Category archive

Anglophobia / Marxism

Save the Daily Mail from Lefty Takeover

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit by

I was an avid fan of the Daily Mail. It represented the voice of middle England, British values, law, order and justice and … Brexit. I used to write for it.

No longer. The editorship has been taken over by arch Remainer, former editor of Country Life and old Etonian, Geordie Greig.

Viscountess Rothermere supported his appointment because socially she was being lobbied by the ultimate elite.

This week has shown a volte face in backing Theresa May and her Chequers deal.

Newspapers are made in the mould of their readers. Readership number bring in advertising revenue. Without them a paper dies.

Don’t let this happen to the DM.

Write to Viscount Rothermere and switch to The Sun and Daily Telegraph:

Viscount Rothermere, DMG, Northcliffe House, 2 Derry Street, London, W8 5TT.

When it hits the readership numbers it hits advertising. Then they’ll act.

SHOCK As Knives and Alcohol Sold to Little KIDS in London

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

In truly shocking news, over 2,500 test purchases of which were carried out by London Trading Standards (in conjunction with local councils and the Metropolitan Police as a part of Operation Spectre to reduce such crime over an 18 month scheme) revealed the age-restricted items being sold to children, with 14% of the shops selling knives and 12% selling alcohol among the 285 illegal sales recorded.

Punishments for such illegal knife purchases usually lead to six months in jail or a £5000 fine. Given the recent 12% increase in knife crime over the last twelve months (among a broader increase in crime in London too), and it already makes a bad situation all the more worse off.

The Metropolitan Police called such behaviour ‘unacceptable’ all the while deputy mayor for policing and crime Sophie Linden stated that:

The only way we are going to rid our streets of these dangerous weapons is by working together to stop them getting into the hands of young Londoners.

Sadly, the police are more interested in non-criminal “hate crimes”.

DISGUSTING: Labour Shadow Home Secretary SLAMS Chequers Deal As Too Anti-EU

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit by

In a recent statement, Labour’s Shadow Home Secretary Emily Thornberry has called the Chequers deal ‘nonsense’ and Labour shall block any deal with the European Union that forms on that plan.

She felt that the plan was ‘full of red tape’ and ‘would not work’, all the while highlighting that for her party, it failed the six tests the party has set when it has come to Brexit.

Thornberry has become the first major Labour politician to confirm that Labour shall not accept this deal, with the party itself stating that its plans on the matter remain the same, and other members like their Shadow Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union Keir Starmer only up to this point suggesting that Labour would not accept a deal based on the Chequers arrangement.

Whether this shall be the final nail in the deeply unpopular deal is yet to be seen.

Popular TV show used as PROPAGANDA to DEMONISE patriots

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism/Patriotism by

In yet another unhealthy dose of cultural Marxism, state-owned broadcaster Channel 4 once again demonises patriotic Brits of who are worried and fearful about the rise of Islamic extremism in our society, and those of us who want to feel pride in our country as well.

In a show called Ackley Bridge (of which is about the day to day goings on about the multicultural eponymous school in a fictional Yorkshire town of the same name), the eighth episode displays severe hatred towards patriots and those worried about the rise of radical Islam in British society, under the guise that we are all supposedly far-right neo-Nazis who simply hate all Muslims. Seriously.

It starts off pretty badly in this sense, with a campaigner handing out said leaflets outside the school, whereby he yells about how the UK has become a ‘dumping ground for Muslim extremists’ and to join his group’s rally on that following Saturday, not to mention to keep ‘England English’. When confronted by staff (one of whom accuses him of distributing ‘racist propaganda’ in a school environment), he is sarcastic, states that the material isn’t racist (which it isn’t, because Muslim extremists aren’t a race, unless one views all Muslims as extremists of course, which is absurd on that notion alone) and advocates that he has ‘free speech’ rights (which he does). One staff member then threatened him with violence, stating that if the campaigner comes to the school again it won’t only be the ‘flyers he’ll lose’. To show how evil and racist the guys are, they have England tops on with a St. George’s Cross. How lovely.

Now already we are in crap creek with the distortion and lies about the populist right and their opposition towards radical Islam. To my knowledge, those on our side who hand out flyers to crowds usually don’t do it on areas like school gates and such, nor are we usually fond of having a violent confrontation with people we disagree with. Case in point, when me and others at the MBGA team were threatened with violence from the Stand Up To Racism conference last year, we calmly left the place (not that they didn’t try, but that’s a story for another time). We don’t go out and cause trouble, especially near schools as that doesn’t get us anywhere. Now there are problems with Islamist grooming gangs behaving in such a fashion, most notably in Bradford as Katie Hopkins recently exposed, but we on the populist right don’t behave in such a passive aggressive manner for obvious reasons. Meanwhile, we want to stop such gangs from conducting such despicable behaviour, and does Channel 4 have a problem with that or something? If so, it speaks very loudly of their moral code as opposed to ours on the populist right.

Besides, the seemingly hostile attitude of the aforementioned staff, especially the threat of violence was totally uncalled for. I can appreciate the campaigner was being rude and passive aggressive, but he wasn’t refusing to leave the premises, and from this, suggesting violent attacks against him for handing out flyers that some may deem offensive is not only alarming but extremely out of line. As conservative commentator Ben Shapiro once stated when faced with similar threats of violence for expressing a naughty opinion ‘that seems mildly inappropriate for a political discussion’.

To make matters worse, this condoning of unprovoked violence with people you disagree with is a constant theme all throughout this episode. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

After a brief altercation between two prominent characters in this episode, Nasreen and Samantha, among other elements, a group of students examine the leaflet of which they mock for suggesting that halal meat funds terrorism (which it does, more rather its certification as halal does), the two main characters in this episode kiss and start to form a bond of which shall become more significant later on in selling the anti-patriot propaganda.

After more plot development transpires in the episode in which Nasreen discusses how we live in a ‘Brexit, austerity Britain’ of which puts minority groups in ‘twin shackles’ of racism and homophobia – couldn’t resist, eh Channel 4? – and she has Samantha’s number written on her arm by Samantha – oddly looking like the numbers written into the arm of Donnie Darko’s in the golf scene in the 2001 cult classic Donnie Darko, but I digress – Nasreen meets Samantha at her house after talking via text. As Nasreen arrives at the house, we get an ominous shot of the St. George’s Cross flying from the house’s window (every leftie’s favourite whipping boy at this moment) and then have a discussion when they mention the shoe theft, do silly chicken jokes (apparently, this show decided to become The Room for a short time) and make love. Very nice.

After detailing her experiences with a friend, we finally see the rally take place in which… nothing really happens. The protestors yell about how it is ‘their England’ and want to protect their country for the sake of defending what their ‘grandfathers and grandmothers’ fought for in World War 2 which is freedom above anything else. Why Channel 4 would immediately insinuate that this is a bad idea is befuddling. Just because they are talking about Islamist extremism (of which is a major problem in UK, and with Islamic terror plots being stopped frequently, there’s no dancing around the issue) doesn’t delegitimise their cause. Funnily enough, they make no statements against all Muslims, nor be actually racist towards minority groups, all of which makes me wonder what part of this Channel 4 finds objectionable.

I can appreciate the left hates any criticism of Islam at all (mainly because they feel it demonises all Muslims – of which says a lot more about their worldview that it does ours on the populist right) and feel that such marches target all Muslims, all the while feel that probably these terrorists have grievance given evil European colonialism (no I am not making this up), but none of that holds up to scrutiny. The populist right are against radical Islam not all Muslims, given how an idea can be entirely separate from a person who supports it, because Sharia law’s regressive views on government, how women should be treated, how minorities should be treated (especially in the LGBT community) not to mention how intolerant it is to other worldviews, is not something a civilised, liberal democracy should bow down to. These marches and such only come about because whether it be Islamist terrorism, grooming gangs among other issues, the elite seem to remain silent all the while endlessly preaching about how Islam is a religion of peace (without bothering to read its holy books of course) and that anyone who objects is an evil bigot and Islamophobe. When this anger brews, a peaceful protest against it is perfectly legitimate, and to demonise patriots who share fears about the way extreme Islam is seemingly being ignored by our political class is utterly despicable. After all, if we can’t express such views in a peaceful manner (of which are totally legitimate), what is the alternative? Starting a riot? Confronting the authorities in aggressive ways? Or would Channel 4 prefer us to shut up for the sake of preserving their utopian leftie vision of a multicultural society, regardless of the harm that may do and the inevitable anger that may rise from it? I bet so, and from that, what an utter disgrace. It’s no surprise that the broadcaster is state-funded then; its views parrot the views of the liberal elitist class.

Not to mention how the protestors are so crudely stereotyped; often fat, wearing English flags, often bald resembling skinheads associated with actual far-right groups like the National Front and looking and acting like typical football hooligans. For a political side who claim not to judge the actions of a group by stereotypes about them, the left happily abandon that against their opponents, don’t they?

Moving on, Nasreen’s sister advocate throwing eggs unprovoked at the protestors, on the grounds that they supposedly ‘deserve it’. No they don’t. While one may find the views of someone or a group objectionable, immediately resorting to violence to counteract them not only shows you to be the overly aggressive one, it gives your opponents (no matter how awful they may be) the upper hand morally. The constant advocacy for unprovoked violence against peaceful protests and campaigners in this show is truly alarming.

To make matters worse, once Nasreen notices Samantha there (being a lesbian character, I assume this is a dig against the Gays Against Sharia group), she decides to say screw morals and throw eggs at the protestors, including Samantha. This leads to a chase scene where the group follow Nasreen through a shopping centre, quickly losing her. Now again, this is out of order and highly inaccurate. Once again, throwing eggs into the faces of your political opposition for peacefully protesting is not only wrong, but immoral. If they don’t throw the first punch, why should you fight back? Offensive tactics like this is the reason why many left-wing groups like Unite Against Fascism and the aforementioned Stand Up To Racism are not heavily popular to many; they advocate violence against people they disagree with hence making them look like violent thugs, no matter how obscene the opposition is.

Meanwhile to my knowledge, patriots don’t follow angry lefties who try to violently attack them; they let them go or let the surrounding police officers deal with them. From experience, I have noticed that patriots at rallies, no matter how angry they are, don’t fight against or follow lefties trying to cause a scene. At the Day For Freedom, me among many others in the MBGA team were left in a pub after the main event when we noticed some angry left-wing thugs outside with brass knuckles. Instead of fighting them, we let the police come and arrest them. At a recent Gays Against Sharia march I attended at Stockon-on-Tees, lefties from Stand Up To Racism who tried to storm the crowd to presumably attack the speakers were dealt with by police. Those attending the meeting, despite also being very angry about Sharia like the protestors in the programme, didn’t follow them back. To portray us on the populist right as angry Neo-Nazi skinheads deliberately wanting to attack people from ethnic minorities is not only wrong, but embarrassingly laughable, and also arguably snobby as well to working class patriots unhappy with the elite not wanting to tackle radical Islam and being sneered down by them for doing so. Also note the intentional sad music and contrasts between a baby in the group and the grown men, indicating the loss of innocence the toddler shall suffer by going down this road. Unbelievable. Talk about propaganda.

Then we get the final confrontation between Nasreen and Samantha over the latter’s political views. After a lazy ad hominem attack of ‘racist’ doesn’t fly (given as Samantha points out, she has slept with an Asian woman), the writers try to make Samantha seem dumb by her not knowing the difference between Indian and Pakistani culture when calling Nasreen’s house the former despite her heritage being the latter. Samantha then points out some legitimate grievances; her mother getting called a ‘slapper’ when passing the local mosque because of her skirt being too short or her grandfather getting spat at in a mostly non-white area, all the while pointing out that its only the extremists her group want kicked out, not all Muslims. Such problems are real, and clearly not right, and it speaks worryingly to the mindset of the writers that these problems and pointing them out (especially the extremists being kicked out) is racist and non-legitimate. Nasreen’s response is to claim that there are some who treat her bad for being ‘brown’ which is also wrong. Not to mention how the other way round Samantha was talking about her grandfather being spat upon was by people invited into the country, hence that attitude is also unacceptable and while may also underlie existing tensions too, is weird one would hold animosity like that when being welcomed into another country full of people one has the animosity towards, while the white people behaving badly also doesn’t help matters either. Either way it is unacceptable, but weird how pointing it out one way is seen as racist.

A cringey discussion of halal comes up, when Samantha states that she doesn’t want everything to become halal as it ‘funds terrorism’. Nasreen denies this, claiming it isn’t true (which it is) and Samantha discusses how her ‘grandfather’ told her that; implying that she is a misguided person wrongly being brainwashed by extremists and doesn’t understand the truth about certain issues. This is once again a disgusting smear against the British populist right who mostly do know their facts about Islamic extremism and hence use such fears to peacefully protest. There is a reason most of the populist right in Britain don’t subscribe to the views of say Timothy Scott, given that he clearly knows nothing about it, as opposed to someone like Anne Marie Waters, Douglas Murray, or Katie Hopkins who does. This is a lazy smear tactic by the left; in that their opponents are only being lied to by someone else and could be shown down the right path. What a disgusting smear.

The conversation ends with Samantha saying that there is ‘nothing wrong’ with wanting to ‘keep Britain British’, of which is treated with shock with Nasreen who argues that ‘you can be more than one thing’ when referring to her Pakistani heritage (of which no-one was arguing against). Once again, the populist right are portrayed as Neanderthal-esque bigots of who hate people of other races and cultures and should embrace multiculturalism. There is nothing wrong with wanting to preserve our culture, especially when it has been arguably the liberal elite who has been happily watering it down for the last fifty years or so, as someone like journalist Peter Hitchens points out. That doesn’t mean one can’t respect other cultures, but why should that mean accepting diluting our parent culture to do that? Legendary comedian John Cleese pointed this out when discussing London’s changing demographics.

After sweeping Sharia’s proven homophobia under the rug too, Nasreen talks about how anti-Islam marches leave her scared for weeks, usually being called a ‘terrorist’ or told to ‘go back to her country’ because of people like Samantha. Again, this is indefensible behaviour, but Enoch Powell pointed out, such behaviour underlines already existing racial tensions, and can’t be blamed simply on one expressing a politically incorrect view. Not to mention how the populist right themselves don’t subscribe to such views, and can’t have the guilt by association fallacy attached to us over that while we would condemn this sort of behaviour in full. No-one is saying all Muslims are terrorists, and we on the populist right don’t encourage that worldview, so what gives Channel 4 the right to smear us this way when discussing how all those who are anti-Sharia in their eyes anti-Muslim bigots? The hypocrisy of the left is stunning to witness.

They for the rest of the episode try reconcile such differences (despite Samantha showing continued commitment to Nasreen by refusing to share her identity about their relationship coming to light, so that people won’t ‘harass her’ too), but to no avail, all the while Samantha gets called a racist for attending the march along with a friend, including by a teacher. Lovely. And the episode further cements how Samantha is out of touch and a loner because she admits that she came from a mostly white area during her early school years and she hasn’t got many friends, thus continuing the false portrayal of patriots as lonely outsiders with nothing to do that the left loves to spin. Thus ends the episode sans the aforementioned family drama over drug addiction.

So that is the end of the episode; ugly, disgusting propaganda of which demonises patriotic right-wingers for wanting to fight against Sharia on the grounds that supposedly hate all Muslims, are aggressive towards minority groups and are uneducated bigots. Forgive me if you’ve heard all this before, and it isn’t funny anymore, especially being pushed on a popular TV show with frequent consistent over a million views in terms of viewing figures, especially when the left at large and those uninitiated with politics may just swallow such views at face value.

But to portray innocent patriots as bigoted is wrong given we have no problem with racial minority groups, with even some people from those groups (most notably YouTubers like Red Pill Phil and Jonaya, of who has attended several marches on our side). To portray them as aggressors is also wrong, given that we peacefully march against acts of terrorism and grooming gangs, all the while idiotic lefties happily do all the dirty work when it comes to the violence at these rallies, of which they stoke. To portray them as sad loners of who are being led down the wrong road by extremists is also wrong, given that we do know our stuff about these issues, as opposed to many of our leftie opponents who don’t and from this shall smear well meaning patriots as Neo-Nazis, as if we are one in the same. It is about as laughably misguided as a typical non informed music journalists listing hard rock bands like Queen, Kiss and Rush into a documentary about heavy metal; it is utterly painful to watch.

This is especially true given that the far-left and the alt-left are never given equal coverage in these shows, despite them behaving far worse.

To make matters worse, unlike something like the abysmal The Battle For Britain’s Heroes of which was mostly irredeemable as both a documentary and as propaganda, Ackley Bridge is not too bad on its own. It’s well made, has great acting, and as talked about before, does handle tricky issues like drug addiction in a smart and hard hitting way. And even stuff like the chemistry between Nasreen and Samantha is well done and feels real. Hence why such a lazy swipe against genuine patriots who care for all British citizens is so infuriating in a show that clearly means very well.

All it shows is that even half decent shows can fall flat on their faces when dealing with political subject matter it knows nothing about. The sooner shows like this stop doing that the better. It shall make these shows more watchable and make us appreciate the other qualities of the show beyond their idiotic propaganda motives, something our overall culture could learn as a result.

A NEW PARTY? Vince Cable hints at the creation of a new centrist party

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

In a recent interview, current Liberal Democrat leader Vince Cable has hinted at the idea of his party potentially changing its name to attract centrist Conservative and Labour MPs who are alienated by the seemingly pro-Brexit stance of the former and the hard left stance of the latter.

While against the idea himself, Cable stated that he was in talks with eighteen MPs (six of which are Conservatives and the other twelve Labour) to develop such a party, all the while stating that in case the ‘tectonic plates move’, the Liberal Democrats have ‘good relationships’ with the other MPs.

He cited French President and banker Emmanuel Macron’s centrist party En Marche as an inspiration, albeit it shall not share the same title, with Cable acknowledging that 95% of the British public ‘do not speak French’. En Marche won the most seats in the 2017 French legislative elections, all the while Macron won the French Presidency in the presidential election in the same year, in an intense campaign against National Front leader Marine Le Pen.

This comes after Cable planned to also change the party’s rules to allow a non-MP to lead the party (as he himself isn’t planning to lead the party come the 2022 election in Britain) and allow non-members to vote on motions at the party’s conference next week.

He also suggested that the new name would be something like the New Liberal Democrats, highlighting that the party still retained its values of being liberal and socially democratic too.

This isn’t new for the party. Indeed, the party’s modern form as the Liberal Democrats was originally a merger between the long established Liberal Party and the then recently former Social Democratic Party, of which was a split of the Labour Party after many in the party (mainly the ‘Gang Of Four’ of Roy Jenkins, David Owen, Bill Rodgers and Shirley Williams) felt it went too far to the left under their then leader Michael Foot. At the 1983 election, the Liberals and the Social Democratic Party formed an electoral alliance (of which some argue caused the left wing’s vote to become split, leading then Conservative Party Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher to win a landslide victory), of which then begot the Liberal Democrats in 1988.

The move also has some precedent, with various polls indicating the public want a new centrist party.

What the party’s stance on Brexit is at the moment is unclear, and of grave concern indeed.

Sajid Javid REJECTS Abortion Buffer Zones

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

In a recent move, Home Secretary Sajid Javid has rejected calls to introduce buffer zones outside of abortion clinics, of which would’ve prevented pro-life protestors from gathering outside of them.

The reason is that for Javid, the protests were usually ‘passive’ in nature, infrequent overall and while acknowledging some wrongdoing on the behalf of some of these protests (including handing out model foetuses at these protests), admitted that legislation already covers for any bad behaviour at such protests, most notably the Public Order Act 1986, of which Javid cited in his argument.

For now, the issue for him is ‘under review’. The review began under his predecessor Amber Rudd, following controversies surrounding alleged disturbances at such protests.

Reactions to said changes have been very mixed.

On the one hand, Clare Murphy, director of external affairs at British Pregnancy Advisory Service, was impressed that the government recognised that such protests could ‘have a profoundly negative impact on women seeking healthcare’ and suggested that further co-operation with the government was the only way to resolve the issue.

On the other hand, Richard Bentley, managing director at the Marie Stopes UK charity, felt that such a conclusion didn’t go far enough to resolve the issue, all the while Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott stated that ‘this is a disgusting failure to uphold women’s rights over their own bodies’, and that ‘Javid must urgently reconsider’ and that he had given ‘the green light for women to be harassed and abused for exercising their right to choose’.

DISGUSTING: Fundraiser CONVICTED for stealing Lee Rigby’s charity money

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism/Patriotism by

In a recent turn of events, a fundraiser who was collecting money via a charity single as donations to the late soldier Lee Rigby’s family has been convicted for fraud.

Gary Gardener was convicted for two counts of fraud at Leicester Crown Court over the charges, of which involved a charity single to commemorate the life of Rigby, a single of which he knew would be a ‘flop’ to push forward ’emerging music artists’.

This money came around at charity events of which the Rigby family attended. He also claimed to Rigby’s son Jack that other fundraising events that he was conducting would set up Jack ‘for life’, and eventually raised £24,000, of which Rigby’s family never saw, despite endlessly trying to get in contact with Gardener over the money. Instead, he used the money to become the top producer of said single, pay off his overdrafts and according to the Coventry Telegraph, blow it on more expenses. Rigby’s widow Sarah claimed that she ‘never received a penny’ from the single’s profits.

The lorry driver initially denied wrongdoing, despite having blown £1000 on a recording studio for the single, and £3000 for a launch event of which included big name acts, like the pop band Boney M.

He was cleared of a third charge of fraud whereby he failed to keep a record of the amount he raised at fundraisers.

The fact that anybody can be defrauded, let alone the family of a murdered war hero is disgraceful.

It also shows how low some are prepared to sink to make a quick profit.


in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit/Patriotism by

In a recent turn of events, prolific anti Islam activist Tommy Robinson has been rejected from the UK Independence Party after an initial proposition advocating the idea of him joining the party has been turned down by the party’s chairman Tony McIntyre.

In his statement (cited in Kipper Central), he discussed how that conference motions must be put forward by a UKIP branch, and the motion was therefore blocked as it only was put forward by two party members (their Family And Children Spokesman Alan Craig and prominent member of the party’s youth wing Young Independence Reece Coombes).

This is his statement:

I have made it a point during my tenure as Chairman of the Party to adhere strictly to the Party Rules, as they are the backbone of the Party. I believe strongly in freedom of speech and would suggest that this motion is presented to the next Autumn Party Conference via the correct channels. I take full responsibility for this error in judgement as it is mine and mine alone.

Blackman, 2018

Some who support the motion argue that since it was an emergency motion (of which according to the party’s rulebook, can be put forward without the backing of a branch due to a ‘major political change’ within UKIP), it should have been put forward regardless. This includes Coombes.

Now letting Robinson into UKIP has been met with mixed reaction.

On the one hand, he has major support from the party, mainly through prominent members conducting interviews with him and the likes of leader Gerard Batten and peer Lord Pearson defending him during his recent run in jail over his charging with contempt of court.

That being said, persons such as Ben Walker of the UKIP NEC have commented on Robinson’s varied past. Some object to him being a member of three groups proscribed from the party, including the British Freedom Party, the British National Party (of which he left as they wouldn’t accept his black friends to one of their meetings) and the English Defence League, of which he led from 2009 until 2013.

Whether this shall mean Robinson is permanently banned from UKIP is yet to be seen.

What is wrong with giving jihadis the death penalty anyway?

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism/Patriotism by

Mass hysteria has struck once again. Following Home Secretary Sajid Javid’s decision to not seek ‘assurances’ as to whether two members of the Beatles group of Jihadis shall not be executed when they arrived at the United States, utter hell and fury has poured out of the left.

We have had the left endlessly complain about how it was abhorrent that Javid’s acceptance of the death penalty was horrible, from thinkpieces outlining how Britain’s opposition to such a punishment should be maintained, to MPs like Diane Abbott and David Davis complaining about how ‘abhorrent and shameful’ it is to be potentially allowing the death penalty against such people and how ‘unnecessary’ it was to let the Americans off the hook in this regard respectively, to a mixture of the two, most notably with a LBC discussion between one of their hosts Shelagh Fogarty and Lord Carlile, of which the latter called Javid ‘completely wrong’ on the subject matter. The outrage has been so strong, that it has even led to the mother of one of the terrorists launching a legal case against his decision.

But in many a view (including my own), one question has to be asked: why is it wrong with giving jihadis the death penalty anyway?

Firstly, it seems like a perfectly sound punishment for people whose mission it is to kill for their cause no matter what, given that they are fighting in their eyes a holy war against the West. Need we forget that the likes of the Jihadi Beatles aren’t exactly saints (obviously), especially given how one of them (Jihadi John), has executed numerous people in cold blood, including prominent American journalist James Foley in Syria. This is perhaps the most notorious of their crimes, all the while they have a rap sheet nearly a mile long, including executing various people (including some journalists), hostage taking, torturing dissidents among other heinous acts. In fact, the two specific Beatles going to be extradited (George and Ringo), were known for promoting extreme views before joining ISIS and taking part in many of the disgusting activities ISIS got up to. I could appreciate the argument against them receiving the death penalty if they were vulnerable guys and open to rehabilitation, but given that they are jihadists of who shall happily kill and butcher in the name of spreading their evil ideology, they are clearly beyond reform. They believe they are soldiers in a holy war against the West, and from that, only understand the language of violence. Kill or be killed is their attitude, something a typical prison sentence isn’t going to satisfy. Now while I understand some would argue that giving them the death penalty is giving them what they want as Islamic martyrs, surely at least getting rid of some of the extremists means that not only is some of the enemy defeated, but it shall also show be appropriate given their reprehensible behaviour.

It also shows that we have the upper hand against these guys, something simply jailing them shall not bring. There was a reason for example that during World War 2, Britain refused to release Nazi Prisoners of War for the longest time, and even when the war was over, it took time for the relatively left wing Labour government of Clement Atlee to free them. There was also a reason that during the Falklands War, no mercy was given to Argentinian enemies. If we as a free, democratic country want to show that we shall not tolerate the behaviour of barbarians like ISIS, we should show them that we shall not tolerate their vile behaviour under the guise of showing diplomacy. And especially given that the leaders of our great nation have been foolish enough to allow ISIS terrorists back into the country, give them council housing (amongst a housing crisis I should add), and even constantly pander to the ideology that has caused numerous terrorist attacks on our soil, it is about time that Britain found the spirit of Churchill and put our foot down against an irredeemable enemy who wants to change our way of life.

So one must wonder why the left (and some on the centre-right like Davis) advocate that the jihadists be let go. After all, I don’t recall their reaction to such a punishment being as hostile when the likes of Dylan Roof who (quite rightly) initially received the death penalty for the deaths he caused during the clear case of terrorism during the 2015 Charleston church shootings. Nor would they probably complain if the likes of say Thomas Mair had received a similar punishment. I think there are various reasons for this, and none of them good. Firstly, I think the whole idea that the West is currently collectively treading on eggshells around the issue of Islam applies here. There is no reason we shouldn’t be sending these jihadis to death in the United States, but unfortunately, the whole notion of Islamophobia and offending progressive types comes about here. This partially comes from the idea that progressives (for whatever reason) feel as though the Islamic world and (by that extent) Muslims as a whole are oppressed and that any sort of criticism against them is picking on a minority group. This in turn leads to Islamic terrorists being seen as reactionaries and freedom fighters, of which in the left’s eyes is a reaction against European colonialism and the various foreign wars against Middle Eastern countries since then. As prolific author Raymond Ibrahim points out, progressive types feel that Muslim violence is a direct result of Muslim grievance of both European colonialism and American imperialism (both of which are supposedly encapsulated by the state of Israel), and from this, the violence Islamic extremists carry out while not justifiable, is unsurprising given what we in the West have done to them, of which to them indicates that their proverbial revenge is at least vindicated in that regard. From this, it can be seen that any attack the West launches against jihadists in retaliation is just further abuse of that part of the world, and extolling more suffering against those living throughout it. That is of course absurd, given how people in such areas are the most vulnerable to jihadist attacks, given that the most frequent Islamic attacks occur in the Islamic world, but that’s besides the point. Not to mention how the bigotry of low expectations undoubtedly play a part here too. The idea that because the culture that inspires Islamic terrorism has different standards to that of the far more peaceful Western culture that they fight against, that it is inherently wrong to apply our standards of law against them. As journalist Melanie Phillips points out, the left (as exemplified by her former employees at sh*trag The Guardian) feel that it is racist to judge other cultures by the standards of the West as a whole, apart from Israel of which they regard as part of the West. From this, any attempt to judge Islamic terrorism by our own standards is racist and wrong and we should treat them with not ambivalence, but rather different standards, hence why applying the death penalty to them is us in the West misunderstanding their culture according to the left. Moral relativism in action, and boy does it stink.

Meanwhile, other explanations may be more damning as to those the left share a proverbial bed with. As Tommy Robinson points out, some of the left feel that they can use Islam extremism to achieve a communist state in the end. This mainly comes around from how, like Islamic extremists, the radical left hate the law, the police and the state hence why they are in bed with radical Islam for you, even though they shall eventually turn on them too, on the grounds that they hate religion too. Casein point, the actual jihadists who have been big names within leftie movements. Take for example the various Islamic extremist groups who work with Stand Up To Racism and the Labour Party. For the former, one prominently featured guest at last year’s SUTR conference (of which I’ll be detailing my experiences there in a future article, of which you can get a sense of what went down here) was the director of CAGE Moazzam Begg, who was a former Gitmo prisoner and had called Jihadi John a ‘beautiful young man’, all the while SUTR worked with him and his group. Meanwhile, the Labour Party invited into Parliament a group called MEND (of who the think tank The Henry Jackson Society call ‘extremist’) and whose head supported the killing of British soldiers. To rub salt into the wound, this was during the time of year when most wear a poppy to show respect to fallen soldiers.

So I feel that there is no good reason as to why jihadists shouldn’t be given the death penalty. They are extremists who live by their moral code of kill or be killed, and given that they are waging holy war against us, we have every justification to fight fire with fire, so to speak. But given the left’s sympathies with radical Islam, both in the supposed legitimacy of the grievances of the jihadists and the way they can use their ideology to get into power themselves, it is unsurprising that there has been yet more pho-outrage against allowing jihadists to be put to death, let alone criticise the jihadists at the centre of it all at all.

It shows that the left are guided by deceit, ridiculous emotional arguments and very questionable ethics in place of facts and practicality. The sooner their power wanes, the better.

But on a final note, good on Sajid Javid for actually approving this in the first place. While clearly put into the role of Home Secretary as a diversity hire in response to the whole Windrush Scandal and the laughable accusations of racism it brought against the Conservative Party, he has seemingly proven his worth so far. He has finally proscribed Hezbollah as a political organisation in this country while his predecessors twiddled their thumbs on the issue and helped to block a plan to create a customs partnership with the European Union after Brexit in the House of Commons, feeling it would harm British trade worldwide. He has even said that the grooming gang issue in Britain has to be fought head on, regardless of race.

If he continues down this route, he may prove his salt just yet. Heck, even former Conservative MP Norman Tebbit praised Javid on the grounds that he felt that he was a ‘man of action and principle’ in the current ‘mess’ that was this Parliament. This indicates a positive future for Javid at this point.

I wish him well.

OUCH: London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s approval ratings at ALL TIME LOW

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

In a recent poll conducted by polling company YouGov on behalf of the Queen’s Mary University, it found that London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s approval ratings had fallen dramatically over the summer.

At the end of April, his approval ratings as to whether he was doing a good job or not were at 52% overall, and now at the beginning of September, they are at 44%. Meanwhile, over the same amount of time, his disapproval ratings went from 30% to 40%, up 10 points over the matter of a few months. The Don’t Know section didn’t change much, dropping one point from 17% to 16%.

Philip Cowley, Professor of Politics at the university, said this about the poll:

In April 2018, Sadiq Khan was still ahead among those aged 50-64, working class Londoners, those living in outer London and white voters. He’s now behind among all of these groups. When we first started polling, he was one of the most popular politicians in Britain. Such was his cross-party support, he even had net positive support from Conservative voters. Those days are long gone.

Cowley, 2018

This suggests that Khan, despite once having the likable personality to have won over the majority of Londoners including members from his opposition party, has lost a lot of support over the last few months, of which seems he shall never get back.

This could be attributed to the high rise of crime over his tenure, among other things, but this is just speculation.

The poll also found that former UKIP leader Nigel Farage (who has previously teased about standing for London Mayor in the 2020 elections) wasn’t necessarily a popular candidate for the position, with only 22% supporting him for the job, and a further 62% opposing it. 16% stated that they didn’t know.

CRAZY Labour MP wants to make misogyny a HATE CRIME

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

When you thought idiocy in the Labour Party and among feminists couldn’t get any sillier, it has. During the debate over the completely useless upskirting bill, Stella Creasy (currently the Labour and Co-operative MP for Walthamstow) has added an amendment to the bill that advocates that misogyny be an aggravating factor, thereby making it a part of where the case the judge in a court of law has to consider when sentencing someone over upskirting.

In other words, effectively make misogyny a hate crime in the UK, thereby meaning more freedoms are being drained away in the process. What a great time to be alive eh?

Now before I get away backlash for this, I completely appreciate that upskirting is a disgusting, lewd practice that should be frowned upon, but at the same time whether it needs the force of the law (already stretched to breaking point it seems) is another matter entirely.

Meanwhile, Creasy is using this as a way to further push making misogyny in general a hate crime. This is her statement:

“Upskirting is a classic example of a crime in which misogyny is motivating the offence. We protect women in the workplace from discrimination on grounds of their sex, but not in the courtroom – with upskirting, street harassment, sexually based violence and abuse a part of life for so many it’s time to learn from where misogyny has been treated as a form of hate crime and end this gap.”

This is yet another case of a miserable feminist MP abusing her position to control society and its culture to make women a protected class, while portraying men as all evil sexist pigs. Given how that is ironically sexist towards women (implying women aren’t capable of protecting themselves without the power of a stronger power to do so), it seems weird that any so called feminist pushes for legislation that permeates a stereotype of women being weak on their own.

Then again, she is a Labour MP; the party that helped to cover up various Muslim rape gangs of who targeted both young white and Sikh girls, endorse segregated meetings between the sexes in Muslim majority areas, pushes legislation of which favours transgender men at the expense of female safety and wouldn’t even accept the manifesto of Britain’s main feminist party; the Women’s Equality Party unlike all of the other major parties according to a former council candidate for said party.

The Labour Party has been dead for ages and has been pandering to identity politics since the late 1980s to make up for its shortcomings. However long it takes for that niche to fall off is anyone’s guess. Hopefully this bill shall be defeated in Parliament like it was the last time it was proposed and some freedom (what little we have left) shall be maintained.

On a final note, this also shows why feminism is now unpopular among women nowadays, with only 38% of American women identifying as feminists, and only 7% of British women identifying as so. Pandering to endless middle class feminist causes as opposed to something the majority of women of whatever class can back is very alienating especially when it hurts both women and men in equal measure. Spiked writer Ella Whelan in a recent edition of Question Time heavily criticised such a bill for increasing the size of the state and intervening for needlessly in women’s lives, and despite being criticised for it by screeching social justice warrior Afua Hirsch who lied to her over women being sexually harassed during work (more about her here), she had a point. Feminism is useful for the state to not only look good in front of voters, but the draconian measures they push help to make the state gain more power, something measures pushed by the likes of Creasy aid. Her book on the problems with third wave feminism is titled What Women Want: Fun, Freedom and an End to Feminism. All I can say is if that is what women truly want, the sooner it does, the better. It is about time third wave feminism comes to end or radically changes to be about more than authoritarian japes against law abiding citizens who want to get on with their lives. That is one of the many steps we can take to help to make Britain, along with the rest of the West, great again.

Why is the establishment pushing Love Island on us?

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

Unless you have been living under a rock over the last few weeks (God bless you if you have been), you shall have noticed the endless publicity and promotion of the reality show Love Island down the throats of the masses for the last few months.

It has gone beyond the usual cabal of general reality shows being promoted and then swiftly disappearing. In this case, even mainstream political broadcasting has gotten in on the action. It has been featured or referenced in numerous news programs, including Newsnight, Question Time and most frequently on ITV’s Good Morning Britain, in which the show seems to be more frequently pushed than on any other program. Even high profile politicians have gotten in on the act; casein point the Conservative Party pushing it by promoting their own type of water bottle as seen on the show, with anti Labour slogans such as ‘don’t let Corbyn mug you off’. They removed such an idea later on. Meanwhile Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn threw in his support for one of the contestants too.

Now why is the show being pushed so much? It is no different from any other rubbish light reality TV nonsense, and seems completely separated from politics, right?

Well, it is more connected than one thinks, and its popularity also speaks very badly of our culture too.

But firstly, I shall discuss the obvious reasons why it is so popular. As a silly reality TV series, it provides light relief from the harshness of everyday life and its drama and confrontations endlessly delight many. And given the harsh climate of the world today, where stories about Islamic extremism and the governments of Europe becoming more authoritarian, such fluffy nonsense provides an easy escapist feeling for the masses to feel calmed. As John Harris and Paul Joseph Watson have pointed out, as the world gets darker, the masses want less challenging material to eat up and vice versa. Hence why for example in the 1990s, where politics in the West was mostly peaceful with the end of the Cold War and general peace in most of the Western world (sans the former Yugoslavia), a culture of angst developed in all forms of media. Whether it be music with grunge, movies with serious political thrillers, TV shows about conspiracy theories like The X Files and Twin Peaks took off and video games of which dealt with heavier subject matter such as violence like Mortal Kombat, government conspiracies with Resident Evil and psychological horror like Silent Hill became widely popular. Now in a darker world, light reality shows like this, along with dumbed down pop music, derivative superhero movies, underwhelming and safe triple A video games, and short comedy skits on YouTube are like easy digestible junk food for the masses. Quick, easy and most importantly not good for you, it is mass produced for the masses’ garbing mouths.

But a more sinister reason is that such shows are more useful as a distraction tool for the masses, hence its endless pushing on political shows. While I’m no fan of political theorist Noam Chomsky, he is occasionally right when it comes to our society and culture at large. More specifically, his discussion of how the media endlessly pushes sports like football when it doesn’t have any meaningful impact on anyone’s life is useful as a tool to divert the masses away from things that matter and which can make them think. In short, he states how he felt that:

It offers people something to pay attention to that’s of no importance and keeps them from worrying about things that matter to their lives that they might have some idea of doing something about.

Now while I feel he was perhaps too harsh on sports (given that it helps to aid a sense of local pride within a community of which can be important for cohesion in areas like Manchester and Tottenham), with reality TV I could not agree more. Reality TV shows are not important and is so light and fluffy that it provides escapism from reality and allows people to put their energy into something that doesn’t matter to their lives, as opposed to more important factors relating to socio-economic issues that they could do something about. Hence why the likes of these politicians use this show as a way to get people on board with their programs, like say how an advertisement of a water bottle because it is linked to a show they like can then develop an unwavering bond later on to those with such a link to popular culture. Manufacturing consent you could say. After all, given the potential Brexit betrayal and the government’s refusal to do anything about a decaying society at the moment, gaining people on side via shows like this is surely a lot easier than actual good policies alone.

It also is useful to the establishment as it provides them with yet another excuse to not do anything about the continued watering down of British society as a whole. As Daily Mail columnist Peter Hitchens has pointed out, it shows that our culture is at such a low point that the once extremely taboo (that being unstimulated sex on TV) is now commonplace on national TV. Not to mention how the degradation of our language and society being pushed by a show like this doesn’t help matters too. Given our elite seems to be on the globalist gravy train, anything that undermines British values of restraint and conservative attitudes to sex (something the show pushes to a tee) is something that should be spread around. So it shreds our moral fibre too, thereby making us more accepting of our cultural decline to make way for a more globalist world.

On that note, it allows for some people (albeit not all) of those who watch such shows to become easier to control as a citizenry. Now while I don’t doubt that many of the people watching these shows are perfectly well minded, there are those who watch these shows who could be impressionable of who have no idea about what moral boundaries there are. Shows like this which advocate for hedonism and promiscuous sex (neither being good things obviously) are clearly going to damage the moral fibres of those who feel impressionable and are swayed by whatever is popular and acceptable by dominant cultural shows like this. So if this show advocates that such negative character traits (along with the bickering and sociopathic tendencies of these contestants) are OK, it must be OK to do it in everyday life right? Eroding our moral fibre makes us easier to control as it means we can no longer be as outraged as we once were at societal changes that can negatively affect us, so it is easier to bury under the rug.

So all in all, shows like Love Island are pushed by the establishment based on how their initial quality of being light escapism can be used as a means of distraction, and a way to render our moral and cultural fibres corroded for good.

We need to reject such rubbish as this if our society is to prosper once again. In times where a society unravels, moronic stuff like this often referred to as ‘bread and circuses’ becomes widespread. The original quote comes from a Roman scholar of who used it to demonstrate how Roman politicians used cheap food and entertainment to maintain power because their actual policies couldn’t do so alone anymore.

When we eventually say no to nonsense like this, it shall be for the better is all I’m saying. Because if not, we are just being mad, literally mad all the while watching our glorious nation busily heap up our own funeral pyre without turning our eyes to it.

That is what societal poison Love Island is, hence why our corrupt establishment pushes it as much as they can. It is time we said no to this.

Could Tommy Robinson be joining UKIP?

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit/Islamism by

In a recent turn of events, a blog is claiming that political activist Tommy Robinson could be joining the UK Independence Party. The National Executive Committee of the party are going to potentially debate a motion first put forward by their Family and Children Spokesman Alan Craig, of which has to be given the go ahead by the party’s chairman Tony McIntyre and the party’s NEC this Sunday.

The proposition reads as follows:

Conference believes that Tommy Robinson is a global figure who stands in the long English tradition of anti-establishment rebels with a cause from Robin Hood to the Suffragettes; admires his campaigns both for #FreeSpeech and to expose the authorities’ decades-long silence and inaction over the industrial-scale child sexual abuse by rape gangs; and requests the NEC to consider offering him membership of UKIP.

– Craig, 2018

It seems that the possibility of Robinson (otherwise known by his real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) has been eaten up by several UKIP members, including prominent member of their youth wing Young Independence Reece Combes and Nathan Ryding, the chairman of the youth wing, and member of the NEC of who shall support the motion tomorrow, according to Kipper Central.

Craig has put the motion forward on the grounds that he was now a ‘global phenomenon’ who backed important campaigns and now was a ‘kipper at heart’ to be welcomed. At this point, if the greenlight is lit on this proposal, the NEC shall give him the option to join at their annual conference, after consulting their members and discussing the motion again.

Meanwhile, Robinson has thrown his own views out there on the subject matter. In a video titled ‘My message to UKIP’s NEC’, Robinson outlines how thankful he is to UKIP in their backing of him in the ongoing court case against him over his controversial jailing where he allegedly was guilty of contempt of court, a ruling currently undergoing a retrial for later this year.

He also states however that he doesn’t appreciate how UKIP does not ask its members for approval as to whether he should join or not, but rather leaves that to the NEC initially. He feels that the status symbol that he has gained could be beneficial for the party, and that UKIP were missing out on a ‘political revolution’ by not allowing him in.

At this current stage, Robinson is not allowed in UKIP, as he has been a member of two groups of which are on the party’s proscribed groups list; the anti-Islam activist group the English Defence League (of which he led from 2009 to 2013 in a very public resignation) and the far-right British National Party (of which he quit upon finding out his black friends were not allowed to attend the party’s meetings). That being said, the move to let him join has some precedent if it goes ahead; both UKIP leader Gerard Batten and peer Lord Pearson have been interviewed by Robinson in the past, with the former sharing a stage with him at the Day For Freedom rally back in May 2018.

Whether this motion goes ahead is yet to be seen. But if it is, it could mean that while the party shall inevitably get a heavy backlash from angry leftists, some think it could gain UKIP a swell of working class support it desperately needs. Whether it can help the party to recover from its bad fortunes is another matter.

Why is the media pushing child drag queens so much?

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

A while ago, I was watching an episode of the chat show Loose Women as background noise while doing my day to day routine.

From this, I couldn’t help but notice that one of the central stories was titled: ‘My 11-Year-Old Son Is a Drag Queen’. During said segment, it mainly focused on a mother (of who looked like she should be at the latest anime convention) embracing her son as a drag queen after noticing that he could ‘lead [a] happy life(s)’. Meanwhile, there is a big reveal as to the child in drag (how lovely), the kid talks about how being a drag queen gives him ‘confidence’ and he even does a twirl for the audience. Bless. The panellists also lap it up too of course.

Now while such a bizarre spectacle would be odd on its own standalone status, it is also part of a significantly worrying trend in our society; the promotion of child drag queens.

Not only have we had Loose Women promote such weird behaviour, we have also had many other examples of the mass media pushing these young children (or should that be exploited) over the last few years. The early morning breakfast show This Morning having not one, but two main features whereby child drag queens were the main subject, with one discussing how awful it was that a 14-year-old kid wasn’t allowed to go on to perform in his school’s talent show after the headmaster (quite rightly) cited legal reasons about how because of the child’s age, it wasn’t legal for him to perform drag in front of other children. Various stories about how young children are opening their own drag clubs, including one story in the Daily Mail about how a 10-year-old child in New York opened up one himself. Elle Magazine presenting such people on their YouTube channel. This is only the tip of the iceberg mind you, given there are other examples of such confusing behaviour being promoted by the media at the large.

There are numerous reasons for this behaviour being promoted, and none of them are particularly positive, mainly in what they say about our culture or society at large.

Now before I continue, I have no problem with general drag acts or queens for that matter. To my knowledge, there is nothing particularly harmful about they’re doing and have a culture all of their own which doesn’t try to impose ideas on to others or anything of that kind. I take the libertarian view on such a matter; if they aren’t interfering with my life or causing any harm to those around me or in general society, I have no problem with it.

I happily draw a more conservative line however when children are involved. Given that they are some of the most vulnerable and impressionable people in general society of who don’t fully understand the world around them, forgive me if I have a problem when their safety is potentially threatened by something which is potentially harmful. Given that out liberal society has already seemed to happily throw them under the bus when it comes to pursuing their progressive agenda, whether that be through ignoring the various Islamic grooming gangs who rape thousands of them in various cities or having many young black children grow up in fatherless homes because of how a large welfare state has given no incentive for such communities to develop strong families (something even Tottenham MP David Lammy pointed out), it is no surprise that they happily let this potentially psychologically damaging behaviour fly.

At best, the implications of the increase in the promotion of this behaviour is simply the left (of who dominate our society at large) making up for lost time in the worst way possible. It seems that ever since former Olympian and participant in the distasteful and also damaging piece of TV turd nugget Keeping Up With The Kardashians Bruce Jenner became a woman back in 2015, there has been a huge attempt to push transgender rights and figures in general life to make up for the fact that the left up until that point hadn’t said much about transgenders or the like and were probably terrified that as the side who supposedly care about the little guy, they had ignored one major minority group for the longest time. Hence why whether it be bringing drag queens into nursery schools to discuss gender fluidity with the students, to the council of Brighton and Hove sending out letters to parents asking which gender their child most felt comfortable with, such attempts to push the transgender agenda into politics (of which in part encompasses the drag queen lifestyle) are clearly the left being over the top and making up for alleged lost time not sticking up for transgenders at large. Hence the acceptance of more peculiar lifestyles such as people who are non-binary or do drag for example. The left are going crazy for seemingly ignoring this minority, and such blinding acceptance of these lifestyles (best encapsulated by the various hosts of media outlets and journalists and such) is an atonement of sorts for doing so.

The other reasons are not so positive. Firstly, it signals that our culture is in steady decline, with more perverse lifestyles of which were once seen as risqué and harmful being increasingly seen as normal and acceptable. As InfowarsPaul Joseph Watson points out, given how our culture has increasingly become more depraved under the postmodern notion that high culture is the same as lowbrow culture (often inspired by the likes of the pseudointellectualism of the Frankfurt School), our culture as a result in turn becomes more debauched. While child drag queens aren’t the most depraved aspect of this societal change, they are part in parcel (London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s favourite chestnut) of such a shift. Child drag queens are seen as more normal in a society increasingly more acceptable to more radical ideas in the vain attempts to be more open and liberal, all the while making the general population more numb to such ideas, and hence even more bad and disgusting ideas aimed at reducing the moral fibre of the West. If it takes clear exploitation of children to push this idea forward than so bl**dy be it in the lefts collective mind.

Not to mention how this is linked in with the societal normalisation of paedophilia as well. After all, dressing in drag is at the very least experimental in a sexual nature; mixing around with gender only being one part all the while experimenting with how one can look convincing as an attractive part of the opposite sex inherently means that a sexual element plays a role here. So it should come as no surprise that the potential sexualisation of children being pushed by the dominant media is linked to the normalisation of paedophilia in our society. Already this is pretty alarming, all the while the main reason for this clearly is how the top echelons of society is full of paedophiles. Whether it be how in towns in Rotherham and Telford some councillors have either given character references for groomers or allegedly had sex with children respectively, the Roman Catholic Church has allowed paedophile priests to get away with their behaviour for decades through cover up, various sex ring bust ups (including Operation Yewtree and Marc Dutroux) have included members of the elite in implication or otherwise, how Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Orgy Island’ had a similar protection by elites among other cases. Hence indicating that such behaviour running rampant makes the top brass’ disgusting behaviour all the more normal, so they won’t be cuffed for their illegal behaviour.

Finally, the other reason the media is pushing this is potentially the most damning of all. In a culture whereby any sort of meaningful basis (national identity, gender, religious values) is either gone or endlessly demonised, we have an increasingly lost generation of who feel they have nothing left. To make matters worse, as opposed to previous generations, there is no outlet for a generation to express their angst. Whereas the likes of cult classic horror films, heavy metal and violent video games helped to keep generations in the past able to express their self-loathing in a positive manner, now they have barely anything to do so. Film has been utterly watered down into nothingness beyond bland blockbusters and rubbish overrated dramas, any heavy metal music (among other alternative genres from the mainstream, including alternative rock for that matter) never get the airtime and more mainstream overproduced nonsense is pushed and video games have been infiltrated by social justice freaks, as the whole #Gamergate controversy proves. With nothing left, experimenting with gender seems to be a last avenue for a generation lost in terms of identity and culture (not to mention #Comicsgate, but that is a story for another time). And given how allegedly brave and daring it seems to be a drag act in this day in age, it isn’t hard to see that this seems to be the only avenue left for many lost children and young adults, with the media’s promotion legitimising it in ways unimaginable ages ago. How the mighty has fallen.

So it seems that the main reason such behaviour is promoted by the media at large is an indictment on our culture. It shows that our culture is perverse, promoting more debauchery than ever before. It shows that the underlying sexual aspects of it adds to a worrying aspect of a normalisation of paedophilia within our society, of which aids the top brass of our society who revel in it. And it shows that our culture is so lacking in substance and offers so little to the next generation that such odd behaviour is seen as an only way out.

It is an utter indictment of what our society has become: groundless, tasteless and overall rotten. Shame on the mass media for promoting this sort of behaviour and a shame on our establishment class for allowing society to fall so far to get this low point in Western culture.

It further indicates a cultural revolution, something akin to a modern day Renaissance, it definitely needed. The sooner that happens the better. The sooner this sort of behaviour is more seen as the off putting and rarely seen as it should be, the healthier our culture will once be again, and all the better for it.

Help to OUST Theresa May!

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit by

It’s quiet during summer so let’s have some fun and join the Conservative party.

Ok, admittedly, they’re not much fun when you have to attend the rubber chicken dinner fundraisers, paying exorbitant £s for works canteen food c1970s with a glass of free warm white wine and having to dig deep for the raffle of out of date chocolates or a signed photo of Theresa May, but there is an upside to my opening line.

Do you want to change the course of our country? Do you want Brexit to be delivered? If so, we have to play the game.

Don’t give up your membership of UKIP or For Britain, or whoever you vote for, keep that but join the Conservative party and change it from inside.

If you have a high profile social media platform then it’s going to be difficult. But if you are just disgruntled from Tunbridge Wells or fed up from Feltham, then join.

Many of us are doing just this. MPs and association chairmen are reporting an upsurge in membership. It’s people like you that are joining, not for their love of the Maybot.

You don’t have to attend the rubber chicken dinners or ladies’ luncheons but do attend the AGMs and vote. Do attend the events with visiting ministers and tell them what you think, and do exercise your right in the most important part of your membership – your vote for the Tory party leadership contest. Vote and use it well.

Let’s change our country.

London March Against Facebook Ban of Alex Jones to Go Ahead

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

The march against Facebook and BBC centre-left-wing bias will occur tomorrow, Saturday the 4th of August.

There will be a police presence for safety reasons, due to threats by anti-Semitic group Liberty Defenders (Pretenders?) to behead Luke Alexander, and also Norwich boxer Glen Saffer to burn alive Luke Nash-Jones.


  • Luke Nash-Jones, Leader of Make Britain Great Again
  • Sharon Klaff, Pro-Israel Campaign for Truth
  • Luke Alexander, Supporter of Make Britain Great Again
  • Freddy Vachha, UKIP London Chair
  • Elizabeth Jones, UKIP NEC
  • Edward Howard, Youth Leader for Make Britain Great Again
  • Martin Costello, Treasurer for Make Britain Great Again

Meet-up point: 14:30 (2:30pm)

Facebook London, 1 Rathbone Square, London, W1T 1FB

15:00 March to BBC Broadcasting House

Facebook anti-Trump campaign BACKFIRES INTENSELY

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Patriotism by

As you may be aware, there was a campaign on Facebook to get the 2004 song American Idiot to Number 1 in light of Donald Trump’s first UK visit as American President. Me, among others, felt that the campaign itself was a stupid idea; it was more endlessly silly anti-Trump virtue signalling over his state visit from a country which is supposedly his closest ally and needs as much help from him as it can get post-Brexit, especially with the new trade deal he is willing to give us.

But putting my opinion aside, the end result was pretty hilarious to say the least. Despite the campaign attempting to get the 2004 song to number one, it came at a paltry 25, being beaten out by the various trendy artists of our current year like Jess Glynne and George Ezra.

To make matters even more hilarious, when based on official sales alone (given that the Official Charts Company complies both individual sales, downloads and online streaming – a system which is inherently silly and which I have started a petition against which you can sign here) the song came in at number 2, making it even more funny as to the massive backfire this entailed.

So which song clenched the Number 1 slot, you may ask? That would be the classic football anthem Three Lions by Baddiel, Skinner and The Lightning Seeds. Nice to see that the people chose to place a song which celebrated their nation at number 1 as opposed to virtue signal against a leader of another.  

Reuters SLANDERS the pro-Trump rally as far-right

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Patriotism by

More lies, damned lies and smears from the mainstream media now. As you may know, either through attendance or media coverage of it mainly through our company’s livestream of it, there was a pro-Trump rally held outside the US Embassy in Vauxhall last Saturday.

This was not only to show that there are Brits who do support Trump and his agenda (shock horror) but to also show displeasure at our own current system of affairs by comparison. Trump was praised, the likes of wretched career politicians (namely Theresa May, Sadiq Khan and John Bercow) were lambasted and it was a great day all around. Many made speeches (including myself) and it was a great show of affairs, with at the very least hundreds showing up to show support for the 45th President’s visit to our glorious isles.

That being side despite how peaceful it all was, it wasn’t like we were going to receive positive coverage for the event, given the anti-Trump bias that seems to be affecting British culture, politicians, atmosphere and most of all the press at the minute.

It would have been one thing if they just heavily covered the anti-Trump protest and left ours out completely. But while that was mostly the case, one particular outlet had the gall to call our peaceful protest far right.

In a recent article by Reuters titled ‘English far-right activists applaud Donald Trump in central London’, they denounce the peaceful pro-Trump rally as far right. Why? Because of the innocuous connection this one had with the pro-Tommy Robinson rally. Really, I’m not joking.

They emphasise this connection heavily throughout the article, not only slandering Robinson with the lazy label of him being supposedly far right too (of which has seemed to stick for many years without any facts to back that up whatsoever), but also using a guilt by association fallacy by making all those attending far right for backing him too.

They also lie here as well; they claim that the main point of the rally was Tommy Robinson being jailed. For anyone who actually attended the event, they would know that this wasn’t so. The main point of the rally was to show support for President Trump and nothing else. Nothing in the iconography on the main stage nor any of the speeches discussed that. At best, we occasionally diverted in our speeches to complain about the EU and mass immigration (like Martin Costello’s excellent speech, which you can see here) but nothing about Robinson, of which the article crudely describes him as a ‘jailed activist’. At worst, it was a pro-Trump rally through and through, and linking it to Robinson as if he was the main focal point behind the rally is absurd, especially given that this event had been planned months before his arrest. Heck, it even had to be cancelled once before when Trump threw in the towel on a state visit earlier this year supposedly over the ‘bad deal’ the US embassy was, or what was more likely the anti-Trump feeling some sections of the country had, including our own capital’s mayor Sadiq Khan. I don’t blame him for bailing out when he did to be honest.

I understand one could argue that a lot of the placards being handed out often had #FreeTommy messages written on them and that some of the crowd had similar iconography all the while screaming Tommy’s chant on occasion. While true, that is on those participants, who have the free will to wear such iconography and chant such chants if and when they choose. We as the rally’s organisers were not pushing for such an angle mostly, and the only reason we had #FreeTommy messages on the placards was simply because of convenience; we were heading to the latter rally afterwards (albeit individually because of the limitations that had been placed on us through the Public Order Act by the Metropolitan Police) and it made it easier for us to produce such placards (admittedly I didn’t attend the #FreeTommy protest soon after, but from what I could gather, it was swimming with such placards).

Bottom line is that people coming to the rally were the main ones with the pro-Tommy Robinson agenda in mind as opposed to the organisers. From this, to claim that the overall rally was about Tommy Robinson is laughable at best and vestigial at worst.

And the only far right people that were there was Generation Identity people of who usually hold placards at these protests reading about how ‘Real Men Fight Back!’ in the context of Tommy Robinson’s arrest. That being said, those at MBGA News try to distance ourselves from that group as much as we can, all the while I can distinctly overhearing Luke Nash-Jones (our editor-in-chief here and one of the main organisers for this event) whispering about how bothered he was that the ‘Nazis’ had shown up, referring to the GI people there. I think I also saw Luke along with other organisers and police officers trying to tell the gentleman about to wield the banner to vacate the space, but to no avail. So again, even the actual far right at this rally were turned away from it as much as possible. In short, to claim our event was far right based on some individual nutcases is utterly groundless.

It is a shame that we keep getting slandered this way by the MSM, but that is the way it goes for now until we can get our foot through the door, so to speak. To make matters worse, we can’t do very much here; unlike other press outlets, they aren’t members of the Independent Press Standards Organisation, meaning one can’t send complaints to them over this as one would expect to.

All we can do is show passive resistance to these outlets for now, whether it be by boycotting them or just being aware of the narratives they are spinning in general. And they wonder why trust in the mainstream media in Britain is dying? Such propaganda like this is the reason why.

The elite is full of paedophiles. Why do you think they promote it so much?

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Ah Facebook. Once a shining light of hope in terms of sharing connections and information, it is now a cesspool of vulgarity, lies and having an addictive quality akin to that of cocaine. These criticisms among other issues are why the crew here at the Make Britain Great Again will be having a protest against such problems with Facebook, Twitter and the BBC, later on this week.

We (including myself) will speak against such problems in an effort to raise awareness and hopefully change it, and even if the protest falls on many a deaf ear, the important nature of it is reason enough to complain.

Now one main criticism that we have is the double standard Facebook imposes when it comes to censorship. This is because while they go out of their way to censor fake news and hate speech, this often resulted in moderate conservatives getting pulled from the platform. This included posts on our Facebook page, most notably ones about criticising paedophiles, something we heavily criticised during one of our livestreams.

One reason I suggested to explain this blanket ban was because of how the elite was crawling with paedophiles, and criticism of such behaviour would be subsequently seen as unacceptable on that platform. This article is a description of such behaviour.

Let’s examine the nitty gritty here; for years there has been an attempt by the MSM and our culture at large to promote or downplay paedophilia for whatever reason. This isn’t some tin foil hat conspiracy either. There have been numerous examples of such behaviour in recent years. Most notably, this came in form of the media outlet Salon giving a platform to Todd Nickerson, who openly admitted to having a thing for children, culminating in a video whereby he declared that he wasn’t a monster, described his sick fantasies about loving children all the while having a dreamy looking clip of a young girl in a ballerina costume in the background. He criticised anyone who (quite rightly) called him out on his behaviour as part of the ‘vile right-wing hate machine’. Because apparently right-wingers worried about young children getting raped by disgusting individuals like Nickerson are cranks who should have people turn their noses up at them, more so than the actual paedophile here. Salon quite rightly then unpublished the articles after much uproar.

Meanwhile, BBC Three (the outlet of our public broadcaster aimed at a teenage audience I might add) released a similar article called ‘Paedophiles need help, not condemnation – I should know’ where an anonymous individual (surprise, surprise) discussed how paedophiles like the author were misunderstood and wouldn’t want to harm children. That’s nice and all, but why is our public broadcaster giving a platform to people like this who openly admit to sexually preferring children and treating disgusting elements in our society like paedophile online relationships (with the author discussing how he found a woman online who was LIKE HIM), given that such people are clearly those who should be looked at by a doctor, not emboldened by a public broadcaster, especially given the harmful message that it sends out, that being paedophilia is OK?

Meanwhile, various Hollywood movies have had similar messages about paedophilia. Most notably 1997’s Lolita actually asked the audience to be sympathetic towards the main character WHO WAS A PAEDOPHILE, not to mention how he abducted the title character to pursue his romantic relationship with her after her mother died. The film was so controversial at the time that it took time to get distribution in both the USA and Australia, all the while the British Board of Film Classification brought in experts and child psychologists to assess whether the film was harmful or not.

In 1999, American Beauty was released and focused a good chunk of the run time on a main character (now laughably played by alleged paedophile Kevin Spacey) who was stalking his teenage daughter’s friend because he had a crush on her, all the while treating his wife like dirt. And while the character doesn’t go through with the deed, the fact that the film didn’t criticise his behaviour is rather telling. Admittedly, it was quite uplifting to see him shot in the back of the head at the end of the film. Ten years later, The Hangover made several inappropriate jokes about a baby engaging in lewd sexual acts like masturbation for example. 2017’s Call Me By Your Name has received heavy criticism from conservative commentators for supposedly endorsing a paedophilic relationship between a 17 year old boy and a 24 year old student. The left didn’t care though. They ate up the film (mainly because it was a ‘powerfully affecting portrait of first love’) and comedian Jimmy Kimmel brought up the film at the recent Oscars ceremony whereby he stated that films like that are made to ‘upset [Vice President of the United States] Mike Pence’. Ah, the left. Laughing and cheering at their own jokes because no-one else can, typical of bad comedians in general.

Speaking of the left, their hero Peter Tatchell co-wrote a book called The Betrayal of Youth back in 1980, which called generally for the legalisation of sex with children, while his chapter (as activist against child rape, Luke Nash-Jones, frequently points out) questioning whether 16 was the right age of consent, and wrote similarly about such behaviour both for the Outrage! Campaign (which itself campaigned for lowering the age of consent) in 1996 and in 1997 for The Guardian whereby he advocated that ‘not all sex involving children is unwanted, abusive and harmful’. While he has distanced himself from such works later on (advocating that he wouldn’t have co-written the book had he known about the genuine paedophiles involved in it) he still maintains that people shouldn’t be arrested for their behaviour for having sex with minors, even if he stated that he disagrees with the act itself. Whether he is serious or just covering his own back (especially given the flip-flop views on paedophilia) is unclear. Meanwhile MP Harriet Harman (the arch feminist in Westminster) has been linked along with various other MPs to Liberty, which was linked to the Paedophile Information Exchange, which was calling for child sex and lobbied heavily for it.

So, you may be wondering why paedophilia, a reprehensible act made illegal in most decent countries, is being promoted heavily by the dominant culture at large. The reason? Because the elite (who dominate the important facets of society) revel in it. Make no mistake; a good chunk of the top brass in society get up to such behaviour. The most prominent example is how the various Islamist grooming gangs sweeping up and down the country are covered up by the elite who regularly run the councils ignorant of such behaviour until it is staring at them right in the face. Usually, it would be out of pathetic fears of being called a ‘racist’, but sometimes the reasoning is a lot sicker than that. Take for example how in Rotherham, a councillor gave a CHARACTER REFERENCE for one of the accused groomers in a town whereby accusations had been ignored by the authorities for nearly 2 decades until the Jay Report forced their hand, even if such nasty behaviour is still operating in the town. There are also accusations of how police officers got involved with the groomers in their sex with minors, similar to how in Telford, councillors were among the accused when it came to allegations of prominent grooming gangs stretching as far back as over 40 years.

So not only are the authorities scared of being called racist because of their fear of not wanting to be hostile to a foreign culture, feeling that they shouldn’t judge bad behaviour from a different culture but also because some authorities share similar urges and sympathies with the groomers in question.

Meanwhile, Muslim grooming gangs are only scratching the surface when it comes to elites being involved in the sexual conduct of minors. Take for example another religion, that of Catholicism, more specifically how the Catholic Church had numerous priests have sex with minors and covered it up for decades too. The 2015 film Spotlight is the best representation of this abuse and the lives it helped to destroy. To this day, the behaviour still goes on, and the various priests involved haven’t been prosecuted because of their elite status, and the reluctance of the various Popes to act against this reprehensible behaviour.

On top of this, various cases of sex child trafficking ring busts often involve the elite. Take for example the launch of Operation Yewtree, whereby former BBC presenter Jimmy Savile had various accusations about him (entering the hundreds) covered up for years by his friends in the entertainment industry and political friends. The subsequent investigations of Operation Yewtree led to several arrests, including those of glam rocker Gary Glitter (himself already convicted of possessing child porn in the late 1990s) and publicist Max Clifford, who then died in prison to no tears spilt.

Meanwhile, in 2008 financer Jeffrey Epstein was convicted for soliciting prostitution from girls aged as young as 14, mainly through his ‘Orgy Island’ whereby he would go to have sex with young girls, all the while having celebrity friends (like former US President Bill Clinton and actor Kevin Spacey) come along with him. There is also allegedly a similar scandal among British MPs yet to be uncovered, meanwhile former British MP Cyril Smith has similar accusations spanning decades, and alleged attempts to cover up his deeds were heavily criticised by Wigan MP Lisa Nandy. Australia has an allegedly similar problem with its MPs too. Meanwhile Led Zeppelin guitarist Jimmy Page abducted and potentially raped a 14-year-old groupie and former Judas Priest drummer Dave Holland was convicted in 2004 for having sex with a minor.

And if anything good came out of the #MeToo movement, it finally brought down titans within the movie industry who had gotten away with their bad behaviour for decades and exposed a legitimate rape culture in the industry, which up until that point had been dismissed as conspiracy. The most notable example of this being how film director Roman Polanski has often been excused for drugging and raping a young girl in the 1970s (leading him to flee the United States) by Hollywood actors at large, who signed a petition to allow him back into the United States. The fact that it took the #MeToo movement to have him removed from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences says a lot to the sympathy he has in Hollywood.

The contrast between the reception of director Elia Kazan winning his honorary Oscar (whereby various Hollywood lefties sat down and didn’t applaud him because of his involvement with the House Committee of Un-American Activities to weed out communists in the film industry) and to Polanski winning the Best Director Oscar in 2002 for The Pianist (whereby the audience were in seemingly unanimous in applause and some in standing ovation) speaks very loudly of both their sympathy to Polanski, and the backwards moral relativist politics of Hollywood, whereby disagreeing with someone politically is far worse than raping a child.

So, in conclusion, our elite is full of paedophiles and is using their power to promote that sort of behaviour. The only thing we can do about it at the time being is to demand change, both by boycotting any facet of popular culture that endorses paedophilia all the while voting out corrupt politicians and councillors who get involved in that sort of behaviour, and to expose it later on.

That is the simple solution. A more concrete one is to have tougher sentencing for such crimes when they are exposed. This is most notable in arguably bringing back the death penalty, which has been abolished for over 5 decades in the UK and is needed once again to get rid of these rats. After all, it seems strange that the rise of such people in our media and establishment has exploded with the correlation of abolishing the one guaranteed deterrent against it. And while one may say my suggestion is a tad extreme, I would argue that tough times call for tough measures. We need to establish the rule of law again in the West otherwise such behaviour is only going to carry on and on. The banning of exposing such behaviour by Facebook is one symptom of a very wide problem, which will only get worse as the years go by if nothing is done to tackle it.

REVEALED: Shocking Crime Statistics the EU and Our Governments Do Not Want You to See

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

This week I published my book, the Migrant Crime Wave, covering the shocking crime statistics that the EU and our governments do not want you to see.

It is compiled from official EU statistics, reports and committees, respected think tanks from around the world and verifiable news sources. What we reveal is a cover-up, particularly of rape statistics and the migrant nationalities of those committing the crimes.

I cover:
– terrorism
– rape and violent assaults (mainly against women and children)
– illegal border crossing
– trafficking in human beings
– drug trafficking and consumption

Some of the shocking statistics :

• 40 percent of rapes in Italy have been committed by migrants.
• 5,000 returned Jihadis that have travelled to Syria/Iraq now live in the EU.
• 40 percent of migrants from the Maghreb committed robbery or theft within the first year of their arrival in Germany.
• Migrants are 10.3 times as likely to commit gang rape as native Germans.
• Asylum seekers are 42.7 times more likely to commit gang rape.
• In the Netherlands, half of the youth of Moroccan origin (aged 18-24) have been investigated by police.
• In Sweden 76 percent of the perpetrators that could be identified for sexual assault on the street were of foreign origin.

Violence and crime have increased in Europe since the unprecedented and unwelcome level of migration facilitated by Schengen and the open borders policies of the EU.

We are in a battle to protect our culture, heritage and way of life against the liberal left who instead of encouraging family friendly policies for Europeans, prefer to replace us with alien cultures because our own birth rates are dropping. With almost 50% youth unemployment across many EU countries, forced migration is a dangerous policy, damning the futures of a whole generation of young people.

The number of rapes is exploding, and protection of women is a priority. This can only be raised in the context of gender equality and LGBT rights, while migrant attitudes to our women and girls is brushed off as ‘cultural issues to be addressed’ and rape statistics are being ignored. We have a right to be protected, not the migrants.

Because of the mainly jihadi based terror in our countries, law-abiding Muslims who identify as European, should be encouraged to be more vocal about their condemnation of Radical Islam as there is a dangerous and growing anti-Muslim sentiment, not just among the far Right but ordinary citizens too.

We have to halt migration from Pakistan and north Africa, until we are confident that our Muslim citizens have integrated by learning our languages, adhering to national law rather than Sharia, reject female genital mutilation, honour killings, burkas and forced marriage.

We have to stop the foreign funding of mosques as they have done in Switzerland and the closing down of radical mosques, as in Austria with deportation of hate preachers. That is a start but we have a long way to go.

This week we saw the African invasion of Spain via Ceuta when 100s of migrants jumped the fences, attacked the Spanish semi-militarised Guardia Civil, who were forced to watch and were humiliated by their government which insists they cannot use their guns.

What have we come to when our police and military stand by and allow invaders to walk straight into our countries? The Guardia Civil can use their guns on Spanish citizens, but not the invaders.

It is no surprise that when the centre right Spanish government fell recently, there was no general election. Instead, an EU puppet socialist government took the reins.

When Italy shut its borders, Spain opened theirs. There will now be a further migrant crime wave.

You can download my book here: Home – Janice Atkinson MEP

DEFLECTION: Weak Sadiq Khan Blames SOARING Violent Gang Crime on Middle Class

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

The wave of violent crime in London has been making plenty of headlines recently, with murders in the Capital outstripping New York earlier this year.

Policing in London is the responsibility of the Mayor and the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) who have issued plenty of soundbites so far but no real plan on how to tackle it.

With this in mind, Sadiq Khan’s latest statement on the causes shows just how out of touch with the situation on the ground he has become. Replying to a question on an LBC phone-in show, the Mayor stated that ‘Cocaine use at middle class parties’ is driving the gang related violence on the streets, a position previously endorsed by both Simon Kempton of The Police Federation and Justice Secretary David Gauke when he mentioned it back in May.

In one way, I can see where the comment has come from – much of the violence is drug related and for the drug gangs to thrive, they need customers. However, cocaine use has not suddenly appeared out of thin air over the last couple of years under Khan’s Mayoralty and has been prevalent in London since at least the 1980’s. Indeed, when The City of London started to forge ahead after deregulation in the 80’s, the ‘yuppy’ culture embraced recreational drug use as part of their ‘work hard, play harder’ culture, not to mention the rise of the illegal raves at the turn of the decade where another drug of choice, Ecstasy, was a central part of the party experience.

Working in the mobile phone trade in the 90’s, where large amounts of cash were being made as the sector exploded, drug use was always in evidence at major events and parties that I attended – the amount of times I cursed the lack of a toilet cubicle when desperate to get rid of the last three pints of lager I had drunk was testament to that!

Yet throughout that time, there was no surge in violent knife crime, moped raiders and acid attacks.

So, if we accept the premise that more customers means more crime, then surely drug use now must be at exponentially larger levels than before? The reality is no – indeed, the following was reported by The Home Office CSEW report within the last month –

Around 1 in 11 (9.0%) adults aged 16 to 59 had taken a drug in the last year. This equated to around 3.0 million people, and was similar to the 2016/17 survey (8.5%). The trend in last year drug use among 16 to 59 year olds has been relatively flat since the 2009/10 survey, and the latest estimate was similar to a decade ago (9.4% in 2007/08). However, the 2017/18 prevalence estimate was lower than in 1996 (11.1%), when the time series began.

So drug use is actually down on 20 years ago and has been flat over the last eight years, meaning that Khan’s explanation is not backed up by official figures.

So what is the cause?

In my opinion, there are multiple reasons. Firstly, the arrival of a new criminal class from overseas has triggered a struggle for control of the trade on our streets. Writing in The Evening Standard in July last year, David Cohen interviewed a former gang member who stated that , “In the last 10 years, since the Somalis and Congolese came to London, they taught us a new level of violence. These people had seen family members mutilated so when they said ‘I’m gonna smash you up’ us guys would be shouting ‘yo blud, what you mean?’ and they would just pull out a blade and juk [stab] you in the chest. It upped the speed and level of violence for us British born guys. We had to arm up to protect ourselves. It became an upward spiral”

This ties in with conversations I have had with rank and file Police Officers in my own area, Hayes. I have been advised that there is a war going on for the trade between the Somalis, Afghans and Eastern European crime gangs which has led to an increase in violence both here and in neighbouring West Drayton.

Secondly, the Police now are hit with barriers they didn’t have before when tackling violent crime. Whilst it is true that funding is an issue, political correctness has manifested itself within the senior levels of the force and has led to reluctance in confronting the fact that both perpetrators and victims come predominantly and disproportionately from minority communities. This has led to the cut back in intelligence led stop and search of gang members because it could be perceived as ‘racist’.

I was once told by a young lady who works for a firm of solicitors in my area that when her clients were arrested, throwing in an accusation of racism against the arresting officer would get them put on limited duties for a while whilst an investigation was carried out, making them think again about carrying out such an arrest next time.

Thirdly, communications channels are now far more widely available and cheaper than they ever were, allowing gangs to organise more quickly and respond to threats to their ‘patch’. Unregistered Pay as You Go mobile phones (known as ‘burners’) are easy to buy for under £20 and can be thrown away and replaced quickly and easily, meaning that the police cannot track or listen in to known high level criminals. Added to the new phenomenon of social media, where gang members taunt each other on line via multiple platforms and ‘drill rap’ videos and it is easy to see how a turf war can be escalated and occur very quickly.

So, what is the answer?

Glasgow had a similar issue with rising crime and has turned itself around via an intelligence led solution where police, youth workers, community leaders and government agencies all worked together to pool resources and tackle the problem at the root, engaging with those vulnerable to getting involved in a life of gangs and crime and turning them away from that path. The Evening Standard have highlighted this during their recent newspaper campaign against the rising death toll in London and deserve credit for doing so – The Mayor could do worse than engage and listen to the people they have spoken with.

There is also a problem where the police no longer have the links to communities that they had back in the seventies and early eighties. Many of the officers I have spoken with locally have been drafted in from other areas and as such need time to get to know what is going on within the communities they are policing. Unfortunately, with the multiple re-arrangements being carried out within the Met, those officers tend to be moved around, as do those in charge of the force in the area. A long term local policing plan where officers are embedded in their areas for a period of years will have the effect of a better understanding on the ground and help to build links with the community.

Finally, both the police and the border agencies need to be given the equipment and the back up to do their job, free of the politically correct dogma we see coming out of both City Hall and Westminster. A criminal is a criminal, irrespective of their race or religion. If the community led campaign fails an individual and they become a hardened gang member and menace to the local community then they need to face the full force of the law upon committing a crime and be removed until they are no longer a threat.

This all takes time, organisation and in some cases, funding. Most of all, it takes the will to want to confront and defeat the root causes of the problem.

By trying to deflect the blame on to ‘middle class drug use at parties’, Sadiq Khan is virtue signalling and ignoring the real reasons behind the crime wave that is hitting our City.

That is a dereliction of his duty to serve and a betrayal of all those affected by violent crime. It is time for him to resign and allow somebody with the guts and drive to replace him to get a grip before more young lives are needlessly lost.

Freedom at Threat: Enfield Council Taken Over by Labour Cronies!

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

What could be worse than a moronic Labour led council? A Labour led council of which promotes diversity and pandering to certain voting blocs!

This is applicable to the one in Enfield. According to The Times, this cronyism is applicable to how the Labour led council has seemingly been taken over by both members of the Alevi community (a religious minority group consisting mainly of both Kurds and Turks), not to mention relatives of a convicted felon.

In the article, it details how through a process of deselection the council made sure that many currently serving councillors were replaced by people from this community to pander to a voting bloc, despite that demographic only making up 10% of the borough’s population.

This, combined with how various members of the Kurdish and Turkish community joined the party before the selection process, means that now the council now consists of 40% Kurds, Turks and Turkish Cypriots, being vastly overrepresented in it.

To make matters worse, some of these councillors are related to a former one; one Nesimi Erbil, who represented Labour for the Lower Edmonton ward, who had to stand down because of two suspended prison sentences; the first in 2014 for fraud and the other in 2016 for a public order offence.

His extended family who have seemingly infiltrated the council include a daughter, a niece, a nephew, someone connected through marriage and two related to his cousin, a man who is the chairman of the British Alevi Federation. One of the people related to the cousin (Saray Karakus) is now the Mayor of Enfield, as well as a Labour representative of the Haselbury ward. There are also other unspecified ones consisting of business associates or relatives.

This level of cronyism and diversity hire has also led to new-time councillors taking up positions given to more experienced councillors, such as planning chairman and cabinet member for the environment. It seems that such backhand deals are seeming to trump any sort of meritocracy in Enfield Council these days.

And before anyone defends such cronyism on the grounds of ‘diversity’, it turns out that black councillors are also getting the short end of this behaviour too. Take for example how according to one councillor, all six black councillors were deselected (despite Black British making up 17% of the overall borough, more so than the other demographic groups, overrepresenting their proportion in Enfield Council now) in favour of Turkish candidates.

The situation is apparently so bad, that the Labour NEC have been informed of the problem and are now investigating such behaviour in the council. Previous attempts to question such nepotism by Conservative council leader Joanne Laban were shut down, due to the supposed ‘personal’ nature of the questioning and how they didn’t relate to council matters. Even current Momentum members and centre-right members of the Labour area have shown opposition to this takeover, along with other Turkish members of the council. The main party are also investigating the issue on both sides.

So, in short, we have a council taken over by heavy cronyism and nepotism, whereby any sort of dissent is not tolerated.

You know what makes this worse? This is my council.

Now while thankfully I never voted for Labour at these elections (instead for two Conservative councillors and one UKIP candidate – I was even planning to run for my party For Britain but to no avail) it does seem alarming that such corruption such exist for any party, let alone one of the most prominent in the country.

Hopefully this issue should be sorted, especially with the investigation going on with contributions from the Labour Party themselves. The various MPs of the Enfield Borough have not commented on the incident yet.

Why the populist right needs to distance themselves from Generation Identity

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Patriotism by

Admittedly, there are certain times within a movement’s history when one has to draw a line in the sand. This is naturally a good thing of course; indicating where one’s limits lie in terms of what is acceptable among the movement not only helps to define it but also allows for the movement to be seen as moderate to weed out any extremist people who may latch onto it; trying to make themselves seem more moderate when they are anything but. This is what I believe among other people within the populist right, is what we need as a movement to do to the identitarian group Generation Identity.

Why is this? There doesn’t seem to be anything inherently wrong with them; they peacefully protest alongside genuine patriots who care about their country, support our side in many of our causes including reducing mass immigration and freeing Tommy Robinson and are heavily proactive most notably in stopping NGO boats escorting economic migrants to Europe. So, what could be wrong with that? The problem is what their main goals are as opposed to the other campaigns they support. The group seemed about as steeped in racial identity politics as your typical Stand Up To Racism idiot or your average Richard Spencer alt-right supporter for reasons of which I’ll discuss shortly.

Now while there is nothing wrong with criticising mass immigration or Islamic terrorism, and one shouldn’t be called racist for doing either. That being said, we shouldn’t at the same time backing people steeped in identitarianism or actual otherwise we are no better than our social justice warrior counterparts on the left, making it a difficult balance at times. I for one regret and felt immensely guilty for bringing up how I was one of the few white British people at my workplace during my first contribution to the Red Pill Factor livestream, especially given how well my fellow colleagues treat me there, of who I deeply apologise to if they are reading this.

It is because I was reducing them to their racial and national traits when I shouldn’t have. It was unnecessary because it didn’t really fit the conversation beyond the fact we were discussing immigration affecting the British workforce as a whole. People are far more than just their race or nationality; they are their character more than anything else. Judging them solely on their race or nationality is inherently wrong.

Hence why us on the populist right cannot support GI. If we claim to be not racist and such, we shouldn’t be associating ourselves with a group who advocates as a main policy ethnopluralism, as established on their website (of which I read so you don’t have to). This idea, first established by French philosopher Alain de Benoist and coined by Henning Eichberg advocates for countries divided by ethnicity. In other words, a fancier way of advocating racial segregation.

The idea had also found favour among the extreme French movement the Nouvelle Droite (meaning New Right in English) and the alt-right in the United States, so much so that even Richard Spencer gave Benoist a platform at one of his events despite the latter distancing himself from such movements. Both have already received much heavy criticism for their openly racist and extreme views, and it’s not like Generation Identity do much to be more moderate on the issue.

After all, they suggest that such a policy would be good because it supposedly ‘warms tensions’ between cultures. This sounds utterly absurd, given that one of the main problems that both Great Britain and Western society has as a whole is how migrant communities are creating tension among the native population by refusing to integrate.

The balkanisation of the West if you will and forgive if I would not rather our glorious isles resemble the former Yugoslavia in the 90s because of such idiotic policies. Having a system like this in place also seems alarmingly racist and akin to other systems of its kind, like say the Apartheid system employed in South Africa for the longest time or racial segregation in the southern areas of the United States during the Jim Crow era. From this, it would seem bizarre why those on the populist right would want to attach ourselves with such a movement at all based on its profoundly illiberal and racist policies, given we claim to stand against both.

Meanwhile, like many other far-right groups, Generation Identity are steeped in historical iconography. Take for example their symbol, of which represents the Lambda, of which King Leonidas used in the Battle of Thermopylae to fend off Persian forces, despite being vastly outnumbered and eventually losing to the latter forces. If that sounds at all familiar that is because it most recently adapted into the 2006 film 300 starring Gerard Butler, and the application of a military conflict to a fight against bad government policies over immigration seem as bombastically absurd as half of the historically inaccurate fantasy in the Zack Snyder film.

Meanwhile, they also pride themselves on Reconquista, whereby they see their fight against the left and their hegemony as akin to how Visigothic kingdoms recaptured the Iberian Peninsula, of which had been conquered by Muslim armies. This again seems laughably absurd given that they seem to be talking of how bringing actual conflict against the left and general immigrant groups as opposed to just using political action to solve their issues. In both cases, we have a group using historical examples of famous battles to not only justify their actions, but imply a war is on their hands and will use any action necessary to win.

That may sound absurd at first, but consider this. They both attempt to block boats carrying migrants from entering ports in countries like Italy for example (not necessarily wrong but shows that this group are willing to go an arguably unnecessary extra mile for their cause) and ITV’s documentary Undercover: Inside Britain’s Far Right (when it wasn’t trying to demonise For Britain leader Anne Marie Waters as a far right Nazi for criticising Islam) revealed how their members often have combat training all the while boost about having self-defence skills. It seems that as opposed to most of the populist right of who peacefully protest and campaign against ideas we don’t like, GI take it a step further and actively prepare for and carry out exercises of which causes actual disruption and confrontation. This clearly isn’t a group based on the non-aggression principle and it seems that they will resort to violence to achieve their aims.

Their general policies beyond the obvious problems with ethnopluralism also should send alarm bells ringing. They discuss the demographic crisis of which Europe is currently facing and then conflates with the conspiracy theory around The Great Replacement (of which isn’t real, but that is an argument for another time). To solve this, they suggest supposedly ‘reconquer’ cultural vacuums inherent in our societies. And while I am all for reasserting national identity into Great Britain, the idea of supposedly doing it by conquering our lands (whatever that means is hard to say even though it sounds worrying) sounds like aggression and fits right in with the more overtly aggressive stance the group is taking on such serious issues.

Meanwhile, they also advocate rebuilding an ethno-cultural identity without as they say ‘falling into xenophobic reflexes’ which seems impossible given that the inherent policy pushes race above everything else. Also, they stress that they want to determine political discourse through ‘meta-politics’, whereby they outline the determined discourse for ‘direct and concrete’ political decisions later on. This seems slightly authoritarian and again against the more liberal outlook of the populist right movement which accepts people and isn’t planning to determine how political discourse is carried out among our movement, provided the content isn’t extreme.

Finally, discussing general identity, they seem to further establish segregation by suggesting that the only way to maintain our own culture is to reject other cultures mixing with it whatsoever, of which again sounds authoritarian as while there are inherent problems with multiculturalism, completely rejecting and not allowing it at all seems to be extreme in the other direction, and ignore some of the benefits it can bring. The fact that their political outlook is not only authoritarian but makes me sound like your typical social justice warrior can’t be a good thing indicating the inherent problems in the ideology of GI.

Meanwhile, their spokespeople are not ones to inspire confidence in this movement either. Most notably this applies to Martin Sellner of who is arguably the face of GI, all the while being the head of the Austrian affiliation. Now while I will protect Sellner’s right to free speech and heavily criticise his banning in the UK earlier this year (of which I defended his right to speak his ideas in a speech I made at The Liberalists UK’s Count Dankula march) I can still heavily criticise his ideas because of the problems they have. Not only does he apouse a lot of GI’s bogus ideas (mainly The Great Replacement at talks like his Traditional Britain Group back in 2017) but also used to be heavily involved with the Nazi scene in Austria too, of which he was a part of until 2011. And while now it seems that he has claimed to have changed his tune, it seems that his views haven’t changed much at all, given the identitarian politics of GI.

Meanwhile, other supporters have been bluntly open about the racism within GI. Melanie Dittmer of Rhineland Idenitarians has said such wonderful thoughts such as ‘if you throw all the colors together, you end up with brown’ and when asked by a German-Arab reporter as to what the difference between her and Dittmer were, the latter proudly (and unironically) replies with ‘the blood!’. And while one may argue I am simply using the guilt by association fallacy, my response would be that the inherent ideas of GI are bad as it is, so it’s not like the movement were already beyond the pale before having cranks like Sellner and Dittmer metaphorically s*it the bed. Meanwhile, the fact that they are faces of this movement also indicates that the group of GI aren’t terribly bothered by having these cranks be the spokespeople for their movement either.

So, their constant clinging on to us, whether it be through marching with us with their flags or banners or standing shoulder to shoulder with us during campaigning is a massive problem. Not to mention how many of the moderate voices on our side have seemingly bought into their message hook line and sinker. For example, Canadian journalist Lauren Southern hangs around with the likes of Sellner quite a bit, and is now joining him in suing the UK over their recent ban there. Meanwhile, the youth branch of UKIP Young Independence initially invited him to speak for a talk, of which was decisively cancelled after much outcry. Both Southern and UKIP are some of our more famous and moderate voices, which makes their hanging around of guys like these worrying, especially with the former having expressed sympathy with the alt-right before. Their association to us only gives fuel to the fire of the left who hate us and will use any tactic to silence us.

After all, they are a racial identitarian group of who espouse illiberal policies all the while bizarrely constantly comparing historical conflicts to nowadays, indicating that they are willing to use violence and intimidation to get what they want. And finally, they seem more bothered by racial separation, of which is not only inherently racist and discriminatory, but also creates more of a problem with racial and national segregation in our society of which is already creating enough tension within our communities as it is.

In short they are no different to far right parties or groups like the British National Party or the National Front in that sense (their pseudointellectualism and slicker presentation meaning that they aren’t fully far right, of which is common among the alt-right), they are no different to the intolerance of left wing identitarian movements and their use of history to push ethno-nationalist propaganda is no better than the likes of Nazi Germany who pushed the greatness of the Aryan race or the Greek party Golden Dawn pushing the Battle of Thermopylae and the image of the Spartans down their voting bloc, especially given GI’s inherent illiberal values being similar across the board.

So, what can we do?

We do need to start distancing ourselves from GI. After all, doing such an act can be good for our movement. UKIP were decisive in kicking out various Nazi types who tried to join. Tommy Robinson struggled for years to remove actual racists from the English Defence League of which kept them out later on. General conservatives in America started to distance themselves from the alt-right once it became clear how extreme they were. And Anne Marie Waters blocked GI’s Jordan Diamond from attending her events when his position became clear. If we stand by our principles distancing ourselves as much as possible from GI will be a good start. Because if we don’t, all we are doing is playing into the left’s hands of who will smear us over these fringe individuals infiltrating our movements. Don’t think this is a small issue either.

Remember all the nonsense they gave us over the video of Ali Dawah being attacked by the Democratic Football Lads Alliance at the Day For Freedom? Or their whinging about Stefan Molyneux’s connection to that event too given his statements about black people in the past? They will jump on any opportunity to sink us. We can’t give it to them. We need to distance ourselves from GI as much as we can. After all, if we endlessly rightly criticise the left for supporting identitarian lunatics like Black Lives Matter and Stand Up To Racism, surely we should be setting an example. That is why the populist right needs to distance ourselves from Generation Identity. If we don’t, we will suffer slowly but surely once their true intentions become clearer and clearer by the day.

Petrol bomb attacks plague Northern Ireland

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

Recently, Northern Ireland has been struck with fire bomb attacks, targetting the town of Derry, specifically the Fountain with over 30 being thrown at police alone.

Various politicians and senior officials have condemned the violence. This includes both Democratic Unionist Party and Sinn Fein figures, while Superintendent Gordon McCalmont thanked those who helped to stop the attacks, calling it ‘an attack on our whole community’.

It seems that religious tension is part of the reason why such attacks have been frequent in this area. Democratic Unionist Party leader Arlene Foster called for police to aid people within this area, which is a highly Protestant area.

Whether this means more attacks on this area will become the norm is yet to be seen.

What is does show though is that one of the main problems with Northern Irish society – the religious differences between Protestants and Catholics – has yet to go away, despite all the progress made up to this point.

British Trump Rally Will Go Ahead Despite BAN By London Mayor’s Police

in Anglophobia / Marxism/World News by

On the 20th of January 1981, in his Inaugural Address, President Ronald Reagan expressed how America must “do whatever needs to be done to preserve this last and greatest bastion of freedom.”

America, we will, despite effectively a threat by our police forces to imprison the UKIP London Chair, Freddy Vaccha; my deputy, Martin; and myself for three months imprisonment, stand firm, and welcome on the 14th of July your choice of president.

London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s Met Police have applied for a Public Order to stop us assembling at the US Embassy, while they will allow far-left groups to nonetheless counter-protest there against us. Despite weeks of pressure from the state, we will not cancel this event. We will stand firm against communism! We will march for Trump, through the streets of London, even if the police block us from the US Embassy.

If the British Prime Minister or Queen visited the USA, can you imagine the chair of the New York Republicans being banned from going anywhere near the British Embassy, or in fact, one side of New York City, in case he gave a short speech in support of the Anglo-American alliance? This is the effective situation with the police objecting to Mr Vachha giving a speech to welcome Donald. I run “Make Britain Great Again” – the British equivalent to the Tea Party – and with the support of patriots within the European Parliament and the London Assembly, my supporters and I will stand firm for democracy, and in solidarity with our American brethren.

We will do so not just out of respect for your democratic vote. Not just because we admire Trump’s stance against globalism and political correctness. Not just because it is the morally right thing to do. But because you truly are the only bastion of freedom in the world today. When we look down that dark tunnel, you are that glimmer of light in the distance. It is YOU, our cousins across the Atlantic, that give us the power to dream of peace and freedom. You help us find the courage to fight against these incredible forces of evil that dominate our land.

It is today I find myself, as subject of the British Queen, looking to our brothers across the USA as the last bastion of not just freedom, but hope for humanity. While Americans look in horror as they observe the expansion of liberalism into California, I know our nation has fallen far further than you probably imagine. Our once beautiful country is overrun by an unholy alliance of Islamism and Marxism. My brothers, I pray you avoid this fate. Your fortieth president’s words almost bring me to tears, “You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness. ”

We know all to well what horror awaits you if you do not reject the song of globalism. The British Overton window is so far left that Obama looks like a hardcore patriot. The main opposition party rallies under the red flag of communism, singing the L’Internationale song, as their leader poses with statuettes of Lenin.

My family left Zimbabwe, our home for generations, to return to Britain, where rule of law is supposed to exist. Where John Stuart Mill defined the concept of negative liberty, which came to be better expressed in the United States. Where there is the mother of all Parliaments. Now I stand fighting for freedom, while a wave of Koch brothers postmodernist hyper-individualistic snowflakes have thrown open our borders, welcoming in thousands of illegal immigrants as terrorism, murder and rape figures soar. Theresa May has cheated ‘we, the people’, killing democracy, by refusing us Brexit that we clearly voted for.

Terrorist attacks on stadiums, shops, and even the home of the Queen, and the Parliament – our equivalent to Congress – are so frequent that no one is shocked any more. The Mayor of London, who opposes Trump’s visit has stood on a platform 9 times with a radical imam called Suliman Gani, who supported ISIS. He complained to MPs who condemned a hardline Islamic cleric. His own brother-in-law was part of the radical terrorist group Al-Muhajiroun. Khan brushes of these rising Islamic terror attacks as “part and parcel” of city life, while anyone who opposes Sharia law risks imprisonment for up to six years.

Luke Nash-Jones, Organiser of the pro-Trump rally in London, and Leader of Make Britain Great Again, waves a Gadsden flag as a warning to the British monarch not to ignore the voice of the people, as he begins a speech to a Brexit rally.

Trump rightly claimed London has “no go zones”. Gang warfare on our streets is out of control, as our capital city has a higher murder rate than New York City. Men with machetes and swords walk the streets slaughtering our children, while the police leave the mothers to wipe up their dead children’s blood. We are not permitted to carry a gun to protect ourselves – even owning a knife can result in imprisonment.

Free speech no longer exists in Britain. The police spend their budget on arresting and imprisoning people who make ‘politically incorrect’, conservative, comments on Facebook or Twitter. Your founding father, George Washington said that, “If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” London police charged an American lady Amy for wishing someone a “gay day” –  she was held in a police cell. The police beat u elderly people who march for freedom.

Melanie Shaw, Tommy Robinson, Emma West, and others have been locked up under Orwellian laws, for calling out the child rape epidemic in these isles, where MPs and Pakistani men have raped thousands of little girls, as councillors and the police, desperate to embrace multiculturalism and diversity, covered up their actions. Judges have dismissed cases, letting paedophiles walk free, because their wives could not speak English, or because they stated such showed understanding of other cultures. Left-wing MP Naz Shah told the victims to “Shut up for the good of diversity”.

I must quote again a speech of Ronald Reagan,

The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn’t die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it’s a simple answer after all. You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, “There is a price we will not pay.” There is a point beyond which they must not advance. This is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwater’s “peace through strength.” Winston Churchill said that “the destiny of man is not measured by material computation. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits — not animals.” And he said, “There is something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty.”

From the cesspit of degenerate hedonism, we see that glimmer of hope on a YouTube channel – the news that our state-owned television networks shield from us. We wave the Gadsden flag at rallies across these isles, as police seek to arrest persons wearing red “Make Britain Great Again” baseball caps. Millions of Britons feel the spirit of those men who in 1776 fought for their freedom. Today we face not a question of whether we have representation, but of our very survival!

While the London Mayor’s police force has sought to ban any pro-Trump rally or march, they have allowed numerous counter-protestors to insult you and your President. They have even tolerated a disrespectful “Baby Trump” blimp to fly, but banned the UKIP London Chair from taking a pro-Trump boat down the Thames.

I conclude with words Reagan read in that address, as he referred to the diary of Pvt. Treptow who was killed in World War II. He had inscribed the following pledge, ”America must win this war. Therefore I will work, I will save, I will sacrifice, I will endure, I will fight cheerfully and do my utmost, as if the issue of the whole struggle depended on me alone.” You stood by us in World War II, and helped save Europe. We need you again.

Shock and anger as Trump Rally BANNED by Met Police.

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

The eagerly awaited Trump welcome rally on the 14th July has been BANNED from the US Embassy or anywhere south of the River Thames by Met Police under an inappropriate application of Public Order Act (POA) sections 12 and 14.

Luke Nash Jones was contacted by the London police force who informed him that if he, Martin Costello, or UKIP London Chairman Freddy Vaccha go anywhere near the US Embassy, they will be arrested and would spend up to 3 months in prison!

If the British Prime Minister or Queen visited the USA, can you imagine the chair of the New York Republicans being banned from going anywhere near the British Embassy, or in fact, one side of New York City, in case he gave a short speech in support of the Anglo-American alliance?

The police have no basis to apply POA to ban the rally, and hence a London Assembly member has contacted the Met police. Section 12 of the order states

“If the senior police officer, having regard to the time or place at which and the circumstances in which any public procession is being held or is intended to be held and to its route or proposed route, reasonably believes that—

(a)it may result in serious public disorder, serious damage to property or serious disruption to the life of the community.”

Luke has organised many peaceful rallies, which never caused “serious damage to property” or caused lives to be at risk. We have never called for violence, so section 12 is not relevant. It only applies if a rally organiser calls for violence.

Section 14 of the order states “If the senior police officer, having regard to the time or place at which and the circumstances in which any public assembly is being held or is intended to be held, reasonably believes that—

 (b)the purpose of the persons organising it is the intimidation of others with a view to compelling them not to do an act they have a right to do, or to do an act they have a right not to do.

There is no grounds to claim either of these sections. We have a history of successful rallies and we wish to welcome the elected leader of our closet ally, the United States! We need a trade deal post-Brexit!

If anything, any Public Order to disperse should be issued to the fascist counter-protesters who seek to attack those welcoming Trump. The duty of the police is to ensure us a safe route from the US Embassy, through Parliament Square, and on to Downing Street. The fascist snowflakes will have their protest on the 13th, and on the 14th, those with a brain cell will stand for democracy!

To move the assembly from the new US Embassy to the old embassy and/or Trafalgar Square would be to remove all effectiveness, ignoring the duty of the police to protect peaceful assemblies, and thus a breach of the ECHR Articles 9, 10, and 11.

Under the ECHR, is utterly illegal to be “imposing a condition on the location of a protest”, this effectively goes against the purpose of the rally – we must be outside the real embassy to show solidarity with Americans in London!

It is clear that the likes of Khan and the rest of the political establishment wish to stop the American embassy staff filming us for their Twitter and any video of the pro-Trump crowd going viral, yet somehow the latte liberals’ pathetic baby Trump blimp gets the green light of all and sundry to see. This childish stunt shows shocking misjudgement and is an embarrassment to our glorious country!

If the Trump rally is to be cancelled, the relevant section of the POA is section 13, under which the anti-Trump riot would also be cancelled.

Could you imagine this happening between Boris Johnson and Obama on a visit to the UK? What is our country coming to if we can’t even welcome the elected POTUS and show him that he is welcome here and the US is a crucial ally once again as we desperately try to escape the clutches of the corrupt EU?

North Korea, Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, many parallels from history can be aligned to this latest attack on the freedom of speech. We are living in very dark times indeed and unless we stand for free speech, we will all be slaves and never truly free.

Tommy Robinson Appeal CANCELLED Because Judge ‘Not ready’!

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

In an underhanded move by London’s Royal Courts of Justice, Tommy Robinson’s  appeal for release hearing on the 10th July has been postponed just days before the planned huge rally in protest on his incarceration.

The reason given was that the government’s lawyers say ‘they’re not ready’.

Arrested recently on the grounds of a “breach of the peace”, a rushed trial saw him jailed within an hour, where the charge was changed to “contempt of court”.

Tommy was not given an opportunity to get his own lawyer to the court room, and the court defence lawyer advised him to plead guilty – which he did, in order to avoid an even longer sentence.

It is clear that the government do not want a public backlash to take place on the 14th July when tens of thousands are once again expected to rally in the capital against the latest draconian attack on freedom of speech.

Many, whether they agree if with Robinson’s views or not, believe that the Orwellian threat is very real and must be tackled in unison in order to prevent the police state locking down further and eroding our freedom.

The hearing will now take place on 24th July.

Lefty Pretty SoyBoy Trudeau Frantically Denies Sexually Assaulting Waitress

in Anglophobia / Marxism/World News by

Pretty-faced princess of the postmodernist lefty cess-pit, the Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau has denied allegations that he groped a reporter at a festival in 2000.

Though a past issue of the Creston Valley Advance newspaper reveals a claim that Mr Trudeau apologised for his behaviour and said: “If I had known you were reporting for a national paper, I never would have been so forward.” A rather difficult statement for the left who are proudly promoting the #MeToo campaign.

The event in Creston, British Columbia, was held to raise money for an avalanche safety charity with which Mr Trudeau was involved.

Days afterwards, an unsigned editorial appeared in a local paper accusing him of “groping” a young female reporter. The piece accused Mr Trudeau of “inappropriately handling” the reporter, who felt “blatantly disrespected” by the actions, which were not described.

The prime minister said he did not recall any “negative interactions” at the event.

CBC spoke to Valerie Bourne, the publisher of the paper at the time, and the paper’s then-editor, Brian Bell, both of whom believe the reporter.

Moped gangs PRETEND to be Traffic Police to trick drivers

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

When the problems with moped crime in London couldn’t look like they could get any worse, now they are resorting to impersonating traffic police to trick drivers to pull over and subsequently threaten them for valuable items.

According to the Evening Standard, police are now warning of such behaviour, attributing it to a specific incident in the Chelsea Embankment whereby a cab was caught by said impersonators, who claimed the cab’s passengers had run a red light. Once the group didn’t identify themselves and called the police, the gang drove off.

Meanwhile, such gangs adopt police tactics such as having blue flashing lights and usually resort to threats to gain what they want.

Apparently, such issues are already adding to an intense problem for the police in the explosion of moped crime of which has sprung up from 827 in 2012 to over 23,000 in 2017 alone.

Many people have been the unfortunate victims of this during this epidemic including the author of this article, and the fact that both those living in working class and upper-class areas of London are being affected heavily by this, makes it a huge problem across the board. The recent mugging by British comedian Michael McIntyre and his family further put this point home.

Now while the police have solutions to combat this issue, such as using decoy bikes and remote-control spikes, it seems that the recent explosion of this crime has roots that go further than what has been discussed.

Between the recent claims about the lack of resources to deal with low level crime such as burglaries and the powers that be advising officers to avoid chasing moped gangs because of health and safety, it seems that the police have their hands tied behind their back in terms of any blunt solutions to these issues which is stopping any progress from being made in stopping the issue.

Add to this a mayor more bothered with giving resources to hate crime hubs and diversity hiring strategies for the Metropolitan Police than solving actual crime, and you have a recipe for disaster. The clashing of immigrant communities in certain London boroughs and the high levels of poverty in the capital highlights this further.

This all builds an atmosphere which not only inevitably leads to general crime, but its increase as well, and one theory in particular demonstrates this. The Broken Windows theory was one coined by social scientists James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling of who discussed how when general anti-social behaviour is allowed to go unpunished, more serious crime becomes acceptable. In essence, if one broken window wasn’t fixed, it would lead to the other windows being broken, as ‘one unrepaired window is a signal that no-one cares, and so breaking more windows costs nothing.’

The fact that police do not investigate low level crime such as burglaries much anymore and that only 7% of overall robberies are being solved is a testament to this. The fact that no-one in the capital seems to be bothered by high levels of poverty either speaks to this also.

Which is why the only solution is to bring back tougher policing. As the author of this article said in a recent MBGA News livestream, bring back police patrols. Bring back stop and search. Bring back tough policing. Have better motor services. Reopen police stations, some shut under Sadiq Khan’s watch.

If this tough policing worked for both New York and Glasgow, the former used the idea of Broken Windows in their policing as well, there is no reason why it shouldn’t work for London.

Meanwhile, socio-economic issues need to be examined. Given the high levels of poverty in the capital, there should be a bigger effort made in giving opportunities for people. For example, given that there are thousands of young people involved in gang activity with police saying the average age of those carrying out moped crime being just 15, maybe there needs to be better opportunities for them so they don’t resort to crime. Reopening closed youth clubs would be a good start, all the while fixing the issues for youth apprenticeships for instance would be a wise move too.

All the while mass immigration needs to be examined. The creation of various migrant ghettos throughout the capital has subsequently created division among racial and tribal lines, often leading to high crime rates throughout these areas.

Reducing the high levels of immigration into the capital is necessary to not only slow down the growth of these divisions, but make it easier to deal with within our own borders as well. It should also allow more demand for housing, already strained partially because of mass immigration, not to mention how all the dirty Russian, Chinese and Gulf money owns a good chunk of the property market, creating a monopoly whereby properties remain empty, all the while becoming increasingly expensive for your regular Londoner.

Like Canada, it has created a situation whereby first-time buyers are increasingly locked out of the property market, hence why this dirty money needs to be at first examined and then removed from the market altogether.

Such suggestions could aid the dire socio-economic conditions of the capital at the minute, which plagues it like a virus.  

These are just suggestions at this point. But given such problems exist in London, someone needs to start addressing them, especially given how the current Mayor seems unable to do so. London deserves better than being a series of poor immigrant ghettos where crime is becoming the norm and no-one in power seems to give a damn about it. London deserves better than this.

Tommy Robinson’s Appeal Judge Has Already Declared Him GUILTY

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Tommy Robinson’s appeal will be heard on 10th of July by Britain’s top judge Lord Brian Leveson.

Leveson has ALREADY declared Tommy to be guilty, before hearing the appeal.

He gave an interview to the BBC Radio 4’s Law In Action programme on the 24th of June in which he used the case of Tommy Robinson as an example of when posting material on the internet can lead to imprisonment due to contempt of court.

At 03:45 into the interview, Leveson states:

“Members of the public ought to know that publishing comments which impact unfairly on the course of a trial could constitute contempt of court and there is a very good recent example of a man who videoed material which he fed into the internet which did constitute contempt of court as a result of which he was sentenced to a term of imprisonment.”

English Courts Protect Sharia Law BUT Make It a CRIME For Christians To Pray

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

The High Court has today upheld the Public Space Protection Order created by London’s Ealing Council in April 2018. The Ealing PSPO criminalises prayer, the handing out of leaflets and any act of approval regarding Christian beliefs.

Whether you are religious or not, whatever your beliefs be, this is fundamentally a question of free speech. If the state bans Christians from peacefully praying, you will be next.

A group of London Christians have been ostracised for peacefully holding a prayer vigil near an abortion clinic. Meanwhile, changes unveiled by the Sentencing Council last month could see anyone critical of Islam given up to six years’ jail time.

The Ealing residents believe abortion to be murder, and hold pro-life vigils in hope that they can stop what they see as murder. They are not violent. They simply pray, and in so doing, they do not breach the harm principle defined by John Stuart Mill, the father of free speech.

Alina Dulgheriu, a mother aided by pro-life vigils and who brought the legal challenge is considering options for appeal.

“Today the Court has said that it is okay for councils to criminalise prayer, even silent prayer on our streets, how can this be right? Today the Court has dismissed fundamental human rights such as freedom of expression because it gives authorities the benefit of the doubt in whether doing so is reasonable or not. I thought the whole point of human rights is that authorities have to truly justify draconian laws?”

Andre Clovis of Tuckers Solicitors, representing Ms Dulgheriu has issued the following statement:

“This outcome sets a dangerous precedent and is a direct attack upon our very basic rights, such as freedom of expression. My view is that this decision cannot and should not be looked at in isolation for fear we continue the worrying trend of becoming a society where those with opposing views simply seek to shut each other down rather than engage in dialogue and debate.”

“The true test for your belief in freedom of expression, is whether you are prepared to fight for the rights of those whose views you do not share, because you believe it is their right to hold and express views different from your own.”

Clare Carberry, an Ealing resident and spokeswoman for the Be Here For Me campaign said:

“Much of the abuse she has experienced has been owing to grotesquely false allegations shamefully supported and bruited about by those who oppose her, including my own council ( Ealing) and even my local MP Rupa Huq.”

#FreeTommy and OTHERS: British State THREW Young Mum Emma West in the Gulag

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

Emma West, a mother, was arrested in November 2011 after she protested about immigration whilst travelling on a bus with her baby. Her protest was captured on video and uploaded to YouTube as well as being copied by many national media outlets. The video was viewed millions of times.

A judge said West was clearly suffering from mental health problems at the time of the outburst. Nonetheless, the state respond urgently, harshly, with a fury to which they didn’t apply to the disgusting Parliamentary paedophiles in Dolphin Square, or the Pakistani child rape gangs in Rotherham.

Following the upload of the video Emma was arrested, held in the UK’s highest security prison for women – she hasn’t killed anyone, she said some words, which yes, were offensive – no one died! Britain is supposed to have a concept of freedom of speech, whereby you can say anything, even if rude or stupid, as long as you don’t breach John Stuart Mill’s harm principle. West stated that most people on the bus were not English – she didn’t call for them to die, or otherwise harmed.

Here are some of her comments:

She says: “What’s this country coming to?”

“A load of black people and and load of f***ing Polish.”

One commuter challenges West, who rounds on him telling him: “You aren’t English”, to which he replies “No, I’m not”

She then scans the tram, pointing out people one-by-one, saying: “You ain’t English, you ain’t English, None of you are f***ing English.

“Get back to your own f***ing countries.”

“Britain is nothing now, Britain is f***k all.

“My Britain is f**k all now.”

You can argue that is foulmouthed, but it was not a call for violence. Emma lives in a country which has been made unrecognisable by the permitting of mass immigration for over sixty years. Neither Emma nor any other native English man or woman (or Briton come to that) has had any say in this invasion of the country. This most fundamental act of betrayal has been committed by generations of British politicians, and people feel they have no voice.

West was released and then subjected to a year and a half’s intimidation by the state as the powers-that-be desperately tried to get her to plead guilty to charges relating to racially motivated serious crimes (racially aggravated intentional harassment and racially aggravated assault) which would have almost certainly sent her to prison. Eventually, worn down by the stress she pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of racially aggravated harassment, alarm or distress.

But those with power were not satisfied simply with her criminal conviction. Emma has now had her livelihood as a dental nurse taken away by the General Medical Council with this preternaturally smug judgement, as a [Dental Council] spokeswoman said: “Her conduct was truly appalling.”

“It clearly has the capacity to bring the profession into disrepute and to undermine public confidence in its standards.”

“Furthermore, her violent and abusive conduct would demonstrate a real risk to the safety of patients.”

“In relation to her racially aggravated offence, this was committed in a public setting and received further public exposure, as a person had uploaded the video clip to the internet which has been viewed extensively.”

So there you have it, political correctness can not only send you into the clutches of the law but take your means of living away. It is reassuring to know that instead of dealing with real problems like the increase in rape statistics due to mass migration, the paedophile epidemic in which politicians are complicit, and the soaring murder figures, our police are busy banging people up for not embracing cultural Marxism. Welcome to the USSR, to 1984, to the hell that is modern communist Britain.

London Police Overlook Illegal Immigration, Stating No Reason for 20% INCREASE in Rape

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

The number of alleged rapes reported to police in London has risen by almost 20 per cent in a disturbing increase police are struggling to explain.

There were 7,613 reported rapes in the year to January, compared to 6,392 over the previous 12 months, according to figures collated by the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC).

Often, lefties will brush off rape increases, by saying the hard work of deranged feminists flashing their tits at people in the name of sexual equality has made it easier for rape victims to come forward. That bullshit won’t sell this time, because Sir Craig Mackey, deputy commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, said the rise could not be accounted for simply by more victims feeling able to report abuse or better recording practices. Oh, damn!

This is a massive turning point. Joanne McCartney, the deputy mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, told the meeting on Wednesday that Sir Craig’s statement was “the first time a senior officer has come to this committee and accepted that the increase in sexual violence may not just be about an increase in reporting and confidence”.

Scotland Yard has emphasised that the statistics emerged following an attempted rape and robbery by Nayed Hoque, 20, of Manor Park.

Sir Craig muttered, “there is something going on with sexual offending in London that we don’t fully understand.

“We see the end of it but we don’t understand the causes.”

Surely it has nothing to do with the increase in illegal immigration, as hordes of unskilled, aggressive, Sharia-praising thugs assemble in Calais, offering to kill us all?

A German report found that 92.1 percent of the increase in rape was attributable to illegal immigrants. In Leipzig, rape figures increased by 670%!

Pfeiffer et al. 2018 found that there was a high level of violence by Morrocan migrants – these people are not genuine refugees under UN convention.

Other data points are also damning. Between 2014 and 2016, the share of solved violent crimes attributed to asylum seekers increased to 13.3 percent from 4.3 percent — a disproportionately high share compared with the state’s foreign population. Bloomberg says this is “behavior that would go unpunished, or is even encouraged, [in their home countries]”.

Famous YouTubers join both UKIP and For Britain. What does this mean?

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit by

Over the last week or so, there has been a collective shift for the main pro-Brexit populist parties in Britain in that various famous YouTubers have signed up to them. On the one hand, the likes of Sargon Of Akkad, Count Dankula, Paul Joseph Watson and Milo Yiannopoulos have joined UKIP. Meanwhile, the likes of Reverend Simon Sideways have joined For Britain.

What does this mean for both parties? On the one hand, it provides good news for both parties. For UKIP, this is probably the best news for the party since they helped to win the EU referendum back in 2016. This increased attention they have received as a result hasn’t gone unnoticed all, with them gaining between 500 to a thousand new members from the increased exposure.

All the while, having various prominent members of the sceptic community of YouTube may give them some more street cred among those watching their videos and the populist voting crowd of who lost faith in UKIP, feeling that they were a single-issue party. Meanwhile, former leader Nigel Farage may be far from thrilled at this news, because he recently lashed out at the current leader Gerard Batten over the latter’s hard stance on Islam .

Meanwhile Sideways may not be as prominent, but it still gives For Britain a major boost. He has a subscription base of 22k people, all the while being heavily featured in videos about huge protests, like the recent Gays Against Sharia protest in Bristol and the pro Brexit rally in London to celebrate the second anniversary of the result. Now the party has more than Morrissey’s endorsement, which can only be a good sign.

But will the support mean anything in the long run? While the increased support it will undoubtedly give both parties might give both a short-term boost, one could argue as to whether it will sustain them.

Neither For Britain or UKIP have taken the position of opposition government. Both had a poor performance in the recent Lewisham East by-election, for example, David Kurten gained only 380 votes (being beat by the likes of the Women’s Equality Party can never be a good sign for any party). It seems unlikely that the voting public are that bothered by the political right at this point.

The fact that only at most a thousand new members have joined UKIP because of this YouTuber exodus (despite having millions of subscribers between them, not to mention the general followings they have besides that) is not proof that the general public en masse is deserting Labour for the purples. Sargon’s infamous use of the word “n**ger” probably won’t help gain votes.

Add to that how Batten will be standing down early next year, and the Members of the European Parliament for the party losing their jobs because of Brexit, and this only seems like a small term gain for the party as opposed to anything substantial.

For For Britain meanwhile, it may mean something more significant. The increased support they are receiving from big names like Sideways and Morrissey may give them more clout in the political mainstream, which may aid them later on. Whether they can use this to boost their future election prospects is yet to be seen.

Their decent performances in the 2018 local elections and their unremarkable performance in the aforementioned by-election in Lewisham East (where they were beaten by UKIP, indicating that they are still the main Brexit party around), it seems that they have a long way to go before hitting huge electoral success yet. Not to mention controversy about one of their former local election candidates having to be ejected from the party because of his links to the proscribed Neo-Nazi group National Action indicates that they still have a problem with such people clinging onto them for political gain, which won’t do the party any favours in the future.

What it overall shows however is the changing world we live in. The pull a party can gain from having famous Internet personalities is something to marvel at, showing huge progress from the days of traditional celebrities announcing their support for a political candidate or party.

The old celebrity class is losing favour with the masses, especially the various entertainment personalities showing signs of mental collapse over the likes of Brexit and Trump, and the appetite for more rational and fresh voices in politics is growing. Whether UKIP or For Britain can use this to their advantage is yet to be seen.

Brexiteers were right on the NHS: The £350 million payment is finally realised!

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit by

One of the main promises of the Vote Leave campaign (the infamous £350 million for the NHS promised in much of the campaign material) has finally been realised. Despite being brushed off by the likes of Nigel Farage as a ‘mistake’ and it being mocked by Remoaners for two years after the referendum, the promise has finally come to light.

Prime Minister Theresa May has stated that in light of the 70th anniversary of the National Health Service will receive an extra £600 million pounds, partially from a supposed dividend from the money we will no longer have to pay into the EU as part of our former membership of the bloc.

This is great news, especially since it finally vindicates Leave voters and campaigners from being bludgeoned by Remoaners who constantly claim that the slogan was a lie to delegitimise Brexit (because it’s not like the Remain side ever lied at all, oh no).

Taxes are also allegedly meant to go up as well to pay for it, which is clearly spiffle and scaremongering. Previously, half of the money we gave the EU came back to help the NHS. Now, all of it will return to us, meaning we have TWICE as much to spend.

Paul Johnson (the director of the Institute of Fiscal Studies) has stated that all of the EU contributions will be used up by 2022, mainly through the EU divorce bill and government commitments to fill gaps in EU spending. However, soon we will be free of that behemoth! Meanwhile Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt has admitted that even if Brexit doesn’t give us this economic boost, the extra funding will be provided anyway. 

So, despite all of this, it at least seems that the NHS will get extra funding when we leave the EU.  

A new agreement with Libya to crack down on NGOs and human trafficking

in Anglophobia / Marxism/World News by

The Mediterranean has been for many economic migrants the purgatory before the promised land, which would be geographical Europe of course. This is a false idea, those who leave Africa brainwashed and invited in by globalist elites have been told a story that is not quite right. Any sensible person knows that there is certainly no space in Britain, France, Germany and Italy for three-quarters of Africa to show up uninvited.

An army of cheap and illegal labourers who will most likely end up picking potatoes in fields, or having to end up in criminal businesses, such as drugs and prostitution. This is not because we are inhumane, and do not want to give them decent jobs, but because your options career-wise become rather limited when you come to a country illegally and with no documentation.

Luckily, due to a series of fortunate events, including a new Trump-backed Italian government, things are looking slightly more hopeful now at the gates of Europe.  A new deal, struck between the United Nations and the Libyan coast guard sustained by the government in Tripoli, will make sure that the Mediterrenean waters that stretch from the Libyan border with Tunisia all the way to Egypt will no longer be treated as international waters and it will be the responsibility of the Libyans to identify illegal ships with migrants.

Once identified, because the United Nations has now forced Libya to constitute its own JRCC (Joint Rescue Coordination Centre), the ships will have to be returned to the North African shore instead of having to be rescued by the Italian navy that for logistic and peacekeeping reasons used to be forced to bring these migrants to Sicily or Malta which would then give them access to all of the Eurozone.

The International Maritime Organisation (IMO), has helped the weak and unstable current Libyan government, or at least the only one recognised by the west in Libya, to organise its almost non-existent and low skilled military personell’s Search and Rescue (SAR) zone on the coast. As much as the Libyans have been unreliable in the past, with regards to providing answers to the influx of migrants originating from their shores, we now need them. The west, and the European Union especially, has to work with the Libyans to solve this dreadful problem. The problem not being only the arrival of desperate, destitute peoples from Africa per se – but also a serious one of human trafficking.

It is the human traffickers in Africa who organise travel of masses of people coming from Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Nigeria and Zaire all the way to northern Africa. Statistics found by a Fusion investigation have shown that 8o% of women are raped while putting their lives in the hands of these traffickers to get to Europe.

NGOs are a massive problem. Until now, NGO ships most likely funded by Soros, closely linked to the Open Europe Organisation, have been directly or indirectly helping the traffickers’ cause by smuggling illegal aliens into Europe. The “Open Arms” ships, have taken a countless number of aliens all the way to ports like the one of Palermo in Italy or Valencia in Spain. Many of those who arrive then decide to undertake journeys to richer countries like Germany and our very own Britain of course. We hope that with this new United Nations accord, Libya will take its responsability but more importantly the NGO criminal cosmopolitans will no longer have the excuse nor be able to search and rescue in Libyan national waters. Ultimately, Libya is now effectively a secure port; every single one of those migrants will have to be returned to Tripoli under international law.

As desperate as these migrants might be, they are no longer welcome to Europe, because now we have become the desperate ones having to deal with an invasion, in the true sense of the word. The very worst part of it is that we were never asked, the decisions were made for us, by a very dangerous elitist, internationalist, but rather secret, society that has made it their life’s goal to disintegrate the social fabric of our nations.

BREAKING: #FreeTommy: Courts to Hear Appeal Against Imprisonment of Tommy Robinson

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

#FreeTommy Update: Lord Justice Leveson will hear Tommy’s appeal on 10th July 2018 at the Royal Courts of Justice in London.

Sir Brian Henry Leveson is currently the President of the Queen’s Bench Division and Head of Criminal Justice.

While we can all agree this is good news, we have yet to see what the result of the hearing will be. Leveson’s past suggests he may not take a very favourable view of Tommy.

Leveson has previously called for further criminalisation of investigative journalism, and he proposed a tightening of the 1998 Data Protection Act to give journalists less protection and jail those who break the new rules for up to two years. He also called for amending the 1984 Police and Criminal Evidence Act to remove the ‘journalistic exemption’ for material that has been ‘stolen’ — which would mean most information leaked by whistleblowers.

LEAKED? Letter Supposedly By Theresa Says She Will Call Second Referendum In July

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit by

LEAKED? A letter is circulating the Internet with claims it was written by Mrs May.

It says that the transitional period is no longer an option and there will be a second referendum in which one of the options will be to REMAIN in the EU. The only question is, Hasn’t the Queen already given Royal Assent to the Withdrawal Bill?

This move that Nigel Farage called for is similar to that which happened when Ireland rejected the EU Constitution and was forced to vote again. The evil globalists are rejecting democracy!

Theresa could have taken us out the EU immediately years ago by repealing the European Communities Act, but she delayed, and stalled.

The Remoaner played the “war of attrition”, tiring the Brexiteers down, and we fear now, as people are fed up, and disengaged, she will quickly swing a second referendum that will probably make Soros cheer.

Deranged Remoaners Beg the EU Take Them As Refugees Escaping British Patriotism

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit by

On the second anniversary of the largest plebiscite to take place in the UK, here is an example of one of the more deranged emails that I receive from Remainers:

“Dear Janice, I voted to remain in the EU and I still strongly believe we should stay in Europe and we will make a terrible mistake if we leave. However, in the event we do, is it possible for UK citizens to claim asylum in the EU? After all, I really don’t want to live in a xenophobic, extremist rightwing, hermit regime style country. I genuinely feel under physical threat from right wingers and I would like to know how the government is going to heal the wounds that have formed in our communities. It’s starting to feel like silent civil war. Yours sincerely”

By far, most emails in my inbox come from those who are concerned about damaging legislation being passed by the EU, that the person above either thinks is OK or is not aware of Brussels’ incompetency.

What is worrying is that the Remainers think they can genuinely reform the EU or that there is absolutely nothing wrong with it.

Why then, is every nation that has gone into a general election since our referendum vote voting for ‘alternative’ governments? Across the EU it is collapsing. Whether it is for economic or migratory reasons, and sometimes both, the EU will not exist in its present form after the May 2019 EU elections.

Why is it that those governments, even if they have been in power for a number of years (Orban), come back stronger, with a clearer mandate and are riding high in the polls?

All of their policies – migration, fiscal, borders, reform of the legislative and judiciary – are polar opposites of what the EU calls ‘democracy and rule of law’. Franz Timmermans, month after month, gives speeches on ‘democracy and rule of law’ but fails to understand why the people are voting for Orban, Salvini, Strache, Wilders, AfD, 5SM – and fails to bring forward the reform the EU needs to survive.

So when we see the Remainers marching in London, to a big fanfare from the MSM, they too sound like Franz Timmermans, unable to see that the failed EU is about to fall. And good riddance.

1 2 3 7
Go to Top