Category archive

Anglophobia / Marxism

Help to OUST Theresa May!

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit by

It’s quiet during summer so let’s have some fun and join the Conservative party.

Ok, admittedly, they’re not much fun when you have to attend the rubber chicken dinner fundraisers, paying exorbitant £s for works canteen food c1970s with a glass of free warm white wine and having to dig deep for the raffle of out of date chocolates or a signed photo of Theresa May, but there is an upside to my opening line.

Do you want to change the course of our country? Do you want Brexit to be delivered? If so, we have to play the game.

Don’t give up your membership of UKIP or For Britain, or whoever you vote for, keep that but join the Conservative party and change it from inside.

If you have a high profile social media platform then it’s going to be difficult. But if you are just disgruntled from Tunbridge Wells or fed up from Feltham, then join.

Many of us are doing just this. MPs and association chairmen are reporting an upsurge in membership. It’s people like you that are joining, not for their love of the Maybot.

You don’t have to attend the rubber chicken dinners or ladies’ luncheons but do attend the AGMs and vote. Do attend the events with visiting ministers and tell them what you think, and do exercise your right in the most important part of your membership – your vote for the Tory party leadership contest. Vote and use it well.

Let’s change our country.

London March Against Facebook Ban of Alex Jones to Go Ahead

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

The march against Facebook and BBC centre-left-wing bias will occur tomorrow, Saturday the 4th of August.

There will be a police presence for safety reasons, due to threats by anti-Semitic group Liberty Defenders (Pretenders?) to behead Luke Alexander, and also Norwich boxer Glen Saffer to burn alive Luke Nash-Jones.


  • Luke Nash-Jones, Leader of Make Britain Great Again
  • Sharon Klaff, Pro-Israel Campaign for Truth
  • Luke Alexander, Supporter of Make Britain Great Again
  • Freddy Vachha, UKIP London Chair
  • Elizabeth Jones, UKIP NEC
  • Edward Howard, Youth Leader for Make Britain Great Again
  • Martin Costello, Treasurer for Make Britain Great Again

Meet-up point: 14:30 (2:30pm)

Facebook London, 1 Rathbone Square, London, W1T 1FB

15:00 March to BBC Broadcasting House

Facebook anti-Trump campaign BACKFIRES INTENSELY

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Patriotism by

As you may be aware, there was a campaign on Facebook to get the 2004 song American Idiot to Number 1 in light of Donald Trump’s first UK visit as American President. Me, among others, felt that the campaign itself was a stupid idea; it was more endlessly silly anti-Trump virtue signalling over his state visit from a country which is supposedly his closest ally and needs as much help from him as it can get post-Brexit, especially with the new trade deal he is willing to give us.

But putting my opinion aside, the end result was pretty hilarious to say the least. Despite the campaign attempting to get the 2004 song to number one, it came at a paltry 25, being beaten out by the various trendy artists of our current year like Jess Glynne and George Ezra.

To make matters even more hilarious, when based on official sales alone (given that the Official Charts Company complies both individual sales, downloads and online streaming – a system which is inherently silly and which I have started a petition against which you can sign here) the song came in at number 2, making it even more funny as to the massive backfire this entailed.

So which song clenched the Number 1 slot, you may ask? That would be the classic football anthem Three Lions by Baddiel, Skinner and The Lightning Seeds. Nice to see that the people chose to place a song which celebrated their nation at number 1 as opposed to virtue signal against a leader of another.  

Reuters SLANDERS the pro-Trump rally as far-right

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Patriotism by

More lies, damned lies and smears from the mainstream media now. As you may know, either through attendance or media coverage of it mainly through our company’s livestream of it, there was a pro-Trump rally held outside the US Embassy in Vauxhall last Saturday.

This was not only to show that there are Brits who do support Trump and his agenda (shock horror) but to also show displeasure at our own current system of affairs by comparison. Trump was praised, the likes of wretched career politicians (namely Theresa May, Sadiq Khan and John Bercow) were lambasted and it was a great day all around. Many made speeches (including myself) and it was a great show of affairs, with at the very least hundreds showing up to show support for the 45th President’s visit to our glorious isles.

That being side despite how peaceful it all was, it wasn’t like we were going to receive positive coverage for the event, given the anti-Trump bias that seems to be affecting British culture, politicians, atmosphere and most of all the press at the minute.

It would have been one thing if they just heavily covered the anti-Trump protest and left ours out completely. But while that was mostly the case, one particular outlet had the gall to call our peaceful protest far right.

In a recent article by Reuters titled ‘English far-right activists applaud Donald Trump in central London’, they denounce the peaceful pro-Trump rally as far right. Why? Because of the innocuous connection this one had with the pro-Tommy Robinson rally. Really, I’m not joking.

They emphasise this connection heavily throughout the article, not only slandering Robinson with the lazy label of him being supposedly far right too (of which has seemed to stick for many years without any facts to back that up whatsoever), but also using a guilt by association fallacy by making all those attending far right for backing him too.

They also lie here as well; they claim that the main point of the rally was Tommy Robinson being jailed. For anyone who actually attended the event, they would know that this wasn’t so. The main point of the rally was to show support for President Trump and nothing else. Nothing in the iconography on the main stage nor any of the speeches discussed that. At best, we occasionally diverted in our speeches to complain about the EU and mass immigration (like Martin Costello’s excellent speech, which you can see here) but nothing about Robinson, of which the article crudely describes him as a ‘jailed activist’. At worst, it was a pro-Trump rally through and through, and linking it to Robinson as if he was the main focal point behind the rally is absurd, especially given that this event had been planned months before his arrest. Heck, it even had to be cancelled once before when Trump threw in the towel on a state visit earlier this year supposedly over the ‘bad deal’ the US embassy was, or what was more likely the anti-Trump feeling some sections of the country had, including our own capital’s mayor Sadiq Khan. I don’t blame him for bailing out when he did to be honest.

I understand one could argue that a lot of the placards being handed out often had #FreeTommy messages written on them and that some of the crowd had similar iconography all the while screaming Tommy’s chant on occasion. While true, that is on those participants, who have the free will to wear such iconography and chant such chants if and when they choose. We as the rally’s organisers were not pushing for such an angle mostly, and the only reason we had #FreeTommy messages on the placards was simply because of convenience; we were heading to the latter rally afterwards (albeit individually because of the limitations that had been placed on us through the Public Order Act by the Metropolitan Police) and it made it easier for us to produce such placards (admittedly I didn’t attend the #FreeTommy protest soon after, but from what I could gather, it was swimming with such placards).

Bottom line is that people coming to the rally were the main ones with the pro-Tommy Robinson agenda in mind as opposed to the organisers. From this, to claim that the overall rally was about Tommy Robinson is laughable at best and vestigial at worst.

And the only far right people that were there was Generation Identity people of who usually hold placards at these protests reading about how ‘Real Men Fight Back!’ in the context of Tommy Robinson’s arrest. That being said, those at MBGA News try to distance ourselves from that group as much as we can, all the while I can distinctly overhearing Luke Nash-Jones (our editor-in-chief here and one of the main organisers for this event) whispering about how bothered he was that the ‘Nazis’ had shown up, referring to the GI people there. I think I also saw Luke along with other organisers and police officers trying to tell the gentleman about to wield the banner to vacate the space, but to no avail. So again, even the actual far right at this rally were turned away from it as much as possible. In short, to claim our event was far right based on some individual nutcases is utterly groundless.

It is a shame that we keep getting slandered this way by the MSM, but that is the way it goes for now until we can get our foot through the door, so to speak. To make matters worse, we can’t do very much here; unlike other press outlets, they aren’t members of the Independent Press Standards Organisation, meaning one can’t send complaints to them over this as one would expect to.

All we can do is show passive resistance to these outlets for now, whether it be by boycotting them or just being aware of the narratives they are spinning in general. And they wonder why trust in the mainstream media in Britain is dying? Such propaganda like this is the reason why.

The elite is full of paedophiles. Why do you think they promote it so much?

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Ah Facebook. Once a shining light of hope in terms of sharing connections and information, it is now a cesspool of vulgarity, lies and having an addictive quality akin to that of cocaine. These criticisms among other issues are why the crew here at the Make Britain Great Again will be having a protest against such problems with Facebook, Twitter and the BBC, later on this week.

We (including myself) will speak against such problems in an effort to raise awareness and hopefully change it, and even if the protest falls on many a deaf ear, the important nature of it is reason enough to complain.

Now one main criticism that we have is the double standard Facebook imposes when it comes to censorship. This is because while they go out of their way to censor fake news and hate speech, this often resulted in moderate conservatives getting pulled from the platform. This included posts on our Facebook page, most notably ones about criticising paedophiles, something we heavily criticised during one of our livestreams.

One reason I suggested to explain this blanket ban was because of how the elite was crawling with paedophiles, and criticism of such behaviour would be subsequently seen as unacceptable on that platform. This article is a description of such behaviour.

Let’s examine the nitty gritty here; for years there has been an attempt by the MSM and our culture at large to promote or downplay paedophilia for whatever reason. This isn’t some tin foil hat conspiracy either. There have been numerous examples of such behaviour in recent years. Most notably, this came in form of the media outlet Salon giving a platform to Todd Nickerson, who openly admitted to having a thing for children, culminating in a video whereby he declared that he wasn’t a monster, described his sick fantasies about loving children all the while having a dreamy looking clip of a young girl in a ballerina costume in the background. He criticised anyone who (quite rightly) called him out on his behaviour as part of the ‘vile right-wing hate machine’. Because apparently right-wingers worried about young children getting raped by disgusting individuals like Nickerson are cranks who should have people turn their noses up at them, more so than the actual paedophile here. Salon quite rightly then unpublished the articles after much uproar.

Meanwhile, BBC Three (the outlet of our public broadcaster aimed at a teenage audience I might add) released a similar article called ‘Paedophiles need help, not condemnation – I should know’ where an anonymous individual (surprise, surprise) discussed how paedophiles like the author were misunderstood and wouldn’t want to harm children. That’s nice and all, but why is our public broadcaster giving a platform to people like this who openly admit to sexually preferring children and treating disgusting elements in our society like paedophile online relationships (with the author discussing how he found a woman online who was LIKE HIM), given that such people are clearly those who should be looked at by a doctor, not emboldened by a public broadcaster, especially given the harmful message that it sends out, that being paedophilia is OK?

Meanwhile, various Hollywood movies have had similar messages about paedophilia. Most notably 1997’s Lolita actually asked the audience to be sympathetic towards the main character WHO WAS A PAEDOPHILE, not to mention how he abducted the title character to pursue his romantic relationship with her after her mother died. The film was so controversial at the time that it took time to get distribution in both the USA and Australia, all the while the British Board of Film Classification brought in experts and child psychologists to assess whether the film was harmful or not.

In 1999, American Beauty was released and focused a good chunk of the run time on a main character (now laughably played by alleged paedophile Kevin Spacey) who was stalking his teenage daughter’s friend because he had a crush on her, all the while treating his wife like dirt. And while the character doesn’t go through with the deed, the fact that the film didn’t criticise his behaviour is rather telling. Admittedly, it was quite uplifting to see him shot in the back of the head at the end of the film. Ten years later, The Hangover made several inappropriate jokes about a baby engaging in lewd sexual acts like masturbation for example. 2017’s Call Me By Your Name has received heavy criticism from conservative commentators for supposedly endorsing a paedophilic relationship between a 17 year old boy and a 24 year old student. The left didn’t care though. They ate up the film (mainly because it was a ‘powerfully affecting portrait of first love’) and comedian Jimmy Kimmel brought up the film at the recent Oscars ceremony whereby he stated that films like that are made to ‘upset [Vice President of the United States] Mike Pence’. Ah, the left. Laughing and cheering at their own jokes because no-one else can, typical of bad comedians in general.

Speaking of the left, their hero Peter Tatchell co-wrote a book called The Betrayal of Youth back in 1980, which called generally for the legalisation of sex with children, while his chapter (as activist against child rape, Luke Nash-Jones, frequently points out) questioning whether 16 was the right age of consent, and wrote similarly about such behaviour both for the Outrage! Campaign (which itself campaigned for lowering the age of consent) in 1996 and in 1997 for The Guardian whereby he advocated that ‘not all sex involving children is unwanted, abusive and harmful’. While he has distanced himself from such works later on (advocating that he wouldn’t have co-written the book had he known about the genuine paedophiles involved in it) he still maintains that people shouldn’t be arrested for their behaviour for having sex with minors, even if he stated that he disagrees with the act itself. Whether he is serious or just covering his own back (especially given the flip-flop views on paedophilia) is unclear. Meanwhile MP Harriet Harman (the arch feminist in Westminster) has been linked along with various other MPs to Liberty, which was linked to the Paedophile Information Exchange, which was calling for child sex and lobbied heavily for it.

So, you may be wondering why paedophilia, a reprehensible act made illegal in most decent countries, is being promoted heavily by the dominant culture at large. The reason? Because the elite (who dominate the important facets of society) revel in it. Make no mistake; a good chunk of the top brass in society get up to such behaviour. The most prominent example is how the various Islamist grooming gangs sweeping up and down the country are covered up by the elite who regularly run the councils ignorant of such behaviour until it is staring at them right in the face. Usually, it would be out of pathetic fears of being called a ‘racist’, but sometimes the reasoning is a lot sicker than that. Take for example how in Rotherham, a councillor gave a CHARACTER REFERENCE for one of the accused groomers in a town whereby accusations had been ignored by the authorities for nearly 2 decades until the Jay Report forced their hand, even if such nasty behaviour is still operating in the town. There are also accusations of how police officers got involved with the groomers in their sex with minors, similar to how in Telford, councillors were among the accused when it came to allegations of prominent grooming gangs stretching as far back as over 40 years.

So not only are the authorities scared of being called racist because of their fear of not wanting to be hostile to a foreign culture, feeling that they shouldn’t judge bad behaviour from a different culture but also because some authorities share similar urges and sympathies with the groomers in question.

Meanwhile, Muslim grooming gangs are only scratching the surface when it comes to elites being involved in the sexual conduct of minors. Take for example another religion, that of Catholicism, more specifically how the Catholic Church had numerous priests have sex with minors and covered it up for decades too. The 2015 film Spotlight is the best representation of this abuse and the lives it helped to destroy. To this day, the behaviour still goes on, and the various priests involved haven’t been prosecuted because of their elite status, and the reluctance of the various Popes to act against this reprehensible behaviour.

On top of this, various cases of sex child trafficking ring busts often involve the elite. Take for example the launch of Operation Yewtree, whereby former BBC presenter Jimmy Savile had various accusations about him (entering the hundreds) covered up for years by his friends in the entertainment industry and political friends. The subsequent investigations of Operation Yewtree led to several arrests, including those of glam rocker Gary Glitter (himself already convicted of possessing child porn in the late 1990s) and publicist Max Clifford, who then died in prison to no tears spilt.

Meanwhile, in 2008 financer Jeffrey Epstein was convicted for soliciting prostitution from girls aged as young as 14, mainly through his ‘Orgy Island’ whereby he would go to have sex with young girls, all the while having celebrity friends (like former US President Bill Clinton and actor Kevin Spacey) come along with him. There is also allegedly a similar scandal among British MPs yet to be uncovered, meanwhile former British MP Cyril Smith has similar accusations spanning decades, and alleged attempts to cover up his deeds were heavily criticised by Wigan MP Lisa Nandy. Australia has an allegedly similar problem with its MPs too. Meanwhile Led Zeppelin guitarist Jimmy Page abducted and potentially raped a 14-year-old groupie and former Judas Priest drummer Dave Holland was convicted in 2004 for having sex with a minor.

And if anything good came out of the #MeToo movement, it finally brought down titans within the movie industry who had gotten away with their bad behaviour for decades and exposed a legitimate rape culture in the industry, which up until that point had been dismissed as conspiracy. The most notable example of this being how film director Roman Polanski has often been excused for drugging and raping a young girl in the 1970s (leading him to flee the United States) by Hollywood actors at large, who signed a petition to allow him back into the United States. The fact that it took the #MeToo movement to have him removed from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences says a lot to the sympathy he has in Hollywood.

The contrast between the reception of director Elia Kazan winning his honorary Oscar (whereby various Hollywood lefties sat down and didn’t applaud him because of his involvement with the House Committee of Un-American Activities to weed out communists in the film industry) and to Polanski winning the Best Director Oscar in 2002 for The Pianist (whereby the audience were in seemingly unanimous in applause and some in standing ovation) speaks very loudly of both their sympathy to Polanski, and the backwards moral relativist politics of Hollywood, whereby disagreeing with someone politically is far worse than raping a child.

So, in conclusion, our elite is full of paedophiles and is using their power to promote that sort of behaviour. The only thing we can do about it at the time being is to demand change, both by boycotting any facet of popular culture that endorses paedophilia all the while voting out corrupt politicians and councillors who get involved in that sort of behaviour, and to expose it later on.

That is the simple solution. A more concrete one is to have tougher sentencing for such crimes when they are exposed. This is most notable in arguably bringing back the death penalty, which has been abolished for over 5 decades in the UK and is needed once again to get rid of these rats. After all, it seems strange that the rise of such people in our media and establishment has exploded with the correlation of abolishing the one guaranteed deterrent against it. And while one may say my suggestion is a tad extreme, I would argue that tough times call for tough measures. We need to establish the rule of law again in the West otherwise such behaviour is only going to carry on and on. The banning of exposing such behaviour by Facebook is one symptom of a very wide problem, which will only get worse as the years go by if nothing is done to tackle it.

REVEALED: Shocking Crime Statistics the EU and Our Governments Do Not Want You to See

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

This week I published my book, the Migrant Crime Wave, covering the shocking crime statistics that the EU and our governments do not want you to see.

It is compiled from official EU statistics, reports and committees, respected think tanks from around the world and verifiable news sources. What we reveal is a cover-up, particularly of rape statistics and the migrant nationalities of those committing the crimes.

I cover:
– terrorism
– rape and violent assaults (mainly against women and children)
– illegal border crossing
– trafficking in human beings
– drug trafficking and consumption

Some of the shocking statistics :

• 40 percent of rapes in Italy have been committed by migrants.
• 5,000 returned Jihadis that have travelled to Syria/Iraq now live in the EU.
• 40 percent of migrants from the Maghreb committed robbery or theft within the first year of their arrival in Germany.
• Migrants are 10.3 times as likely to commit gang rape as native Germans.
• Asylum seekers are 42.7 times more likely to commit gang rape.
• In the Netherlands, half of the youth of Moroccan origin (aged 18-24) have been investigated by police.
• In Sweden 76 percent of the perpetrators that could be identified for sexual assault on the street were of foreign origin.

Violence and crime have increased in Europe since the unprecedented and unwelcome level of migration facilitated by Schengen and the open borders policies of the EU.

We are in a battle to protect our culture, heritage and way of life against the liberal left who instead of encouraging family friendly policies for Europeans, prefer to replace us with alien cultures because our own birth rates are dropping. With almost 50% youth unemployment across many EU countries, forced migration is a dangerous policy, damning the futures of a whole generation of young people.

The number of rapes is exploding, and protection of women is a priority. This can only be raised in the context of gender equality and LGBT rights, while migrant attitudes to our women and girls is brushed off as ‘cultural issues to be addressed’ and rape statistics are being ignored. We have a right to be protected, not the migrants.

Because of the mainly jihadi based terror in our countries, law-abiding Muslims who identify as European, should be encouraged to be more vocal about their condemnation of Radical Islam as there is a dangerous and growing anti-Muslim sentiment, not just among the far Right but ordinary citizens too.

We have to halt migration from Pakistan and north Africa, until we are confident that our Muslim citizens have integrated by learning our languages, adhering to national law rather than Sharia, reject female genital mutilation, honour killings, burkas and forced marriage.

We have to stop the foreign funding of mosques as they have done in Switzerland and the closing down of radical mosques, as in Austria with deportation of hate preachers. That is a start but we have a long way to go.

This week we saw the African invasion of Spain via Ceuta when 100s of migrants jumped the fences, attacked the Spanish semi-militarised Guardia Civil, who were forced to watch and were humiliated by their government which insists they cannot use their guns.

What have we come to when our police and military stand by and allow invaders to walk straight into our countries? The Guardia Civil can use their guns on Spanish citizens, but not the invaders.

It is no surprise that when the centre right Spanish government fell recently, there was no general election. Instead, an EU puppet socialist government took the reins.

When Italy shut its borders, Spain opened theirs. There will now be a further migrant crime wave.

You can download my book here: Home – Janice Atkinson MEP

DEFLECTION: Weak Sadiq Khan Blames SOARING Violent Gang Crime on Middle Class

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

The wave of violent crime in London has been making plenty of headlines recently, with murders in the Capital outstripping New York earlier this year.

Policing in London is the responsibility of the Mayor and the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) who have issued plenty of soundbites so far but no real plan on how to tackle it.

With this in mind, Sadiq Khan’s latest statement on the causes shows just how out of touch with the situation on the ground he has become. Replying to a question on an LBC phone-in show, the Mayor stated that ‘Cocaine use at middle class parties’ is driving the gang related violence on the streets, a position previously endorsed by both Simon Kempton of The Police Federation and Justice Secretary David Gauke when he mentioned it back in May.

In one way, I can see where the comment has come from – much of the violence is drug related and for the drug gangs to thrive, they need customers. However, cocaine use has not suddenly appeared out of thin air over the last couple of years under Khan’s Mayoralty and has been prevalent in London since at least the 1980’s. Indeed, when The City of London started to forge ahead after deregulation in the 80’s, the ‘yuppy’ culture embraced recreational drug use as part of their ‘work hard, play harder’ culture, not to mention the rise of the illegal raves at the turn of the decade where another drug of choice, Ecstasy, was a central part of the party experience.

Working in the mobile phone trade in the 90’s, where large amounts of cash were being made as the sector exploded, drug use was always in evidence at major events and parties that I attended – the amount of times I cursed the lack of a toilet cubicle when desperate to get rid of the last three pints of lager I had drunk was testament to that!

Yet throughout that time, there was no surge in violent knife crime, moped raiders and acid attacks.

So, if we accept the premise that more customers means more crime, then surely drug use now must be at exponentially larger levels than before? The reality is no – indeed, the following was reported by The Home Office CSEW report within the last month –

Around 1 in 11 (9.0%) adults aged 16 to 59 had taken a drug in the last year. This equated to around 3.0 million people, and was similar to the 2016/17 survey (8.5%). The trend in last year drug use among 16 to 59 year olds has been relatively flat since the 2009/10 survey, and the latest estimate was similar to a decade ago (9.4% in 2007/08). However, the 2017/18 prevalence estimate was lower than in 1996 (11.1%), when the time series began.

So drug use is actually down on 20 years ago and has been flat over the last eight years, meaning that Khan’s explanation is not backed up by official figures.

So what is the cause?

In my opinion, there are multiple reasons. Firstly, the arrival of a new criminal class from overseas has triggered a struggle for control of the trade on our streets. Writing in The Evening Standard in July last year, David Cohen interviewed a former gang member who stated that , “In the last 10 years, since the Somalis and Congolese came to London, they taught us a new level of violence. These people had seen family members mutilated so when they said ‘I’m gonna smash you up’ us guys would be shouting ‘yo blud, what you mean?’ and they would just pull out a blade and juk [stab] you in the chest. It upped the speed and level of violence for us British born guys. We had to arm up to protect ourselves. It became an upward spiral”

This ties in with conversations I have had with rank and file Police Officers in my own area, Hayes. I have been advised that there is a war going on for the trade between the Somalis, Afghans and Eastern European crime gangs which has led to an increase in violence both here and in neighbouring West Drayton.

Secondly, the Police now are hit with barriers they didn’t have before when tackling violent crime. Whilst it is true that funding is an issue, political correctness has manifested itself within the senior levels of the force and has led to reluctance in confronting the fact that both perpetrators and victims come predominantly and disproportionately from minority communities. This has led to the cut back in intelligence led stop and search of gang members because it could be perceived as ‘racist’.

I was once told by a young lady who works for a firm of solicitors in my area that when her clients were arrested, throwing in an accusation of racism against the arresting officer would get them put on limited duties for a while whilst an investigation was carried out, making them think again about carrying out such an arrest next time.

Thirdly, communications channels are now far more widely available and cheaper than they ever were, allowing gangs to organise more quickly and respond to threats to their ‘patch’. Unregistered Pay as You Go mobile phones (known as ‘burners’) are easy to buy for under £20 and can be thrown away and replaced quickly and easily, meaning that the police cannot track or listen in to known high level criminals. Added to the new phenomenon of social media, where gang members taunt each other on line via multiple platforms and ‘drill rap’ videos and it is easy to see how a turf war can be escalated and occur very quickly.

So, what is the answer?

Glasgow had a similar issue with rising crime and has turned itself around via an intelligence led solution where police, youth workers, community leaders and government agencies all worked together to pool resources and tackle the problem at the root, engaging with those vulnerable to getting involved in a life of gangs and crime and turning them away from that path. The Evening Standard have highlighted this during their recent newspaper campaign against the rising death toll in London and deserve credit for doing so – The Mayor could do worse than engage and listen to the people they have spoken with.

There is also a problem where the police no longer have the links to communities that they had back in the seventies and early eighties. Many of the officers I have spoken with locally have been drafted in from other areas and as such need time to get to know what is going on within the communities they are policing. Unfortunately, with the multiple re-arrangements being carried out within the Met, those officers tend to be moved around, as do those in charge of the force in the area. A long term local policing plan where officers are embedded in their areas for a period of years will have the effect of a better understanding on the ground and help to build links with the community.

Finally, both the police and the border agencies need to be given the equipment and the back up to do their job, free of the politically correct dogma we see coming out of both City Hall and Westminster. A criminal is a criminal, irrespective of their race or religion. If the community led campaign fails an individual and they become a hardened gang member and menace to the local community then they need to face the full force of the law upon committing a crime and be removed until they are no longer a threat.

This all takes time, organisation and in some cases, funding. Most of all, it takes the will to want to confront and defeat the root causes of the problem.

By trying to deflect the blame on to ‘middle class drug use at parties’, Sadiq Khan is virtue signalling and ignoring the real reasons behind the crime wave that is hitting our City.

That is a dereliction of his duty to serve and a betrayal of all those affected by violent crime. It is time for him to resign and allow somebody with the guts and drive to replace him to get a grip before more young lives are needlessly lost.

Freedom at Threat: Enfield Council Taken Over by Labour Cronies!

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

What could be worse than a moronic Labour led council? A Labour led council of which promotes diversity and pandering to certain voting blocs!

This is applicable to the one in Enfield. According to The Times, this cronyism is applicable to how the Labour led council has seemingly been taken over by both members of the Alevi community (a religious minority group consisting mainly of both Kurds and Turks), not to mention relatives of a convicted felon.

In the article, it details how through a process of deselection the council made sure that many currently serving councillors were replaced by people from this community to pander to a voting bloc, despite that demographic only making up 10% of the borough’s population.

This, combined with how various members of the Kurdish and Turkish community joined the party before the selection process, means that now the council now consists of 40% Kurds, Turks and Turkish Cypriots, being vastly overrepresented in it.

To make matters worse, some of these councillors are related to a former one; one Nesimi Erbil, who represented Labour for the Lower Edmonton ward, who had to stand down because of two suspended prison sentences; the first in 2014 for fraud and the other in 2016 for a public order offence.

His extended family who have seemingly infiltrated the council include a daughter, a niece, a nephew, someone connected through marriage and two related to his cousin, a man who is the chairman of the British Alevi Federation. One of the people related to the cousin (Saray Karakus) is now the Mayor of Enfield, as well as a Labour representative of the Haselbury ward. There are also other unspecified ones consisting of business associates or relatives.

This level of cronyism and diversity hire has also led to new-time councillors taking up positions given to more experienced councillors, such as planning chairman and cabinet member for the environment. It seems that such backhand deals are seeming to trump any sort of meritocracy in Enfield Council these days.

And before anyone defends such cronyism on the grounds of ‘diversity’, it turns out that black councillors are also getting the short end of this behaviour too. Take for example how according to one councillor, all six black councillors were deselected (despite Black British making up 17% of the overall borough, more so than the other demographic groups, overrepresenting their proportion in Enfield Council now) in favour of Turkish candidates.

The situation is apparently so bad, that the Labour NEC have been informed of the problem and are now investigating such behaviour in the council. Previous attempts to question such nepotism by Conservative council leader Joanne Laban were shut down, due to the supposed ‘personal’ nature of the questioning and how they didn’t relate to council matters. Even current Momentum members and centre-right members of the Labour area have shown opposition to this takeover, along with other Turkish members of the council. The main party are also investigating the issue on both sides.

So, in short, we have a council taken over by heavy cronyism and nepotism, whereby any sort of dissent is not tolerated.

You know what makes this worse? This is my council.

Now while thankfully I never voted for Labour at these elections (instead for two Conservative councillors and one UKIP candidate – I was even planning to run for my party For Britain but to no avail) it does seem alarming that such corruption such exist for any party, let alone one of the most prominent in the country.

Hopefully this issue should be sorted, especially with the investigation going on with contributions from the Labour Party themselves. The various MPs of the Enfield Borough have not commented on the incident yet.

Why the populist right needs to distance themselves from Generation Identity

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Patriotism by

Admittedly, there are certain times within a movement’s history when one has to draw a line in the sand. This is naturally a good thing of course; indicating where one’s limits lie in terms of what is acceptable among the movement not only helps to define it but also allows for the movement to be seen as moderate to weed out any extremist people who may latch onto it; trying to make themselves seem more moderate when they are anything but. This is what I believe among other people within the populist right, is what we need as a movement to do to the identitarian group Generation Identity.

Why is this? There doesn’t seem to be anything inherently wrong with them; they peacefully protest alongside genuine patriots who care about their country, support our side in many of our causes including reducing mass immigration and freeing Tommy Robinson and are heavily proactive most notably in stopping NGO boats escorting economic migrants to Europe. So, what could be wrong with that? The problem is what their main goals are as opposed to the other campaigns they support. The group seemed about as steeped in racial identity politics as your typical Stand Up To Racism idiot or your average Richard Spencer alt-right supporter for reasons of which I’ll discuss shortly.

Now while there is nothing wrong with criticising mass immigration or Islamic terrorism, and one shouldn’t be called racist for doing either. That being said, we shouldn’t at the same time backing people steeped in identitarianism or actual otherwise we are no better than our social justice warrior counterparts on the left, making it a difficult balance at times. I for one regret and felt immensely guilty for bringing up how I was one of the few white British people at my workplace during my first contribution to the Red Pill Factor livestream, especially given how well my fellow colleagues treat me there, of who I deeply apologise to if they are reading this.

It is because I was reducing them to their racial and national traits when I shouldn’t have. It was unnecessary because it didn’t really fit the conversation beyond the fact we were discussing immigration affecting the British workforce as a whole. People are far more than just their race or nationality; they are their character more than anything else. Judging them solely on their race or nationality is inherently wrong.

Hence why us on the populist right cannot support GI. If we claim to be not racist and such, we shouldn’t be associating ourselves with a group who advocates as a main policy ethnopluralism, as established on their website (of which I read so you don’t have to). This idea, first established by French philosopher Alain de Benoist and coined by Henning Eichberg advocates for countries divided by ethnicity. In other words, a fancier way of advocating racial segregation.

The idea had also found favour among the extreme French movement the Nouvelle Droite (meaning New Right in English) and the alt-right in the United States, so much so that even Richard Spencer gave Benoist a platform at one of his events despite the latter distancing himself from such movements. Both have already received much heavy criticism for their openly racist and extreme views, and it’s not like Generation Identity do much to be more moderate on the issue.

After all, they suggest that such a policy would be good because it supposedly ‘warms tensions’ between cultures. This sounds utterly absurd, given that one of the main problems that both Great Britain and Western society has as a whole is how migrant communities are creating tension among the native population by refusing to integrate.

The balkanisation of the West if you will and forgive if I would not rather our glorious isles resemble the former Yugoslavia in the 90s because of such idiotic policies. Having a system like this in place also seems alarmingly racist and akin to other systems of its kind, like say the Apartheid system employed in South Africa for the longest time or racial segregation in the southern areas of the United States during the Jim Crow era. From this, it would seem bizarre why those on the populist right would want to attach ourselves with such a movement at all based on its profoundly illiberal and racist policies, given we claim to stand against both.

Meanwhile, like many other far-right groups, Generation Identity are steeped in historical iconography. Take for example their symbol, of which represents the Lambda, of which King Leonidas used in the Battle of Thermopylae to fend off Persian forces, despite being vastly outnumbered and eventually losing to the latter forces. If that sounds at all familiar that is because it most recently adapted into the 2006 film 300 starring Gerard Butler, and the application of a military conflict to a fight against bad government policies over immigration seem as bombastically absurd as half of the historically inaccurate fantasy in the Zack Snyder film.

Meanwhile, they also pride themselves on Reconquista, whereby they see their fight against the left and their hegemony as akin to how Visigothic kingdoms recaptured the Iberian Peninsula, of which had been conquered by Muslim armies. This again seems laughably absurd given that they seem to be talking of how bringing actual conflict against the left and general immigrant groups as opposed to just using political action to solve their issues. In both cases, we have a group using historical examples of famous battles to not only justify their actions, but imply a war is on their hands and will use any action necessary to win.

That may sound absurd at first, but consider this. They both attempt to block boats carrying migrants from entering ports in countries like Italy for example (not necessarily wrong but shows that this group are willing to go an arguably unnecessary extra mile for their cause) and ITV’s documentary Undercover: Inside Britain’s Far Right (when it wasn’t trying to demonise For Britain leader Anne Marie Waters as a far right Nazi for criticising Islam) revealed how their members often have combat training all the while boost about having self-defence skills. It seems that as opposed to most of the populist right of who peacefully protest and campaign against ideas we don’t like, GI take it a step further and actively prepare for and carry out exercises of which causes actual disruption and confrontation. This clearly isn’t a group based on the non-aggression principle and it seems that they will resort to violence to achieve their aims.

Their general policies beyond the obvious problems with ethnopluralism also should send alarm bells ringing. They discuss the demographic crisis of which Europe is currently facing and then conflates with the conspiracy theory around The Great Replacement (of which isn’t real, but that is an argument for another time). To solve this, they suggest supposedly ‘reconquer’ cultural vacuums inherent in our societies. And while I am all for reasserting national identity into Great Britain, the idea of supposedly doing it by conquering our lands (whatever that means is hard to say even though it sounds worrying) sounds like aggression and fits right in with the more overtly aggressive stance the group is taking on such serious issues.

Meanwhile, they also advocate rebuilding an ethno-cultural identity without as they say ‘falling into xenophobic reflexes’ which seems impossible given that the inherent policy pushes race above everything else. Also, they stress that they want to determine political discourse through ‘meta-politics’, whereby they outline the determined discourse for ‘direct and concrete’ political decisions later on. This seems slightly authoritarian and again against the more liberal outlook of the populist right movement which accepts people and isn’t planning to determine how political discourse is carried out among our movement, provided the content isn’t extreme.

Finally, discussing general identity, they seem to further establish segregation by suggesting that the only way to maintain our own culture is to reject other cultures mixing with it whatsoever, of which again sounds authoritarian as while there are inherent problems with multiculturalism, completely rejecting and not allowing it at all seems to be extreme in the other direction, and ignore some of the benefits it can bring. The fact that their political outlook is not only authoritarian but makes me sound like your typical social justice warrior can’t be a good thing indicating the inherent problems in the ideology of GI.

Meanwhile, their spokespeople are not ones to inspire confidence in this movement either. Most notably this applies to Martin Sellner of who is arguably the face of GI, all the while being the head of the Austrian affiliation. Now while I will protect Sellner’s right to free speech and heavily criticise his banning in the UK earlier this year (of which I defended his right to speak his ideas in a speech I made at The Liberalists UK’s Count Dankula march) I can still heavily criticise his ideas because of the problems they have. Not only does he apouse a lot of GI’s bogus ideas (mainly The Great Replacement at talks like his Traditional Britain Group back in 2017) but also used to be heavily involved with the Nazi scene in Austria too, of which he was a part of until 2011. And while now it seems that he has claimed to have changed his tune, it seems that his views haven’t changed much at all, given the identitarian politics of GI.

Meanwhile, other supporters have been bluntly open about the racism within GI. Melanie Dittmer of Rhineland Idenitarians has said such wonderful thoughts such as ‘if you throw all the colors together, you end up with brown’ and when asked by a German-Arab reporter as to what the difference between her and Dittmer were, the latter proudly (and unironically) replies with ‘the blood!’. And while one may argue I am simply using the guilt by association fallacy, my response would be that the inherent ideas of GI are bad as it is, so it’s not like the movement were already beyond the pale before having cranks like Sellner and Dittmer metaphorically s*it the bed. Meanwhile, the fact that they are faces of this movement also indicates that the group of GI aren’t terribly bothered by having these cranks be the spokespeople for their movement either.

So, their constant clinging on to us, whether it be through marching with us with their flags or banners or standing shoulder to shoulder with us during campaigning is a massive problem. Not to mention how many of the moderate voices on our side have seemingly bought into their message hook line and sinker. For example, Canadian journalist Lauren Southern hangs around with the likes of Sellner quite a bit, and is now joining him in suing the UK over their recent ban there. Meanwhile, the youth branch of UKIP Young Independence initially invited him to speak for a talk, of which was decisively cancelled after much outcry. Both Southern and UKIP are some of our more famous and moderate voices, which makes their hanging around of guys like these worrying, especially with the former having expressed sympathy with the alt-right before. Their association to us only gives fuel to the fire of the left who hate us and will use any tactic to silence us.

After all, they are a racial identitarian group of who espouse illiberal policies all the while bizarrely constantly comparing historical conflicts to nowadays, indicating that they are willing to use violence and intimidation to get what they want. And finally, they seem more bothered by racial separation, of which is not only inherently racist and discriminatory, but also creates more of a problem with racial and national segregation in our society of which is already creating enough tension within our communities as it is.

In short they are no different to far right parties or groups like the British National Party or the National Front in that sense (their pseudointellectualism and slicker presentation meaning that they aren’t fully far right, of which is common among the alt-right), they are no different to the intolerance of left wing identitarian movements and their use of history to push ethno-nationalist propaganda is no better than the likes of Nazi Germany who pushed the greatness of the Aryan race or the Greek party Golden Dawn pushing the Battle of Thermopylae and the image of the Spartans down their voting bloc, especially given GI’s inherent illiberal values being similar across the board.

So, what can we do?

We do need to start distancing ourselves from GI. After all, doing such an act can be good for our movement. UKIP were decisive in kicking out various Nazi types who tried to join. Tommy Robinson struggled for years to remove actual racists from the English Defence League of which kept them out later on. General conservatives in America started to distance themselves from the alt-right once it became clear how extreme they were. And Anne Marie Waters blocked GI’s Jordan Diamond from attending her events when his position became clear. If we stand by our principles distancing ourselves as much as possible from GI will be a good start. Because if we don’t, all we are doing is playing into the left’s hands of who will smear us over these fringe individuals infiltrating our movements. Don’t think this is a small issue either.

Remember all the nonsense they gave us over the video of Ali Dawah being attacked by the Democratic Football Lads Alliance at the Day For Freedom? Or their whinging about Stefan Molyneux’s connection to that event too given his statements about black people in the past? They will jump on any opportunity to sink us. We can’t give it to them. We need to distance ourselves from GI as much as we can. After all, if we endlessly rightly criticise the left for supporting identitarian lunatics like Black Lives Matter and Stand Up To Racism, surely we should be setting an example. That is why the populist right needs to distance ourselves from Generation Identity. If we don’t, we will suffer slowly but surely once their true intentions become clearer and clearer by the day.

Petrol bomb attacks plague Northern Ireland

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

Recently, Northern Ireland has been struck with fire bomb attacks, targetting the town of Derry, specifically the Fountain with over 30 being thrown at police alone.

Various politicians and senior officials have condemned the violence. This includes both Democratic Unionist Party and Sinn Fein figures, while Superintendent Gordon McCalmont thanked those who helped to stop the attacks, calling it ‘an attack on our whole community’.

It seems that religious tension is part of the reason why such attacks have been frequent in this area. Democratic Unionist Party leader Arlene Foster called for police to aid people within this area, which is a highly Protestant area.

Whether this means more attacks on this area will become the norm is yet to be seen.

What is does show though is that one of the main problems with Northern Irish society – the religious differences between Protestants and Catholics – has yet to go away, despite all the progress made up to this point.

British Trump Rally Will Go Ahead Despite BAN By London Mayor’s Police

in Anglophobia / Marxism/World News by

On the 20th of January 1981, in his Inaugural Address, President Ronald Reagan expressed how America must “do whatever needs to be done to preserve this last and greatest bastion of freedom.”

America, we will, despite effectively a threat by our police forces to imprison the UKIP London Chair, Freddy Vaccha; my deputy, Martin; and myself for three months imprisonment, stand firm, and welcome on the 14th of July your choice of president.

London Mayor Sadiq Khan’s Met Police have applied for a Public Order to stop us assembling at the US Embassy, while they will allow far-left groups to nonetheless counter-protest there against us. Despite weeks of pressure from the state, we will not cancel this event. We will stand firm against communism! We will march for Trump, through the streets of London, even if the police block us from the US Embassy.

If the British Prime Minister or Queen visited the USA, can you imagine the chair of the New York Republicans being banned from going anywhere near the British Embassy, or in fact, one side of New York City, in case he gave a short speech in support of the Anglo-American alliance? This is the effective situation with the police objecting to Mr Vachha giving a speech to welcome Donald. I run “Make Britain Great Again” – the British equivalent to the Tea Party – and with the support of patriots within the European Parliament and the London Assembly, my supporters and I will stand firm for democracy, and in solidarity with our American brethren.

We will do so not just out of respect for your democratic vote. Not just because we admire Trump’s stance against globalism and political correctness. Not just because it is the morally right thing to do. But because you truly are the only bastion of freedom in the world today. When we look down that dark tunnel, you are that glimmer of light in the distance. It is YOU, our cousins across the Atlantic, that give us the power to dream of peace and freedom. You help us find the courage to fight against these incredible forces of evil that dominate our land.

It is today I find myself, as subject of the British Queen, looking to our brothers across the USA as the last bastion of not just freedom, but hope for humanity. While Americans look in horror as they observe the expansion of liberalism into California, I know our nation has fallen far further than you probably imagine. Our once beautiful country is overrun by an unholy alliance of Islamism and Marxism. My brothers, I pray you avoid this fate. Your fortieth president’s words almost bring me to tears, “You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness. ”

We know all to well what horror awaits you if you do not reject the song of globalism. The British Overton window is so far left that Obama looks like a hardcore patriot. The main opposition party rallies under the red flag of communism, singing the L’Internationale song, as their leader poses with statuettes of Lenin.

My family left Zimbabwe, our home for generations, to return to Britain, where rule of law is supposed to exist. Where John Stuart Mill defined the concept of negative liberty, which came to be better expressed in the United States. Where there is the mother of all Parliaments. Now I stand fighting for freedom, while a wave of Koch brothers postmodernist hyper-individualistic snowflakes have thrown open our borders, welcoming in thousands of illegal immigrants as terrorism, murder and rape figures soar. Theresa May has cheated ‘we, the people’, killing democracy, by refusing us Brexit that we clearly voted for.

Terrorist attacks on stadiums, shops, and even the home of the Queen, and the Parliament – our equivalent to Congress – are so frequent that no one is shocked any more. The Mayor of London, who opposes Trump’s visit has stood on a platform 9 times with a radical imam called Suliman Gani, who supported ISIS. He complained to MPs who condemned a hardline Islamic cleric. His own brother-in-law was part of the radical terrorist group Al-Muhajiroun. Khan brushes of these rising Islamic terror attacks as “part and parcel” of city life, while anyone who opposes Sharia law risks imprisonment for up to six years.

Luke Nash-Jones, Organiser of the pro-Trump rally in London, and Leader of Make Britain Great Again, waves a Gadsden flag as a warning to the British monarch not to ignore the voice of the people, as he begins a speech to a Brexit rally.

Trump rightly claimed London has “no go zones”. Gang warfare on our streets is out of control, as our capital city has a higher murder rate than New York City. Men with machetes and swords walk the streets slaughtering our children, while the police leave the mothers to wipe up their dead children’s blood. We are not permitted to carry a gun to protect ourselves – even owning a knife can result in imprisonment.

Free speech no longer exists in Britain. The police spend their budget on arresting and imprisoning people who make ‘politically incorrect’, conservative, comments on Facebook or Twitter. Your founding father, George Washington said that, “If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” London police charged an American lady Amy for wishing someone a “gay day” –  she was held in a police cell. The police beat u elderly people who march for freedom.

Melanie Shaw, Tommy Robinson, Emma West, and others have been locked up under Orwellian laws, for calling out the child rape epidemic in these isles, where MPs and Pakistani men have raped thousands of little girls, as councillors and the police, desperate to embrace multiculturalism and diversity, covered up their actions. Judges have dismissed cases, letting paedophiles walk free, because their wives could not speak English, or because they stated such showed understanding of other cultures. Left-wing MP Naz Shah told the victims to “Shut up for the good of diversity”.

I must quote again a speech of Ronald Reagan,

The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn’t die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it’s a simple answer after all. You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, “There is a price we will not pay.” There is a point beyond which they must not advance. This is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwater’s “peace through strength.” Winston Churchill said that “the destiny of man is not measured by material computation. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits — not animals.” And he said, “There is something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty.”

From the cesspit of degenerate hedonism, we see that glimmer of hope on a YouTube channel – the news that our state-owned television networks shield from us. We wave the Gadsden flag at rallies across these isles, as police seek to arrest persons wearing red “Make Britain Great Again” baseball caps. Millions of Britons feel the spirit of those men who in 1776 fought for their freedom. Today we face not a question of whether we have representation, but of our very survival!

While the London Mayor’s police force has sought to ban any pro-Trump rally or march, they have allowed numerous counter-protestors to insult you and your President. They have even tolerated a disrespectful “Baby Trump” blimp to fly, but banned the UKIP London Chair from taking a pro-Trump boat down the Thames.

I conclude with words Reagan read in that address, as he referred to the diary of Pvt. Treptow who was killed in World War II. He had inscribed the following pledge, ”America must win this war. Therefore I will work, I will save, I will sacrifice, I will endure, I will fight cheerfully and do my utmost, as if the issue of the whole struggle depended on me alone.” You stood by us in World War II, and helped save Europe. We need you again.

Shock and anger as Trump Rally BANNED by Met Police.

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

The eagerly awaited Trump welcome rally on the 14th July has been BANNED from the US Embassy or anywhere south of the River Thames by Met Police under an inappropriate application of Public Order Act (POA) sections 12 and 14.

Luke Nash Jones was contacted by the London police force who informed him that if he, Martin Costello, or UKIP London Chairman Freddy Vaccha go anywhere near the US Embassy, they will be arrested and would spend up to 3 months in prison!

If the British Prime Minister or Queen visited the USA, can you imagine the chair of the New York Republicans being banned from going anywhere near the British Embassy, or in fact, one side of New York City, in case he gave a short speech in support of the Anglo-American alliance?

The police have no basis to apply POA to ban the rally, and hence a London Assembly member has contacted the Met police. Section 12 of the order states

“If the senior police officer, having regard to the time or place at which and the circumstances in which any public procession is being held or is intended to be held and to its route or proposed route, reasonably believes that—

(a)it may result in serious public disorder, serious damage to property or serious disruption to the life of the community.”

Luke has organised many peaceful rallies, which never caused “serious damage to property” or caused lives to be at risk. We have never called for violence, so section 12 is not relevant. It only applies if a rally organiser calls for violence.

Section 14 of the order states “If the senior police officer, having regard to the time or place at which and the circumstances in which any public assembly is being held or is intended to be held, reasonably believes that—

 (b)the purpose of the persons organising it is the intimidation of others with a view to compelling them not to do an act they have a right to do, or to do an act they have a right not to do.

There is no grounds to claim either of these sections. We have a history of successful rallies and we wish to welcome the elected leader of our closet ally, the United States! We need a trade deal post-Brexit!

If anything, any Public Order to disperse should be issued to the fascist counter-protesters who seek to attack those welcoming Trump. The duty of the police is to ensure us a safe route from the US Embassy, through Parliament Square, and on to Downing Street. The fascist snowflakes will have their protest on the 13th, and on the 14th, those with a brain cell will stand for democracy!

To move the assembly from the new US Embassy to the old embassy and/or Trafalgar Square would be to remove all effectiveness, ignoring the duty of the police to protect peaceful assemblies, and thus a breach of the ECHR Articles 9, 10, and 11.

Under the ECHR, is utterly illegal to be “imposing a condition on the location of a protest”, this effectively goes against the purpose of the rally – we must be outside the real embassy to show solidarity with Americans in London!

It is clear that the likes of Khan and the rest of the political establishment wish to stop the American embassy staff filming us for their Twitter and any video of the pro-Trump crowd going viral, yet somehow the latte liberals’ pathetic baby Trump blimp gets the green light of all and sundry to see. This childish stunt shows shocking misjudgement and is an embarrassment to our glorious country!

If the Trump rally is to be cancelled, the relevant section of the POA is section 13, under which the anti-Trump riot would also be cancelled.

Could you imagine this happening between Boris Johnson and Obama on a visit to the UK? What is our country coming to if we can’t even welcome the elected POTUS and show him that he is welcome here and the US is a crucial ally once again as we desperately try to escape the clutches of the corrupt EU?

North Korea, Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, many parallels from history can be aligned to this latest attack on the freedom of speech. We are living in very dark times indeed and unless we stand for free speech, we will all be slaves and never truly free.

Tommy Robinson Appeal CANCELLED Because Judge ‘Not ready’!

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

In an underhanded move by London’s Royal Courts of Justice, Tommy Robinson’s  appeal for release hearing on the 10th July has been postponed just days before the planned huge rally in protest on his incarceration.

The reason given was that the government’s lawyers say ‘they’re not ready’.

Arrested recently on the grounds of a “breach of the peace”, a rushed trial saw him jailed within an hour, where the charge was changed to “contempt of court”.

Tommy was not given an opportunity to get his own lawyer to the court room, and the court defence lawyer advised him to plead guilty – which he did, in order to avoid an even longer sentence.

It is clear that the government do not want a public backlash to take place on the 14th July when tens of thousands are once again expected to rally in the capital against the latest draconian attack on freedom of speech.

Many, whether they agree if with Robinson’s views or not, believe that the Orwellian threat is very real and must be tackled in unison in order to prevent the police state locking down further and eroding our freedom.

The hearing will now take place on 24th July.

Lefty Pretty SoyBoy Trudeau Frantically Denies Sexually Assaulting Waitress

in Anglophobia / Marxism/World News by

Pretty-faced princess of the postmodernist lefty cess-pit, the Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau has denied allegations that he groped a reporter at a festival in 2000.

Though a past issue of the Creston Valley Advance newspaper reveals a claim that Mr Trudeau apologised for his behaviour and said: “If I had known you were reporting for a national paper, I never would have been so forward.” A rather difficult statement for the left who are proudly promoting the #MeToo campaign.

The event in Creston, British Columbia, was held to raise money for an avalanche safety charity with which Mr Trudeau was involved.

Days afterwards, an unsigned editorial appeared in a local paper accusing him of “groping” a young female reporter. The piece accused Mr Trudeau of “inappropriately handling” the reporter, who felt “blatantly disrespected” by the actions, which were not described.

The prime minister said he did not recall any “negative interactions” at the event.

CBC spoke to Valerie Bourne, the publisher of the paper at the time, and the paper’s then-editor, Brian Bell, both of whom believe the reporter.

Moped gangs PRETEND to be Traffic Police to trick drivers

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

When the problems with moped crime in London couldn’t look like they could get any worse, now they are resorting to impersonating traffic police to trick drivers to pull over and subsequently threaten them for valuable items.

According to the Evening Standard, police are now warning of such behaviour, attributing it to a specific incident in the Chelsea Embankment whereby a cab was caught by said impersonators, who claimed the cab’s passengers had run a red light. Once the group didn’t identify themselves and called the police, the gang drove off.

Meanwhile, such gangs adopt police tactics such as having blue flashing lights and usually resort to threats to gain what they want.

Apparently, such issues are already adding to an intense problem for the police in the explosion of moped crime of which has sprung up from 827 in 2012 to over 23,000 in 2017 alone.

Many people have been the unfortunate victims of this during this epidemic including the author of this article, and the fact that both those living in working class and upper-class areas of London are being affected heavily by this, makes it a huge problem across the board. The recent mugging by British comedian Michael McIntyre and his family further put this point home.

Now while the police have solutions to combat this issue, such as using decoy bikes and remote-control spikes, it seems that the recent explosion of this crime has roots that go further than what has been discussed.

Between the recent claims about the lack of resources to deal with low level crime such as burglaries and the powers that be advising officers to avoid chasing moped gangs because of health and safety, it seems that the police have their hands tied behind their back in terms of any blunt solutions to these issues which is stopping any progress from being made in stopping the issue.

Add to this a mayor more bothered with giving resources to hate crime hubs and diversity hiring strategies for the Metropolitan Police than solving actual crime, and you have a recipe for disaster. The clashing of immigrant communities in certain London boroughs and the high levels of poverty in the capital highlights this further.

This all builds an atmosphere which not only inevitably leads to general crime, but its increase as well, and one theory in particular demonstrates this. The Broken Windows theory was one coined by social scientists James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling of who discussed how when general anti-social behaviour is allowed to go unpunished, more serious crime becomes acceptable. In essence, if one broken window wasn’t fixed, it would lead to the other windows being broken, as ‘one unrepaired window is a signal that no-one cares, and so breaking more windows costs nothing.’

The fact that police do not investigate low level crime such as burglaries much anymore and that only 7% of overall robberies are being solved is a testament to this. The fact that no-one in the capital seems to be bothered by high levels of poverty either speaks to this also.

Which is why the only solution is to bring back tougher policing. As the author of this article said in a recent MBGA News livestream, bring back police patrols. Bring back stop and search. Bring back tough policing. Have better motor services. Reopen police stations, some shut under Sadiq Khan’s watch.

If this tough policing worked for both New York and Glasgow, the former used the idea of Broken Windows in their policing as well, there is no reason why it shouldn’t work for London.

Meanwhile, socio-economic issues need to be examined. Given the high levels of poverty in the capital, there should be a bigger effort made in giving opportunities for people. For example, given that there are thousands of young people involved in gang activity with police saying the average age of those carrying out moped crime being just 15, maybe there needs to be better opportunities for them so they don’t resort to crime. Reopening closed youth clubs would be a good start, all the while fixing the issues for youth apprenticeships for instance would be a wise move too.

All the while mass immigration needs to be examined. The creation of various migrant ghettos throughout the capital has subsequently created division among racial and tribal lines, often leading to high crime rates throughout these areas.

Reducing the high levels of immigration into the capital is necessary to not only slow down the growth of these divisions, but make it easier to deal with within our own borders as well. It should also allow more demand for housing, already strained partially because of mass immigration, not to mention how all the dirty Russian, Chinese and Gulf money owns a good chunk of the property market, creating a monopoly whereby properties remain empty, all the while becoming increasingly expensive for your regular Londoner.

Like Canada, it has created a situation whereby first-time buyers are increasingly locked out of the property market, hence why this dirty money needs to be at first examined and then removed from the market altogether.

Such suggestions could aid the dire socio-economic conditions of the capital at the minute, which plagues it like a virus.  

These are just suggestions at this point. But given such problems exist in London, someone needs to start addressing them, especially given how the current Mayor seems unable to do so. London deserves better than being a series of poor immigrant ghettos where crime is becoming the norm and no-one in power seems to give a damn about it. London deserves better than this.

Tommy Robinson’s Appeal Judge Has Already Declared Him GUILTY

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Tommy Robinson’s appeal will be heard on 10th of July by Britain’s top judge Lord Brian Leveson.

Leveson has ALREADY declared Tommy to be guilty, before hearing the appeal.

He gave an interview to the BBC Radio 4’s Law In Action programme on the 24th of June in which he used the case of Tommy Robinson as an example of when posting material on the internet can lead to imprisonment due to contempt of court.

At 03:45 into the interview, Leveson states:

“Members of the public ought to know that publishing comments which impact unfairly on the course of a trial could constitute contempt of court and there is a very good recent example of a man who videoed material which he fed into the internet which did constitute contempt of court as a result of which he was sentenced to a term of imprisonment.”

English Courts Protect Sharia Law BUT Make It a CRIME For Christians To Pray

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

The High Court has today upheld the Public Space Protection Order created by London’s Ealing Council in April 2018. The Ealing PSPO criminalises prayer, the handing out of leaflets and any act of approval regarding Christian beliefs.

Whether you are religious or not, whatever your beliefs be, this is fundamentally a question of free speech. If the state bans Christians from peacefully praying, you will be next.

A group of London Christians have been ostracised for peacefully holding a prayer vigil near an abortion clinic. Meanwhile, changes unveiled by the Sentencing Council last month could see anyone critical of Islam given up to six years’ jail time.

The Ealing residents believe abortion to be murder, and hold pro-life vigils in hope that they can stop what they see as murder. They are not violent. They simply pray, and in so doing, they do not breach the harm principle defined by John Stuart Mill, the father of free speech.

Alina Dulgheriu, a mother aided by pro-life vigils and who brought the legal challenge is considering options for appeal.

“Today the Court has said that it is okay for councils to criminalise prayer, even silent prayer on our streets, how can this be right? Today the Court has dismissed fundamental human rights such as freedom of expression because it gives authorities the benefit of the doubt in whether doing so is reasonable or not. I thought the whole point of human rights is that authorities have to truly justify draconian laws?”

Andre Clovis of Tuckers Solicitors, representing Ms Dulgheriu has issued the following statement:

“This outcome sets a dangerous precedent and is a direct attack upon our very basic rights, such as freedom of expression. My view is that this decision cannot and should not be looked at in isolation for fear we continue the worrying trend of becoming a society where those with opposing views simply seek to shut each other down rather than engage in dialogue and debate.”

“The true test for your belief in freedom of expression, is whether you are prepared to fight for the rights of those whose views you do not share, because you believe it is their right to hold and express views different from your own.”

Clare Carberry, an Ealing resident and spokeswoman for the Be Here For Me campaign said:

“Much of the abuse she has experienced has been owing to grotesquely false allegations shamefully supported and bruited about by those who oppose her, including my own council ( Ealing) and even my local MP Rupa Huq.”

#FreeTommy and OTHERS: British State THREW Young Mum Emma West in the Gulag

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

Emma West, a mother, was arrested in November 2011 after she protested about immigration whilst travelling on a bus with her baby. Her protest was captured on video and uploaded to YouTube as well as being copied by many national media outlets. The video was viewed millions of times.

A judge said West was clearly suffering from mental health problems at the time of the outburst. Nonetheless, the state respond urgently, harshly, with a fury to which they didn’t apply to the disgusting Parliamentary paedophiles in Dolphin Square, or the Pakistani child rape gangs in Rotherham.

Following the upload of the video Emma was arrested, held in the UK’s highest security prison for women – she hasn’t killed anyone, she said some words, which yes, were offensive – no one died! Britain is supposed to have a concept of freedom of speech, whereby you can say anything, even if rude or stupid, as long as you don’t breach John Stuart Mill’s harm principle. West stated that most people on the bus were not English – she didn’t call for them to die, or otherwise harmed.

Here are some of her comments:

She says: “What’s this country coming to?”

“A load of black people and and load of f***ing Polish.”

One commuter challenges West, who rounds on him telling him: “You aren’t English”, to which he replies “No, I’m not”

She then scans the tram, pointing out people one-by-one, saying: “You ain’t English, you ain’t English, None of you are f***ing English.

“Get back to your own f***ing countries.”

“Britain is nothing now, Britain is f***k all.

“My Britain is f**k all now.”

You can argue that is foulmouthed, but it was not a call for violence. Emma lives in a country which has been made unrecognisable by the permitting of mass immigration for over sixty years. Neither Emma nor any other native English man or woman (or Briton come to that) has had any say in this invasion of the country. This most fundamental act of betrayal has been committed by generations of British politicians, and people feel they have no voice.

West was released and then subjected to a year and a half’s intimidation by the state as the powers-that-be desperately tried to get her to plead guilty to charges relating to racially motivated serious crimes (racially aggravated intentional harassment and racially aggravated assault) which would have almost certainly sent her to prison. Eventually, worn down by the stress she pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of racially aggravated harassment, alarm or distress.

But those with power were not satisfied simply with her criminal conviction. Emma has now had her livelihood as a dental nurse taken away by the General Medical Council with this preternaturally smug judgement, as a [Dental Council] spokeswoman said: “Her conduct was truly appalling.”

“It clearly has the capacity to bring the profession into disrepute and to undermine public confidence in its standards.”

“Furthermore, her violent and abusive conduct would demonstrate a real risk to the safety of patients.”

“In relation to her racially aggravated offence, this was committed in a public setting and received further public exposure, as a person had uploaded the video clip to the internet which has been viewed extensively.”

So there you have it, political correctness can not only send you into the clutches of the law but take your means of living away. It is reassuring to know that instead of dealing with real problems like the increase in rape statistics due to mass migration, the paedophile epidemic in which politicians are complicit, and the soaring murder figures, our police are busy banging people up for not embracing cultural Marxism. Welcome to the USSR, to 1984, to the hell that is modern communist Britain.

London Police Overlook Illegal Immigration, Stating No Reason for 20% INCREASE in Rape

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

The number of alleged rapes reported to police in London has risen by almost 20 per cent in a disturbing increase police are struggling to explain.

There were 7,613 reported rapes in the year to January, compared to 6,392 over the previous 12 months, according to figures collated by the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC).

Often, lefties will brush off rape increases, by saying the hard work of deranged feminists flashing their tits at people in the name of sexual equality has made it easier for rape victims to come forward. That bullshit won’t sell this time, because Sir Craig Mackey, deputy commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, said the rise could not be accounted for simply by more victims feeling able to report abuse or better recording practices. Oh, damn!

This is a massive turning point. Joanne McCartney, the deputy mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, told the meeting on Wednesday that Sir Craig’s statement was “the first time a senior officer has come to this committee and accepted that the increase in sexual violence may not just be about an increase in reporting and confidence”.

Scotland Yard has emphasised that the statistics emerged following an attempted rape and robbery by Nayed Hoque, 20, of Manor Park.

Sir Craig muttered, “there is something going on with sexual offending in London that we don’t fully understand.

“We see the end of it but we don’t understand the causes.”

Surely it has nothing to do with the increase in illegal immigration, as hordes of unskilled, aggressive, Sharia-praising thugs assemble in Calais, offering to kill us all?

A German report found that 92.1 percent of the increase in rape was attributable to illegal immigrants. In Leipzig, rape figures increased by 670%!

Pfeiffer et al. 2018 found that there was a high level of violence by Morrocan migrants – these people are not genuine refugees under UN convention.

Other data points are also damning. Between 2014 and 2016, the share of solved violent crimes attributed to asylum seekers increased to 13.3 percent from 4.3 percent — a disproportionately high share compared with the state’s foreign population. Bloomberg says this is “behavior that would go unpunished, or is even encouraged, [in their home countries]”.

Famous YouTubers join both UKIP and For Britain. What does this mean?

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit by

Over the last week or so, there has been a collective shift for the main pro-Brexit populist parties in Britain in that various famous YouTubers have signed up to them. On the one hand, the likes of Sargon Of Akkad, Count Dankula, Paul Joseph Watson and Milo Yiannopoulos have joined UKIP. Meanwhile, the likes of Reverend Simon Sideways have joined For Britain.

What does this mean for both parties? On the one hand, it provides good news for both parties. For UKIP, this is probably the best news for the party since they helped to win the EU referendum back in 2016. This increased attention they have received as a result hasn’t gone unnoticed all, with them gaining between 500 to a thousand new members from the increased exposure.

All the while, having various prominent members of the sceptic community of YouTube may give them some more street cred among those watching their videos and the populist voting crowd of who lost faith in UKIP, feeling that they were a single-issue party. Meanwhile, former leader Nigel Farage may be far from thrilled at this news, because he recently lashed out at the current leader Gerard Batten over the latter’s hard stance on Islam .

Meanwhile Sideways may not be as prominent, but it still gives For Britain a major boost. He has a subscription base of 22k people, all the while being heavily featured in videos about huge protests, like the recent Gays Against Sharia protest in Bristol and the pro Brexit rally in London to celebrate the second anniversary of the result. Now the party has more than Morrissey’s endorsement, which can only be a good sign.

But will the support mean anything in the long run? While the increased support it will undoubtedly give both parties might give both a short-term boost, one could argue as to whether it will sustain them.

Neither For Britain or UKIP have taken the position of opposition government. Both had a poor performance in the recent Lewisham East by-election, for example, David Kurten gained only 380 votes (being beat by the likes of the Women’s Equality Party can never be a good sign for any party). It seems unlikely that the voting public are that bothered by the political right at this point.

The fact that only at most a thousand new members have joined UKIP because of this YouTuber exodus (despite having millions of subscribers between them, not to mention the general followings they have besides that) is not proof that the general public en masse is deserting Labour for the purples. Sargon’s infamous use of the word “n**ger” probably won’t help gain votes.

Add to that how Batten will be standing down early next year, and the Members of the European Parliament for the party losing their jobs because of Brexit, and this only seems like a small term gain for the party as opposed to anything substantial.

For For Britain meanwhile, it may mean something more significant. The increased support they are receiving from big names like Sideways and Morrissey may give them more clout in the political mainstream, which may aid them later on. Whether they can use this to boost their future election prospects is yet to be seen.

Their decent performances in the 2018 local elections and their unremarkable performance in the aforementioned by-election in Lewisham East (where they were beaten by UKIP, indicating that they are still the main Brexit party around), it seems that they have a long way to go before hitting huge electoral success yet. Not to mention controversy about one of their former local election candidates having to be ejected from the party because of his links to the proscribed Neo-Nazi group National Action indicates that they still have a problem with such people clinging onto them for political gain, which won’t do the party any favours in the future.

What it overall shows however is the changing world we live in. The pull a party can gain from having famous Internet personalities is something to marvel at, showing huge progress from the days of traditional celebrities announcing their support for a political candidate or party.

The old celebrity class is losing favour with the masses, especially the various entertainment personalities showing signs of mental collapse over the likes of Brexit and Trump, and the appetite for more rational and fresh voices in politics is growing. Whether UKIP or For Britain can use this to their advantage is yet to be seen.

Brexiteers were right on the NHS: The £350 million payment is finally realised!

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit by

One of the main promises of the Vote Leave campaign (the infamous £350 million for the NHS promised in much of the campaign material) has finally been realised. Despite being brushed off by the likes of Nigel Farage as a ‘mistake’ and it being mocked by Remoaners for two years after the referendum, the promise has finally come to light.

Prime Minister Theresa May has stated that in light of the 70th anniversary of the National Health Service will receive an extra £600 million pounds, partially from a supposed dividend from the money we will no longer have to pay into the EU as part of our former membership of the bloc.

This is great news, especially since it finally vindicates Leave voters and campaigners from being bludgeoned by Remoaners who constantly claim that the slogan was a lie to delegitimise Brexit (because it’s not like the Remain side ever lied at all, oh no).

Taxes are also allegedly meant to go up as well to pay for it, which is clearly spiffle and scaremongering. Previously, half of the money we gave the EU came back to help the NHS. Now, all of it will return to us, meaning we have TWICE as much to spend.

Paul Johnson (the director of the Institute of Fiscal Studies) has stated that all of the EU contributions will be used up by 2022, mainly through the EU divorce bill and government commitments to fill gaps in EU spending. However, soon we will be free of that behemoth! Meanwhile Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt has admitted that even if Brexit doesn’t give us this economic boost, the extra funding will be provided anyway. 

So, despite all of this, it at least seems that the NHS will get extra funding when we leave the EU.  

A new agreement with Libya to crack down on NGOs and human trafficking

in Anglophobia / Marxism/World News by

The Mediterranean has been for many economic migrants the purgatory before the promised land, which would be geographical Europe of course. This is a false idea, those who leave Africa brainwashed and invited in by globalist elites have been told a story that is not quite right. Any sensible person knows that there is certainly no space in Britain, France, Germany and Italy for three-quarters of Africa to show up uninvited.

An army of cheap and illegal labourers who will most likely end up picking potatoes in fields, or having to end up in criminal businesses, such as drugs and prostitution. This is not because we are inhumane, and do not want to give them decent jobs, but because your options career-wise become rather limited when you come to a country illegally and with no documentation.

Luckily, due to a series of fortunate events, including a new Trump-backed Italian government, things are looking slightly more hopeful now at the gates of Europe.  A new deal, struck between the United Nations and the Libyan coast guard sustained by the government in Tripoli, will make sure that the Mediterrenean waters that stretch from the Libyan border with Tunisia all the way to Egypt will no longer be treated as international waters and it will be the responsibility of the Libyans to identify illegal ships with migrants.

Once identified, because the United Nations has now forced Libya to constitute its own JRCC (Joint Rescue Coordination Centre), the ships will have to be returned to the North African shore instead of having to be rescued by the Italian navy that for logistic and peacekeeping reasons used to be forced to bring these migrants to Sicily or Malta which would then give them access to all of the Eurozone.

The International Maritime Organisation (IMO), has helped the weak and unstable current Libyan government, or at least the only one recognised by the west in Libya, to organise its almost non-existent and low skilled military personell’s Search and Rescue (SAR) zone on the coast. As much as the Libyans have been unreliable in the past, with regards to providing answers to the influx of migrants originating from their shores, we now need them. The west, and the European Union especially, has to work with the Libyans to solve this dreadful problem. The problem not being only the arrival of desperate, destitute peoples from Africa per se – but also a serious one of human trafficking.

It is the human traffickers in Africa who organise travel of masses of people coming from Chad, Sudan, Ghana, Nigeria and Zaire all the way to northern Africa. Statistics found by a Fusion investigation have shown that 8o% of women are raped while putting their lives in the hands of these traffickers to get to Europe.

NGOs are a massive problem. Until now, NGO ships most likely funded by Soros, closely linked to the Open Europe Organisation, have been directly or indirectly helping the traffickers’ cause by smuggling illegal aliens into Europe. The “Open Arms” ships, have taken a countless number of aliens all the way to ports like the one of Palermo in Italy or Valencia in Spain. Many of those who arrive then decide to undertake journeys to richer countries like Germany and our very own Britain of course. We hope that with this new United Nations accord, Libya will take its responsability but more importantly the NGO criminal cosmopolitans will no longer have the excuse nor be able to search and rescue in Libyan national waters. Ultimately, Libya is now effectively a secure port; every single one of those migrants will have to be returned to Tripoli under international law.

As desperate as these migrants might be, they are no longer welcome to Europe, because now we have become the desperate ones having to deal with an invasion, in the true sense of the word. The very worst part of it is that we were never asked, the decisions were made for us, by a very dangerous elitist, internationalist, but rather secret, society that has made it their life’s goal to disintegrate the social fabric of our nations.

BREAKING: #FreeTommy: Courts to Hear Appeal Against Imprisonment of Tommy Robinson

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

#FreeTommy Update: Lord Justice Leveson will hear Tommy’s appeal on 10th July 2018 at the Royal Courts of Justice in London.

Sir Brian Henry Leveson is currently the President of the Queen’s Bench Division and Head of Criminal Justice.

While we can all agree this is good news, we have yet to see what the result of the hearing will be. Leveson’s past suggests he may not take a very favourable view of Tommy.

Leveson has previously called for further criminalisation of investigative journalism, and he proposed a tightening of the 1998 Data Protection Act to give journalists less protection and jail those who break the new rules for up to two years. He also called for amending the 1984 Police and Criminal Evidence Act to remove the ‘journalistic exemption’ for material that has been ‘stolen’ — which would mean most information leaked by whistleblowers.

LEAKED? Letter Supposedly By Theresa Says She Will Call Second Referendum In July

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit by

LEAKED? A letter is circulating the Internet with claims it was written by Mrs May.

It says that the transitional period is no longer an option and there will be a second referendum in which one of the options will be to REMAIN in the EU. The only question is, Hasn’t the Queen already given Royal Assent to the Withdrawal Bill?

This move that Nigel Farage called for is similar to that which happened when Ireland rejected the EU Constitution and was forced to vote again. The evil globalists are rejecting democracy!

Theresa could have taken us out the EU immediately years ago by repealing the European Communities Act, but she delayed, and stalled.

The Remoaner played the “war of attrition”, tiring the Brexiteers down, and we fear now, as people are fed up, and disengaged, she will quickly swing a second referendum that will probably make Soros cheer.

Deranged Remoaners Beg the EU Take Them As Refugees Escaping British Patriotism

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit by

On the second anniversary of the largest plebiscite to take place in the UK, here is an example of one of the more deranged emails that I receive from Remainers:

“Dear Janice, I voted to remain in the EU and I still strongly believe we should stay in Europe and we will make a terrible mistake if we leave. However, in the event we do, is it possible for UK citizens to claim asylum in the EU? After all, I really don’t want to live in a xenophobic, extremist rightwing, hermit regime style country. I genuinely feel under physical threat from right wingers and I would like to know how the government is going to heal the wounds that have formed in our communities. It’s starting to feel like silent civil war. Yours sincerely”

By far, most emails in my inbox come from those who are concerned about damaging legislation being passed by the EU, that the person above either thinks is OK or is not aware of Brussels’ incompetency.

What is worrying is that the Remainers think they can genuinely reform the EU or that there is absolutely nothing wrong with it.

Why then, is every nation that has gone into a general election since our referendum vote voting for ‘alternative’ governments? Across the EU it is collapsing. Whether it is for economic or migratory reasons, and sometimes both, the EU will not exist in its present form after the May 2019 EU elections.

Why is it that those governments, even if they have been in power for a number of years (Orban), come back stronger, with a clearer mandate and are riding high in the polls?

All of their policies – migration, fiscal, borders, reform of the legislative and judiciary – are polar opposites of what the EU calls ‘democracy and rule of law’. Franz Timmermans, month after month, gives speeches on ‘democracy and rule of law’ but fails to understand why the people are voting for Orban, Salvini, Strache, Wilders, AfD, 5SM – and fails to bring forward the reform the EU needs to survive.

So when we see the Remainers marching in London, to a big fanfare from the MSM, they too sound like Franz Timmermans, unable to see that the failed EU is about to fall. And good riddance.

When will Nigel Farage let his little baby grow up?

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

As you may be aware, former UKIP leader Nigel Farage has openly criticised their new leader Gerard Batten for his hard stance on Islam.

In a recent party meeting, Farage discussed how while Batten’s new direction on criticising Islamic extremism was welcome, he felt that his supposed attack on the religion would mean that UKIP would ‘lose’ any support. He also stressed gaining the support of moderate Muslims.

While many would find it surprising that Farage would openly attack the party for such issues (for which I believe it would have the backing of the majority of the British public), the sad truth is that it doesn’t surprise me much at all.

This is because Farage, as great as he was as both UKIP leader and the one to get Brexit rolling, has seemingly been doing everything he can to push the party back. Why do I think this you may ask?

It is because he seems rather terrified of either the party moving on beyond Brexit (why this is, I don’t know; our Editor-in-Chief asks if Nigel is concerned about his image for his media career) and has subsequently demonised anyone who has tried to bring change into the party. This also isn’t helped by how he seems to weed out anyone from the party who doesn’t share exactly his view.

Most of his feuds have been out of line. This fall out with Batten being one example, showing his complete unwillingness to tackle one of the most important issues in our country of which could win votes for the party, and make sure those votes didn’t fall in to the hands of actual far right parties.

His public feud with Clacton MP Douglas Carswell over funding, that some suggest would have been spent on jobs for Nigel’s favourites. Then there is his infamous clash with Neil Hamilton AM over whether his mistress Alex Philips should be parachuted in Wales; awkwardly for Nigel, Welsh UKIP said no. Democracy in action!

Not to mention, his (or more likely the party’s) removal of the likes of anti-globalist Godfrey Bloom and Winston McKenzie from UKIP because of their non-PC attitude caused huge fallout, with the former stating that Farage had ‘lost touch’ with his grassroots supporters in the party and the latter openly (and wrongly) called the party racist over the debacle.

Now I fully appreciate that the likes of Bloom and McKenzie were probably not the shall we say presentable types that UKIP may have wanted to have standing for the more professional party they were becoming in the earlier half of this decade, but they were local party supporters, not to mention electable.

Bloom was a Member of the European Parliament for Yorkshire and the Humber for a decade, and McKenzie did come third in the seat of Croydon North, both in the 2012 by-election in that seat & the 2015 general election. His blunt dismissal of both of them may have been excusable, one may argue, because he was planning to professionalise the party. That would be wonderful had the subsequent candidates been worth their salt, but more on that later.

Despite what one’s feelings are on both Bloom and McKenzie being fired from UKIP are, at least one could argue that they were doing it to make the party look professional, which their gaffes prevented UKIP from doing. However, many UKIP members would feel otherwise. 

As for Anne Marie Waters, she may have been politically incorrect, some would say she needs to be more so, but she was also deadly serious, and anyone who campaigned with her back in last year’s UKIP leadership election (including myself) would know.

She cared about important issues like Islamist extremism, on top of issues like public sector funding and holding the authorities (the police most notably) to account. I believe she was the perfect person to take UKIP forward after its complete tanking in that year’s earlier general and local elections being blamed on its supposed one issue stance.

The way she was treated was shocking to me. It seems weird that Farage was so angry about Waters. While there was some controversy within UKIP regards her choice of campaign team, it was Waters herself that Farage attacked, as he claimed that she was a ‘racist’ after she lost, and even hoped that she would leave the party as soon as she lost. What a charmer!

I find this to be most inconsistent. After all, she had said similar statements about Islam back in 2015 when she was standing as a candidate in Lewisham East for UKIP and no one complained there (she came third). Meanwhile, Farage had no qualms about backing the likes of Marine Le Pen, the Alternative for Germany party and Donald Trump, of who all had similarly critical views on Islam, and ran on those platforms. Hell, Trump managed to win the Presidency, so Farage’s views that such a view is unelectable isn’t true either.

Not to mention how he also backed the Republican Senate candidate for Alabama Roy Moore, whose views on Islam are far more extreme than anything Waters expressed (unless you think calling Islam a ‘false religion’ and arguing that Muslims shouldn’t be allowed to stand for public office aren’t extreme views – neither view advocated by Waters it should be said). Meanwhile, Moore’s other views (including those on various tragedies in the US being committed because of the lack of belief of God in the States and homosexuality) are far more extreme than anything Waters could have cooked up. So, one must wonder why Farage had such a problem with Waters at all.

It was most likely because he couldn’t control the party from the outside with his stooge Bolton, or have as large an influence as he used to. Despite stepping down as leader after the 2016 EU referendum declared a Leave victory and denying various chances to re-run, he seems to have a huge sway as to who is in charge and their limitations. He is still leader of the EFDD. From this, most of UKIP’s leaders post-Farage have been singing from the same hymn sheet.

That would be fine had this worked out for the better for the party, but it hasn’t, with even the likes of prominent UKIP member Suzanne Evans saying that Farage had ‘terrible judgment’ over it.

The likes of Carswell and Mark Reckless defecting to UKIP in 2014 may have been seen as great advances for the party at the time (of which Farage was initially positive about for the former and called the latter a ‘great result’) but when Farage seemingly implied that they were career politicians jumping on the UKIP bandwagon, it got rather messy with public feuds between both politicians and Farage, with him even calling the latter returning to the Conservatives ‘very dishonourable’.

Not to mention his backing of former leaders Paul Nuttall and Henry Bolton. The former may have been possibly competent, or maybe a weak yes-man, but was clearly the captain of a sinking ship of who didn’t have the resources or the public support to stop it sinking completely.

And the latter (who Farage claimed was a ‘man of substance’) is now disgraced, through his infidelity to a very racist woman and is now under such grand delusion, is now starting his own party, making him this decade’s Robert Kilroy-Silk. At least Farage called Henry’s behaviour ‘stupidity’ I suppose.

That is why his constant intervention post his leadership is such a problem; it’s stopping the party from growing into a post-Brexit party that can truly challenge consensus politics and do something. I understand that he is passionate about Brexit (what British patriot isn’t), but there are other problems affecting Britain outside of that.

His refusal to move beyond Brexit and weed out anyone who does threatens to sink UKIP into political Britain, leaving a power vacuum where actual far right parties can spring on, which is never a good thing.

There are rumours that Nigel Farage may stand as a Democratic Unionist Party candidate in Northern Ireland in the next general election, a move which has been compared to Enoch Powell’s one whereby he left the Conservatives in 1974 and subsequently stood for the Ulster Unionist Party later that year, winning the seat and holding it for 13 years. And while this comparison is probably one just to further demonise him as evil and racist like Enoch supposedly was (which he wasn’t), it is apt here. And maybe it is for the best.

Until he can let his baby grow up in UKIP, it will ultimately struggle not to be stagnant and will strive against political oblivion. This will only lead to bad times in the future which will give the far right breeding ground. So maybe it is time for Farage to keep his promise about staying out of politics. It’ll do him and his party some good.

Who Are The Fascists? Review of Snowflakes’ SHUTDOWN of Lewisham Hustings

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

If you aren’t aware, there was a large amount of concentration over the Lewisham East seat in London over the last month. This owed to their recent by-election, triggered by the resignation of Heidi Alexander, their former MP, who became Sadiq Khan’s deputy Mayor.

This isn’t about the by-election in general or campaigning but rather a specific event during it. That being the (probably now) infamous hustings that occurred on the 12th of June, whereby various fools from Stand Up To Racism (that wonderful bunch) showed up to protest against the For Britain candidate Anne Marie Waters.

You’ve heard the stories; a bunch of angry cretins were protesting (AKA yelling incoherently, violently blocking and pushing people to stop them from getting in), one cohort managed to get inside and disrupt the event and the hustings was shut down very early because the police had instructed it be so. This is a personal recounting of those events.

So, as I said, I attended the hustings to support Anne Marie Waters and her party For Britain, which were located at a Salvation Army hub in Catford. After arriving at the local train station, I was wondering where it was. I didn’t want to use my mobile phone to find the address, fearing it would be snatched by a moped gang or something like that.

Thankfully it didn’t take me long and one specific indicator helped dramatically. That indicator? Various SUTR campaigners outside the location yelling slogans about showing solidarity with their Muslim neighbours and how racist Anne Marie Waters was, with the latter turning to dust if it had been put under any scrutiny.

Getting in the main entrance was a no-win situation as not only were the protestors blocking it, the door had been locked anyway. I joked with a fellow FB supporter about potentially using a battering ram to get inside. So, as I was standing there feeling rather amused by the surroundings with fellow For Britain supporters, the burning question came; how would one be able to get in exactly?

Thankfully, there was another entrance one could enter, which others were using. The problem was that these campaigners were blocking that entrance too and shoving those daring to get in.

Despite this, I decided I would at least try to get in. I didn’t come all the way I had travelled for nothing, and wanted to enter the event, and wasn’t going to let a bunch of millennial thugs stop me. As I and some others were waiting in a fine but squashed queue, one could see the true nastiness of this group. There were people shoving those trying to get in with no impunity, and the police weren’t doing much to calm the group or stop their behaviour.

There was a demented millennial soyboy yelling at people directly in their faces when entering that they were fascists or something of the like. And there was also a black man criticising another for attending, feeling that he was supporting those who would deplatform him, like what had happened in the past, and the one being criticised wasn’t buying it and acknowledged what had happened before, feeling as though the people he was supporting wasn’t anything like what was being described to him.

To make matters worse, entering was (unsurprisingly) a real pain. A guy in front of me had already been pushed rather violently and I was subsequently pushed in the knock-on effect, which nearly led me to break the fence of someone’s house behind me. Thankfully I mostly kept my balance, which stopped that from occurring.

I then saw that instead of being let in one at a time, the people in front of me were simply playing chicken as to who was going to try to run and shove their way in there next. It became rather laughable when even the Libertarian candidate in front of me (a nice guy it seemed who was rather happy despite the situation he was in) was being called a fascist by this group, who had some large object on him too, which I jokingly thought could be used as a battering ram against these fools.

Then it was reluctantly my turn. I made a quick dash and those people tried their best to shove and push me away. Adrenalin was pumping throughout me like there was no tomorrow. Thankfully this will and a black supporter of For Britain (who I recognised from leafletting) aided me in.

To the people behind, they were yelling about me being fascist and that I should be ashamed of myself and the like. I gave them a middle finger in response and told them to ‘kiss my **s’. I felt smugly proud that I had managed to beat these fascists at their own game.

This however didn’t last. When arriving in the hustings, it was pretty typical. People were conversing, eating (I helped myself to free food too) and getting ready for the event to start.

Then the event started. It was a good start; essentially the host explained that he was formerly of 38 Degrees and now was a part of Bring Back Democracy, the latter group hosting the event. He then explained the rules of event. Again, perfectly typical. He explained why the Labour and Conservative candidates for the area hadn’t decided to show up (according to him the former didn’t even respond to the group at all – which he called ‘arrogance’ on her part – and the latter had ‘other commitments’) and then started the hustings.

All was going well, but something rather bothered me; Waters hadn’t shown yet. At this point, I had assumed she was running late. This had happened at UKIP leadership (the far more peaceful I might add) hustings in London last year, where she showed up a few minutes late. Either that or she was trying to get in with having to shove through the ridiculous lot outside. At one point later on in the hustings, I heard louder shouting from them, which I had assumed had been her showing up and trying to enter, but to no avail.

So, all of the candidates made their individual speeches. It was mostly the sort of politician small talk that one would expect about helping the area, the people and fighting for specific rights, based on the group (like the Womens’ Equality Party fighting for women and UKIP fighting for Brexiteers, as you would expect).

There were a few highlights though. The Monster Raving Loony Party candidate was rather funny and joked about voting for him to attack the politicians where it hurts (the ‘ballot box’) which got a few chuckles from the audience, including me. The UKIP candidate David Kurten had to deal with an annoying heckler, supposedly one from the Lewisham Anti-Racist Group, who whinged and moaned about racism and then tore Waters’ paper identification up, giving us a very bad Sinead O’Connor impression. The inevitable boos and anger she received from the crowd coupled with the applause and cheers she got when a police officer escorted her outside was nice to see.

It was good that despite differing political alignings, no one cared about the mad ravings of a mad loon who should have been in the most nearest retirement home. No wonder Kurten’s response (about how funny he found it when white people lectured him, a black man, about racism) received cheers and laughs from the audience alike. The Libertarian candidate sticking up for Waters by saying how it proved his point about how ‘we can’t exercise our free speech’ (who it turned out couldn’t be there tonight as the police had advised her not to come) earned similar sympathy.

But then the curtain dropped. The organiser of the event then sadly told us that the police had been told by higher ups to pull the event. No specific reason was given (surprise, surprise). The disappointment was immense, especially since we all walked out after only half an hour or so of the hustings. Only the introductions for each candidate who had attended were done at this point.

People were mostly disappointed, but also disgusted and rightly so. How could the police let these lunatics on the outside win? How dare they let that outside dictate who should and shouldn’t show up. And I don’t blame individual officers for this. I blame the higher ups for allowing the event to be called off at all. Maybe their higher ups have agendas of their own. Who knows?

So, after seeing the disappointed faces upon leaving (including some candidates, like the Monster Raving Loony Party one giving a wry grin) and talking with another millennial from the area (who had been sitting next to me and had been discussing how he was planning to vote for either UKIP or For Britain in the upcoming by-election), I decided to head off. Despite overhearing that most had gone to the nearest pub, I had no intention of staying. I was so fed up and disheartened and I wasn’t planning to have a solemn drink over it, especially with people I mostly don’t know, and besides, I wasn’t excited for the inevitable fallout from the SUTR that was eventually going to come our way, so I headed off.

It all should have ended there, but oh no. This mob had one more trick up their sleeves. While on my way back to the nearest train station, I was singing very loudly along to the Killing Joke song Pandemonium which I had recently heard and one of the SUTR mob saw me across the street. If you have seen previous videos about this group, including our own, you know who I’m on about. The tall bald guy who looks like an Eastenders reject and does security for them (presumably because the soyboys in SUTR wouldn’t be able to handle an actual fight on their own individually, despite provoking them so frequently).

Already having spooked me last year when the MBGA News team infiltrated their event and found out I was an infiltrator, I decided to cut my losses and not look at him. All was going well. I was nearing the station and about to go when he yelled ‘oi’ and attempted to take a picture of me, presumably thinking that I was a FB supporter, which I was, but he didn’t know that at the time.

The fact that he assumed this without any impunity (like say I was a Liberal Democrat supporter for example, who were going down the same street as I was) speaks very much of his worldview. I looked away as quickly as possible. They cackled like the evil people they were, and I entered the station. I then went to the other platform and hid, simply because it had looked like they were still following me (and my appropriate train was there too, which didn’t hurt).

Forgive me, but I wasn’t wanting to get into a shouting match or a potential fight against a few Nazi scum (isn’t that what they fight against? Oh well). I then left, but felt extremely paranoid about it afterwards. Overhearing some people on the train back initially made me think that they were a part of them, but then was relieved to find out that they weren’t on their side. I then was in a state of paranoia for the remainder of the night, and it still slightly haunted me for days afterwards.

So that is my story. All I can say is that not only was the behaviour of the supposed anti fascists and anti racists truly something to behold and was rather bitter that the event had been closed down, what really bugged me was that the authorities allowed it to happen. Not only had they let this mob be aggressive and violent towards their political opponents, they handed a victory to them. What does shutting down this event indicate for them? That they’re winning. If stuff like this continues to happen, it will only get worse for the state of free speech in this country to those who lean right and even those who lean left but have one or two anti PC views. It was a shambles.

Shame on the higher ups of the police for shutting the event down.

Shame on the Labour Party for not condemning this sort of behaviour and encouraging it by portraying their opponents as fascists and Nazis and subsequently boycotting events to justify their actions.

Shame on those involved in these idiotic protests who don’t have a thought of their own and are so scared of differing opinions, they resort to violence and intimidation to silence opposition, like the cowards they are.

And shame on those who could have done something but didn’t. They didn’t stop these protestors from getting out of control. They didn’t stop their passive aggressive behaviour. They didn’t allow free speech to take place, one of our sacred rights that we lose at our peril. If their right to protest can be defended (even though to my knowledge anti social behaviour didn’t constitute protest – unless you find shoving people, yelling in their face and being generally aggressive not such behaviour not to mention violating the Public Order Act 1986 which prohibits such behaviour), why can’t we have the right to conduct peaceful assembly?

A total shame that this was allowed to happen. I guess when you listen to fools, the mob rules.

Remainer MP THREATENS to Tell POLICE if Public Write to Her

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Brexit by

Remain-supporting Tory MP Antoinette Sandbach has threatened to report non-constituents who email her to the police.

She has set up an email auto-response saying: “For the avoidance of doubt any further contact from non constituents, who have received this bounceback and are therefore aware that I can not deal with their query may be classed as harrasment may be reported to the police and other relevant authorities including the House of Commons authorities and the Member of Parliament for the non constituent.”

This comes shortly after Linda Banahan, 64, wrote to Antoinette Sandbach’s local Conservative association accusing her of treachery after she backed rebel amendments in the Commons over Brexit.

In the email, which she copied to Ms Sandbach, she warned that she could no longer vote for her because of her lack of loyalty to the party.

But Mrs Banahan, who volunteers on the chaplaincy team at a local hospital, said she was left suffering from anxiety and high blood pressure after Ms Sandbach sent a ‘heavy-handed’ response warning that she had passed the message to police.

Mrs Banahan accused Ms Sandbach of ‘seeking to shut down freedom of speech by reporting emails she does not like to the police’.

The text of the ‘abusive’ email is as folows: “Her disloyalty and untrustworthiness has destroyed any chance of my ever supporting the Eddisbury Conservatives whilst she remains in post.

“In fact she has ensured I will do everything I can to make her treachery known. I will work hard to ensure her lack of loyalty to her party, Prime Minister, Government and voters is as widely known as possible to make sure people wishing to vote Conservative know she cannot be trusted.

“I hope the Eddisbury Conservatives will seriously consider deselecting her for such a selfish and self-centred betrayal of the party and country.”

Ms Sandbach replied: “Your email address has been added to my blocked email as there is a strict policy against abusive emails operated by this office and your email has also been reported to the police. In future if you wish to contact me you will have to do so in writing.” Mrs Banahan has now said she lives in fear of a knock on her door from the police.

This is a shocking overreaction from someone who should be prepared to take such mild criticism as part of their job.

If she fails to support her party, then it is only reasonable that someone who voted for her on the assumption that she would follow the party manifesto on which she stood should let her know of their disappointment and disillusionment.

How can this constituent’s message be deemed abusive? Is she trying to bully Brexiteers into silence? Is the call by the plebs for democracy too stressful for her to face?

UK police using YOUR tax money for Arabic ads against “hate speech”

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

Surrey Police are using YOUR tax money to fund adverts in Arabic asking people to report any “hate crimes”.

Looking at this advert, you could have mistaken this for the Cairo police force. 99.7% of British official residents (according to state figures) will not be able to read this post!

Child rapists let go by courts, police apologising for ignoring evidence of paedophilia, stabbings on the rise, but oh, cops find time to make Facebook posts in Arabic, a language spoken by just 0.3% of Britain’s population. The constant promulgation of the myth of “white privilege” is clearly promotion of a ludicrous myth!

If I went to live in Egypt, I would be expected to learn Arabic. They wouldn’t translate everything for me. I suppose it would be racist if anyone were to dare suggest the same in return. God forbid anyone suggesting English is our de facto official language.

As for the content of the advert itself, the police are asking for evidence of mean words. Words?! How is that more serious than RAPE?!!!

The Kalergi plan is real! Google it! Look up “Union for the Mediterranean”.


Is Our Traitor Class Going To Murder Tommy Robinson? Sign the #FreeTommy Robinson Petition

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Is Our Traitor Class Going To Murder Tommy Robinson? #TruthSayer #FreeTommy Robinson Petition?

As a relative newbie to this cause I am saddened to see so much internal division.

Luke Nash-Jones and I met an American in London after the march and he saw our posters and our red hats with “Make Britain Great Again”. He said “I love that”, then he asked what we were protesting for and to take a picture of us, and he said that’s what they called the Brits during the war – Tommies.

They were known for their fighting spirit! How many Tommies died fighting a Nazi ideology for the freedom of our country and of Europe? Isn’t that the whole point? ‘We are all Tommy’?

Tommy Robinson has put himself in danger as a #TruthSayer #ExposingEvil fighting this cause because he believes he is doing so for the right reasons, and he is right, he has shown us the way, he exposes the truth. He exposes what needs to be exposed and what our #TraitorClass has worked very hard to #coverup.

Tommy Robinson has shown us the knowledge. He has shown us great courage. He has shown us WHY and HOW to articulate the argument… isn’t the best way to honour that to learn from him and amplify the argument?

We are fighting for Brexit but Is Our Traitor Class Going to Murder Tommy Robinson #TruthSayer #FreeTommy Robinson Petition?
It’s Time4Change we need to remove the #TraitorClass.

Our #TraitorClass have been complicit in the cover-up for decades of Pakistani Muslim grooming child rape gangs and Tommy has been a lone TruthSayer trying desperately to warn us about it and in return, our #TraitorClass have persecuted Tommy…

It’s Time to #WakeUp, it’s time to #StandUp its #Time4Change it’s time to switch the TV off and support this cause. It’s more serious than you think!

Your world is being stolen from below your feet… if you don’t want to live in a fascist society then it’s time to make your voice heard.

Forget about left or right, you have all been hoodwinked into infighting while they steal your country and destroy your values.

We need you now in your 1,000s, your 100s of thousand and your millions, we need you all to articulate those arguments.

We need an army of you being brave and confident like Tommy and to help continue on his journey.

We need you all to get famous and when Andy Warhol’s quote becomes a reality and we each have our say, our 17 minutes of fame then our job is done and the problem would be solved.

Evil cannot hide in d’light! It needs the cover of darkness to hide. Now is the time to shine D’Light and expose the evil in its true full slimy form!

Remember why we are fighting! What are we fighting for?

We are fighting for Brexit But Is Our Traitor Class Going To Murder Tommy Robinson #TruthSayer #FreeTommy Robinson Petition?

We are fighting for the thousands of child girls being gang-raped.
We are fighting to bring London and UK back from the murder capital of the world to its former kind, peaceful society
We are fighting for our #FreedomofSpeech #FreeSpeech
We are fighting for Brexit, we cannot be free of this tyranny with Brexit it is our only way!

We are fighting the deliberate murderous jihadi attacks covered up and disguised by our authorities and car accidents or dangerous driving.

It’s time to drop the infighting and not get caught up in hosting other people’s battles… don’t be duped into hosting other people’s battles or thinking there is a left and a right; you have all been duped, this battle is bigger – our society is being destroyed!

We are fighting this for our country and our rights and freedoms and those defenceless girls being raped and our citizens being mowed down and covered up… not for any other reason!

It’s our job to talk to everyone, everything, and anything – spread the message and get on every channel possible… talk talk talk.

There is a concerted effort to remove free speech from this country:

Demonise and criminalise any criticism of Islam.

Free speech is under attack.

Now they are planning to murder Tommy Robinson…

London and the UK is now dramatically worse than it was a year ago and has been in a steady decline since Blair was in power, and now in recent years has started to spin into an accelerated decline.

Go to the Marches.
Support #Freetommy cause on his official site only covered up
email this Leicester MP and tell him your concerns [email protected] Support Make Britain Great Again

I don’t say this to many men but I love you, Tommy Robinson or Steven Yaxley Lennon… You are a True HERO!!!! We all love you!

We are fighting for Brexit But Is Our Traitor Class Going To Murder Tommy Robinson #TruthSayer #FreeTommy Robinson Petition?
[email protected]
YouTube Account:

Go to the Marches
Support #FreeTommy cause on his official site only
email this Leicester MP and tell him your concerns [email protected]
Support Make Britain Great Again http://mbganews.com

We are fighting for Brexit But Is Our Traitor Class Going To Murder Tommy Robinson #TruthSayer #FreeTommy Robinson Petition?

Left or Right, We’ve All Been Duped? Our Traitor Class Are Planning To Murder You NEXT?

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Left or Right, we Have All Been Duped? Our Traitor Class Planning A Murder – Are You NEXT?

Free Tommy Robinson Petition Tommy Robinson truth sayer champion for Free Speech.

OK, as a newbie, researching like hell and learning fast. I’m starting to see through the smoke and it’s uglier than I first thought. Forget about Brexit, forget about the right and forget about the left. I think we have all been had! #WakeUp We have all been Duped!

The left support Islam because they have bought into the emotional sale. The Tories support the globalists because they bought into the global government power control sale but we are all ruled by Islam…

The Tories support both – they toe the lines of power. Yet they are not in power.

If you don’t believe me, there are two simple things you can do to check:
1. Voltaire once said if you want to find out who rules over us, see who you cannot criticise?
2. Go and research who our (real) president is?

Forget Brexit Left Right We Have All Been Duped? Our Traitor Class Planning A Murder – Are You NEXT? Free Tommy Robinson Petition
Tommy is in jail for one reason – he criticised those who really do rule over us. Tommy is a TruthSayer, a champion for FreeSpeech. The reason why it was unlike anything British i.e. the judge being the witness, the alleged victim, judge lawyer and jury, Tommy not having access to his lawyer, Tommy being arrested and tried within 3 hours, the judge having no care for Tommy’s safety. This is not British; these are not British values of fairness, fair play and caring. WHY? It is because the British are not ruling over us any more.

We are an incidental caught between two powers. We wave our little flags but it means nothing. It’s not enough – what is encroaching upon us is deadly serious, and deadly it is. This time the people need to unite. It’s Time4Change. We need to remove our #TraitorClass. It’s time to take the blinkers off – both the left and the right, and ask yourself: do you really want to be ruled by this power? This force? Your petty party politics, left or right, is what is going on. It’s just a smoke screen, keeping us all stupid to the reality… #TheTruth…

Left, Right, We Have All Been Duped? Our Traitor Class Planning A Murder – Are You NEXT? Sign the Free Tommy Robinson Petition

Sometimes it’s obvious that the right ideas are right, in front of us and some ideas need to be left behind, but the important thing is to take a good idea right inside you no matter whether you’re right or left. We just need to take the right from the left to the right and just focus on doing what’s right for the right reasons. Tommy Robinson truth sayer champion for Free Speech.

Tommy Robinson truth sayer champion for Free Speech was arrested as a freelance reporter reporting on Pakistani Muslim Child-Rape Gangs who have been allowed to run free terrorising our society. He has also exposed possible Jihadi attacks killing children on our streets. Just Google ‘car mounts pavement’ or YouTube ‘car mounts pavement’ or Justice For Our Boys

Justice for our boys Tracy Blackwell Josh Kennedy George Wilkinson Harry Rice Murdered by Jaynesh Chudasama

Tracy Blackwell London, UK
We are the parents of Josh aged 16 Harry aged 17 and George aged 16, who were murdered by Jaynesh Chudasama and his passenger on the 26th January 2018.

‘I have never met a more courageous braver man in my whole life’ – Kevin Carroll talking about Tommy Robinson 9 June 2018
Tommy who has spoken up for so many of us is unable to speak because our traitor class has silenced him. Are they planning his murder? So on the 9th of June at the Free Tommy rally his faithful cousin Kevin Carroll spoke for Tommy, here is what he had to say…

This is just another example of how Tommy Robinson cared about our people and was fearless in pursuing his quest to expose the evil that is covered up by our quisling leaders our true traitor class.

Tommy Robinson is a true hero of the people for the people he tackled freedom of speech and exposing the vicious Muslim Pakistani paedophile child rape gangs… why are we not up in arms?

Wake up Britain, they just demonised and jailed the whistleblower who is defending you! Now it’s your turn to defend him. #freetommy #freetommynow #freetommyrobinson

If you search for “car mounts pavement” on Google you will find many examples of these kinds of crimes such as
“Van driver who mounted pavement in a revenge attack has sentence cut on appeal”
“Car mounts the pavement and mows down the group of people outside London bar”
What is so shocking is the light sentences they are getting – how many of these are deliberate?

Never Forgotten?? Lee Rigby (5 Years today) ?? Manchester Bombing (1 year today) ?? Saffie Rose Roussos ?? John Atkinson ??Olivia Campbell-Hardy??Kelly Brewster?? Alison Howe?? Lisa Lees ??Angelika Klis?? Marcin Klis ??Martyn Hett??Nell Jones ??Jane Tweddle-Taylor ??Chloe Rutherford ??Liam Curry?? Michelle Kiss?? Elaine McIver ??Wendy Fawell?? Eilidh MacLeod?? Sorrell Leczkowski ??Courtney Boyle ?? Philip Tron ?? Megan Hurley??Georgina Callander??

You might like these videos:

Red Pill Factory /// Make Britain Great Again
Published on Jun 10, 2018
If you appreciated this video, we need you to help us make more. Donate please NOW:

Forget Brexit Left Right We Have All Been Duped? Our Traitor Class Planning A Murder Are You NEXT? Free Tommy Robinson Petition
Chronicle of St James

Red Pill Factory /// Make Britain Great Again
Published on Jun 12, 2018
Oh, Tommy Robinson #FreeTommy – Official Music Video

We are fighting for Brexit But Is Our Traitor Class Going To Murder Tommy Robinson #TruthSayer #FreeTommy Robinson Petition?
Chronicle of St James

Tommy Robinson video reports on Tracy Blackwell Justice for our boys
Tracy Blackwell Chronicle of St James

Tommy Robinson Freedom of Speech Religion of Peace Speakers Corner Hyde Park
Chronicle of St James

Other videos that might interest you are:
Tracy Blackwell
Justice for Our Boys

Redpill Phil

Redpill Phil

TOMMY ROBINSON NEWS #Freetommyrobinson
Fighting For Justice

Nick Hurd, you have some questions to answer for us!!

Forget Brexit Left Right We Have All Been Duped? Our Traitor Class Planning A Murder – Are You NEXT? Free Tommy Robinson Petition

[email protected] Official
YouTube Account:

Go to the Marches
Support #FreeTommy cause on his official site only

Support Make Britain Great Again
email this Leicester MP and tell him your concerns [email protected]

Call Sajid Javid
[email protected]
0207 219 7027
Constituency Office
01527 872 135

Labour Support Dives: DESPERATELY Slashing Ticket Prices for Their Music Festival

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Student Politics by

Fantastic news! The big Labour music festival has flopped! There was more ANGER and RAGE as JezFest tickets were SLASHED by 70% following poor sales.

With only an estimated 3000 tickets sold days before the Labour Live festival, organisers have been forced to cut the cost to tackle the estimated £1 million expected loss on the initiative. Angry customers have been venting their fury on social media after paying £35 a ticket when they first went on sale – this has now been reduced to £10 with other reports of tickets being handed out for free to save the red faced blushes.

A livid ticket holder BLASTED the organisers suggesting their loyalty by purchasing the tickets had been ignored. However, this is not usual for the Labour Party who turn quicker than milk on issues such as student tuition fees and Brexit, they will say ANYTHING to get votes.

While Corybn had visions of his very own Nuremburg rally, the fact is nobody wants to see a bunch of washed up bands, a whiney SoyBoy (Owen Jones) and a grandad on stage once again trying to manipulate the vulnerable young.

JizFest will be consigned to the dustbin of history like a used, soggy tissue.

Government Will BAN Hezbollah Marches: Victory for Make Britain Great Again and the FLA

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Following counter-protests to the Hezbollah flag march in London, the government plans to proscribe the Islamist organisation later this year. Here, we bring you the full story that the media is ignoring.

Hezbollah’s military wing was banned as a terror group in Britain in 2008 but a legal loophole allows supporters to fly the flags at events such as last Sunday’s rally, because Hezbollah’s political arm is not banned.

The Home Office has the power to ban the political wing and thereby proscribe the group in its entirety, but it didn’t. Why?

Tommy Robinson spoke of a case where police let an accused paedophile go free to avoid a riot by a certain religious community. In Bradford, Tottenham and elsewhere riots have caused violence, even the horrific death of a police officer Keith Blakelock.

The state approach seems to be to ignore serious crime to avoid a riot by ethnic minorities and Islamists – they are letting jihadis slowly take over. If I dare to revise the words of Enoch Powell, the whip hand is held by the Anglophobes!

Former Home Secretary Amber Rudd was accused of appeasing radicals, as she drew some mythical distinction between a peaceful wing of Hezbollah, and a violent wing.

This is as stupid as saying ISIS would be allowed to register a peaceful branch as a British political party. All persons waving the Swastika are deemed bigots, so all persons waving a Hezbollah flag are terrorist sympathisers.

For years, the “political wing” of Hezbollah was permitted to march on our streets, despite being labelled a terrorist group by the USA, and the Arab League. Even Hezbollah itself denied that it has two wings.

Following recent terror attacks in London and Manchester, where children were killed, British patriots decided enough is enough.

Arriving at the counter-demo to Hezbollah, the People’s Charter Foundation (known for the slogan Make Britain Great Again) and the Football Lads Alliance met a mixed reception.

While happy Israeli activists shook our hands, two members of the Zionist Federation who seemed to be organisers told us we were not welcome. They placed a metal barrier between us and them.

As Jewish activists sang songs up the road, the FLA and MBGA, the supposed “far-right”, went round the back and literally stopped the Islamist march, by sitting in the road on the march route despite death threats.

Undeterred by slurs against our character, British patriots achieved what never has been before. We forced the government to stand up to extremism, as we met the Islamists with signs saying Make Britain Great Again, and both British and English flags.

We stood for freedom and Western civilisation, even when kettled, blocked in by a wall of police vans, and threatened with being trampled by police calvary on horseback. And we won!

The British must stand together and speak out for justice and freedom, for our traditional values and culture. On Sunday, our voice was louder than the Islamists, and the state stopped ignoring their promotion of violence. Those who say rallies are pointless, think again!

Tommy Robinson Moved Prison: High Risk of Being Murdered Tonight

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

Tommy Robinson, known for bravely campaigning against child rape gangs, last night was moved for no apparent reason to a new prison. He was being held in Hull, for reporting facts that the BBC had already made public domain. No charges were brought against the BBC. Within hours, the quickest processing of a case that we know of in history, Robinson was locked up. Meanwhile, the state can’t find and detain paedophiles who have abused thousands of our children.

Tommy has been moved to Leicester prison, which has a high Islamic population, according to Paul Joseph Watson, who claimed inmates were banging Robinson’s cell wall all night and shouting death threats. He has not be placed in solitary confinement, but in open ‘gen pop’, meaning persons convicted for child rape will be able to beat him up, even kill him, in revenge for calling out such crimes. Already a price has been placed on the British hero’s head.

This is a death sentence. He did nothing wrong. He read out information in the public domain, and the judge supposedly didn’t even watch the livestream Tommy made before summing up. Tommy wasn’t on the court forecourt. He used the words “alleged” and “accused”. No reporter was booked for this during the Rolf Harris case. Tommy has been singled out. We will not accept this bullying by our police state.

#FreeTommy: police ‘used undercover men to incite crowds’?

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

This Saturday at the #FreeTommy rally, the atmosphere was tense. The police were marched out of Whitehall by an angry crowd, but are we being given the true story?

For example, the media is quick to label the crowd as thugs, but ignores why they were so angry. The police were literally knocking elderly people to the ground, pushing and manhandling the crowd with what seemed to be needless force.

Did they wish to provoke an incident so that they would have an excuse to beef up the police state?

In 2009, Liberal Democrat Tom Brake MP who attended the G20 protests accused the police of planting provocateurs to start riots.

“When I was in the middle of the crowd, two people came over to me and said, ‘There are people over there who we believe are policemen and who have been encouraging the crowd to throw things at the police,'” Brake said.

But when the crowd became suspicious of the men and accused them of being police officers, the pair approached the police line and passed through after showing some form of identification.

Did the police do likewise on Saturday? We struggle to believe they were simply maintaining the peace, as multiple witnesses claim to have heard Underground station announcements claiming the rally to be cancelled.

Do the police serve the British people, or so they receive their commands from the union of the Arab League and the EU, that has a parliament of the Mediterranean in Barcelona?

The body that has demanded we step up migration from Arabic countries. Did the facts Tommy highlighted inadvertently hinder their plan? Is that why he and his supporters face what seems like state efforts to silence us?

Donald Trump SLAMS Theresa May as ‘too politically correct’

in Anglophobia / Marxism/World News by

In recent times, American President Donald Trump has called British Prime Minister Theresa May ‘too politically correct’ before the G7 Summit in Canada, indicating that her attitude towards him (among other elements) would prevent him from having meaningful talks at that Summit.

He apparently has grown tired of Mrs. May’s ‘school mistress’ tone, not to mention how whenever in discussion with him (mainly via phone calls) he resents her discussing policy as opposed to having a broader agenda, and feeling as though her demands are taking advantage of the special relationship between the US and the UK.

He also seems to resent her criticising him in public whenever she feels that he has stepped out of line, calling her ‘too politically correct’ over her supposedly refuting his claim that there are no no-go zones for the authorities (of which there are).

In response to these criticisms which Trump has allegedly made, Mrs. May had this to say:

‘I just get on and make sure that I’m delivering. That’s the job of any politician.’

This seemingly antagonistic relationship between the two world leaders is a far cry from prior encounters between the two. Theresa May after all was the first world leader to meet Trump following his inauguration, where they infamously held hands and riled much controversy among the left in Britain who hate Trump.

Trump had also previously been willing to do a quick trade deal with Britain post-Brexit. Whether this exchange throws that into jeopardy is now in question.

But Mrs. May wasn’t the only world leader in Trump’s sights involving the G7 Summit. Justin Trudeau, the Prime Minister of Canada, was heavily criticised by Trump for being ‘dishonest and weak’ over the recent trade wars between the two countries. There was also tension between him and the French President Emmanuel Macron, also in contrast to the strong relationship the two had previously had.

Mr. Macron had this to say about Trump prior to the summit:

‘You say the US President doesn’t care at all. Maybe, but nobody is forever.’

His comments seem to indicate that his impact as a world leader doesn’t matter, as one day, he’ll be out of office. He also joked about his country becoming supposedly more isolationist.

Given Trump’s comments and his behaviour at the G7 Summit, whether this will further harm the Special Relationship is yet to be seen. Whether this behaviour will be reflected at his Singapore meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un is also yet to be seen. And finally, whether Mrs. May will take Trump’s criticisms on board and will actually try to work with him is yet to be seen. One can only hope that is the outcome. We shall see.

Channel 4 releases disgusting propaganda that SLANDERS Britain’s heroes

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

Just when you thought Cultural Marxism in Britain couldn’t hit a lower point, it has. Channel 4 in their infinite wisdom decided to air more anti-British, pro-globalist, pro politically correct propaganda in the form of The Battle For Britain’s Heroes, presented by one Afua Hirsch, Guardian columnist, The Pledge contributor and utter whinger. Here, we have her yet again calling for statues to be removed, particularly those of Winston Churchill and Nelson’s Column, the latter of which she has been calling for since August last year following the Charlottesville protests in the USA whereby the statue of Confederate soldier Robert E. Lee was also removed.

So yes, in other words Afua is someone whose main focus and USP is moaning about racism. Kind of like Munroe Bergdorf and Weyman Bennett then; as in people who would never get any real job in their lives so sell social justice whinging to make up for it. Amazing. The fact that society seems to cater to these people so much speaks loudly of how far down the progressive rabbit hole we currently are in.

Back to the programme. First, she starts on Nelson. Immediately, she complains about his pro-slavery views (as if such views, though abhorrent, weren’t common at the time, which they were among the ruling class) and that she got more than she ‘bargained for’ when writing such a column advocating for the removal of his statue.

Forgive me for not playing the violins when one writes a provocative article written from the lens of an SJW cretin. It would be like complaining about being shot in a warzone. She complains about this abuse for a good few minutes (I thought this was meant to be a history documentary challenging perceived history) making her the centrepiece here. So, like a typical SJW she paints herself as the victim, being the narcissistic fool she is. She moans about mean tweets and the like, and of course cherrypicks the most obscene.

Following on this, we get back to actually challenging this perception of Nelson being a hero (calling him on the ‘wrong side of history’ for being pro-slavery – really). Firstly, she uses guilt by association law to establish that he was the leader of the Navy in the West Indies where slavery thrived (which doesn’t establish him endorsing slavery), using the same tactic to establish that he admired slave owners and their wealth (which again doesn’t establish him endorsing slavery) and does that again to establish his marriage into a slave owning family (which yet again doesn’t establish him endorsing slavery).

Meanwhile, throughout this part, all context is removed. We have no idea what his relation to the trade was at this point, nor do we know that the people he knew and married were good people or not. There were nicer slave owners, even if the business itself was utterly abhorrent. So, no context is given and instead we are left with this ridiculous display of propaganda to make Nelson into an evil soul because he had links to the slave industry and slave owners. Nothing about endorsing slavery, him owning slaves or him being directly involved in the slave industry at this point.

But it gets better. When it is revealed that he helped to defend slave owners in the West Indies, she complains that he ‘should have known better’ and that when the person defending his actions on the grounds that his views were more of a reflection of the 18th century and not a defect to him, she complains about the lack of ‘basic compassion’ Nelson had towards Africans. Funny how the African kings who often were the ones selling the slaves to the various Empires lacked that compassion.

Finally, the man defending Nelson ends the conversation by saying that he didn’t have time to advocate anti-slavery views as his day job was to defend Britain from the French, which had he failed, would have occupied London. When she then complains about him telling only ‘half the story’ after the conversation is over and him being in ‘denial’, what that translates to is that he doesn’t hate Nelson as much as I do because of slavery. Because throughout that exchange, he didn’t deny links Nelson had to the slave trade, but instead showed that applying modern values to them is ridiculous (which it is) and that his main asset was defeating Napoleon, of who was a far bigger advocate of slavery and butchered his way across central Europe to maintain an Empire.

She then confronts a ‘Twitter troll’ about the abuse (no joke) in a pub, whereby signs about the Navy wanting men are displayed (just to get shots of toxic masculinity in motion I guess). Suffice to say, it doesn’t go well. She first complains about being ‘nervous’ meeting a Twitter troll (again, no joke) and then he thoroughly destroys her by talking about how if we start taking down historical statues, where does it stop? All she does in response is whinge about how personal his Twitter attacks were. It ends with him jokingly advocate that he would rather he be locked up in response to her trying to poison the well against him by making him out to be behaving irrationally. All fine and well then, and what a great laugh it is for the audience. Wait, isn’t this meant to be about tearing down statues and challenging history? Not complaining about mean Twitter trolls?

Moving on, she then changes tact a quarter of the way through. After seemingly having an epiphany about not being fond of destroying statues after seeing the destruction of Nelson’s Pillar in Ireland by the IRA in 1966 where she feels sentimental, she decides the debate must change to include Nelson’s pro-slavery outlook (which she hasn’t proven).

Still feeling that Nelson’s history is being concealed (despite an Admiral literally telling her that the facts are already out there), she decides to make such history visible through a ‘guerrilla projection team’ by putting chains on his column. All that happens is that some sightseers take pictures and yet more historians tell her the obvious: this is bad and will divide people. The only person siding with her is one Kehinde Andrews, who shares her views about destroying history based on supposed racism (another one of the types who base a career on victimhood as explained above) and a former director of the British Museum who complains as well about slavery and how ‘selective’ we are about our history. Hate to see what his tenure at the British Museum was like.

Then another leftie trope props up: because of how multicultural and ‘diverse’ we are, we should alter the views of the statues to reflect this. God help us. The moronic Rhodes Must Fall campaign comes up, whereby she interviews ‘one of the few black students studying at Oxford’ (apparently Oxford University is also racist now) who by his accusations of Cecil Rhodes being a white supremacist (which aren’t true by the way) and stealing South Africa’s resources (as in finding them before the indigenous population could), was advocating for the campaign, and showing that Oxford are setting their standards low these days. God forbid when one of these idiots gets into the high offices of government. He then lies through his teeth with fake quotes and states that South Africa’s history is not taught in schools (which it is, I remember clearly in primary school) and then openly shows how much he hates Britain by saying that Britain’s ideas of being great should be challenged. Funny how he hates the country he lives in and the university he attends, but still hypocritically wallows in both. Funny also how South Africa’s myth of a rainbow nation and Nelson Mandela’s awful past (which included pouring petrol into tyres around black people’s necks to kill them) is not discussed either, especially given how the latter has a statue in London too. But given that Afua has defended both Mandela and his recently deceased wife, why should one be surprised?

After being schooled by yet another professor over her crusade (see this keeps happening here), she then turns her sights to Bristol and on Edward Colston, mainly because she failed on the whole Rhodes Must Fall argument. This mainly includes her meeting a street artist (the cream of the crop when it comes to intellectual debate I’m sure) who has been ‘correcting’ history by reminding people that Colston was a slave trader. Here, she condones illegal street vandalism (of a statue no less) because it is ‘responsible’ to lecture modern day Brits about how guilty they should feel over the slave trade. Her only complaint here was that the act was ‘criminal’ and that it was a wet night. What a plonker.

She then travels to Germany (the wonderful multicultural love-nest that is Germany) to examine how they confront their history as opposed to Britain with Hitler speeches playing in the background. We’re off to a bad start here. It gets worse when she compares Germany removing Kaiser and military statues after the Second World War to how Britain doesn’t at all. Here she makes a false equivalence: Germany behaving like this after World War 2 signified their transition from a military dictatorship whereby symbols reflecting that were removed to show this whereas Britain has no such transition to speak of. It’s a false argument. Meanwhile, we also see Nelson Mandela’s statue being shown as one not to remove. Given that he was a terrorist, it seems weird that she would whitewash his history, eh?

Speaking of World War 2, she finally goes after Winston Churchill. After relying on diary evidence that he allegedly claimed that Indians were beastly (not exactly concrete proof of anything), she then brings up the old false chestnut that Churchill was responsible for the Bengali famine, which killed millions of Indians. She states that ‘no help’ came from London (not true either, with Churchill often begging other countries for food to supply the starving Indians) and ignores how the minister for supplies at the time, Huseyn Shurawardy, had policies which led to the hoarding of rice supplies, according to Stephen Weir’s book History’s Worst Decisions. His rejection of aid from countries like Canada was based on the length of time the food would reach India, therefore being ineffective as opposed to racism.

When asked about what it says about Churchill’s legacy, instead of responding rationally in that his quick response showed how heroic he was (with some commentators arguing that the situation would have worsened had he not been so forthright with his response) Churchill was apparently ‘nasty’. What an insult. Not only to Churchill, but to the millions who died in the Bengali famine too, whose legacy to be exploited like this is beyond rational political discussion.

She also then has the gall to say that the bombing of Dresden was not for the better, given the civilians it killed. Again, ignoring the context of it being wartime and the Nazis happily bombing London and its people to kingdom come and it becomes furtherly insulting.

After getting schooled yet again (this time by one Jacob Rees-Mogg), she then goes full vanity project with a museum of her own, allegedly exposing Churchill, called Churchill Unveiled (how risqué!). After some discussion involving the Blightly café (whereby the main protestor and the owner debate), her overall conclusion is that we should be objective about history, and not remove statues at all. Given how extreme her views have been up to this point, that conclusion seems fairly rational. Who knew?

So, there we have it. A disgusting piece of anti-British propaganda that for all its claims about wanting to be objective about history, is disgustingly one-sided in how it slanders some of Britain’s biggest heroes. It has no consistent argument, arguing for the removal of statues at first and then talking up more objective outlooks later. Her views are utterly weak and hence she gets utterly destroyed by everyone she confronts. She comes across as unlikable and narcissistic, encouraging illegal vandalism for the former and complaining about her mean tweets for the latter.

Her conclusion seems dreadfully out of place with the rest of the programme, and worst of all, it skews history in a disgraceful manner. Nelson being pro-slavery overall and Winston Churchill being an evil, vile racist are both unfounded and this programme doesn’t support that in any way, all the while exaggerating the negative sides of both Edward Colston and Cecil Rhodes.

Funnily enough, statues she didn’t advocate removing include Gandhi (who held very racist views of black people), Abraham Lincoln (who believed in the inherent superiority of white people over black people) and Nelson Mandela (who led the armed wing of the African National Congress and killed innocent blacks, often violently I should add), whose statues still stand proudly in Parliament Square, with no criticism whatsoever. Funny that.

Shame on Afua Hirsch for her lying and shameless propaganda trying to demonise Britain’s heroes. Shame on the press for giving such shows good coverage. And mostly, shame on Channel 4 for sharing such nonsense which she couldn’t even defend on early morning breakfast shows. Shame on all of you. A plague on all your houses it shall be then.

I’d rather much watch Lucy Worsley’s show about the Suffragettes instead. At least there you are taught actual history, not skewed history by someone with an agenda. Shame on all those who were involved in this pigswill (apart from those refuting the propaganda) and I hope they all sit in the nearest corner and ponder whether it was all worth it.

Islamist-linked Labour candidate and the wild bunch of the Lewisham by-election

in Anglophobia / Marxism/Islamism by

As you are probably aware, on the 14th of June 2018, there will be a by-election in Lewisham East to replace the incumbent MP Heidi Alexander, who has now been picked for the job of Deputy Mayor under Sadiq Khan (presumably to cover for him as he vanishes when another violent attack happens in the capital, as you do).

From this, there is an upcoming by-election whereby a whole slew of candidates will be standing, fourteen in total. Pretty much every British political party under the sun is standing, sans the likes of very small parties like the English Democrats and also the various joke candidates one would often expect at a by-election like this.

So, who is standing? Let’s review the record:

The Green Party candidate is one Rosamund Adoo-Kissi-Debrah, of who is mainly focused on being a clean air campaigner (nothing shocking there then). Her background mainly consists of being the head of a 6th form in Lewisham (being local in the constituency is a big boost already), and being involved heavily in education in her area in general, with her being a school governor too. Hence why one of her other main priorities if elected (to make schools to ‘be proud of’) should be no shock either.

Mostly harmless, right? But no. It turns out that she advocates that Britain has another referendum over Europe, arguing that Britain should have a ‘final say over Europe – with the option to remain in’. Presumably she forgot that we already had that nearly two years ago at this point, but there we are. It is possible that this candidate can do well, given that the Green Party have always finished up in the top five of the last few Lewisham results, but it seems very unlikely for her to win.

Given that the Labour Party has such a stronghold over this seat and that the Green Party are pretty much pointless at this time (given that all three of the major parties have bought into the climate change agenda, including Labour), she may do well, but a win is highly unlikely.

But what more would you expect from a party who are single issue to the point of being asinine and having only the city of Brighton and Vivienne Westwood propping them up? Not to mention, the whole anti-Brexit rhetoric of Debrah is something that will be seen from other candidates too. Brace yourselves.

Moving on, the Conservative candidate is one Ross Archer. Looking like the unholy love child of Martin Lewis and George Osborne, Archer’s main priorities for the area mainly are about stressing good education, improvements to the local railway network (which include extending the Bakerloo Line on the London Underground to not only Lewisham but surrounding areas, like Catford and Lower Sydenham, and to the zoning of the Grove Park Overground station), fly-tipping (which saw him campaign to stop the weekly bin collection by the Labour led council) and the football teams around the location (no joke). Another local candidate, it seems that Archer has been campaigning in the area for some time, not only here, but also in various campaigns about rubbish collection and attempted to become the mayor of Lewisham, only to lose to the Labour candidate.

He is most likely the candidate who will come second here. This seat has been held by Labour since 1992, and their candidates have usually come second in subsequent general elections, sans 2010 when the rise of the Liberal Democrats had them come third.

Ah, those were the days. The days when Nick Clegg seemed like a respectable politician and the media were comparing him to Winston Churchill, as opposed to the laughing stock he is now and his party for that matter. Anyhow, the Conservatives will most likely come second here.

There have been rare occasions when a Conservative takes a long-held Labour seat in a by-election (the 2008 by-election in Crewe and Nantwich being one such example), but given Labour’s stranglehold here, it is unlikely to happen.

There is also an independent candidate in the running under one Charles Edward Carey. A new candidate, his main focus is updating the Statute Law Database, which is the official database of laws made in Parliament. His problem is that it isn’t up-to-date (having been updated to the year of 2002), so the public are misinformed about what legislature currently stands. His main goal is to use this campaign to raise awareness of this issue.

While independent candidates have occasionally done well, the last time one was elected to Parliament was in the 2006 by-election in Blaenau Gwent and the last one generally elected being in 1997. That and his single-issue campaign and his very limited social media profile (he has on his Twitter account thirteen tweets at the time of writing) means that his chances are limited at best. Whether he has enough clout in the constituency to aid him is yet to be seen.

Meanwhile, the main focus of this election is the Labour candidate, one Janet Daby. Already, she seems like the most likely winner in this contest. The seat is exclusively a Labour safe seat as previously discussed, and various betting companies have placed her as the favourite to win because of it.

Admittedly on the surface, she doesn’t seem too bad. Her experience in politics (being the Deputy Mayor of Lewisham being the main representative here) and her background in social care and running a food poverty charity may earn her sympathy points.

That being said, she isn’t some harmless stooge for the Labour Party. Oh no, rather she seems rather dangerous in some ways, making her seemingly inevitable victory all the more worrying. Firstly, she is yet another type who hates democracy, advocating the UK stay in the single market after we leave the European Union. In other words, she advocates that the UK still accepts the free movement of people, EU laws and the vast fees the EU dumps on us every year. In other words, everything we voted against when we voted to Leave.

Given that most of the public wants to leave the single market (as indicated by a poll detailing most of the Leave voters wanting a hard Brexit which would mean leaving the Single Market), Daby is clearly a Remoaner. The cruel irony being that her fellow contenders in the Labour Party for this selection were more lenient on this issue, feeling that we should leave it to respect the result of the referendum.

Beyond that though, Daby has links to the extremist imam Shakeel Begg, of Lewisham Islamic Centre. Earlier this year, she had a general discussion with him at the centre. Given his extremist advocacy (of which included supporting Islamist fighters abroad and promoting religious violence, which he lost a libel case against the BBC over), it seems rather worrying, especially since all three Labour candidates shared a platform with him at some point. So here we have Lewisham’s most likely next MP: a Remoaner with links to Islamist extremists. Hip hip hooray!

The Democrats and Veterans Party are also standing here. Led by former UKIP leadership and Parliamentary contender John Rees-Evans, the party stands on broadly patriotic, libertarian and Eurosceptic values. Their candidate is one Massimo DiMambro, whose main policy is campaigning for direct democracy. While his locality to the area will again help (not to mention his previous standing in Lewisham Deptford under the UKIP flag), his single-issue stance and the various controversies surrounding his party already (mainly through their utter failure at the 2018 local elections and the deputy leader resigning soon after) probably will work against him as well.

Not to mention how his election campaign has only raised £370 out of the £1000 expected on Just Giving, which isn’t a good sign either. Not much in his favour it seems.

Speaking of libertarianism, the official Libertarian Party are standing here as well, with their candidate Sean Finch. He similarly stands on libertarian values to the Democrats and Veterans candidate as well, with free speech being the big aspect touted here.

However, unlike their Stateside cousins (whereby the American Libertarian Party is considered the third party in the States behind the Democrats and the Republicans), the Libertarian Party UK haven’t done much throughout the last decade and a bit from their formation, having only stood in both the 2010 and the 2017 elections and never gaining 1% in any of the seven seats contested.

It is rather telling how limited their resources are given they didn’t contest in the 2015 election (calling it ‘waste of time and funds’) and had the None Of The Above vote beat them in their first contested by-election in 2009 in Norwich North. Their lack of much support online (most notably with their interview with Finch gaining only 186 views at the time of this writing) doesn’t help either. So again, no real competition.

The Radical Party are also standing, with their Party Secretary Patrick Gray. Their chances seem rather limited as well. Given that their platform is based on left-wing doctrine (such as fighting against the likes of lobbyists, reducing the gap between rich and poor and general globalism), it seems rather pointless standing in a Labour safe seat, especially given that their big policies over remaining in the European Union and climate change are already taken by the Labour and Green parties respectively. Not a strong contender either, especially with a lack of a strong presence on the ground or on social media, and a sense of elitism in this candidate (a former Oxford boy) doesn’t go in his favour either.

The Young People’s Party are also standing, represented here by Thomas Hall. Their platform is one of mostly economics, inspired by Georgist thinking, mainly on the grounds of basing taxes on land instead of earnings, leaving the EU and bank reform. Like the Libertarian Party, all of their contested seats have landed them with less than 1% of the vote ever since their founding in 2012, and their main niche may not appeal to a wide core of voters. Not much of a chance here either.

To lighten the mood, a joke candidate is also standing in the Monster Raving Loony Party’s Howling Laud Hope, the leader of the party. Not much to say, beyond the fact that their various policies may be jokey and the rest of it (including replacing carrier bags with pigeons and introducing silent fireworks to avoid pets being frightened), but the sad truth is that they probably are more tenable than anything out of Westminster these days. Given that this is a joke candidate, listing their chances will be pointless.

UKIP are also standing with their London Assembly member and former leadership contender David Kurten. A first-time contender in Lewisham, this could be an opportunity for UKIP to recover its bad fortunes. After all, they tend to do well in by-elections, with last year’s result in the Stoke-on-Trent Central by-election being their best result in an otherwise disappointing year for the party. Kurten’s main stances (of campaigning for a ‘full Brexit’ and cracking down on crime) may win him support too. 40% of Lewisham did vote Brexit and that vote has to go somewhere, while the general crime increase in London (especially in Lewisham) may aid them too.

That said, the party’s diminishing fortunes, along with the controversy over Kurten (through some of the comments he made last year over gay children and the Stop The Khanage campaign material) are working against them here. Only time will tell as to whether they can pull it out of the bag here.

The Christian People’s Party is also standing, with their regular candidate Maureen Martin standing. Not much here to say either, as she has come last in the prior two elections in this seat, and there doesn’t seem much different here.

The Women’s Equality Party is also standing in their candidate Mandu Reid, a local resident and the founder of the Cup Effect, a women’s menstrual health NGO. An unashamedly feminist candidate, she was inspired to stand after the #MeToo campaign gained steam, feeling as though she ‘had to put herself forward’ afterwards. It doesn’t seem that she will get very far, given the very one-note nature of her candidacy and the party she stands for.

The Liberal Democrats are also standing with their candidate Lucy Salek. Previously a council candidate, she also is notable for her humanitarian work (including being the chair for the refugee charity AFRIL), which may go in her favour.

Meanwhile, she is also a staunch Remain type, which given that seems to be the only platform the party has these days isn’t a surprise. She plans to use a potential win to use it as a ploy to make a statement against Labour’s wishy-washy stance on Brexit, with party leader Vince Cable going as far to say that the party will use the by-election to ‘cut the majority substantially’.

The fuss over her supposedly misleading election material may work against her too. Given their recent uptake in the 2018 local elections, they may have a strong chance here. Then again, their lack of ability to break new ground following the 2010 general election seems to indicate otherwise.

Last but not least, we have Anne Marie Waters of For Britain standing. Previously a UKIP candidate for the area (coming third in the 2015 election there), Waters started the party in October 2017 after having left UKIP over her loss over the UKIP leadership election and the various top brass of the party calling her racist and the like.

Her previous standing may help her here, and many of the policies that she stands for this time round (including solving the housing crisis in the area and getting a hard Brexit too) may win over voters. Meanwhile, the endorsement of The Smiths’ former frontman and British icon Morrissey (of who called her a ‘humane Thatcher’) can’t hurt. Neither can the controversy.

Her standing has already caused a stir, most notably with the likes of various leftie groups threatening to disrupt her campaign and the Labour Party boycotting next week’s hustings over her being allowed to stand there, mainly because of her views on Islam. It may be possible that her prior standing may win back her old voters, not to mention all the fuss in the press may boost her profile. Only time will tell.

So, after all that, one must think what was the point of discussing this? Because of how crucial the outcome is. Beyond how the most likely next MP for Lewisham East is a Remoaner with links to Islamist extremism and the various single-issue candidates who can no more muster the true meaning of the cult classic Donnie Darko than they can electoral support, there is a compelling battle here, that being the one between UKIP and For Britain. Given the former’s seeming collapse in voter share and the latter’s slow rise (mainly through beating the Green Party and UKIP in some wards in the local elections earlier this year), the battle between the two big pro-Brexit and populist parties in Britain shall commence.

Will this mortal combat see UKIP rise from the ashes once more or show For Britain to be their replacement? Only time will tell.

Only one thing’s almost certain though: Janet Daby will be Lewisham East’s next MP, who is so problematic that it won’t even be good for her party’s leader. Ouch. Then again, her anti-Brexit stance and links to Islamist extremism will be the ultimate fatality for the British public.

Michael McIntyre gets ATTACKED in Sadiq Khan’s London

in Anglophobia / Marxism by

Another day, another brutal gang attack in London. This time however, it isn’t Joe or Jane Public being violently attacked, but rather a famous celebrity and his family too.

In this case, famous British comic Michael McIntyre was the unfortunate victim. Here, he was targeted while picking up his son Oscar from his school in Golders Green. The moped gang proceeded to smash his Range Rover with hammers, threaten both McIntyre and his son with a knife and eventually steal both his £15k Rolex watch among other valuables. He then proceeded to care for his son.

One witness described what happened as ‘shocking’, while another opined how ‘normally the trouble is down the other end of the road towards Hampstead’, indicating that wealthy areas like Hampstead are becoming more targeted by such gangs because of their affluence.

To make matters worse, it signifies the increased volume of moped crimes in the city, with the amount increasing from 827 in 2012 to over 23,000 last year alone. It seems both ordinary and wealthier Londoners are being targeted for such brutal crimes, most notable with how the likes of McIntyre are now victims of such crime.

This is yet another clear indictment of both failures on behalf of police and government to tackle this problem. Along with a general increase in crime in the capital after Sadiq Khan became Mayor back in 2016, there are further calls for him to actually tackle this issue. While people like McIntyre can joke about the incident during more recent shows in Dublin during his current live tour, others are not so lucky.

So Sadiq, if by chance you are reading (of which I highly doubt), when will you actually do something to combat this problem? Instead of complaining endlessly about the Conservative party’s cuts to policing, how about allocate those resources properly? Scrap the over 900 officers dedicated to hate crime and place them in more resourceful areas. Bring back stop and search completely. Bring back police patrols. Be tougher on moped gangs. Do the things one would expect you to do as a Mayor of such an important city.

Because if you don’t, and continue to turn London into something resembling the State Of Nature both Hobbes and Locke warned about when defending the existence of a government or a mini El Salvador, Honduras or another third world Latin American country gripped by violent crime, you will be punished at the ballot box in 2020. Do your job Mr. Mayor.  

1 2 3 6
Go to Top