Osbourne to plough his car into a crowd of Muslims near the Finsbury Park Mosque in London in June 2017.

Yet other times, particularly when the perpetrators are Muslims, such a consensus becomes elusive. At least that is what we are told. Suddenly the motive becomes complicated.  We’re told that the attackers could have been influenced by any number of factors, and for some — including many journalists, pundits, social scientists, terrorism experts, even heads of government— there is one factor that did not, or even could not, play a role: and that is the terrorists’ stated faith.

A week after the Westminster attack in March 2017, journalist Mehdi Hasan offered this argument in an article with the  title, “You Shouldn’t Blame Islam for Terrorism. Religion Isn’t a Crucial Factor in Attacks.”

According to Hasan, Islam is not the “main motivation” in Muslim terror attacks, and if the attackers do cite religion as an influence, it is because they are “cynically appealing to Radical Islamic motifs or doctrines” that provide “a ready-made justification” for their violence.

A week after the 2013 murder of British Army soldier Lee Rigby in Woolwich, Hasan wrote in the New Statesman that “Muslim extremists usually cite political, not theological, justifications for their horrendous crimes.” As evidence, Hasan cites the words of Michael Adebolajo, one of the two men who killed Rigby: “The only reason we killed this man…is because Muslims are dying daily.”

He omits (because his argument depends on ignoring half of what jihadists say) Adebolajo’s multiple references to Islam during his 80-second on-camera rant. “By Allah, we swear by the almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you until you leave us alone,” he said, his blood-soaked hands holding two blood-soaked knives. “So what if we want to live by the Sharia in Muslim lands?” And, clearly providing a religious justification for his act, Adebolajo said, “We are forced by the Qur’an in Surat at-Tawba [the ninth chapter of the Qur’an], through many many [verses] throughout the Qur’an, that we must fight them as they fight us.”

Adebolajo’s statements indicate that we shouldn’t understand Islamist terrorist motives as being either political or religious. Rather, we should recognise that, in the mind of the jihadist, the two domains are inseparable. Simply put, their theological convictions inform their political beliefs.

That Adebolajo was not just using Islamism, the Qur’an, and Sharia as an “excuse” is evident by looking at the ten years that preceded his assassination of Rigby. After enrolling at Greenwich University in London in 2003, he began mingling with Islamists, including members of alal-Muhajiroun (a group once co-led by Anjem Choudary, recently found guilty of inviting support for the Islamic State). In 2006, Adebolajo participated in a demonstration outside the trial of Mizanur Rahman who had called for “another 9/11” in countries “all over Europe” in response to the publication of the Danish cartoons caricaturing Muhammad.

2009, Adebolajo attended a protest of the EDL (English Defence League, insisting those in attendance convert; and a year later he was apprehended and returned to the United Kingdom after attempting to emigrate to Somalia, where he hoped to live under Islamic law). Abebolajo’s interpretation of Islam was not an inconsequential factor in his radicalisation or his justification for murder.

And this is not a one-off. Countless Islamist terrorists have demonstrated that their political grievances and terrorist acts are inspired by a sincere belief in a radical interpretation of Islam.

Mohamed Atta, one of the 9/11 hijackers, wrote a letter to his co-conspirators drenched with references to martyrdom and the glory awaiting them in paradise. (“Be happy, optimistic, calm because you are heading for a deed that God loves and will accept,” Atta instructed the attackers. “It will be the day, God willing, you spend with the women of paradise.”)

And two individuals who appeared in the 2016 Channel 4 documentary entitled The Jihadis Next Door later went on to commit acts of terror: one, Abu Rumaysah, became an executioner for ISIS, and another, Khuram Shazad Butt, led the group of terrorists that carried out the London Bridge attack in June 2017.

Of course, members of the “it’s-not-Islam” crowd will argue that these terrorists have followed a perverted version of Islam. But a reading of Islam’s most revered and influential texts — including the Qur’an, hadiths (collections of the sayings and deeds of Muhammad), the biographies of Muhammad, and tafaseer (commentaries by respected Islamic scholars) — indicates that all this violence follows Islamists’ accepted interpretation of the religion. The Qur’an is not written in a concurrent timeline. The beginning is not the earliest event and the end not the last. Tommy Robinson and Peter McLoughlin have written Mohammed’s Koran that does indeed put it in a chronological order.

Islamists express a desire to establish a religious state and resurrect a vast caliphate. They are following the Qur’an. Verse 18:26 of the Qur’an says that Allah “shares not His legislation with anyone,” and verse 4:59 declares, “Obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you believe in Allah and the Last Day.”

Some radical Islamist groups argue that violence can be used to restore religious rule in territory once controlled by Muslims that has ceased to be sufficiently governed by Islamic law. That would mean that Bradford, Birmingham and parts of East London can be subject to open jihad!

One verse that supports this argument is 5:50, which reads, “Is it the judgment of [the time of] ignorance they desire? But who is better than Allah in judgment for a people who are certain [in faith]?”

There are, of course, tolerant and peaceful verses in the Qur’an like ‘There is no compunction to religion’ or ‘Transgression should not be done’ But these are early in the timeline. The belligerent verses that came toward the end of Muhammad’s career — when the Muslims’ military and political power were ascendant and they override the more tolerant verses.

Other statements from Qur’anic texts also lend themselves to justifying the use of violence to spread submission to the one true faith. (The word Islam actually means submission, or ‘to submit’.)

The two most trusted hadith collections (Bukhari and Muslim) testify to Muhammad declaring, “I have been commanded to battle mankind until they declare that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.”

Also Ibn Khaldun wrote, “In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation) to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. Therefore, caliphate and royal authority are united in Islam, so that the person in charge can devote the available strength to both of them at the same time.”

The verses, hadiths, and commentaries cited above all provide a firm theological basis for Islamists’ desire to legislate and enforce Sharia and jihadists’ use of violence to topple secular regimes and establish a religious state. But this still leaves us with the issue of Islamist terrorism, including why it is carried out and how the terrorists justify killing civilians — and even themselves.

As the statements by Tsarnaev and Adebolajo prove, many Islamist terrorists see their attacks as a legitimate form of defensive jihad.

Terrorist attacks cannot be viewed as distinct from radical Islam’s stated goal of toppling regimes and creating a pan-Islamic state. Osama bin Laden explained the singular purpose behind al-Qaeda’s attacks on the Muslim world and the West this way in his ‘Letter To America’ in 2002: “The removal of these governments is an obligation upon us, and a necessary step to free the Ummah, to make the Shariah the supreme law and to regain Palestine. And our fight against these governments is not separate from our fight against you” [emphasis added]. And in a 2016 article entitled “Why We Hate You & Why We Fight You” published in its magazine Dabiq, ISIS explained that it hates and fights the West, first and foremost, not because of its foreign policy but because of its disbelief. “The gist of the matter is that there is indeed a rhyme to our terrorism, warfare, ruthlessness, and brutality,” the article explains. “We have been commanded to fight the disbelievers until they submit to the authority of Islam, either by becoming Muslims, or by paying jizyah — for those afforded this option — and living in humiliation under the rule of the Muslims.”

Some have seized on and applied this rationale to justify terrorist attacks on civilians. Yusuf al-Qaradawi, for example, one of the most influential Islamic scholars in the world, stated that Israeli women and children can be targeted because of Israel’s law mandating a stint of military service (even though many potential conscripts are granted exemptions).

Al-Qaeda has stated that attacking Western civilians is justified because of their collective political support for governments that engage in hostilities in Muslim lands.

Takfir is a component of Islam, dating back to the Sunni-Shi’a split and the Kharijites of the seventh century. It was used most notoriously by Ibn Taymiyyah, who argued in fatwas around the year 1300 that Muslim Mamluk troops could engage in battle against the invading Mongols despite their leader’s recent conversion to Islam. The Mongols, Ibn Taymiyyah claimed, were not true Muslims because of the influence of Shi’ite and Mongol beliefs and customs on their society.

In recent decades, jihadist groups have used takfir as a justification for killing both troops and civilians.

Finally, there is the controversy over suicide terrorism — whether Muslims can kill themselves while attacking the enemy. At first glance, it appears that Islam prohibits such actions. Indeed, verse 4:29 says, “And do not kill yourselves.”

Verse 4:74, however, encourages martyrdom by promising “a great reward” to those who “fight in the cause of Allah” and “sell the life of this world for the Hereafter.”

Numerous hadiths indicate that Muhammad approved of fighters entering battle against overwhelming odds, even if their death was all but certain. According to one, Muhammad said, “In order that the people have a livelihood, it is best that they have a man who holds on to the reins of his horse, battling in the way of Allah. He flies upon [his horse’s back] every time he hears the call or alarm, wishing for death or expecting to be slain.” There are so many references in the Islamic scriptures that can be interpreted so as to allow force, coercion and domination of others, meaning Islamists see it as a manifesto of global control, by fair means or foul. The latter being demonstrated too many times over the 1400 year history for it to be coincidence.

The point of the above is this:

First, they counter arguments about the motives of radical Islamic terrorists. Yes, these terrorists do harbour political grievances against Western powers. But these grievances derive from their beliefs. They are living out an extreme yet learned interpretation of the faith.

Second, some argue, for instance, that terrorism cannot be a cause of jihadist and terrorist violence because throughout its 1,400-year history, not all Muslims have exhibited such behaviour. A worrying number have though.

As Fareed Zakaria put it in a Washington Post editorial in 2014, “You can never explain a variable phenomenon with a fixed cause. So, if you are asserting that Islam is inherently violent and intolerant — ‘the mother lode of bad ideas’ — then, since Islam has been around for 14 centuries, we should have seen 14 centuries of this behaviour.” Well, I personally, would argue we have: the above examples being just a few available.

Finally, there is a alleged practical benefit to establishing the connection between militant Islam and Islamism, jihadism, and terrorism. Grasping this connection is essential to understanding the beliefs, we are told, and motivations of the radical groups at odds with the West.  They are at odds with civilisation itself.

We should pay attention when ISIS says “We will never stop hating you until you embrace Islam, and will never stop fighting you until you’re ready to leave the swamp of warfare and terrorism through the exits we provide, the very exits put forth by our Lord for the People of the Scripture: Islam, jizyah, or — as a last means of fleeting respite — a temporary truce.”

Mutual coexistence with Islamism is impossible. We need learn this lesson sooner rather than later.

Twitter gives Muslim Brotherhood a blue tick

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

With Twitter’s recent pledge to remove the blue tick verification from accounts it deems rightwing – a sanction already placed on Milo – the tick is becoming effectively an endorsement of political views.

Hence, whom Twitter grants such verification to will come under great scrutiny. Surely, Islamists do not qualify? What about Muslim Brotherhood leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi? He has been granted a verified Twitter account.

His fatwas in support of suicide bombings against Israeli civilians were instrumental in the development of the terror method. 😐😐

Terrorist-supporter speaking at Labour-backed London conference

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism/Student Politics by

Former Guantanamo Bay prisoner, Moazzam Begg, who called ISIS terrorist Jihadi John a good guy, will be speaking at Labour MP Diane Abbott’s “Fight Islamophobia” conference tonight. Think about this: The man supported a TERRORIST, and now he’s shouting “Islamophobe” at his critics.

In fact, he has previously been dropped as a speaker due to his links to the terrorist.

Stand Up to Racism’s national conference at Friends Meeting House in Euston, London, on Saturday the 21st of October advertised Diane Abbott, a Hackney MP and Shadow Home Secretary, as its star speaker, along with Moazzam Begg, who has called Mohammed Emwazi – also known as Jihadi John – a “beautiful young man”, and been condemned by Amnesty International.

Luke Nash-Jones infiltrated that October conference held by this “Stand Up to Racism” organisation – his report is here:

Moazzem Begg’s group CAGE is planning to protest against the Football Lads Alliance and veterans march in Scotland this weekend. Think about this: A group, whose leader was in Gitmo, and who praised a terrorist, is opposing a march AGAINST terror. Hardly surprising!

Why is the West soft on Sharia? The truth that the mainstream media will not share.

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit/Islamism by

To sum everything up briefly: Thanks to the anti-American stance of a French president, Europe made an alliance with Arabia that meant in exchange of a steady supply of oil, Europe would let terrorist-backing Saudi Arabia call the shots.

 
Why is Britain so soft on Sharia?

Why are people arrested for “naughty” tweets?

Why don’t we turn away fake refugees who do not meet the UN definition?

Why do we trade so heavily with Saudi Arabia?
(In July 2013, Saudi Arabia’s Wahhabism was identified by the European Parliament in Strasbourg as the main source of global terrorism.)

We only need to consider one thing: What is the REAL cause of 1970s recession that we never truly recovered from?

Across Arabia and the North of Africa are a number of oil rich countries who along with communist Venezuela form the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). The most powerful, and leader of this Islamo-Marxist alliance, is the Wahhabist state of Saudi Arabia.

During the Arab-Israeli Yom Kippur War of 1973, Arab members of the OPEC, who form the majority, imposed an embargo against the United States in retaliation for the US decision to re-supply the Israeli military. Arab OPEC members also extended the embargo to other countries that supported Israel including the Netherlands, Portugal, and South Africa. The embargo both banned petroleum exports to the targeted nations and introduced cuts in oil production.

The 1973 Oil Embargo acutely strained a US economy that had grown increasingly dependent on foreign oil. The price of oil quadrupled. There were long queues outside petrol stations. Britain reduced to a three-day working week. The oil rich OPEC countries, led by terrorist-sponsoring Wahabbist Saudi Arabia, had the West by the balls, and still do. It is no wonder that America, Britain, and the EU, do little while Saudi Arabia throw money into universities and into building of mosques in Europe. They fear another recession.

Another consequence of the sudden increase in oil prices was a sudden influx of US dollar to countries such as Saudi Arabia, which permitted the Saudis to fund a worldwide Islamic resurgence.

Up until this point, the West had been following the Bretton Woods system, where the US dollar was linked to gold, and the world reserve currency. This highly successful system was threatened by France, who saw America as a rival. Aggressive financial diplomacy coupled with de Gaulle’s needless, blatantly destructive demand for conversion of US dollar holdings into gold weakened confidence in the US dollar and helped to precipitate the collapse of fixed exchange rates. France intentionally destroyed the Bretton Woods system, in hope it could rise from the ashes to gain more influence on the world stage. The boom of the Western economy up until that stage, the incredible optimism, ceased, and has never been regained.

The result was a realignment of the world order, from one wherein America and Europe dominated, to that in which now the developing Arabia countries were seen as equals. A petrodollar recycling mechanism was created, through which OPEC surplus funds were channelled through the capital markets to the West to finance the current account deficits. One aspect of this agreement was that in return for US protection of the Saudi oil fields, Saudi would invest in US stocks, and only sell oil in US dollars.

As a result, the USA moved from a manufacturing economy to a consumer based one. The departure from the gold standard allowed it to print as many notes as it wished, and mass circulation occurred, facilitated by the international use of the dollar as a reserve currency – off the back of which a large US welfare state could be afforded. Then there are the claims that those countries such as Libya, Iraq, even Russia, that do not comply with this system at the core of the US economy and level of wealth, the selling of oil only in US dollars, face violent takeover by US forces, or a mass negative media campaign, such as the constant criticism of Putin.

In fact, France’s, still burning, hatred of the USA is a key factor in the fall of Western civilisation. In addition to his attack on the US dollar, de Gaulle was playing with fire, pursuing a Eurabia alliance. After Algeria gained its independence in 1962, France had a change of policy toward the Islamic world, seeking to unite the countries of the Mediterranean into an economic bloc to rival the USA and the Soviet Union. During a November 27, 1967 press conference, Charles de Gaulle stated openly that French cooperation with the Arab world had become “the fundamental basis of our foreign policy.”


The French creation of Eurabia, with backing by the EU Commission.

Perhaps by coincidence this matches the plan of Kalergi, who not only designed the EU flag, and proposed the anthem, but called for a merging of North Africa and Europe into a super-state. The use of the term “Eurabia” was first introduced in the mid-1970s, as the title of a journal edited by the President of the Association for Franco-Arab Solidarity, Lucien Bitterlein, and their articles called for common Euro-Arab positions at every level.

While this opened huge markets for European products in the Arab world, especially in oil-producing countries, and secured supplies of petroleum and natural gas to Europe, it came at a price. Euro-Arab Dialogue Symposia conducted in Venice (1977) and Hamburg (1983) included recommendations that have been successfully implemented. These recommendations were accompanied by a deliberate, privileged influx of Arab and other Muslim immigrants into Europe in enormous numbers.


French president Charles de Gaulle – the man who killed Europe

The recommendations included:

1. Coordination of the efforts made by the Arab countries to spread the Arabic language and culture in Europe,
2. Creation of joint Euro-Arab Cultural Centers in European capitals,
3. The necessity of supplying European institutions and universities with Arab teachers specialised in teaching Arabic to Europeans, and
4. The necessity of cooperation between European and Arab specialists in order to present a positive picture of Arab-Islamic civilisation and contemporary Arab issues to the educated public in Europe.

The nation-state would be no more. Hence, the rise of the word “Islamophobia”, and the government crackdown, the declaration that anyone who question Sharia law is a “racist”. This surge in political correctness, the Anglophobic surge of the British authorities, was a clear betrayal of the people, as in Rotherham the police remained silent while 1,400 little girls were raped. It was driven by a desire for oil profits, but also served well the cultural Marxists who found British individualism to be an obstacle to their communist dream that is so reliant on collectivism. Hence the alliance of Islamists and Marxists, as Labour party students declared their love for Hamas.

Eurabia’s driving force, the Parliamentary Association for Euro-Arab Cooperation, was created in Paris in 1974. It now has over six hundred members — from all major European political parties — active in their own national parliaments, as well as in the European parliament. France continues to be the key protagonist of this association. This process was ratified by the parliamentary assembly of the Council of Europe in September 1991, at its meeting devoted to “The Contribution of the Islamic Civilisation to European culture.”

As we notice the increased alliance of European Union current and prospective members, Switzerland and Norway (Schengen members); with Arab League member and observer states, the future becomes clear – not just a European Union, but no, a Mediterranean Union. Before you dismiss this as foolish ramblings, on the 13th of July 2008, French President Nicolas Sarkozy called for a “Union for the Mediterranean”.

Please read up on the Barcelona Process, otherwise known as the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (Euromed), started in 1995 with the Barcelona Euro-Mediterranean Conference. It was organised by the European Union to strengthen its relations with the countries in the Mashriq and Maghreb regions. The partnership laid the foundations for what came to be the Union for the Mediterranean – that is effectively the country Britons now live within.

To sum everything up briefly: Thanks to the anti-American stance of a French president, Europe made an alliance with Arabia that meant in exchange of a steady supply of oil, Europe would let terrorist-backing Saudi Arabia call the shots.

Royal Navy Whistleblower: UK Military Bases Are Not Secure

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Security concerns raised by Royal Navy whistleblower William McNeilly have been brought up yet again, this time by a top military official. Defence Police Federation chairman Eamon Keating has told Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson that budget cuts have left military bases open to attack.

In 2015, McNeilly leaked a report to WikiLeaks detailing safety and security failures aboard the UK’s Trident nuclear armed submarines and at their base at Faslane in Scotland. The same concerns were raised on Wednesday in an open letter to Williamson, only this time by the officers in charge of base security.

In his letter, Keating pleaded with the Tory minister to veto further cuts to the defence budget and issued him with stark warning: cuts to the Ministry of Defence (MoD) police force budget will lead to fewer officers on the ground and weakened security at Faslane and other MoD sites. The shocking betrayal of UK defence at the hands of our Government is another example of how unfit they are to keep us safe.

“I must highlight the deeply concerning, and in many cases deplorable decision making that is leaving many of the UK’s critical military assets and sites at unacceptable risk of attack on our own shores,” Keating’s letter reads.
“It is perhaps only a matter of time before an MoD establishment in the UK faces attack, and the reality is that continued and pernicious reductions in the capacity of the MoD Police leave it ill-equipped and understaffed to deal with such a situation.”

Keating’s plea for more finances echo the same concerns raised by McNeilly two years ago. At the time, McNeilly’s claims were dismissed by the military.

The header image of this article shows the WikiLeaks submission detailing Trident Security Concerns.

Security weakness will only increase the chances of a large and sustained attack on our land, and we must rally the Government into taking action. With the threat of UK terrorism at its highest level, we cannot be blasé about security, and these concerns from experts must be heeded, or we will become “nothing but targets in this war against terrorism.”

Tommy Robinson Verification Ban: Leftist Echo Chamber Strikes Again

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

It appears as though left-wing social media has removed the ‘verification marker’ of another controversial figure; their target on this occasion was Tommy Robinson, who caught their attention for speaking the truth on key issues facing this country, and the world.

Unfortunately, Twitter did not see it that way, and removed his ‘verification’ status in a rather humorous attempt to silence him, and his many followers.

Twitter need to get a sense of humour and resist the urge to censor the internet because they don’t agree with individual accounts, and they have a duty to protect freedom of expression and speech regardless of whether the corporation agree with those views or not.

In the words of a Facebook user: Tommy = legend: verified and permanent.
To all readers, I do hope you get to read this article before Facebook and Twitter remove it and me from their platforms. Do keep sharing the message, we cannot let them win.

The Real “Nasty Party”: Labour’s War on the Jewish People

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Another day, and another Labour member has uttered a vile, indefensible anti-Semitic remark. This time, it is Nasreen Khan, a former RESPECT activist – led by George Galloway, a passionate Palestinianist – and now a member of Labour. She is part of a two person short-list for a Bradford council seat. The blatant bigot bashed out on Twitter, “What good have the Jews ever done for the world?” Well, for a start, Israel made much of technology used by the phone you used Ms. Khan to spew some hate!

The rest of her message was even more shocking, as she praised the man behind the Holocaust, with the words, “school never taught us this but they are the first to start brainwashing us and our children into thinking the bad guy was Hitler.” However, this is not the first such failure of Labour party members to condemn the Austrian despot, with even top red Livingstone coming under fire for his claim that Hitler supported Zionism. Livingstone was not expelled from the party, but was given merely a two-year suspension from standing for office. Then there is  Naz Shah, whose series of social media posts on Israel and Jews culminated in her resignation as a Parliamentary Secretary to Shadow Chancellor, John McDonnell.

Hence, at a “Times of Israel Presents” event on Wednesday the 9th the week just passed, David Hirsh, a Labour activist, lecturer in Sociology at Goldsmiths, University of London, and author of “Contemporary Left Anti-Semitism,” held a meeting in London regards the rise in anti-Jewish bigotry within the Labour party. Regards the Chakrabarti Report on anti-Semitism, it raised the question, “Why did the inquiry end up as a manifestation of the problem?” “It’s astonishing,” Hirsch said, “that somebody who does this — who says that Zionists are the same as Nazis — should be let back into the Labour party”.

It is not surprising then that a poll by YouGov for the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA), which surveyed 2,025 British Jews, found that over 80 per cent believe Labour is too tolerant of anti-Semitism within its ranks. Moreover, Labour – at this year’s conference in Brighton – had to pass a motion against anti-Semitism – hardly an action that would be taken if such a problem were not present. Hence, Corbyn has to defend to Channel 4 claims that Labour is now the “nasty party”. During the unprofessional, poorly-run debate that had proceeded passing of the motion, delegates repeatedly criticised Labour party management for working with the Jewish Labour Movement.

However, one of the most disturbing developments was when this month, on the 2nd of November, MEND (Muslim Engagement and Development) were invited to speak in Parliament, beside Labour MPs, including Jeremy Corbyn – who previously welcomed “friends” from Hezbollah and Hamas – Stephen Kinnock – whose father invited the IRA to Parliament – and Wes Streeting. I was absolutely shocked!

Only the day before this MEND meeting, the Henry Jackson Society think tank had published an 87-page report detailing a number of concerns regards Mend’s projects, staff and volunteers. It described the organisation as “Islamists masquerading as civil libertarians” and that it had attacked liberal Muslims engaged in counter-extremism.

Such an expression, “Islamists”, hardly seems unfair when one considers that the leader of MEND, Azad Ali, has previously been accused of supporting the murder of British soldiers – a claim he sought to bring a defamation case against in court and failed, implying he does back the execution of our war heroes – and then they have the audacity to invite him to the mother of all parliaments on this very month, November, the period in which we commemorate those, including Jews, who gave so much for our freedom. The betrayal is blatant!

I rushed to get together volunteers to arrange a counter-protest by my organisation, the People’s Charter Foundation, which works closely with Eye On Anti-Semitism. After we completed our day-jobs, we made our way down to the Houses of Parliament, placards in hand, to voice our objection. We are proud of our Judeo-Christian heritage, and seek to protect our land from the threat of Islamofascism. For centuries, the Jewish people of London have integrated, speaking English, respecting local laws and customs, and as for if one follows a certain faith, one has that right, as per John Stuart Mill’s writings on freedom of expression, if they do so peacefully.

Present at the MEND counter-protest, that all mainstream media ignored, was Cliff Dixon, formerly of UKIP, who pointed out that MEND has a problem with Jews. This was in line with the words of Jennifer Gerber, director of Labour Friends of Israel, who said that it was “utterly unacceptable” that Mr Corbyn “chose to attend an event organised by a group which has repeatedly peddled myths about the power of the ‘Israeli lobby’ that play into classic antisemitic tropes”. Further, Marie Van der Zyl, vice president of the Board of Deputies, has stated: “Mend is not an organisation we can work with.”

MPs from the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and the SNP had been listed as speakers at the MEND event, but suddenly withdrew when concerns were brought to their attention. Tory MP Anna Soubry stated that the organisation do not “have the best of reputations”, while another Tory, Crispin Blunt, the Liberal Democrat’s Sir Ed Davey, and the SNP’s Joanna Cherry, all had an attack of conscience as they issued a statement stating: “It has become clear there is controversy over MEND’s record and claims of links between the organisation and extremist views”.

Labour did not cancel plans to attend, but proceeded. Ms Gerber said: “Mr Corbyn’s appearance at this event, and his refusal to attend tonight’s dinner once again suggests that he is more interested in attacking Israel than furthering the cause of dialogue, peace and reconciliation.” Is there any reason that Labour would want to attack the Jewish people?

In an article called “How influential was the Muslim vote?”, the organisation MEND boasts of being able to move the Islamic community to vote for who it chooses. Surfyan Ismail, MEND’s former chief executive, boasted – during a talk at the Zakariyya Central Mosque in Bolton – of influencing up to 30 seats at the election, and acting as ‘kingmaker’. “Anybody who can give any one party 10, 20, 30 seats, like we can, they have to listen to you.” It is blatantly obvious why a political party, especially that in opposition, would be drawn to a group that claims to be able to gain them thirty or so seats – enough to have changed the result of the last general election. It would seem that Labour has betrayed the Jewish people, for decades core supporters, simply for a few votes, for power.

Therefore, in conclusion, I have the thoughts: firstly, the need to awaken to the fact that Labour no longer befits its name, but has turned its back on the people of this land, and on our tradition of liberty. Second, the need more than ever for all people of Britain to stand together, Jew or Gentile, against the scourge of Islamofascism, or the frequency of terror attacks will rise. The extremists have caused such pain and destruction to the West Bank, with the need for the Iron Dome for protection, for survival – let’s not allow them to do the same in Britain too!

Airhead Fairhead’s Bid For London to Lead Islamic Banking

in Islamism by

Former BBC Chair, now International Development Minister, Baroness Fairhead, is leading a Government bid to turn London into the world’s Islamic banking centre.

Outside of the Middle East, London presently leads the world in developing Islamic finance schemes. It has double the amount of Islamic financial institutions than America, and dwarfs France and Germany in this specialism.
Britain is “perfectly placed” to be an Islamic finance hub, claimed the minister at a recent industry conference in London.

The Islamic Insurance Association of London say: “With the Islamic nations of Asia and MENA now amongst the world’s biggest economic success stories there is a real need for the provision of transparent and trusted Shariah compliant commercial insurance and risk products.”

Do you believe that London should be the number one base for Islamic finance? Yes or No?

 

The Left Are Upping The Ante

in Brexit/Islamism by

Recently, the sentiment of the British people has been changing, noticeably so. There has been the peaceful march by the Football Lads Alliance (FLA). It was attended by 73,000 people and the BBC decided not to report on it – so they are taking part in another one outside Broadcasting House on November 5th. The Chartists movement protested against both Labour inviting MEND to Parliament, and against BBC bias. Some UKIP members have spoken out on the dangers of Islamism, and also Anne Marie Waters has formed a new political party (For Britain). Tommy Robinson and others, including MBGA News, have campaigned for the CPS to review the case of Chelsey, a victim of a Islamist grooming gang in Sunderland. There have been some other well attended events too.

These have been populated not by chanting blackshirts, harking back to the glories of 1939 and the Reich, but by ordinary working-class people frustrated by a surge in crime and terrorism. Mothers, fathers, young people who feel the job market is becoming overcrowded and are unable to get work. They are being undercut by migrants, who may be nice people but who will work for substantially less, undercutting the minimum wage. The future is beginning to look bleak. Parts of Britain are becoming no-go zones after dark, with a knife or a ‘sharp’ used in an assault approximately every 14 minutes.

Some have lost friends and family, or know people who have, to the terrorist incidents that are happening with alarming regularity. Suspects are arrested and then released without charge. Others have daughters who are victims of the grooming gangs. In Rotherham alone there were 1400 victims. As if that wasn’t bad enough, parents who tried to intervene were arrested for breach of the peace!

The people of Britain are demanding something more than sound bites and platitudes and some media coverage would be welcome.

Cue ITV. On November 9th ITV are airing a programme called Exposure. Not to expose the grooming gangs, and not to address the woes of our young who are struggling. The show’s tagline is “Inside Britain’s New Far Right”!

Between June and October 2017 an undercover reporter has taken video footage and audio recordings of Anne Marie Waters and the FLA in a number of pubs. Here is a copy of the correspondence the producers have given to AMW: Here

It can be seen that they are also bringing in two ‘experts’ on extremism. One is Nick Lowles and the other Matthew Collins. The former is CEO of Hope Not Hate (HNH), formerly Searchlight the anti-fascist group who benefit from government and Soros funding, and the latter is an alleged ex-BNP mole who also works for Searchlight/HNH.

Hope Not Hate have a very welcoming name and an even nicer logo, of a stylised sun. But they are not impartial. In fact the CEO was allegedly no platformed by the National Union of Students last year, so that’s not exactly a glowing endorsement. In January they will be joined by Matthew MacGregor. He was the digital attack guru for Barack Obama in 2012 and was tasked with discrediting Mitt Romney.

That is all well and good. But where are the fascists? Where are the Nazis? They are not at these meetings or marches. No, ordinary people are there. That is all.

The fact that ordinary people are not accepting the platitudes and lies is evident. What is also evident is that the left of centre and hard left who not only are in positions of power but also control a large section of the media are upping the ante.

And in the New Year I think we will see more concerted action to stifle debate. Is that not what happened in 1939? The difference this time is that it is the ones who shout loudest who are the Anti-fascists, who are a direct descendant of Roter Kampferbund, and the real threat to peace, to democracy, to liberty!

Good bye! MGBA News is shutting down?

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit/Islamism/Student Politics by

OFFICIAL STATEMENT:
It is with great regret and pain that today we must announce that we are closing down both the People’s Charter Foundation and MBGA News, due to the BuzzFeed exposé of our activities.

https://medium.com/@etheridgegeoffrey/rise-of-the-eton-edl-the-toffs-behind-britains-new-hard-right-28b91a467cd8

We are incredibly ashamed and will promptly apologise after having been called out for being “intelligent” rather then relying merely on “emotion”. We understand a well-deserved holiday to the gulag awaits us for “misleading” “the working class”, by sharing facts, the truth – because, of course, the people shouldn’t make a decision but leave such to a stuck-up out-of-touch liberal professor in his ivory tower!

Therefore, all of the People’s Charter Foundation team will present themselves to the police this morning for the crime of “weaponised intellect”, once we find out which statute is relevant (clue: none!) Being smarter than a libtard is not a crime!

To be frankly honest, we thank you for all your support over the last 18 months or so, but we don’t see how we can continue after this damning BuzzFeed exposé of us, that is so weak, so desperate, that THEY deleted it! The author even spelt three people’s names wrong – incredible journalism indeed – Frankie Rudolph, and Timothy Harris do not even exist!

We must certainly be doing something wrong if whiny snowflakes call us a “threat” and “demoralising” to Marxism – we confess, the whole purpose of the People’s Charter Foundation is to weaken Marxism, and hence we’ve opposed the BBC, the EU, Anglophobia, and Islamomarxism.

Both this BuzzFeed piece and Soros-funded HopeNotHate have stated we are probably “may not be racist”. However, this hit-piece points out that we are not anti-Semitic, which makes us incompatible with “neo-liberal progressive homogeny”. Basically, the left are the actual racists!

Ps. Luke’s interest is ju-jitsu (paintball, yes, and also bushcraft), not karate. Real men are interested in such things!

Ps2. As for comments on our associates, since when has serving in the army been a crime? Wear a poppy Geoffrey you creep! Oh sorry, the left would abolish the military.

Ps3. As for claims Russia backs us, they must have forgotten to send the cheque – if they really did back us, our organisation would be ten times noisier. There would be even larger patriotic counter-protests to your Anglophobic events and organisations, thousands, not hundreds, of protestors, and right-wing camera men would be EVERYWHERE the libtards look!

British Legion’s message to MBGA News

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism/Student Politics by

Here at MBGA News we very passionately support wearing the poppy each November to remember the brave heroes who made such sacrifice for our freedom! 

We were surprised to receive a tweet to us from British Legion this morning, thanking MBGA News for backing the poppy.

The video features a brave British soldier, of which we tweeted in response: “Thank you Harris Tatakis! A real hero. We salute you, sir! A fine example to young British men.”

This fine, beautiful tradition, this expression of remembrance is at threat as hard-left student groups and newspapers have made the unfair claim this important commemoration is supposedly a glorification of racism of the Empire – an absurd position when the poppy is most associated with brave sacrifice to quash the vile racist bigot Hitler during WW2.

This is of concern as those who push such negativity are close to and influence a major political party. Moreover, the poppy has been derided, even war memorials attacked, by those who oppose the Iraqi war, or even back jihad – murder of our soldiers.

Tweet by British Legion: http://archive.is/ztpNz

British court deems jihadi a good mother; no jail

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Farhana Ahmed, 40, from north-west London, who encouraged terror attacks on Facebook has been spared jail after a judge told her, “the sooner you get back to your children the better”. Meanwhile, dare you even post an intellectual criticism of a religious ideology, for fear Sadiq Khan’s thought-police will chuck you in the gulag!

After she pleaded guilty to the serious crimes of encouraging terrorism and three counts of disseminating documents, judge Christopher Moss QC sentenced her to a suspended term of two years, meaning she is free to walk the streets. These documents she distributed are the kind that inspired recent attacks on Parliament and in Manchester.

The judge was “moved” by a letter from her eldest son and told Ahmed: “In your exceptional case, the sooner you are returned to your children, the better for all concerned.” Why do his heart strings not tug for the little girls murdered in Manchester? We should not be surprised after the media and police silence over the horrific racist attack on little white girls in Rotherham.

Alone you are not powerful! Time for Team Britain

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit/Islamism/Student Politics by

Have you ever been stung by a bee? It hurt, didn’t it? But few run in fear from a bee. They swat it. Even kill it. You are not powerful alone!

But what if those bees work together as a swarm, flying right at you? Even the bravest such as Winnie the Pooh would run for cover. Now, imagine all those red pilled individuals working in harmony, as a swarm of patriots! An unstoppable force! TEAM WORK! Team Britain!

Stop the infighting! Of course, sensible strategies must be kept to, genuine racists avoided, bogus campaigns dismissed, and the law respected, but this isn’t the cause of the right’s lack of team work.

Enough of this constant drama from attention whores hovering around political circles desperate for a power trip! Supposed right-wingers punching patriots, doxxing others, writing crap online, threatening to sue hardworking patriots where no grounds, asking Antifa to attack patriots, …and even a Facebook group by a Gatehouse Institute writer where the members discuss killing me because I campaign AGAINST terrorism. No wonder the globalists keep winning!

The establishment doesn’t need to even pursue the “divide and conquer” strategy, because there is no unity! There are hundreds of groups, many with no strategy or output whatsoever, and some from overseas with undeclared backers. Too many do little except for backstabbing of others rather than show courage to challenge the Marxists.

Bury the egos, keep WITHIN (but to the right edge of) the Overton window, and focus on stopping globalism.

Coutts bank funded ITV journo Hazel infiltrated UKIP, For Britain, and Generation Identitaire

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Let’s also not overlook Hardcash’s £142,000 loan from Coutts (the Queen’s bank). Why is Coutts funding a hypocritical documentary against counter-jihad, featuring as experts hard-left Marxist ex-BNP HopeNotHate leaders?

Multiple sources, including two prominent UKIP members, claim that Hardcash Productions, headed by a David Henshaw has employed an undercover blonde journalist going by the name of ”Hazel Brown” to ‘expose the far right’ for a documentary called ‘Exposure’ due to air on 9th November. It is claimed that she has infiltrated Génération Identitaire, and UK Independence Party (UKIP) / For Britain meetings featuring Anne-Marie Waters.

(Above: David Henshaw)

Paula Boddington who was at the FLA march (she is a doctor of philosophy specialising in ethics and AI at Oxford University) wrote this earlier today: EXCLUSIVE: UK’s ITV Secretly Records Patriotic Britons, Desperate Smear, Defames Them as “Far Right” @ITV – Geller Report

UKIP members claim “Hazel” was also at the UKIP leadership hustings in London and at the Traditional Britain Group Conference on October 21st. A prominent UKIP member, who does not wish to be named, said that the blonde reporter for ITV, going by the name Hazel, infiltrated Anne-Marie Waters’ For Britain meetings.

(Is this the left-wing spy Hazel Brown who has been infiltrating right-wing groups for an upcoming ITV documentary on the “far right”?)

We presume ITV’s intention is to produce a documentary making claim that a white / neo-Nazi nationalist force is arising in Britain, though we expect they will remain silent on the inherently white supremacist nature of the EU’s free movement rules that have similarities to the notorious “white Australia” policy, or the fact Labour is surely riddled with anti-Semitism if it needed to pass a conference motion to eliminate such bigotry.

An independent journalist Peter Imanuelsen claims the documentary will feature Jack Buckby, a former BNP conference speaker, who has attacked the independent Norway-based journalist. Considering Buckby’s multiple rude, childish attacks on us here at MBGA News, on Farage, and others, and his negative remarks regards black people, we won’t be crying a tear for him.

Activist “Red Pill Phil” and other sources said the documentary features Anne-Marie Waters and Tommy Robinson, who we believe are not racists. It would seem that ITV fear an increase in criticism of Sharia law. A source claims that according to a ‘right to response’ letter Henshaw sent to one of the individuals on Friday, his concern is to expose ”the growth of the so-called ‘counter-Jihad’ movement” which he says is ”as extreme as the ideas and actions promoted by traditionally racist and anti- Semitic groups and individuals on the far right”.

If you look in any group, left or right, some idiots always pop up spurting some racist nonsense, but such should not be taken to represent the whole – rather the constitution of the group, the views of the leaders, and so on, should be taken into consideration. The majority of patriotic people are kind, well-meaning individuals, and as always we in the Chartists movement call for the political right to purge any of the few real bigots who seek to hijack our beautiful love of Britain for their own selfish purposes.

(Left: Hazel Brown)

Essentially it would seem that Henshaw is a COMPLETE AND UTTER HYPOCRITE as his production company Hardcash Productions produced, to use his own words, a ”counter Jihad” programme Undercover Mosque 10 years ago.

The Guardian article covering the story states, ”the programme, which took nine months to make, went undercover in several mosques in the Midlands and showed examples of preachers calling for homosexuals to be killed, espousing male supremacy, condemning non-Muslims and predicting jihad”

Henshaw was investigated by ”the West Midlands police and a Crown Prosecution Service lawyer who was quoted in a joint press release accusing Hardcash Productions of “completely distorting” what some of the preachers were saying.”

Although Hardcash was acquitted by the regulator Ofcom he said, and I quote from him in the Guardian article: ”I am very very angry” and “I really don’t like the libel courts and believe in a world of free comment.’

Sources claim Henshaw says in his letter that the ITV programme ”will also feature comment from two experts on extremism, terrorism and race and religious hate crime – Nick Lowles and Matthew Collins of Hope Not Hate”.

“Red Pill Phil” claims to have seen a transcript featuring blog HopeNotHate’s “documented” details of the actions of the Generation Identitaire UK leader, and remarks made. “Red Pill Phil” also says he believes there is bias in the approach, and also questions why the writers behind the blog HopeNotHate do not pursue racists on the left – an organisation which it seems only targets anyone who criticises globalism.

In fact, when that organisation posted me on a watch list, they placed a caveat that I’m probably not a racist (probably for fear that I’d sue them, because I’m not bigoted), which means it was incredibly misleading to place those who love our culture on a list beside actual white supremacists. My crime? To criticise Islamofascism: terrorism, FGM, and child rape. The blog HopeNoteHate is run by hypocrites considering their leader Nick Lowles was allegedly “no-platformed” by the National Union of Students (NUS) on the grounds he is “Islamophobic.”

(Above: According to the National Union of Students, HopeNoteHate are run by an Islamophobe who is so dangerous he had to be banned from speaking)

Nick Lowles supported an ex-BNP candidate over a UKIP candidate. On his blog Hope not Hate, Nick Lowles wrote: “Former BNP councillor, turned Independent, Paul Cromie, has fought off a strong challenge from UKIP in his Queensbury ward, in Bradford. Well done Paul!” Both Lowles and his associate Matthew Collier are thoroughly nasty far left Marxist individuals generally speaking.

(Above: Nick Lowles)

 

Martin Sellner of Generation Identitaire is alleged to have been a member of a “far right” group as a teenager, but then HopeNotHate’s Matthew Collier is an ex-BNP volunteer and National Front leader.

The Saudi-owned Independent says, “For six years, Collins was himself at the heart of far-right groups in the UK: the south London organiser of the National Front (NF), a close confidant of the leadership and seen by some as a potential future leader of the party. He was also a volunteer at the British National Party’s (BNP) head office and active on the streets with the violent neo-Nazi street fighters Combat 18, whose numbers one and eight stood for ‘A’ and ‘H’ after Adolf Hitler.”

(Above: ex-BNP Matthew Collier)

Imanuelsen also claims there have been attempts to honey trap activists.

We to date have not heard anything racist from Génération Identitaire, and our only concern, which we passed to them, was that their branch names implied Ulster should pass to Ireland – something now amended.  We prefer focus on the Anglosphere to their pan-Europeanism. They came across as a group of passionate young people concerned about enforcement of UN laws on refugees. However, supposedly ITV’s undercover operative has captured “far right” comments on video.

Of course, when the fake news establishment media calls someone “far right”, it has to be taken with a massive pinch, hell, a bucket, of salt. However, Imanuelsen, who admits he has himself made and retracted inappropriate remarks in the past (remarks we certainly do not endorse), has said the UK leader of Generation Identitaire, Jordan, made “discriminatory” comments of “12” on a scale of 1 to 10. “Red Pill Phil” who was shown the transcript has stated the remarks were unacceptable.

Whatever these remarks were, I will make again our call to for zero tolerance for the racial nationalism that some seek to use the right as a vehicle for talk of a homogenously white state by persons such as Tara McCarthy stands at contrast to real conservatives such as ourselves.

While not “jus soli” “magic dirt” civic nationalists, we do believe migrants who adopt our culture, who speak our languages, who live by our laws, and who love our nation, can certainly be adopted into the tribe. We greatly admire and respect, and would sooner have as a friend and neighbour, people like David Kurten AM, who appreciates our heritage, than a white Marxist like Jeremy Corbyn.

(Above: Hazel Brown – to her left: Anne-Marie Waters)

(Above: Hazel Brown at Football Lads Alliance march)

Muslim men: The invisible victims of Islamist intolerance

in Islamism by

As Britain entered the month of October, a fifteen year-old boy was left fighting for his life after being stabbed in the head outside a mosque in Birmingham. The mosque leaders described the horrific attack as “racially motivated”.

But this wasn’t the typical far-right racist that the left-wing media would sensationalise. Although police stated it wasn’t terror-related, an elder at the Maarif-e-Islam Hussainia Mosque said the attack was ISIS-inspired and by a Islamofascist from a rival Muslim sect.

When debunking the myth that Islamist terrorism is caused entirely by Western foreign policy, it’s often brought up that Sunni and Shia Muslims have been fighting each other for 1,400 years – violence began when the two sects formed immediately after the death of Prophet Mohammed – but it’s sadly somewhat overlooked when a Shia is almost killed by a Sunni in this country.

This Muslim-on-Muslim violence in Birmingham shouldn’t surprise anyone. Tarik Chadilioui, a Birmingham-based imam is currently facing extradition, charged with supporting ISIS. The Islamic State has been accused of ethnic cleansing with hundreds of innocent Shia prisoners executed and hate preachers who defend these crimes against humanity may well have been spewing their hate on our streets. This poor Muslim boy, Syed Hassan Abbas, and his family have paid the price for it.

Muslim-on-Muslim murder in the name of Allah has been largely overlooked in the UK. In March last year, an Ahmadiyya shopkeeper was stabbed thirty times and kicked to death by a Sunni militant from Bradford shouting “Allah is the only one!” then “Praise for Prophet Mohammed, there is only one prophet.” Why? The kind shopkeeper’s last Facebook post read “Good Friday and a very happy Easter especially to my beloved Christian nation X”. His name was Asad Shah.

Where was the outrage? When Lee Rigby was murdered, thousands took to the streets to confront Islamofascism. Asad Shah was killed because he loved this country. Just hours before his death, he made a video about the response he received and warned that radical Islam “needs to be nipped in the bud”. He was a British patriot and deserves recognition and respect.

When we think of Rochdale, we think of the rape of a generation of children. We forget the terrorist attack. In February 2016, a respected imam, Jalal Uddin, was beaten to death by ISIS supporters. The quiet, but popular old man was killed with a hammer in an attack “borne of hatred and intolerance”.

The terrorists, Mohammed Hussain Syeedy, 22, and Mohammed Abdul Kadir, 24, accused the imam of practising “black magic” for following an Islamic superstition called Ruqyah healing. It’s punished with death in the Islamic State and was punished with death in the United Kingdom.

This fringe lunacy enables extremism. But it’s been normalised. When questioned by Richard Dawkins, Medhi Hasan, journalist and go-to “moderate Muslim” for left-wing media, insisted that Prophet Mohammed went to heaven on a flying horse. If a moderate Christian or Hindu were confronted with something like this, they’d probably call it a metaphor or lost in translation – if not, they’d be considered hard-line and pious. Are our expectations of the Quran so low, we consider advocates moderate simply for not being terrorists? Atheists should challenge and mock any ridiculous ideas and Muslim leaders who want to reside in the West should do more to discourage their followers from reading scripture so literally.

Then there was the Bangladeshi Muslim man who died in Luton in a suspected honour killing after a relationship with a Hindu girl, Ahmed Mohammed Ibrahim who was beaten to death in Liverpool at 17 for drinking alcohol and the seven year-old boy beaten by his mother for failing to memorise verses from the Qur’an. The child died in his home in Cardiff.

When we think of Muslims being the first victims of Islamofascism, we see Muslim women, the girls subjected to FGM. We rarely think about the abuse and persecution sometimes faced by Muslim men from their communities. At demonstrations, I’ve met ex-Muslims who can no longer see their families and reformists demonised around mosques, sometimes for their views, other times simply for the colour of their skin.

Not only that, but when Muslim boys are exposed to radical ideas, the first victims will be their childhoods. In numerous documentaries, hidden camera footage has exposed teachers in Islamic schools beating their pupils. This is where the seeds of hatred can be planted, ensuring these boys grow up spiteful and angry, to dream of Jihad.

These innocent men have been overlooked for too long. We need to stand up for Muslim men from the more peaceful sects, the westernised Muslims who accept British law as SUPREME, and find common ground with the reformists who expose the hateful teachings that produce jihadist terrorists and hear what solutions they have to offer. This would not only help a section of the Muslim community often ignored but would help us ditch the “far right” label once and for all.

How The Left And The Media Hijack The Islamist Narrative.

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism/World News by

On 22nd May, 2017, a 22 year old jihadist named Salman Abedi wandered into the Manchester Arena during a concert populated primarily by young teens and their parents, and detonated a suicide bomb, killing 22 people including an 8 year old girl, and injuring approximately 120 others. This was the deadliest terror attack on the UK, the other notable one being the 52 commuters killed in the London transport attacks of 2005.

We are often told that we should defy the terrorists by simply carrying on as normal.

The fact that the two deadliest attacks upon the UK in recent memory were at the hands of Islamist terrorists is not simply pub trivia.

When the apologists for Islamofascism get bored of claiming that jihadists are lying about their religious motivations, (“It is nothing to do with Islam” may sound familiar at this point) they invariably engage in the exercise of throwing around skewed data to minimise the danger posed by Islamist terror.

In the now not uncommon event of an Islamist jihadi slaughtering a crowd of innocent people, articles and tweets lying about the remote likelihood of this happening to you, instantaneously begin to surface. Each of these claims are variations on the theme that right-wing or far-right terrorism poses a greater danger than Islamofascist terrorism, and they are based on several studies which attempt to make the same claims.

Since the attacks on September 11, 2001, nearly twice as many Americans have been killed by non-Muslim extremists than by jihadists,” insists this MSNBC article based on this report by research centre New America.

This article was published in the summer of 2015. And whilst the information contained within it is frozen in time, the source report that it cites is not. The report has since been updated, and so anyone citing the article now, is citing statistics that do not include the 49 Orlando clubbers murdered the following year by ISIS-inspired gunman Omar Mateen in the deadliest mass shooting in American history. The updated statistics which now include this attack, along with other attacks in 2016, show that deaths from jihadist terror attacks in the US are now almost double those attributable to far-right terrorists.

The practice of quoting outdated figures to further a false narrative is a common ruse.

John Sexton of Breitbart notes, the numbers here ostensibly focus on the threat to Americans, but do not take Americans killed abroad by Islamist terrorists into account. The beheading of Daniel Pearl by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the 7 Americans killed in the 2002 Bali Bombing, the 6 Americans killed in the 2008 Mumbai attacks, the 4 Americans killed in the 2016 Brussels bombings, the American killed in the Zamboanga City bombing, the American killed in the 2015 Bamako hotel attack, the 22 year old American student killed in the 2015 Paris attacks, for example, are all absent from these figures. Nor do the figures take into account the number of Islamofascist plots foiled as a result of the asymmetric counter-terrorism focus placed upon jihadism as a result of 9/11. As former counter-terrorism analyst Daryl Johnson acknowledges:

The U.S. government currently employs hundreds of analysts focused on Islamic extremism, but only a couple dozen who monitor domestic terror.

Fortunately I didn’t need to undertake a great deal of arduous research to find this quote. Why? Because it’s mentioned in the very same report (MSNBC) that is routinely circulated as proof that Islamic terrorism is essentially a non-issue in comparison to “far-right” terrorism.

But surely, the most blatant and deliberate skewing of the numbers here is in the fact that the biggest terror attack in the history of the United States is discounted by beginning the tally on 12th September 2001.

Florida State College Professor Andrew Holt issued a statement debunking this  and the methods it uses. In it he points out that if one were to start the clock a day earlier and therefore include the approximately three thousand innocent lives taken on 9/11, then “there have been around 62 people killed in the United States by Islamic extremists for every one American killed by a right wing terrorist.”

Also, the proportionality of terror attacks attributable to Islamist extremism does not factor in the scarcity of Muslims in western population.

Muslim adults comprise less than 1% of the U.S population, and yet according to data, persons claiming to follow Islam are responsible for a whopping 27% of the terrorism in that country. This is a significant over-representation among such a tiny minority and, as expected, is completely overlooked in this report. 5.2% in the UK are Muslim and yet those claiming to be of said faith have been responsible for 316 woundings or deaths since 2000. In Europe since 2004 the figure is 5103. This figure is starkly drawn into relief when we note that this violence said by perpetrators to be from, or inspired by, the Qur’an, and the Qur’an alone.

The number of “far-right”, Jewish or Christian inspired attacks is currently zero. That figure is unlikely to change any time soon.

And the next time you are confronted by someone claiming that “far-right terrorism” (or some variation of) is a greater threat than Islamofascist terrorism, they will be citing a report or article that contains most, if not all, of the below errors:

  • A tally which starts after the biggest terror attack committed on U.S. soil.
  • A tally which ends before the deadliest mass shooting on U.S. soil. (Both of these attacks were committed by jihadists.)
  • A tally which fails to include certain other jihadist and right-wing attacks.
  • A tally which misreports certain attacks as “right-wing” or “far-right”.
  • A report which fails to include figures for Americans killed abroad.
  • A report which ignores foiled plots.
  • A report which ignores the number of non-fatal casualties.
  • A report which is not calibrated to consider the disproportionate focus of counter-terror analysis on Islamist terrorism.
  • A report which is not calibrated to consider the disproportionate number of attacks by Islamofascists in relation to Muslim’s lack of prevalence as a minority group.
  • A report which conflates several disparate ideological motivations for non-Islamic terrorism by lumping them all into the “far-right” bracket.
  • A report which ignores all terror attacks outside of the United States.

This narrow focus on terrorism committed within Western borders is particularly galling. According to the 2015 Global Terrorism Index, only 2.6 percent of terror-related deaths occur in the West (for accuracy, this figure includes the September 11th attacks.) Furthermore, just 4 groups (Islamic State, Boko Haram, the Taliban, and al Qaeda) were responsible for 74% of the world’s terror related deaths in 2015 — and Islamic State and Boko Haram were responsible for over half of the world’s terrorism fatalities between them.

Ironically, those of us concerned about the global impacts of Islamism are routinely accused of xenophobia and bigotry by the very same people who demand that we measure this threat by ignoring Islamist terrorism in foreign states. They seem to be arguing that as long as jihadism is negligible in the West then it’s as though the threat to “foreigners” in the rest of the world is of no concern. That sounds a lot like bigotry and xenophobia to me.

None of this is to say that far-right terrorism is not an issue. But the prevalence and threat of Islamist terrorism is a perfectly legitimate area of concern and focus in its own right. Particularly, one would think, in the immediate aftermath of an Islamist inspired bloodbath.

And this insistence on changing the subject to the far-right in response to it is not dissimilar to mounting a sustained campaign of vocal objection to cancer research on the basis that diabetes kills people too. It’s a textbook example of ‘Yes but whatabout’.

Many well-meaning people have been taken in by these reports, seemingly due to a legitimate concern over a general increase in far-right sentiment. However, their circulation and citation by Islamism apologists is a deliberate attempt to limit the problem of Islamofascism solely to terrorism, then to further limit it to terrorism on Western soil, and then to dismiss even that concern with deceitful nonsense.

Scarcely a few hours after a Muslim refugee in Stockholm ploughed a truck through crowds of pedestrians killing 5 people including an 11 year old girl who was literally ripped in half, and injuring 15 others, The Irish Times published an article worrying about how this ISIS inspired butchery would be used as political capital by the Swedish far-right.

Immediately hijacking any conversation on the detrimental impacts of Islamism as an ideology, and redirecting it towards the likes of Anders Breivik and Thomas Mair is often intended not only to whitewash the global phenomenon of Islamist terrorism, but also to divert focus away from Islam entirely.

It’s like saying right wing ideology causes someone to be a Nazi, but this argument is not extended to Islamofascism. You will often hear the ‘Nothing to do with Islam’ chant, usually after an attack.

There are other parts of the Qur’an to be considered in this as well as jihad and terrorism. This will include Female Genital Mutilation, honour killing, blasphemy, the persecution of the LBGT community, the subjugation of women, and the grooming and sexual exploitation of children, Rotherham being just one case in point.

It is simply a fact that Islamist terrorism is currently the deadliest form of terrorism on the global stage: whether they are Bangladeshi secularists pulled apart by Islamofascists’ blades, whether they are French cartoonists gunned down for defying Sharia blasphemy laws, whether they are Pakistani Sufis incinerated in Lahore for being the wrong kind of Muslims, or whether they are British children blown to pieces and lacerated by shrapnel in a Manchester concert hall.

As if to underscore this, The Telegraph ran the story  here on 26th October of Madihah Taheer, who bought her husband to be a wedding gift of a hunting knife and a plastic dummy so he could practice for killing the so called ‘right wing’ columnist Katie Hopkins!  The groom to be wanted to stab someone 27 times. I wonder if Katie Hopkins would be accused of Islamophobia here.

Almost as if to justify the narrative, in the same week the alleged head of the proscribed organisation National Action Christopher Lythgoe has been charged with ‘encouragement to commit murder’ of a Labour MP. As far as I know he is the only member of the far right to be charged with such, which is dwarfed by the relentless Islamic threat.

It is obvious which ideology presents the greatest problem.

 

STOP! Listen to the people, or the Islamofascists will win

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism/Uncategorized by

In the days since the UKIP leadership result was announced, much frustration has been voiced by the supporters of John Rees Evans and Anne Marie Waters, with the former leaving the party, and second saying she is “not sure” whether to stay.

There are even claims that the election was rigged, even suggestions that ballot boxes were stolen, though despite Henry Bolton OBE being a surprising result to many, including myself, not one person has managed to furnish us with evidence to back up these allegations of foul play. Moreover, if one is to criticise Remoaners as undemocratic for rejecting the result of the EU referendum, or if one is to oppose the totalitarianism of Islamofascism, one can not then deny the will of the members of UKIP who have clearly voted for Bolton. He has the right to wear that crown.

Concerns have been expressed in the Twittersphere regards Bolton’s dropping of UKIP’s policy of an immigration cap. Further, supporters of AMW question if he will share their position on Islam. I would have preferred Kurten take the helm, but the people have spoken, the election has happened. MBGA News will humbly continue drawing attention to the dangers of cultural Marxism, knowing the time will come when Britain will elect either David or someone similar.

Further, whatever political idea you wish to promote, I am going to leave here a thought. Some people no doubt will reject it without due consideration of merit, hurling insults, perhaps those on social media who think they will catch me out. However, the point I make remains valid.

I will tell you a story. A family is away for the weekend in North Wales, seeking to climb Mount Snowdon. The ages and abilities vary. There are the frail but wise grandparents. The teenager who often hits the gym. The little baby. This is the British family on a journey to our future.

Now, would an energetic teenager be well positioned to lead the party if he, map in arm, was to charge off quickly up the mountain past, disappearing off into the distance? The majority left behind would come to a fork in the path and without the map, not know which direction to proceed. With this approach, each at their own pace, the party would soon separate and fail. This is a failing in team-work.

We are a nation brainwashed by fake news of the BBC news and other culturally Marxist outlets. Universities have propagated postmodernist cancer. To those few who swallowed a red pill and are awake, do not expect others to immediately see what you do. Whether you believe in God or not, the account of Christ’s patience with his followers as they learnt his principles should humble us all.

I really feel there is too much needless drama, egos, which effectively seal defeat, because the Marxists would seek to “divide and conquer” but they find the former already accomplished. As a young man, in my early twenties, assigned to a project associated with the MOD, part of my training was to be led up a mountain, in heavy rain, along thin ledges, with deep drops, and then to be left with just a map, compass, and the instruction to get our team back to base before dusk. Egos were certainly bruised but back we made it as one team; all of us. I see correlation here to our struggle for survival as a nation.

From this experience and many other hiking and camping trips, including in the South African jungle, I know that, and this is the IMPORTANT point, a good leader only moves as fast as the slowest in his team is able. You do not leave even one man behind. If we ignore this, the jihadis will win.

There is a need to recognise where the people are, their concerns, their fears – here the Overton window is relevant: the ideas the electorate are open to. Clearly even the majority of UKIP members, while certainly concerned about terrorism, were not open to the concept of an anti-Islam party, so whatever speculations there be on the future, the broader electorate certainly is not so inclined. Otherwise, Britain First or Liberty GB would be in Parliament.

The nation is certainly very distressed by FGM, child rape gangs, and Islamofascist terrorism, and we are prepared to vote for change, even protest. In fact, we, the good people of Britain are yearning for someone to push their concerns, to be our voice, as due to the politically correct climate many are silent with fear of loss of the very employment from which they feed their families. However, understandably the people of Britain strongly support human rights, including freedom of religion, which is enshrined in English/Scottish law, in our “Constitution” as such. Therefore, the message that would appeal is that which opposes those specific Islamist acts, the indirect result of which very likely would be an effective ban on various non-peaceful extremist religious sects.

I have often said I fear England will cease to exist in my lifetime, and of course, the orienteering party must reach the end before the darkness sets in, but remember that phrase, “less haste, more pace”. In these urgent times, may we not forget that people hate, even resist, change. I hope that when the day comes that history of these times is studied, they do not say we were too stubborn to work with the people and their voice.

STOP using a sledgehammer! Whatever political idea you seek to push, think of crossing a wide river, from the current political circumstances to where you want Britain to be in say 5 years – will you make an energetic run and fail as you splash into the water, or will you find stepping stones? Of course I make edgy comments, but the intent must be to push the Overton window, and not to make some impossible attempt to leap beyond it. What a waste of time, money and energy that would be!

To those who wish to win this culture war, our message must reflect the position of the people and the law of the land – “We firmly support freedom of religion, and the role of Christianity in making us the greatest culture in the history of humankind, with a fine moral code that must be defended – religion may only practised subject to British law, and it is not racist but right, ethical, proper, noble, inherently British, and in this Marxist climate, rare, courageous, and valiant, to demand that those laws be consistently and firmly enforced against FGM, child rape, and terrorism, whatever be the religion or race of the criminal.”

This approach, well presented by David Kurten, may perhaps not be all that the supporters of Anne Marie Waters want, but it does not conflict with their desires, and is a move in the direction they wish, while more significantly, it would draw broad support of most Britain. This is the ONLY way we will stop Islamofascism!

Thus in conclusion, the fact that only four years ago Bolton left the most ardently pro-Brussels party, the Liberal Democrats, remains a concern to me, because unlike the Tories or Labour, the yellows do not have a strong history of struggle between Eurosceptic and Europhillic factions, but are thoroughly globalistic.

However, if Bolton follows through with his proposal of Kurten as deputy, and members unite, rather than splinter off, UKIP will have certain purpose as it will rise in this time of uncertainty over Brexit, as a courageous lion to roar, to defend our culture, to hold Theresa’s feet to the fire.

Sixth terror attack on London! We must stand against political correctness.

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Saturday we assembled in London to speak out against violence. Many people, afraid to speak out, crippled by political correctness, would sooner lie that we are Nazis, though my speech clearly featured the phrase “We hate Nazis”. We stood for one thing only: peace. We have had enough of the terrorism, the FGM, and “grooming” gangs.

That very night, there was another terror attack on London. Six people were injured in a massive acid attack after a gang of men sprayed a noxious substance. How many more of our people must be injured, raped, and killed before we say, enough is enough?

Those who did not join us on the 23rd to march for freedom should hang their heads low in shame! You would forsake your own nation, your people, for fear of social stigma.

Enough of virtue signalling! It is time for the British people stand up! We must show that Saxon spirit that Rudyard Kipling spoke of! We must display the bravery of those men who perished on the shores of France at D-Day, the spirit of the Crusaders who shouted Deus Vult, the courage of those who defended these lands from Vikings and Romans. To hell with political correctness!

Witnesses described the panic in the moments after the mass attack as injured people hurried to wash their faces and limbs with water. Paramedics treated six people for injuries as one man repeatedly screamed ‘I can’t see’ in Stratford station.

MBGA update on the UKIP hustings

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit/Islamism by

The candidates for the UKIP leadership are as follows and a brief description shall be included.

Henry Bolton OBE:

Henry Bolton is a former diplomat, soldier, policeman and civil servant. Much of the earlier hustings have been based on Henry presenting himself as the most experienced political candidate. Mr Bolton is proposing a reform of the party structure and media presentation to present a cleaner, slicker image of UKIP. As a policy expert on the EU and borders Henry feels he will be the best candidate on the mainstream media. Henry has worked with many governments in Eastern Europe and as a commander of a strategic intelligence unit in Bosnia.

David Kurten AM:

A former chemistry teacher for 20 years, Mr Kurten is presenting himself as the social conservative candidate and opponent of cultural Marxism. As education spokesman David Kurten is focussing his campaign on education, cultural Marxism and social conservatism. David is one of the front-runners of this leadership race and has emerged as a popular figure among the hustings audiences. Kurten has received the endorsement of Arron Banks and Leave.EU. Mr Kurten has increased in confidence as the campaign has continued, particularly due to the popularity of his policies on transgender education and creating a self sufficient UK in skills.

John Rees-Evans:

John Rees-Evans is the direct democracy candidate and has increased in popularity as the hustings have continued. A passionate and erudite speaker, John had to enter a brief hiatus for personal reasons, however he has increased his presence with a slick media presentation, high production value content and detailed manifesto for reform. John proposes creating UKIP Connect to increase member contacts, UKIP media to create UKIP-made broadcasts and UKIP Direct to implement direct democracy among the membership. John is a former soldier and self-made businessman who has business interests in many different countries.

Anne Marie Waters:

One of the most controversial candidates in this leadership race, Anne Marie is outspoken on Islam and British society. All but one MEP (Stuart Agnew) has stated that they will resign if Anne Marie is elected leader. Anne Marie has been effective among members in the hustings and has increased in passion as the election has gone on. However Anne Marie has focussed on a narrow policy outlook and therefore may struggle to attract a broad enough swath of the UKIP membership. Anne Marie Waters has spoken of her support for the internment of Islamic terror suspects. Furthermore, Anne Marie believes that there needs to be a discussion on Islamic places of worship within Britain.

Joan Collins MEP:

Joan Collins is running as the unity candidate with three other UKIP figures as her deputies. Joan is presenting herself as the woman who can preside over reform of the party structure and grassroots activism. Joan has not performed brilliantly in the hustings and I do not believe that she will win the race.

Aiden Powlesland:

Aiden is wishing to reform UKIP’s finances to allow for a strong financial position for the party. He has been unpopular in the hustings practically since the inception of the race. This is due to his proposal that the membership fee should increase to 90 pounds. This has not resonated with the members at all. Mr Powlesland has not been rhetorically successful in the hustings at all. Furthermore Aiden has presented a short manifesto that is essentially a financial tax document. Therefore Aiden is unlikely to win this race.

Peter Whittle AM:

The current UKIP deputy leader, Peter Whittle is proposing a “vote for UKIP get UKIP” policy where no candidates step aside during elections. Whittle has been critical of aspects of Islam in the past but has refined his view since to a “one country one law” policy. Whittle opposes Sharia courts and is pushing for a one law for all policy to prevent second tier legal systems among ethnic minority communities. Whittle was weak in the initial hustings but has improved substantially and is perceived as a front-runner in this election. Whittle is experienced in all media due to his current prominent position within UKIP. Whittle wishes to own the immigration policy for UKIP and make it front and centre again.

Why do I recommend you vote for David Kurten?

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit/Islamism by

Why do I recommend people back David Kurten as UKIP leader, not Anne Marie Waters or John Rees Evans? Do not read my decision as hatred of other candidates. With his focus on internal management, I think JRE would be a fine party chair, and Bolton too, or an incredible spokesman, if it wasn’t for the fact that Henry accidentally(?) joined the LibDems, but Kurten has the right vision.

While I want certainly public dialogue on Sharia law to be opened, and campaign for such, and I will speak this month at a protest where I believe AMW is also speaking, I find that in a nation with such a strong belief in freedom of religion, more interest is shown by the public when we discuss Islamism, fundamentalist interpretation of the Qur’an and the Hadith, rather than simply Islam.

AMW is certainly brave, with some points I do agree on, and I feel that in the spirit of freedom of expression, we should be allowed to discuss concerns with Sharia law. However, her remarks are so intense that her campaign falls far outside the Overton window of public support, and such an approach will gain limited traction on a national scale so as to influence change. This is not to disregard all she says as worthless. However, while I know Trump is outspoken, this needs to be done strategically, and his remarks do reflect the silent majority, hence the publicity from media rage benefited him.

Moreover, I was surprised and far from impressed when I discovered the inclusion in AMW’s campaign of the former BNP youth leader and conference speaker, Jack Buckby. While as stated, I respect the need for dialogue on the dangers of Sharia law, and admire AMW’s courage, I strongly agree with UKIP’s ban on ex BNP leadership, because that party was overtly racist, calling for whites not to marry blacks, and ruined Brexit dialogue by trying to debate if the Holocaust happened. This makes healthy nationalism look bad, and will turn the public away from any policy to protect them from fundamentalist Islam.

Buckby, who has shared tweets saying not to have relationships with black people, has lashed out at Farage, myself, and others on Twitter, because we won’t work with him – it’s as absurd as suggesting Trump share a stage with David Duke. Then there was his flatmate calling for Antifa to target me. This is very low. I have recently discovered that Buckby registered AMW’s website, and then there is the fact that despite being a massive liability, a PR nightmare, he chaired her launch event. Such a lack of judgement is not what I want in a leader.

However, even these matters aside, there is a fundamental concern: no candidate but Kurten condemns cultural Marxism. We would never have joined the EU or tolerated mass migration, multiculturalism, or Sharia law, if the left had not intentionally eroded our culture. While AMW and Whittle are angry with Islam for its belief homosexuality is a sin, I don’t feel their anger towards Marxism: the problem that allows Sharia law to influence Britain.

JRE is a devout Christian, as is Jacob Rees-Mogg, which even as a cultural Christian who does not regularly attend church, I do greatly admire. Whether one believes in God or not, we cannot deny that these principles are part of what made Britain the finest civilisation in the world. However, JRE rarely speaks of faith or family, but of party management. Direct democracy is appealing to some, but what UKIP lacks post-referendum is an ideology. No one knows what it stands for.

His talk of internal procedures gives him a fine platform from which be a brilliant party chair, a role that Bolton may also be incredible at if he hadn’t been a LibDem, but the leader, their vision must openly address postmodernism. Kurten spoke with me of Orwell’s 1984, Brave The New World, free speech, the Frankfurt school, Praktischer Idealismus, and so forth! This man is awake! His manifesto hits the nail on the head!

Our battle first and foremost must be against the postmodernist Marxist attack on family, faith, and flag, but AMW is certainly not rightwing at all, but said to camera she is leftwing and supports the communist Labour Party. JRE doesn’t mention the problem of Marixsm, while Jane Collins, and Aidan, (who?), don’t seem to stand for anything at all. Kurten wants to protect our traditional values. We must regain our culture if we are to ever be great again!!

1 2 3

Subscribe to MBGA News now!!

* indicates required
Go to Top